MP Pensions: Canadian Taxpayers Being Taken To Cleaners, According To Advocacy Group

First Posted: 01/18/12 12:22 PM ET Updated: 01/19/12 02:27 PM ET

Canadians are being taken to the cleaners by their own MPs for an overly generous pension plan, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation said Wednesday.

The cost of retiring the 41st Parliament would be $262 million in cumulative pensions and $436 million if every MP was to stay in office until 2019, the Federation said in a new report.

What's more shocking than the overall price tag, the Federation said, is that taxpayers contribute more than $23 for every one dollar an MP contributes to his or her own pension plan.

"(Taxpayers) are putting more money into the pension plan than they are actually paying MPs in salary every year," said Gregory Thomas, the group's federal director.

While backbench MPs earn $157,731 a year, Thomas said, an additional $248,000 is added to each of their pensions ever year by taxpayers, while they may contribute as little as $10,990.

The system has been rigged so that the MP pension plan -- which unlike the Canadian Pension Plan or RRSPs is not invested in the market -- pays itself a 10.4 per cent rate of return.

"It's a phony return set on an imaginary investment," Thomas said. "This rate means they basically have the best performing pension over 10 years on the planet ... It's probably the best pension plan on earth."

Next Monday, 39 MPs who were first elected in 2006 will pass the 6-year threshold to qualify for their parliamentary pension.

They will enter "the promised land" in the words of Thomas.

Together, the 39 MPs are set to collect $30.9 million in lifetime payouts, according to the federation.

Younger MPs such as 33-year-old Conservative MP Chris Warkentin and 38-year-old Industry Minister Christian Paradis will have to wait until they are 55 years of age to collect. But even if they don't run again, the Federation said Warkentin and Paradis will still receive an annual pension for the rest of their lives worth at least $46,049 and $61,581 respectively.

"People are walking away after six years on the job with a big payout for life. Starting at 55, a guaranteed index payoff, many of them in the multi-million of dollars," Thomas said.

Although the fictitious rate of return was set by cabinet, and MPs decide on the fate of their own finances through a small all-party committee that meets behind closed doors, the Federation called on the Conservative Government to turn off the taps.

"There is no way the Prime Minister and these MPs can do what they need to do to balance the budget and control spending if they have their own snouts in the pension trough. They need to lead by example, they need to put Canada ahead of their own personal bank balance," Thomas said.

He called for the immediate shut down of MPs' "platinum-plated pension plan" and the creation of a matching dollar-for-dollar defined contribution pension plan similar to the new registered pension plan, the PRPP, the government wants "all of us to adopt."

"If it's good enough for Canadians, it should be good enough for our MPs," Thomas said.

Loading Slideshow...
  • Top 10 Most Expensive MP Pensions

    Welcome to the $3 million club. The following 10 MPs will each receive an estimated total lifetime pension of more than $3 million if they retire in 2019. All the <a href="http://taxpayer.com/sites/default/files/CTFMP-PensionReport-WEB.pdf" target="_hplink">estimates come from the Canadian Taxpayers Federation</a> and are based on an MP retiring in 2019 and ceasing to receive their pension at age 80. The numbers if the MPs retire in 2015 are also included in the caption to each slide.

  • 10. Michael Chong - $3,124,903

    Conservative MP Michael Chong would receive an estimated lifetime pension of $2,684,816 if he were to retire in 2015.

  • 9. Peter Van Loan - $3,194,114

    Conservative MP Peter Van Loan would receive an estimated lifetime pension of $2,462,029 if he were to retire in 2015. (CP)

  • 8. Rona Ambrose - $3,330,876

    Conservative MP Rona Ambrose would receive an estimated lifetime pension of $2,429,149 if she were to retire in 2015. (CP)

  • 7. Rob Anders - $3,643,873

    Conservative MP Rob Anders would receive an estimated lifetime pension of $3,034,089 if he were to retire in 2015. (Jeff McIntosh/CP)

  • 6. Denis Coderre - $3,701,989

    Liberal MP Denis Coderre would receive an estimated lifetime pension of $3,288,821 if he were to retire in 2015. (Graham Hughes/CP)

  • 5. Scott Brison - $3,723,666

    Liberal MP Scott Brison would receive an estimated lifetime pension of $3,113,881 if he were to retire in 2015.

  • 4. James Moore - $3,795,386

    Conservative MP James Moore would receive an estimated lifetime pension of $2,893,658 if he were to retire in 2015. (Althia Raj)

  • 3. Gerry Byrne - $3,996,498

    Liberal MP Gerry Byrne would receive an estimated lifetime pension of $3,450,711 if he were to retire in 2015.

  • 2. Jason Kenney - $4,318,507

    Conservative MP Jason Kenney would receive an estimated lifetime pension of $3,416,779 if he were to retire in 2015. (CP)

  • 1. Stephen Harper - $5,596,474

    Prime Minister Stephen Harper would receive an estimated lifetime pension of $5,456,109 if he were to retire in 2015. Harper's numbers are based on the PM not buying back into the program for his service as a Reform Party MP between 1993-1997. In order to make a political statement, Harper did not contribute to the pension program during his time as a Reform MP. After returning to Parliament Hill in 2002, Harper could have retroactively contributed to the program for his service from 1993 to 1997. According to the PMO, Harper has not and will not make those contributions. MPs are not obligated to disclose this information. If Harper were to choose to buy back in for those years, his numbers would change. If he were to buy back in and retire in 2019 he would receive an estimated lifetime pension of $6,216,858 and $6,233,568 if he were to retire in 2015. His numbers also include the special allowance he will receive as Prime Minister. An earlier version of this story used the numbers based on Harper buying back in for the 1993 to 1997 period. After being contacted by the PMO with the prime minister's pledge not to do so, the numbers were updated. (CP)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

Canadians are being taken to the cleaners by their own MPs for an overly generous pension plan, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation said Wednesday. The cost of retiring the 41st Parliament would be ...
Canadians are being taken to the cleaners by their own MPs for an overly generous pension plan, the Canadian Taxpayers Federation said Wednesday. The cost of retiring the 41st Parliament would be ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 101
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegirlnextdoor
04:58 PM on 01/30/2012
Someone said, and I admit, I do not remember - you can judge a society by how it treats the most helpless, children and the elderly. Our low income elderly get $500 a month. Not so much in the real world. And most of them worked all their lives - not just six years. In fact to qualify you have to have worked 10 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegirlnextdoor
04:51 PM on 01/30/2012
Oh yeah, you read my mind with this one. They would deprive the elderly low income people of $500 a month (not so much when you think about it) and yet they have pensions in in 6 digits per annum.
photo
Newfoundlander
I'm a pessimist, an optimist with experience!
03:51 PM on 01/30/2012
Politics: The conduct of public affairs for private advantage.

The Devil's Dictionary
Ambrose Bierce
06:39 PM on 01/23/2012
How can this group of "pigs at the trough" justify any recrimination against the rest of Canadians when they are feeding at the trough themselves? Don't tell me how they have given up opportunities in the private sector and consequently deserve to be reimbusrsed! My MP, Kelly Block in SK, has no post-secondary education or private sector interests and her only claim to fame is being the mayor of Waldheim, SK! Kelly must be licking her lips because she has been reelected and is now eligible to collect her gold-plated pension. This is absolutely disgusting!
12:18 AM on 01/20/2012
The issue aside, the Canadian Taxpayer Federation is a money making organization with a dream name and a perpetual axe to grind. The news media are so lazy, all they have to do is hang around the CTF and they get ready made copy. Organizations like this one are one trick ponys who live on fees they collect in the self titled name of lobbying. They contribute nothing to society except to prey on people with simple minds who couldn't figure out the details if they had to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegirlnextdoor
04:52 PM on 01/30/2012
um, not sure what you mean by this? You think it is ok to deprive the elderly low income of $500 a month (a pittance) and yet allow these huge pensions for MPs?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DebbyM
07:07 PM on 02/01/2012
So....government official are you? Just waiting for your turn to be one of the pigs at the trough?
11:28 PM on 01/19/2012
Harper and the PC must go. The Liberals and NDP must join up. (Just like Reform and PC) did, so we can take our Country back!! 4 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegirlnextdoor
04:52 PM on 01/30/2012
please make it so.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:35 PM on 01/19/2012
STOP Defined Benefit .

START Defined Contribution .

ELIMINATE all future pension liabilities .

Public and Private .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegirlnextdoor
04:53 PM on 01/30/2012
'splain please, what that means.
04:55 PM on 01/19/2012
once upon a time Mr. Harper was in "reform" party that decrided this generous MP pensions...who opted out when they were elected.

wide gap between those old reformers and the Tories today..huh
Dinsdale Pirahna
"lookin' out the 'ole in the wall"
11:44 AM on 01/19/2012
What Stephen Harper said:
"I don't plan to appoint senators; that's not my intention."
(Harper, Cornwall Standard-Freeholder, January 14, 2006)

What he did:
Harper appoints 18 Senators (December 22, 2008)
Harper appoints 9 senators ( August 27, 2009)
Harper appoints 5 senators (January 29, 2010)
Harper appoints 1 senator ( May 20, 2010)
Harper appoints 2 senators ( December 20, 2010)
Harper appoints 3 senators (May 18, 2011)
Harper appoints 7 senators (Jan 6, 2011)
Total 45 senators

In all fairness, there were quite a few vacancies when he took office, however he created quite a few more even after he had a "majority" of Tory senators in the upper chamber. So it looks like senate "reform" is on the "back burner" and unfortunately we'll be paying for these appointments for a long time to come.
Dinsdale Pirahna
"lookin' out the 'ole in the wall"
12:41 PM on 01/19/2012
Correction: Last appointments should read Harper appoints 7 senators (Jan 5, 2012) not 2011.
12:20 AM on 01/20/2012
If you can read, you might want to read the Constitution which sets out our system of governance and is the rules we must follow until we have the guts and brains to change it.
Dinsdale Pirahna
"lookin' out the 'ole in the wall"
08:40 AM on 01/20/2012
I can read. Can you hear? Because I think you missed my point. I assume you are including Harper when you say "...until WE have the guts and the brains to change it..."? Because Harper campaigned on senate reform and that to 'change it' he said he needed a majority (read "stacked") senate. That was his excuse for making appointments. All I'm saying is that AFTER he got his stacked senate he created 10 more senators. I don't want to sound cynical but almost all the new appointees were Tory bag-men, fundraisers, failed candidates, or political hacks. So again, senate reform has been put on the back burner (that was my point) - at least until we have a Prime Minister that is serious about changing it.
07:57 AM on 01/19/2012
My problem is not the pensions but the MP's contributions. 1 to 23 is absurd. 1 to 5 is reasonable. If these folks want a bigger pension, let them have the option of contributing MORE. Period.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PiperSniper
09:11 AM on 01/19/2012
Even 1 to 5 seems a little much to me and they qualify for full pension after only six years? Designed and voted on by ... themselves!
02:06 PM on 01/21/2012
1 to 5 - no way!

The money they make, they can easily get expert advice and invest in their own RRSP. They can ride the waves of the 'free' market like the rest of us poor saps. If their investments tank, oh well. They will be heading out to the sweet green pastures reserved for ex-politicians, ie consulting and sitting on Boards of Directors.

I say stop it now. How about they get the same crap deal as the Nortel, GM workers they don't bother to stick up for? Their employer (us) can use their pension funds to pay ourselves bonuses and buy expensive toys. Then we can cry poor when they lose their jobs - sorry your pension was un-funded.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegirlnextdoor
04:55 PM on 01/30/2012
old people who worked all their lives get $500 a month. Why should being an MP for 6 years get you some kind of huge pension? It is sick and twisted.
07:13 AM on 01/19/2012
disgusting
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
11:20 PM on 01/18/2012
One thing is for sure the following point reveals where these politicians sit. Absolutely pornographic.

"As Canada's rich-poor divide widens, some experts warn that the concentration of wealth at the top of the income distribution and stagnating wages for everyone else could be a drag on the economy. Though Canada's income gap is not as pronounced as in the U.S., Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives economist Armine Yalnizyan argues that the growing divide is bad for business all the same. "

I always reply to my friends, fans, and followers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
uneeda
Make Peace in Our Time
10:58 PM on 01/18/2012
betcha they ask for an increase before the year's up
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Warpde
Badges? We don't need no stinking Badges.
10:53 PM on 01/18/2012
And lets not forget the number double dipping from their stint in Provincial Politics.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Filthy
06:32 PM on 01/19/2012
In Ontario MPPs put in 10% and that's matched with 10% and it goes into an RRSP. Pretty sure Ontario went through MPP pension reform already back in 92 or 96.
02:09 PM on 01/21/2012
Good to know. But it still should be factored in when their federal pension is calculated, in my opinion.

It all has to come out of the same pockets, after all and Ontarians are not so flush with cash any more.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
10:50 PM on 01/18/2012
Captain Renault: I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!
[a croupier hands Renault a pile of money]
Croupier: Your winnings, sir.
Captain Renault: [sotto voce] Oh, thank you very much.
[aloud]
Captain Renault: Everybody out at once!