Keystone XL Pipeline: Canada Reacts To U.S. Decision Not To Go Ahead With Deal

First Posted: 01/18/12 04:43 PM ET Updated: 01/19/12 09:47 AM ET

The Canadian government says it is profoundly disappointed with the Obama administration for scrapping a multibillion-dollar pipeline project that would have carried oil from Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico and created jobs north and south of the border.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper received a phone call from U.S. President Barack Obama Wednesday afternoon after news had already leaked that the president would scrap the deal.

According to Harper’s press secretary Andrew MacDougall, Obama informed the prime minister that his administration was turning down TransCanada’s application to build and operate the Keystone XL pipeline.

“The president explained that the decision was not a decision on the merits of the project and that it was without prejudice, meaning that TransCanada is free to re-apply. Prime Minister Harper expressed his profound disappointment with the news,” MacDougall wrote in a note to reporters.

“(Harper) indicated to President Obama that he hoped that this project would continue given the significant contribution it would make to jobs and economic growth both in Canada and the United States of America.

The prime minister reiterated to the president that Canada will continue to work to diversify its energy exports,” MacDougall wrote.

Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver told reporters the Conservative government continues to believe the Keystone project is viable, but Wednesday’s decision had stressed the need to focus on other markets to sell Canada’s oil sands.

“We continue to believe that this project is in the best interests of both countries. Our government respects the right of the United States to make its own decisions. However, it is clear that the process is not yet over and we are hopeful that this project will be approved in the future based on its merits,” Oliver said.

The responsible development of the enormous resources provided by the oil sands would create hundreds of thousands of jobs and help pay for social benefits such as health care and education, the minister explained.

“Ninety-nine per cent of our oil exports currently flow to the United States. Today's decision by the Obama Administration underlines the importance of diversifying and expanding our markets, including the growing Asia market to help ensure the financial security of Canadians and families for decades to come,” he said.

Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird told reporters earlier on Wednesday, before the decision was official, that his government had worked very closely with TransCanada to push Keystone XL and had lobbied hard.

The Canadian Government would continue to be an “active supporter” of the project, Baird added, but suggested the Conservatives would now focus their efforts on other potential markets, such as China.

“Listen, it is a challenging political hot potato south of the border, but obviously we were very disappointed with the decision in December,” he said.

“Obviously this whole episode underlines the importance of diversifying our market. We can't have only one customer."

Tim Griffin, a Republican congressman from Arkansas, said Obama had chosen to create jobs in China instead of jobs in the U.S..

“I met with officials there (at the Canadian Embassy), they said they want to do business in the United States but if they can’t do business here, they have to take those oil sands somewhere to have them refined. They said they would do that in China,” Griffin said.

In a statement from The White House, Obama blamed Congressional Republicans for his decision to nix the deal. They had pushed forward a “rushed and arbitrary deadline” that had prevented the State Department from performing a full assessment on the pipeline’s impact, especially on the health and safety of Americans and the environment, he said.

“This announcement is not a judgment on the merits of the pipeline, but the arbitrary nature of a deadline that prevented the State Department from gathering the information necessary to approve the project and protect the American people,” Obama said in a statement.

Although it was disappointed, TransCanada said it had no plans to give up on its pipe dream.

"We will re-apply for a Presidential Permit and expect a new application would be processed in an expedited manner to allow for an in-service date of late 2014,” the company said in a statement.

The NDP’s environment critic Megan Leslie, however, praised the Obama Administration’s decision, but she said scrapping Keystone didn’t mean building the Northern Gateway pipeline to serve Asia was the solution.

Northern Gateway is a pipeline project from Enbridge that would run near Edmonton to a new marine terminal in Kitimat, British Columbia.

The Conservative government has spent “all this money” going down to the U.S. lobbying heavily on Keystone instead of envisioning the future energy economy, Leslie told The Huffington Post.

“It's not about diversifying the buyers for our raw natural resources, it's about diversifying our energy economy for the future,” she said.

“It's a good decision. I think this news doesn't make the Northern Gateway any less risky. So I don't think the automatic answer there is 'well, we have to fast-track Northern Gateway, there are serious concerns with the gateway project as well,” she said.

Leslie said she wasn’t too concerned for the moment that TransCanada would reapply.

“I think it is a pretty stock answer to say 'yeah, you can reapply.' That's a fair thing to say, whether or not TransCanada will be able to fit a new application into the criteria that the Americans are looking for is another question," she said.

TWITTER REACTS TO KEYSTONE DECISION
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

The Canadian government says it is profoundly disappointed with the Obama administration for scrapping a multibillion-dollar pipeline project that would have carried oil from Alberta to the Gulf of Me...
The Canadian government says it is profoundly disappointed with the Obama administration for scrapping a multibillion-dollar pipeline project that would have carried oil from Alberta to the Gulf of Me...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 237
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
11:37 AM on 01/29/2012
I received the following information from PHMSA:
Below is the actual language from the act related to the Diluted Bitumen study.
The Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011
SEC. 16. STUDY OF TRANSPORTATION OF DILUTED BITUMEN.
Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall complete a comprehensive review of hazardous liquid pipeline facility regulations to determine whether the regulations are sufficient to regulate pipeline facilities used for the transportation of diluted bitumen. In conducting the review, the Secretary shall conduct an analysis of whether any increase in the risk of a release exists for pipeline facilities transporting diluted bitumen. The Secretary shall report the results of the review to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives.
Max Kieba
Engineer, Engineering and Research Division
US DOT PHMSA Office of Pipeline Safety
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE E22-215
Washington, DC 20590
U.S. Bitumen Study-What You Need to Know
http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/staticfiles/PHMSA/DownloadableFiles/Pipeline/Regulations/TAC_Report_on_PHMSA_Reauthorization_DRAFT_080211.pdf
You don't need to be a Rocket Scientist to know, that this study needs to be completed before we talk about putting a pipe in the ground that may not even be suited to carry Diluted Bitumen!
03:20 PM on 01/25/2012
When did Canada start getting hyped up on destroying our country with oil, crude at that?! I can say I am very happy about President Obama's decision. I will gladly see 5000 temporary jobs stopped, so that our beautiful country doesn't suffer what the Gulf just did.
04:58 PM on 01/23/2012
I don't understand why we, Canadian, don't want to change our business profile as a supplier of raw material to a supplier of refined material.
That pipeline was to create 10 000 jobs in the USA....why don't we create those jobs here in Canada, it's not like there wasn't enough worker.
Our government need to impose laws on those corporation exploiting our mines, forest and oil reserve. Second and third transformation of our natural resources needs to be made here in Canada. Outlaw corporate lobbying, then you'll get a government that take decision for it's people not for the corporate citizen.
Oh and kick Harper out of his office, we don't need the Neocon wanna be in office.
Let get rid of the Queen once again, and let the Canadian military return to it's first international duty as a peace keeper.
We refused to join the vietnam war but we got drag in Bush war...never again!
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
10:21 AM on 01/23/2012
The Keystone Pipeline and the Northern Gate Pipeline are separate deals. Harper wants both. The first he wanted built immediately; the second with environmental studies and court challenges isn't slated until 2016/2017.

Harper is happy that people like the author of this article and politicians like Gingrich spout that the failure of the Keystone Pipeline will lead to the building of the second.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckym1488
Gender Roles Rock
03:13 PM on 01/22/2012
"Obama had chosen to create jobs in China instead of jobs in the U.S.." Let's remember this when its voting time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
There's still time to change the road you're on...
02:33 PM on 01/25/2012
Romney already created jobs in China.

Obama creates them in the USA...with renewable clean energy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckym1488
Gender Roles Rock
02:49 PM on 01/25/2012
I'm talking about the pipeline. Stick to the article. Everyone is sending their companies overseas because the US makes it very costly and difficult to run a business here, and the Unions require too much and take too long. What jobs has Obama created besides government positions and funding places like Solyndra? Solyndra is a HUGE waste of money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckym1488
Gender Roles Rock
03:10 PM on 01/22/2012
China already owns half the US (probably more) and now they can sell us oil too. Wow. Liberals sure like depending on countries that hate us or that we are indebted to. China probably won't sell us oil because we would have to ask them for a loan to buy it. I know Liberals argument (part of it). is because the oil wouldn't be for the US, but it wouldn't only create a lot of jobs, but whomever the oil is for would have to PAY US TO REFINE IT. Jobs and money. If you're THAT concerned about the environment, I hope you don't drive because that would be contributing. I want to drive, but I don't want oil. Which is it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
There's still time to change the road you're on...
02:38 PM on 01/25/2012
Who is US?

Are you one of the two Koch Brothers?

There are no new refineries builtsince the 1970's and no more refinery jobs.

The refinery has excess capacity.

The refinery (Flint Hills Resources) in Corpus Christi, Texas has been one of the biggest

polluters in the USA AND PAYS NO EXPORT TAXES (Corporate Welfare)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
There's still time to change the road you're on...
02:41 PM on 01/25/2012
"depending on countries that hate us"....like Saudi Arabia?

They agreed to make up any shortfall if Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz

Tea Bag Talking Points.....from "Big Oil"....so transparent.

Try to be more original and creative.....next time!
photo
fromdnorth
OK I checked my micro-bio (didn't know I had one
02:11 PM on 01/22/2012
Harper again outsourcing jobs... a la Wal-Mart...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
12:03 AM on 01/21/2012
The un-truth being perpetuated here is that the KeystoneXL will supply oil to the US. It won't. It will be sent to the Gulf Coast (outside of US tax zones) to be processed and shipped to Asian markets.

This has NOTHING to do with the US 'rejecting' Canadian oil. This oil is bound for China.
09:36 PM on 01/20/2012
I am visiting Florida and there is a huge lack of recycling here. Before America starts trying to play the environmental card about the proposed pipeline and how bad oil from the Canadian tar sands is on the environment >>> open your eyes, get off your couch and start recycling instead of conveniently throwing everything in the garbage bin. It makes me sick every time I come here to see this. Clean up your own back yard before you start throwing stones. Also remember that you do not have to go to war to get Canadian oil! 
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeff Forsythe
06:22 PM on 01/20/2012
Mr. Harper should remember that he represents the good people of Canada when it comes to making deals with the brutal Chinese Communist Party.
It seems to me that there are a few facts concerning human rights that should be taken into consideration.
The fact that the brutal Chinese Communist Party has murdered 80 million of its own people since 1949, the fact that it is attempting the genocide of tens of millions of innocent Falun Gong practitioners by the use of torture, slavery, organ harvesting and murder. The fact that there are hundreds of slave camps hidden all over Red China where all the junk that is sold here is being produced. The fact that a million homes were demolished to build the Olympic Complex with no compensation offered to the poor families who lost everything ­. The fact that 64 kindergard­en children were riding in a nine seat van when it crashed and 15 of the children died while rich Party members buy their girlfriend­s million dollar apartments in Paris. The fact that the poor pay twelve different taxes while the rich pay nary one.
All of these human rights issues I mentioned are true but the Government­s of the World are not informing its citizens because then some very rich greedy corporatio­ns might lose out on some business deal with the gangster Chinese regime.
Just my understanding, thank you.
08:20 PM on 01/22/2012
Here's an interesting tidbit I came across the other day (Reuters, Jan 3, 2012) Petro China just finalized a deal to become the sole owners of the Athabasca Tar Sands project. PETRO CHINA. Notice that this announcement comes BEFORE the Presidential announcement. Petro China is also involved in other tarsands projects. It is of interest to me that this bit of news was not covered by either U.S. or Canadian Huffpost.
07:57 AM on 01/20/2012
The environment, wildlife and animals are certainly not a priority in Canada's decision to turn to the Chinese, who considering what they do in Africa, are certainly the worst possible predators. Canada is ready to sell its sould to the devil! No matter what happens to its nature and wildlife.
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
10:25 AM on 01/23/2012
Insert "goverment" after "Canada". The position of the Canadian people and certainly British Columbians, has not been fully ascertained. The fact that most voters in BC have long supported a ban on oil tankers off our coast indicates that Harper has a fight on his hands.
photo
Barbara DeZan
Knowledge is Power
08:50 PM on 01/19/2012
Politispeak at work.

1. Threatens to turn it all over to "Asia" (translate China). Well, China isn't going to build a pipeline from Canada to Beijing, for sure. Nor is China going to build a pipeline to an Alaskan port (the original idea)
2. Threatens loss of "hundreds of thousands of jobs" when the original TransCanada proposal said 3999-6500 jobs at the most, unskilled labor, temporary and minimum wage.
3. Very upset that they will actually have to pay more to get their tar sands oil to a viable port..in Alaska....which was the original plan.

They are mad because it will cost them more to get their krappy tar sands to a port.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
06:58 PM on 01/19/2012
it its a governemnt owned energy resource, then john Baird lobby away. by why are government officials lobbying for the interests of private corporations?? what the heck?
photo
fromdnorth
OK I checked my micro-bio (didn't know I had one
06:10 PM on 01/19/2012
Harper could not sell oil to the US!

It is becoming clear Harper could not sell coke to a hooker...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
There's still time to change the road you're on...
02:44 PM on 01/25/2012
Harper sold out Canada...to Koch and China!
12:01 PM on 01/19/2012
We do not want more carcinogens from oil Companies. When we think about jobs, lets think about our health too. Anyone watched the crude documentary?