Selective Abortions Prompt Call For Later Ultrasounds

Ultrasound Woman

First Posted: 01/16/12 01:38 PM ET Updated: 01/16/12 01:38 PM ET

A fetus's gender should not be revealed until after 30 weeks of pregnancy, says an editorial published in the Canadian Medical Journal.

This change in procedure for a fetal ultrasound -- where the sex is usually disclosed to parents at 20 weeks -- would help prevent female feticide, says Rajendar Kale, editor in chief of the CMAJ.

In Canada, doctors rarely perform abortions after 22 weeks of pregnancy unless the baby has a lethal fetal abnormality or the mother's life is in danger due to the pregnancy.

Kale says that in countries such as India, China, Korea and Vietnam, female fetuses are commonly aborted because of a preference for sons. Though by no means widespread, the practice is carried out by some immigrants to Canada, Kale says.

His editorial cites a small U.S. study that found 40 per cent of 65 immigrant Indian women surveyed had terminated earlier pregnancies and 89 per cent terminated their current pregnancies when they discovered they were having girls. Previous Canadian research has suggested that sex selection is occurring in Canada in certain groups when families have had girls and are seeking a son. The practice has created a gender imbalance in these communities.

"A pregnant woman being told the sex of the fetus at ultrasonography at a time when an unquestioned abortion is possible is the starting point of female feticide from a health-care perspective," writes Kale. "The solution is to postpone the disclosure of medically irrelevant information to women until after about 30 weeks of pregnancy."
Obstetricians group disagrees

Kale wants to see gender disclosure policies at 30 weeks adopted by the provincial colleges that govern doctors. "Such clear direction from regulatory bodies would be the most important step toward curbing female feticide in Canada."

The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada said Kale' s proposal is inconsistent with their policy, which states that "a patient's request for disclosure should be respected, either directly or in a report to the referring health professional."

In an email to CBC News, the obstetricians group said it believes it is the right of the patient to be informed of the gender of the fetus, and that this information should not be withheld.

The editorial also did not consider tests on the market that give expectant parents a fetal sex determination of high accuracy as early as eight weeks into a pregnancy, the group noted.

"The SOGC in no way condones pregnancy termination based on non-medical reasons, such as the gender of the fetus. The SOGC feels strongly that it is the cultural values and norms in specific segments of the Canadian population that must change to ensure that females are not confronted with procedures and intolerant environments before or after they are born."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA LIVING

A fetus's gender should not be revealed until after 30 weeks of pregnancy, says an editorial published in the Canadian Medical Journal. This change in procedure for a fetal ultrasound -- where the ...
A fetus's gender should not be revealed until after 30 weeks of pregnancy, says an editorial published in the Canadian Medical Journal. This change in procedure for a fetal ultrasound -- where the ...
Filed by Arti Patel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:11 AM on 01/17/2012
Abortion is a woman's right, regardless of the reason why it's being done.
apiazza
There is no such thing as a fiscal conservative.
08:38 AM on 01/17/2012
That is pretty much true.
photo
wanglog
putting the, "mental" back into fundamentalism!
10:00 AM on 01/17/2012
right. but when the issue is approached flippantly or when it is used as a method of birth control by dangerously irresponsible individuals who didn't consider certain cheap and widely available contraceptives or when it is viewed as a, "first-resort" by some, it becomes a treacherous abuse of one's rights.
photo
darksideofthespoon
what we think we become
09:15 AM on 01/17/2012
Fair enough.. but a parent should be happy that they can reproduce regardless of the gender. There are so many amazing women who can't concieve would kill for a girl OR boy.
07:48 AM on 01/17/2012
I've heard that hospitals in Richmond, BC already do not reveal the gender of a fetus. I question the logic, since this is only a problem with select group of people. How about just making selective abortion due to gender preference illegal? My wife and I knew the gender of both our children early on because we had the ultrasounds done at a private lab. It would not have made a difference to us if they were boys or girls. The CANADIANS that I know would not terminate a pregnancy based on gender. I don't think that it would be fair to deny everyone the right to know what their baby is going to be simply because a certain segment of our population do not value females, or women for that matter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gx5000
Life's too short, be happy..
10:16 AM on 01/17/2012
F&F

Again we're getting a story because a small section of society is rather without ethics or morales on both sides, those who would end a pregnancy because of an undesired sex, and doctors wanting to restrict information that is a patient's right to know.
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
10:40 AM on 01/17/2012
That's what I noticed from the article, seems like this practice is rare and restricted to a small group of people. I don't know anybody who would terminate a pergnancy because it's a girl, that makes no sense to me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nanaofmysky
Adopt from a rescue or shelter.
04:18 PM on 01/16/2012
To terminate a pregnacy because of the sex is outrages. It should NEVER be done. Only if there is a very clear life threatening issue should a fetus be terminated,or in a matter of rape. Just because you do not want a girl does not make it right!
apiazza
There is no such thing as a fiscal conservative.
08:40 AM on 01/17/2012
It sounds like you are anti-abortion in general, not just for gender selection.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gx5000
Life's too short, be happy..
10:17 AM on 01/17/2012
Anyone placing Cats over Dogs has issues anyways ;-)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nanaofmysky
Adopt from a rescue or shelter.
01:12 PM on 01/17/2012
I guess so! Only if there is great danger to the mother or rape do I agree to it. Some think it is a solution to birth control. If a child is not right at that time tale precautions. A child is not disposible. Even though there are a lot of parents of late who think so.