Lawful Access Legislation: Police Misusing Funds Lobbying For Spying Powers, OpenMedia Says

Lawful Access Canada Police Chiefs

First Posted: 01/18/12 09:01 AM ET Updated: 01/18/12 06:12 PM ET

Law enforcement officials around the country are misusing taxpayers’ money lobbying for “lawful access” laws that would give them warrantless access to private online information, a digital rights group says.

OpenMedia.ca, which is running the Stop Spying campaign against the government’s proposed expansion of police powers on the Internet, released the contents of a letter Wednesday the group said was sent from the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police to officers around the country.

The letter urges law enforcement officials to send in examples of situations where expanded police powers would have aided in an investigation, noting that a previous effort two years ago “lacked a sufficient quantity” of good examples.

“It is imperative that we gather examples that can support the need for this legislation in the eyes of government, privacy groups, media, police and especially the public,” the letter states in part. “The seriousness of this cannot be understated. We are therefore seeking your support in gathering this information by instructing your members on the vital importance of providing the information to help bring these Bills into law.”

UPDATE: Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police spokesman Tim Smith has confirmed to Huffington Post that the letter was genuine, "and we do not have any issue that it is out there."

"Lawful access represents an important tool to assist policing in combatting serious criminal activity (organized crime, sexual predators, identity theft, etc)," Smith said in an emailed statement. "It is not, as some would like us to believe, being used to target the 'surfing habits' of Canadians."

The CACP's full statement is included below.

The letter, which OpenMedia Executive Director Steve Anderson said was obtained from a “concerned individual” who is not a police officer, states that a research section of the Vancouver Police Department has been asked to compile the examples.

That doesn’t sit well with Anderson, who sees law enforcement’s lobbying for the bill as a misuse of taxpayers’ money.

“They’re asking police officers to basically do research for a PR report that backs up their lobbying,” Anderson told The Huffington Post. “Obviously if the police are spending time doing research for lobbying then they’re not doing what they’re paid to do.”

Anderson suggested the letter was a sign law enforcement officials are asking for powers they don’t need.

“I think the police know that that’s a weakness in the legislation and that’s why they’re trying to dig up any stories they can to show that they need it,” he said. “It’s a solution in search of a problem.”

The Conservative government has said it plans to reintroduce “lawful access” legislation, but it’s unclear what form the new bill or bills will take.

Under bills C-50, C-51 and C-52, the versions of "lawful access" that the Conservatives unsuccessfully tabled in the last Parliament, police would be able to collect emails, phone numbers, addresses and other information about Internet users without a warrant.

Moreover, Internet service providers would be required to retrofit their networks so that law enforcement agencies could monitor Internet activities in real time. And Internet providers could be asked to retain web data on a particular customer.

Critics, including Canada's privacy commissioner, have described the proposed “lawful access” legislation as a threat to civil liberties.

A poll carried out for the privacy commissioner last year found eight in 10 Canadians oppose giving police the ability to collect Internet usage data without a warrant.

This is the full text of the letter as it was provided to The Huffington Post by OpenMedia.ca.

Important Request to all Police Services regarding up-coming Lawful Access Legislation

As you know, the Government of Canada will likely be introducing lawful access bills early in 2012.

The Law Amendments Committee (LAC) and the Lawfully Authorized Electronic Surveillance (LAES) sub/committee have held the lead for the CACP over the past 12 years as we urged successive governments to enact this type of legislation. There is much support across parliament for these Bills however, there are some significant critics of the Bills and the LAC and LAES are busy advocating on your behalf to both inform the public and answer criticism.

One criticism directed from civil liberties and privacy advocates is that the burden by the police to demonstrate the need this legislation has not been met. While we are confident we have made our case to government, it remains important that we make our case to Canadians as a whole. This is especially important in the area of access to subscriber information or what is commonly referred to as "Customer Name and Address" (CNA). The Bill will contain a provision which permits certain designated police officers to compel Internet Service Providers and Telecommunications Service Providers to produce this type of information upon demand and without a warrant. There is also an audit requirement in place with regard to reporting back to government when such requests for information are made. Although the present state of the law is that such information does not require a warrant and can be provided to police voluntarily, the experience by your investigators is that compliance with requests is inconsistent and at times obstructionist.

This Bill is a key tool needed to rectify this problem but has attracted criticisms based primarily on misinformation. The CACP is working hard to counter this misinformation with key examples of the importance of timely and consistent access to CNA by the police. To that end, the LAC has asked the Planning, Research and Audit Section of the Vancouver Police Department to coordinate the collection of actual examples where access to CNA has either provided an effective and important aspect to an investigation or, in the alternative, where refusal by a company to provide the information has hindered an investigation or threatened public safety.

We are aware that a similar request was made approximately 2 years ago, but the report written at that time lacked a sufficient quantity of good examples. We recognize that some of these examples provide confidential operational information and your investigators are therefore reluctant to share the details. However, this type of information is key to countering ill-informed criticism. It is imperative that we gather examples that can support the need for this legislation in the eyes of government, privacy groups, media, police and especially the public. The seriousness of this cannot be understated. We are therefore seeking your support in gathering this information by instructing your members on the vital importance of providing the information to help bring these Bills into law. This, while also finding a way to protect operational information and at the same time allowing us to inform the public and other stakeholders.

We would respectfully ask that you direct the appropriate persons in your organization to assist on a priority basis by January 20, 2012. All that is required is written response, either in the form of an e-mail message or a document attached to an e-mail.

The contacts at the Planning, Research and Audit Section of the Vancouver Police Department to reply to are:

[name redacted]
Strategic Planning and Policy Advisor
Planning, Research &Audit Section
Vancouver Police Department
[contact information redacted]

Sincerely,
[name redacted]
Deputy Chief Constable
Investigation Division
Vancouver Police Department

This is the full text of the CACP's response to OpenMedia's publication of the letter.

One of the main principles of the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police (CACP) is to advance awareness of issues which promote the safety of the communities to which law enforcement serves. We do so purely from a public safety position. Lawful access represents an important tool to assist policing in combatting serious criminal activity (organized crime, sexual predators, identity theft, etc). It is not, as some would like us to believe, being used to target the 'surfing habits' of Canadians. It is based on highly controlled usage to respond to criminal activities which today operate in a safe-haven of anonymity.

In preparation for the re-introduction of legislation, which we believe is forthcoming, the CACP has issued a request to its membership to provide examples that support the need for this important legislation. As our request states "this issue has attracted criticisms based primarily on misinformation" and that "it is imperative that we gather examples that can support the need for this legislation in the eyes of government, privacy groups, media, police and especially the public." This request of our law enforcement members is in keeping with ensuring the integrity of the information we put forward.

Canada's obsolete legislative scheme was implemented during the days of the rotary dial telephone. Modernization of current legislative provisions is urgently required to reflect significant and obvious advancements in communications technologies. Without modernization, the current legislation challenges police investigative techniques and compromises public safety. Urgent amendments are required to allow the police to lawfully and effectively investigate serious offences.

It should be noted that law enforcement recognizes that there needs to be a balance between privacy and the need to provide tools necessary to deal with new and emerging crime trends associated with modern technology. To suggest, however, that police want to engage in 'spying of people's on-line activities' or monitor Canadians surfing habits with no judicial authority is simply incorrect, both in the intention of the police and in the facts of the proposed legislation.

The CACP will be making its position clear to Canadians as the proposed legislation is introduced.

Timothy M. Smith
Government Relations and Communications
Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police

Canada is not the only Western country working on expanding its control of the Internet. Here are some of the world’s more noteworthy attempts to tame the web:

New Zealand: Parliament The First Victim Of Own Law?
1  of  6
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
New Zealand snuck in a three-strikes law against file-sharers as part of an emergency earthquake relief bill. The law, which will see Internet account holders cut off from the web if they receive three copyright violation notices, went into effect last week. Critics have said it violates due process because it doesn't allow the accused to defend themselves. Because the law targets account holders and not actual file-sharers, New Zealand's Green Party says Parliament itself could have its Internet cut off if any of the thousands of people who use the government's Internet use it for illegal downloading. An hour after the law went into effect, a Reddit user claimed to be doing just that.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

Law enforcement officials around the country are misusing taxpayers’ money lobbying for “lawful access” laws that would give them warrantless access to private online information, a digital righ...
Law enforcement officials around the country are misusing taxpayers’ money lobbying for “lawful access” laws that would give them warrantless access to private online information, a digital righ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:03 AM on 02/19/2012
The problem is they have to go digging for reasons, and chances are those reasons won't hold any basis in reality.

It's been proven by numerous articles that Police currently cannot justify the bill or their need for it. The police themselves have admitted it. I find it funny that all of a sudden they're focusing so intently on collecting evidence to support the obviously unsupportable.
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
09:33 PM on 01/19/2012
All across the western world peaceful protest is met by the new police. These are really the military. Yes they are a police force designed to do what soldiers do. The enemy is the citizen, the leaders are the politicians. Right now they are in training mode. Overwhelming forces to counter grandmas and students with a few agent provacateurs sprinkled in to spice up the mix.

By the time the general population gets on board it will be too late to have peaceful protests. Instead we will have mob scenes and riots, death and destruction, and precrime arrests using security certificates. New prisons will fill up.
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
09:32 PM on 01/19/2012
Notice now the Toronto Police, were also at the center of the federal election, with a TPS cop leaking private information about a candidate, to try to fix the federal election? No charges for that illegal act from the OPP, which Fantino ran.

And now Fantino, a big player in the G20, will be in charge of setting up Canada's police-state and surveillance, with his new friends at CSIS from G20.

G20 organized all police in Canada, to follow orders from the PMO.

RCMP, OPP, TPS, CSIS, and every other police dept in Canada, now takes direct orders from the top. And they are influenced by politics, and frankly control which politician is in or out, not hard to do for them.

Canada is a new type of police-state, right now.

Wait until they pass their omnibus crime laws soon, under the banner of "security" central police control of Canada will be enshrined.
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
09:43 PM on 01/19/2012
Harper also gave $10 million tax dollars to a private clinic in Woodbrige to buy support for Julian Fantino for the election, in return Fantino made police information available to the conservative party.

& guess what side deal Fantino made on behalf of the " Boys in Blue"??

A whole lotta quid pro quo going on..sigh
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:59 PM on 01/18/2012
We will not hand over any more of our civil liberties, you think the demonstrations of the world were big last year, wait till it warms up.

Start focusing on the core problems and find solutions instead of writing laws which sweep the problems under the rug.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
01:03 PM on 01/18/2012
The police should not be involved in inititating laws, period. They can be consulted by judiciary committees when needed, but having them "call for" laws crosses the line between impartial policing of existing laws and making laws. It is no different than the military suggesting we invade or attack a particular country. Their job is to carry out the laws, not interpret them (the court's job) nor legislate them (the government's job). However, with this government the lines are becoming more and more blurred as Harper packs his cabinet with ex-cops like Julian "never too many laws" Fantino.
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
12:49 PM on 01/18/2012
The bills from the last session, included:

C-50, access to investigative tools for serious crimes act, which would give police the power to intercept private communications without a warrant under certain circumstances.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&DocId=4740653

C-51, investigative powers for the 21st century act, which would allow police to get warrants to obtain information transmitted over the internet and data related to its transmission, including locations of individuals and transactions; and orders that would compel other parties to preserve electronic evidence.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&DocId=4745885

C-52, investigating and preventing criminal electronic communications act, which would require internet service providers to have infrastructure that will allow law enforcement agents to intercept internet communications of their customers; and provide basic information about their subscribers to law enforcement.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&DocId=4753163

http://www.conservative.ca/media/ConservativePlatform2011_ENs.pdf

Why exactly do police feel they need new electronic surveillance powers? Could they really get into my email without a warrant? And what exactly are privacy advocates so worried about? For his take on this, Nora interviewed David Fewer, director of CIPPIC, the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic. You can hear the full, uncut interview below, or download the MP3. [runs 14:18]

http://www.cbc.ca/spark/2011/09/david-fewer-on-lawful-access/
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
12:39 PM on 01/18/2012
The Harper government wants to be able to access and monitor your emails at any time, without a warrant - sign the petition against this at www.stopspying.ca

To understand why this is dangerous - economic forces around the world do not want us talking to one another, they are trying to stop freedom, not promote it.

Please take action.
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
12:33 PM on 01/18/2012
Maiden Heaven's discuss on page is found at https://www.facebook.com/openmedia.ca#!/topic.php?uid=173437729758&topic=16926
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
12:33 PM on 01/18/2012
TEveryone, please make sure to sign the petition (http://openmedia.ca/StopSpying), and please make sure you share it with everyone you know, be it on FB or Hotmail or on Twitter. We have to step up the game and raise #'s on the petition so They know we are serious. If you want to write to your MP, you can locate them @ http://www.parl.gc.ca/Parlinfo/Compilations/HouseofCommons/MemberByPostalCode.aspx?Menu=HOC

To get a ton more information about the Lawful Access bill, go to Maiden Heaven's discussion page called, "Canadian Police State Legislation Needs Closer Examination". You can use the letter she has drawn up. Edit, copy and paste as you will (and if you do edit, please paste the edited letter to the discussion so that others may use). https://www.facebook.com/openmedia.ca#!/topic.php?uid=173437729758&topic=16926

Make sure to let them know that WE know what is trying to get done, and that WE won't stand for it.

Most importantly, it is CRITICAL that as many people as possible know about online spying. If people don't understand or seem apathetic, tell them it would be like if the government can now legally tap our phones and will be putting a service charge for the surveillance on your monthly phone bill.

Or even better, imagine coming home to find a cop rifling through your stuff, legally without a warrant, then handing you a bill for their services on their way out the door.
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
12:32 PM on 01/18/2012
Harper -tried and failed (4 times!) to create a law that would allow the government to obtain your personal information from an internet provider - without a warrant.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2010/11/01/justice-nicholson-justice-isp.html

I wouldn't have a problem with this if it was:
a) effective; and
b) limited to ONLY fighting crime.

But, given the abject failure that the telemarketing no-call list has turned out to be, it is likely that this will fail too -- at its intended purpose.

Meanwhile it's OTHER purpose -- that of starting us on the slippery slope towards thought control and police intrusion into every aspect of our lives -- will likely succeed.

Also exceedingly easy for those in control to abuse; not to mention the easy possibility of inserting their own material as a set-up.

Big Brother Is Phishing You.

Besides ....who's watching them watching us?

Go open a history book and *learn* why thousands of Canadians fought and died to protect the ideals of freedom and personal privacy (they go hand in hand in case you didn't know).

This Bill skips over one of the most prudent and necessary checks in keeping our enforcement and judicial system working (usually) for the people and not against them.

Privacy is a tangible and inalienable right.

No law enforcement agency should *ever* be able to violate that without due process and strict oversight.

What next burning books?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
working onit
Stop Harper
08:15 PM on 01/19/2012
Thx Donna for the info & the passion. Signed the petition and will be watching for news on how we can oppose this affront to lawful citizens. Unbelievable.
11:59 AM on 01/18/2012
What is it the old-boys club wants? Complete civil unrest within our own walls? We judge other countries for these same abuses!! Stan-up for yourself-before it's too late!!
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
11:01 AM on 01/18/2012
So our cops want someone to spy on ? Here's a suggestion for your first target; YOURSELVES !!!

Root out all of the corruption running rampant in our police forces and maybe then I'll consider giving you some sort of green light, but until then, take a good hard look in the mirror and tell us if you need or deserve the right to spy on others.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gravescanada
09:42 AM on 01/18/2012
If this is true, it is a serious problem. Our law enforcement is given rules they must obey. For Law Enforcement to actively lobby is a serious problem. We live in a democracy, and as such, our law enforcement is to serve and protect. Not serve and protect itself. Just do your jobs and leave the legislation to ELECTED officials.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gx5000
Life's too short, be happy..
03:13 PM on 01/18/2012
"Just do your jobs and leave the legislation to ELECTED officials."

Yeah, they're bad enough to start with ! ;-)