45% Rent Hike 'Unbelievable,' East Van Tenants Say

Vancouver

First Posted: 01/20/2012 8:34 pm Updated: 01/23/2012 2:28 pm


Tenants in an East Vancouver apartment building are fighting the landlord’s attempts to impose a 45-per-cent rent increase.


Many of the tenants are living on seniors’ and disability pensions and say that big a rent hike would be a financial disaster for them.


“I've been going to the food bank up here, which is where I'm going now, and that helps,” said tenant Adeline Saunders.


Saunders, 57, who suffers from rheumatoid arthritis, said her disability pension doesn't cover her bills now, and if her rent goes up, she'll be forced to choose between heat and food.


“Even though they say they put the double windows in here, it’s still freezing in here," said Saunders.


Three dozen seniors live in the 42-year-old building on East 6th Avenue, called Lions Manor, which is undergoing renovations and safety upgrades.


The building is owned by the Mount Pleasant Housing Society, a non-profit organization set up by the Mount Pleasant Lions Club.


Tenant Andy Lai, 72, said he is stressed after receiving notice of the planned hike.


“It’s unbelievable that the rent increase is so much more than the allowable legal limit,” said Lai.


In 2012, B.C. landlords are allowed to raise rents by 4.3 percent.


'Below market value'


But the Mount Pleasant Housing Society has applied to the Residential Tenancy Branch for permission to exceed that limit by more than ten times, arguing that rents at Lions Manor are too far below market value.


Tenant Jacques Cote pays $355 per month for his bachelor suite and that would go up by $145 per month to $500 if the owner is granted the full increase.


“If I am going up $145 a month, it will be a big difference and I don’t know if I can live here anymore,” said Cote.


The society says market value for a bachelor suite in that neighbourhood is $740.


B.C. NDP housing critic Shane Simpson says the province is failing to maintain affordable housing.


“Forty-five per cent for people who live on modest incomes, all at once, is too much,” said Simpson.


Simpson pointed to the $180 million in federal and provincial funding announced in July to maintain old and build new social housing.


“The question is, where is that money? Where is the provincial government in this discussion,” said Simpson. “And why aren’t they at the table with this society providing them the supports to make this work with a rent increase, but a more reasonable one.”


Turned down grant


In response to questions about the new funding, a spokeswoman for the ministry responsible for housing told CBC News in an email Friday that “the $180 million is to support provincial housing programs,” and noted that Lions Manor is privately owned by a non-profit society.


The spokeswoman also said the Mount Pleasant Housing Society was offered $500,000 in 2009 “through the Housing Renovation Partnership for building envelope repairs and energy upgrades.”


But the society turned down the offer in March 2010, the spokeswoman said.


The Mount Pleasant Housing Society declined requests for an interview.


A Residential Tenancy Branch hearing is scheduled for Feb 10.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

Tenants in an East Vancouver apartment building are fighting the landlord’s attempts to impose a 45-per-cent rent increase. Many of the tenants are living on seniors’ and ...
Tenants in an East Vancouver apartment building are fighting the landlord’s attempts to impose a 45-per-cent rent increase. Many of the tenants are living on seniors’ and ...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 47
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
01:10 PM on 01/22/2012
This is news?
I remember when we had a fire in a large apartment building in fortMac.
Rents went from @ 800 a month to 1600 overnight.
Right now they are @ 2800per month.
02:56 AM on 01/22/2012
The rents are below "market value". So what? Lions Manor is not "market housing".
It was built expressly to be subsidized housing, which means below market rents.
As such, it was built with some private donations, but mostly grants from the taxpayer, easy mortgage from CMHC, etc...and being a non-profit society -- no taxes! Ever...
The Housing Society has a mandate...and they should stick to it. Or get a new Board.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamster88
07:40 PM on 01/21/2012
Thank you gov of Canada for attracting rich, slave owning Chinese to jack up our property prices and make living in Vancouver not affordable to Canadians.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike vdB
Get involved, always question, don't just exist.
08:50 AM on 01/23/2012
Sure shows your true colours when you lay the blame at the feet of one culture or ethnic group. Metro Vancouver has one of the most diverse populations in the world and each has contributed to the betterment of society. Each group also contributes to the cost of living in the region. The area is expensive and yet people keep on moving and living there. Keep your racist views to yourself.
02:37 PM on 01/21/2012
Vancouver is not for the poor. Move. There are areas of the country where one can live on government assistance, these places are not located in the 604. Unfortunately, this is harsh, but true. Vancouver council and planners have an agenda for that city, and it does not involve the downtrodden of society. I wish a viable solution existed, but it doesn't, and it wont. I strongly suggest these people leave, if possible, and retreat to a more economically viable location for their circumstances. Vancouver, being the "premier" utopia of this country, will not establish affordable housing, they will not cater to the poor, they will cater to those who provide the strongest municipal tax revenue, and that is all there is to it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shediac
05:52 PM on 01/21/2012
So the 'poor' will live where? Born in Vancouver, lived all their lives in Vancouver and now they have to move to make way for wealthy immigrants...WOW somehow that doesn't seem right...
12:38 AM on 01/22/2012
No, it doesn't seem right, because it isn't right, but it is true. It does not seem to matter how much money is thrown at the problem, this issue will not be resolved so long as the wealthy in Vancouver push their agenda. The cold hard truth of the matter is that the well to do residents of Vancouver do not want these people living there, at all, even with a social housing strategy, it's just a no go, they won't have it. Money talks, and right now it is screaming inequality and forced eviction. Unless somebody can propose a solution, this will continue to happen. I will simply call it as I see it, my disagreement with the whole situation is irrelevant.
01:47 PM on 01/21/2012
Honestly, I'm a compassionate person, but the rents these people have being paying are a joke, they should consider themselves lucky they paid so little for so long. Most people I know pay more than that just for utilities.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:12 PM on 01/21/2012
i wish i paid $355/month rent when i lived in vancouver five years ago.
cdnman
Still a free spirit...
01:38 PM on 01/21/2012
Yeah, I paid that amount for a nice one bdrm in Vancouver's west end near English Bay, but that was 25 years ago.
03:38 AM on 02/03/2012
but don't forget a newspaper was 25 cent ,bus fare was 35 cents ,with no zones I might add\ everything was cheaper , as well as our wages,I was paying 222,00 one bed room apt in new west,,AND I thought that was to high,again some thirty years ago,I live in low income housing ,I pay the so called under market rent ,will bc housing do the same to us,,I just could afford to live here ,never mind afford to live.. period [ to my brothers and sister got a ROOM ' in the basement??
12:07 PM on 01/21/2012
"rents at Lions Manor are too far below market value."
I think it is the tenants in general that are seen as below market value these days.
This whole country and most of the world places no value on what a person has done to help create the world. It is market value at the moment.
We live a pretty good life on the history of work done by others. Those that live in great wealth that others paid to for a life time, now desire even more, at their expense.
We talk of freezing and cutting pensions, cutting taxes that care for those that built our country.
Our attitudes are below market value for a decent society.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Keohane
11:51 AM on 01/21/2012
Slanted CBC pinko spin on this one. Housing is affordable when you are spending 30% or less of your gross monthly income on housing. Whether ownership or private rental or public housing, millions of Canadians are in that 30% position. If the guy's rent went up by $145 to $500 monthly and his income exceeds $1650 a month he can afford it and there's no reason he should be getting a better deal than anyone else is getting. If CBC wants to be crowing about the numbers on the rental rates and the increase, why not tell us how much the guy earns? Like, the Lions Club is out to screw seniors, give me a break.
cdnman
Still a free spirit...
01:44 PM on 01/21/2012
If he is on disabilty he gets about 1000 a month, social security about 1200 a month.(you don't receive both).I think the tenants there pay their own heat on top of rent...it is not govt. subsidized and the whole cost of living in Vancouver is very high.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Blanc
11:43 AM on 01/21/2012
The Lions Club on the Sunshine Coast has just completed a beautiful new apartment building, with a portion of the units being offered to low-income people, the rest at market value. Out here - only a short ferry ride from West Vancouver - rents are around $900 a month for an ocean-view unit. It's hard to believe that a Lions Club chapter would be as heartless and badly-managed as portrayed in this story about East Van.
11:05 AM on 01/21/2012
Gimmmmmmmmeeeeeeeeee. $500/month is a gift. Probably about what the owns has to pay in taxes on the property. Welfare, food bank, rent control. It isn't like we are doing nothing for these people, they just seem to want us to do EVERYTHING for them.Yes; I want to live in a 12 bedroom mansion, with a pool, valet parking and 500 channel cable for free. I can't, so I live where I can afford, pay my taxes, help those that need it, and don't take any handouts. Some days it hurts to get up and go to work, and I do that anyway too.

I have no problem at all helping someone who needs it. That is a responsibility of a just society. I have tons of trouble telling a property owner that he has to operate at a loss, pay his taxes, and renovate his building to help the guy on disability who seems to have no problem getting out and walking down to the food bank to carry back a few bags of free food. And I have even bigger problems with that same guy telling me I'm not giving him enough.
10:01 AM on 01/22/2012
I entirely agree that $500 rent per month is a gift. The problem arises for people who can`t work or are disabled. If they receive $1000 per month in total, and $500 goes toward rent, that leaves them with just $500 for power, phone, heat, food, transportation, medications, etc. There simply isn`t enough to go around. People on welfare don`t live in 12 bedroom mansions - most of the time, they live in sub-standard apartments. These people aren`t trying to be difficult and say gimmee, they don`t know how they will manage to survive.
10:37 AM on 01/21/2012
This is the natural consequence of impeding the price mechanism by crusading for 'affordable housing'. When a price is artificially set too low it will create an artificial excess of demand, this is reflected in the astonishingly high prices of all non rent controlled property in the Vancouver area. Governmental interference into the housing market distorts the natural relationship between supply and demand. Rent controlled areas do nothing but create sub standard housing for the poor since the incentives for landlords to maintain quality buildings is taken away by the overwhelming demand that will fill these apartments at artificially low prices. The Society has no reason to take the Government money since they will easily be able to rent out their apartments as is at the new price they demand. There are more than enough people in Vancouver willing to pay that price as the demand for housing is absurdly high.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
10:17 AM on 01/21/2012
I can't imagine where this will end up. Over one third of Canadains live in apartments. Wages have stagnated, job choices and opportunities have stagnated as goverments contnniue to patronize themselves. Housing just isn't a priority. How will people be able to sustain themselves. Rent shouldn't consume more than 25% of their income. What does a single mom and two kids do? Last nights Market Place ("In "Trouble for Rent," Tom Harrington meets tenants of a national rental company and uncovers a disturbing history of unhealthy homes, poor maintenance and corporate callousness. On hidden camera we hear what tenants are told when shopping for a new apartment and with the help of experts we put apartments to the test. What we find is troubling so we go looking for answers from the people at the top.) was pretty revealing regarding the properties in BC, AB, ON, and NS. Mould, water leaks, collapsed windows all contributing to health and saety issues. $80 000 in fines is better than millions of $ in repairs. Governments need to make the fines and forfeiture of properties more effective. Put a cap on rent. Quit making a few people rich.
10:39 AM on 01/21/2012
Rent control is what got us into this mess into the first place. Economic FACT - artificially low prices create high demand. This in turn lets landlords off the hook for maintaining their rental units. If there are 50 people on a waiting list for a sub standard apartment, what incentive does the landlord have to keep up with regular maintenance?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
11:21 AM on 01/21/2012
Yes, very true but the artifically low rental rate has also enhanced the demand allowing apartment owners to hold back on repairs since capital for further investment is the goal.
08:55 AM on 01/21/2012
Markets smarkets, so much for being a non-profit organization.

I would like to see a detailed assessment on what contributes to market value.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
10:18 AM on 01/21/2012
It's what people will pay. It isn't assessment other than for tax purposes.
03:05 AM on 01/21/2012
You all don't have rent control laws in major Canadian cities??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ascoli
06:09 AM on 01/21/2012
We do in Montreal.
Surely, they do in BC
darksideofthespoon
what we think we become
07:04 AM on 01/21/2012
I think the only stipulation is that the rent amount must be unchanged for a year, then after that 1 year period they are allowed to raise it.. Obviously it shouldn't be 45%, but I guess there's no law withholding that. How sad.
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
01:48 PM on 01/21/2012
Yes we do, after a one year period it is about 4.5% allowed increase.
02:00 AM on 01/21/2012
It simple math for the "Carp's" at the Mount Pleasant Lions Club;

They are trying to Carp-Up some of that $180 Million Dollars in Federal and Provincial funding. The glaring hole in their reasoning is the $500,000 dollars they turned down earlier.