Northern Gateway: Joe Oliver, Federal Energy Minister Says Pipeline Would Transform Native Communities

Joe Oliver

First Posted: 01/25/2012 4:58 pm Updated: 01/26/2012 11:15 am

CALGARY - Canada's Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver says he expects legislation to be introduced this year as a way of streamlining the regulatory process and preventing excessive delays on major energy projects.

Oliver made his comments in a speech Wednesday afternoon to the Calgary Chamber of Commerce as lengthy public hearings continue on the Northern Gateway pipeline from Alberta to northwestern British Columbia.

Enbridge (TSX:ENB) wants to build a 1,170-kilometre twin pipeline that would carry oilsands bitumen from Alberta to Kitimat, B.C., where huge tanker ships would transport it to Asia.

Public hearings into the proposed $5.5-billion pipeline got underway in Alberta this past week. More than 4,000 individuals have signed up to speak about the project in hearings across Alberta and B.C. over the next 18 months.

"One wild card remains — an unpredictable, often increasingly lengthy and needlessly complex regulatory process. Bad processes do not produce good environmental outcomes," Oliver said in his half-hour speech.

"There is risk of abuse. The prime minister used the term hijacked by those who oppose the development of hydrocarbons on purely ideological grounds," he added.

Oliver told reporters that he wants changes made in a timely fashion and it will require legislation.

Oliver said he intends to have the changes in place before the Northern Gateway process is finished. He said there are reviews going on all the time and if the government waited until all were completed, none would ever get done.

The minister said the important thing is to have a set timeline on how long the review process can take.

"We need to make sure that the regulatory process occurs within a defined and limited timeframe so they don't go on forever. Mackenzie Valley pipeline project took nine years to be approved. This is excessive, so that's one of the issues we're going to be looking at."

At an earlier event in Calgary, Oliver made it clear that the government would not intervene in the Northern Gateway process, but was optimistic that aboriginal leaders would eventually come to support the pipeline.

Oliver said he had the opportunity to discuss the project with aboriginal leaders at the First Nations summit in Ottawa, including a number of chiefs from British Columbia.

"It's always been my hope and continues to be that this pipeline would address issues that will create economic activity that will be beneficial," said Oliver.

"We believe the aboriginal communities and First Nations can benefit in a transformative way from some of these developments. There's money on the table, there's equity participation and there's jobs, so it's our hope to continue to have a dialogue with the First Nations and see whether we together can achieve our objectives.

"We have a moral and constitutional obligation to consult and accommodate and we of course will do that."

Oliver said the government believes the oilsands will generate $3.3 trillion in economic activity over the next 25 years and hundreds of billions of dollars that governments can use to support social programs such as housing, education and pensions.

Environmental, aboriginal and social action groups say the risks of a pipeline rupture or oil tanker spill are too great. Not only would the pipeline cross mountain ranges, rivers and streams, it would fill more than 200 tankers a year that would have to navigate the treacherous waters of the Douglas Channel before reaching open sea.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 47
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
There's still time to change the road you're on...
03:28 PM on 01/26/2012
"Only after the last tree has been cut down,

Only after the last river has been poisoned,

Only after the last fish has been caught,

Only then will you find that money cannot be eaten."

Cree Indian Prophecy

Cree are one of the largest group of indigenous peoples...across Canada..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lulex
01:37 PM on 01/26/2012
The man behind harper is Tom Flanagan, a man who supports the ideas of stripping Aboriginals of their rights! Details here: http://www.walrusmagazine.com/articles/the-man-behind-stephen-harper-tom-flanagan/

The Harper views Aboriginals and adversaries to oil sands. Details here
http://www.vancouversun.com/business/Feds+list+First+Nations+green+groups+oilsands+adversaries/6054920/story.html

Harper was linked to the racist group Northern Foundations. It is noted in the book Of Passionate Intensity and you can read about it here: http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2011/04/19/03610.html

Expect no good of this man or his government. He is in my view racist, untrustworthy and lacks regard for Canadian rights and laws!
12:15 PM on 01/26/2012
Would hope that this deal would be beneficial for native communities but a little skeptical until it is actually proven to help these communities!

Samuel (Sam) Getaneh Bogale Calgary Alberta
12:35 PM on 01/26/2012
Many of the First Nations involved in this issue have already signed on and taken financial positions with the company building a pipeline from northeastern B.C. to Kitimat to bring natural gas to LNG plants at that port, from where it will be shipped to Asia(not in super-tankers). So the claim the Harper Government and Big Oil that they are against all development is a lie.

It is the thought of oil leaking or spilling on their lands and waters, including the north coast of B.C., that draws such heated opposition to Gateway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gordon Soderberg
The Green Veteran
09:11 AM on 01/26/2012
Don't let them put one pipe across native lands unless it it to provide fuel for the population that lives there. Canada can fuel itself and should . But should not export a drop that is unrefined.
08:29 AM on 01/26/2012
The last time the aboriginals entered into a deal with "white men", they lost their prime lands and were relegated to reservations. They were doing quite well until we came on the scene and introduced them to Christianity, booze, etc. Now we want the rest of it as well. Every time we see the appalling conditions of first nation communities, we should hide our heads in shame. We are responsible for for their deprivations . We better get our own house in order soon or there will be trouble and we will deserve everything we get as a result.
07:25 AM on 01/26/2012
I agree with this. This could considerably transform the economics for our west coast native nations, and they know it as well. It could also afford affected parties, through multi-lateral consensus agreements, the opportunity to modernize the Indian Act to clearly spell out the divisions of roles and respsonsibilities in responsible governance. What we are concerned with is the potential for an oil disaster in the 100 km of fiords that large oil barges will have to navigate to get to Kitimat BC in the Douglas Channel and back, to feed Asia's huge oil appetite
12:08 PM on 01/26/2012
I fail to see how this deal will all of a sudden change how this conservative government subsidizes social programs. Aren't they all about cutting these programs, and have?

I fail to see how this would help First Nations communities especially when a lot of the engineering jobs are brought in from other countries/Provinces. Most job figures for the pipeline are inflated.

Is there some agreement in talks, that I don't know about, that would give some percentage of Tar Sands profits to specific communities? Is there some deal that would put money back into the infrastructure of Canada? Is there some deal that would put some money towards renewable energy? Can't seem to find anything like that, maybe you can help. I do know that Canada is obligated by NAFTA to export our resources even if we don't have enough for Canadians! Seems like a fair for everyone.

Maybe you can enlighten me to why you agree with Joe Oliver and the small group of people who will benefit from this pipeline? It sure isn't going into your pocket or the guy next to you on the bus.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norma Ward
07:22 AM on 01/26/2012
Perhaps increasing Canada's exports of synthetic crude oil is not in the best interest of our long-term energy security. As shown in this article, it is unlikely that oil sands production levels will ever reach the levels proposed by Enbridge, making it more likely that Canada will have to import increasing volumes of oil:

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2012/01/canadas-oil-sands-are-we-exporting.html

Canada's domestic energy security should be prioritized above pipeline company profits and well above long-term energy security for China and the United States.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beejer50
Flushing B.S. from Coast to Coast
06:52 AM on 01/26/2012
"Not only would the pipeline cross mountain ranges, rivers and streams, it would fill more than 200 tankers a year that would have to navigate the treacherous waters of the Douglas Channel before reaching open sea."

Which is why TransCanada and Exxon is pushing the U.S. to permit their proposed XL pipeline extension to the Gulf of Mexico.

Once refined at Texas refineries, the products will be shipped to Asia in huge supertankers.

So far, the only ones that seem to benefit by the "harvesting" of Alberta's bitumen are Asian factories, pipeline companies, and Big Oil.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mirabay
stand for something or you will fall for
03:31 AM on 01/26/2012
hopefully the native population will not succumb to this as they did when the white man arrived on this continent and laid waste to it..................
09:59 PM on 01/28/2012
What is the point of all this white guilt? I so sick of the endless excuse for poor conditions on reserves, the natives got a raw deal sure, but that was generations past. The reservation system should be scrapped altogether. Give the natives who live on reserves property rights for where they currently reside, let them be in charge of their own personal destiny and scrap the gettos we call reserves.
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
02:41 AM on 01/26/2012
Where was that offer a month ago?

This sounds like snake oil sales to me! All the devil whiskey they can drink!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
There's still time to change the road you're on...
02:36 AM on 01/26/2012
The white man is still trying to cheat the native people's out of their land with a few beads.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lulex
01:23 AM on 01/26/2012
Spoken like a blithering idiot. Not everybody believes you have to destroy the earth to live on it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
11:49 PM on 01/25/2012
--it would fill more than 200 tankers a year that would have to navigate the treacherous waters of the Douglas Channel before reaching open sea--

Well, thank-you HuffPo editors. Always flushing these Canadian Press articles into the argument and we never know who the authors are.

Imagine that, 200 tankers noted and this Canadian Press article skips by the sheer volume of environmental pollution caused just from the 4.5% sulphur content of the lowest grade bunker fuel that the Oil Cartel can supply to them.

Here is a clip from this web site: http://tinyurl.com/ybnaca9 , that describes the pollution horror story which this pipeline will contribute too further.

--

Thanks to the IMO’s rules, the largest ships can each emit as much as 5,000 tons of sulphur in a year – the same as 50million typical cars, each emitting an average of 100 grams of sulphur a year.

With an estimated 800million cars driving around the planet, that means 16 super-ships can emit as much sulphur as the world fleet of cars.

--

I doubt the Minister gives a krap about this pollution.
11:45 PM on 01/25/2012
I think investors will become a little nervous when the shooting starts. With the potential for the large scale swap of BC bud for guns, we might well see Akwesasne West with heavy weapons.
11:32 PM on 01/25/2012
Sloppy Joe? What you say? "transformative"?

Sloppy Joe, ask the folks in suburban Burnaby B.C., how their community was "transformed" not many years ago when the Kinder Morgan pipeline burst.
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
11:43 PM on 01/25/2012
Or the folks in Abbotsford who awoke yesterday with the stench of petroleum products from 110,000 Liters of oil spilled from a Kinder Morgan tank farm.