Labour And Globalization: As Conflicts Go International, Unions Follow Suit

First Posted: 01/27/2012 7:52 am EST Updated: 01/27/2012 12:00 pm EST

On any battleground, common wisdom has long held that defeating an adversary often owes a great deal to one’s ability to think like the enemy.

So it comes as little surprise that as transnational corporations use their global reach to cut costs -- and workers’ pay -- the labour movement has begun to take a similar tack. From picket lines to backroom discussions, big labour is banding together across sectoral, national and international borders in an attempt to capitalize on the very forces that for years have been employed against them.

As Sid Ryan, president of the Ontario Federation of Labour, explains, “There’s only one way we can fight globalization, and that’s to reach out to unions around the globe.”

It’s a strategy that’s being implemented on many fronts in an effort union leaders describe as labour’s best -- and only -- chance for survival.

This week in Washington, D.C., Public Services International, an umbrella organization representing 20 million workers from nearly 150 countries, is holding a meeting of North American public sector unions -- which Canadian Union of Public Employees national president Paul Moist says is the first of its kind in more than 30 years.

In addition to increasingly hostile bargaining tables and mounting attacks on pensions, Moist says discussion has underscored the need for greater cooperation.

“I don’t think we have the luxury anymore in our own borders to focus on our own issues. Globally, we can’t afford not to be talking to each other,” he told The Huffington Post on Wednesday. “The trade union movement must move beyond the borders of supporting one another and supporting communities and non-unionized workers as well.

“I believe we’ll thrive -- or not -- based on our ability to do those things.”

CAW national president Ken Lewenza echoed this sentiment at a rally on Saturday in London, Ont., which drew thousands in support of 420 locked out Electro-Motive Diesel (EMD) workers.

“This will be a wake up call for the international communities, for the international labour movement to act like these global companies. If they’re going to exploit workers from one country to another, we arm our forces and we just refuse to do work that’s going to be moved to the lowest bidder,” he told media. “If the international labour community can’t come together in one voice and one fight-back campaign, then the only question is when are we going to lose the identity of the trade union.”

The CAW is now in talks with the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union (CEP) to create a new labour organization -- which, according to a report obtained by the Toronto Star, is part of a strategy to “reverse the erosion of our membership, our power and our prestige.”

With pressure mounting to cut government spending and boost corporate profits, Moist says the bonds between public and private sector unions have never been closer.

This cooperation was evident at the rally in London, when the leaders of virtually every major Canadian labour organization took to the stage.

During his speech, Moist pledged $15,000 on behalf of CUPE to support the affected CAW workers and their families -- an amount he expects to grow if the lockout wears on.

“We need to not just visibly support, we need to financially support all strikes,” he said on Wednesday. “CUPE is predominantly a public sector union, but … we need to support all workers who are kind of on the receiving end of a corporate blow, and that’s my take on what’s going on in London.”

Despite raking in record profits in 2011, Illinois-based heavy machinery manufacturing giant Caterpillar, which owns EMD through its subsidiary Progress Rail, locked out CAW workers at its London plant on January 1 when the union refused to accept a deal that would slash wages from $35 to 16.50.

Some observers have suggested that Caterpillar -- which has declined multiple requests for comment from HuffPost -- is planning to shift operations to a new facility in Muncie, Ind., where workers earn less than what the company wants to pay its employees in London.

All of which explains why a delegation from United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America (UE) -- the union that represents workers in Erie, Penn., who build locomotives for General Electric, EMD’s main competitor -- made the trek to London on Saturday.

When it comes to “fighting these multinationals,” Gene Elk, a UE official involved in bargaining with General Electric, says widespread cooperation among unions is a must.

Though UE recently negotiated a three-year contract for workers at the Erie plant, Elk says there is a sense that “GE is following lock-step the pattern set by [Caterpillar].”

Last year, GE announced it is building two new plants in Fort Worth, Texas, where Elk suspects wages will be within the $15 to $18 range -- about half of what workers make at the Erie plant.

“We don’t think it’s an accident that GE is setting up a low wage shop in Fort Worth, just like [Caterpillar] is setting up a low-wage shop in Muncie,” he says. “They’re both doing the same thing.”

Both Texas and Indiana are so-called “right-to-work” states, where legislation has made it more difficult for unions to organize.

GE Transportation spokesman Stephan Koller did not address questions about the Fort Worth facility, but maintained that the recent negotiations in Erie “ended in a package that offers good wages and good benefits to our employees.”

“GE did not lock out any of its employees and did not request any wage reductions,” he said.

According to Elaine Bernard, executive director of the Labor and Worklife Program at Harvard Law School, the solidarity between the CAW and UE represents a deepening understanding within the labour movement of how dramatically globalization has shifted the playing field.

“In the old days, you would have said, ‘Well, gee if these Canadian workers’ plant closes, that’s good; That’s more work for us.’ They’re not seeing it that way,” she says. “They’re realizing that if these workers who have fought for and won reasonable working conditions have their working conditions cut in half, that’s not going to benefit anyone in the U.S.”

She describes the recent, tangible examples of growing coordination between disparate unions as the tip of an iceberg that is only beginning to emerge.

“You’re seeing the one-ninth,” she says, “but trust me, there’s eight-ninths below.”

Precisely what this enhanced cooperation will bring -- and how soon -- however, remains to be seen.

In the case of disputes with multinationals like Caterpillar, Ryerson University labour expert Maurice Mazzerolle says power will elude workers until they can mount a campaign that affects the company’s bottom line -- “because at the end of the day, that’s what they’ll respond to.

“I think it would take a meaningful or dialogue or gesture or something from a significant purchaser or their equipment or a government,” he says. “It just can’t be [about] their reputation.”

CORRECTION: Gene Elk is a UE official involved in negotiations with GE. An earlier version of this story incorrectly identified him as UE's national organizing director. The Huffington Post regrets the error.

FLASHPOINTS IN THE HISTORY OF CANADIAN LABOUR

Loading Slideshow...
  • Labour Day: A Canadian Invention

    Few Canadians realize it, but Labour Day is as Canadian as maple bacon. It all began in 1872, when the Toronto Typographical Union went on strike to demand a nine-hour workday. When <i>Globe and Mail</i> chief George Brown had the protest organizers arrested, Prime Minister John A. Macdonald passed a law legalizing labour unions. Thus, a Conservative prime minister became a hero to the working class, and Canada became among the first countries to limit the workday, doing so decades before the U.S. The typographers' marches became an annual event, eventually being adopted by the U.S., becoming the modern day Labour Day.

  • The Winnipeg General Strike

    The end of World War I brought social instability and economic volatility to Canada. On May 15, 1919, numerous umbrella union groups went out on strike in Winnipeg, grinding the city to a halt. Protesters were attacked in the media with epithets such as "Bolshevik" and "Bohunk," but resistance from the media and government only strengthened the movement. In June, the mayor ordered the Mounties to ride into the protest, prompting violent clashes and the death of two protesters. After protest leaders were arrested, organizers called off the strike. But the federal mediator ended up ruling in favour of the protesters, establishing the Winnipeg General Strike as the most important strike in Canadian history, and a precursor to the country's modern labour movement.

  • The Regina Riot

    During the Great Depression, the only way for a single male Canadian to get government assistance was to join "relief camps" -- make-work projects set up by the federal government out of concern idle young men were a threat to the nation. The relief camps, with their poor work conditions, became breeding grounds for communists and other radicals. The "On-To-Ottawa Trek" was organized as a protest that would move from Vancouver across the country to Ottawa, to bring workers' grievances to the prime minister. The trek halted in Regina when Prime Minister R.B. Bennett promised to talk to protest organizers. When talks broke down, the RCMP refused to allow the protesters to leave Regina and head for Ottawa, and on June 26, 1935, RCMP riot officers attacked a crowd of protesters. More than 100 people were arrested and two killed -- one protester and one officer.

  • Bloody Sunday

    In May, 1938, unemployed men led by communist organizers occupied a post office and art gallery in downtown Vancouver, protesting over poor work conditions at government-run Depression-era "relief camps." In June, the RCMP moved in to clear out the occupiers, using tear gas inside the post office. The protesters inside smashed windows for air and armed themselves with whatever was available. Forty-two people, including five officers, were injured. When word spread of the evacuation, sympathizers marched through the city's East End, smashing store windows. Further protests against "police terror" would be held in the weeks to come.

  • Giant Mine Bombing

    In 1992, workers at Royal Oak Mines' Giant Mine in the Northwest Territories went on strike. On September 18, a bomb exploded in a mineshaft deep underground, killing nine replacement workers. Mine worker Roger Warren was convicted of nine counts of second-degree murder. The Giant Mine closed in 2004.

  • The Toronto G20

    The Canadian Labour Congress, representing numerous labour groups, participated in protests in Toronto during the G20 summit in June, 2010. When a handful of "Black Block" anarchists rioted through the city core, it brought an overwhelming police response that resulted in the largest mass arrests in Canadian history. More than 1,000 people were arrested, with most never charged with any crime. Numerous allegations of police brutality have been made, and the Toronto police are now the target of several multi-million dollar lawsuits. So far, two police officers have been charged with crimes relating to G20 policing, and charges against other police officers are also possible.

  • Occupy Canada

    When Vancouver-based magazine Adbusters suggested the public "occupy Wall Street" to protest corporate malfeasance, New Yorkers took the suggestion seriously, and occupied Zuccotti Park in Manhattan. Canadians followed suit, sparking copycat occupations in all major Canadian cities in September, 2011. By December, most of the occupations had been cleared, all of them non-violently. Though the protests achieved no specific goals, they did change the political conversation in North America. What their long-term legacy will be remains to be seen.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atcrossroads
01:48 AM on 02/05/2012
Ok, comments work, replies not so much, so in response to Running To Stand Still:
The over-the-top wages you refer to amounts to less than $ 6000 a month, for skilled workers! That is a decent wage. The only reason you think it is exorbitant is because exploitati­ve wages have become the norm. The CEO of Caterpilla­r, by contrast, earned $ 867 000 per month, or $ 206 000 per week ( in other words, 4 X the annual salary of a skilled worker, in one week) or, if he worked 80 hours a week, $ 2580 per hour. THAT is over-the-top.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
atcrossroads
01:45 AM on 02/05/2012
Is this comment facilty working?
12:57 AM on 02/04/2012
WOW... there seems to be a few folks here who just don't get it. My wife is Unionised (as am I) and she works for slightly higher than minimum wage. If you think that is going to bankrupt the economy, or country, well there's nothing I can say to change your mind.

I think we all understand that when times are tough, everyone must make sacrifices. But, to justify such an outrageous demand for wage concessions when your corporation makes 6 BILLION dollars in profit is criminal. What will happen in a few years time when CAT wants to cut the American workers pay by 50%? Do you really think that they will work for $8/hour?

The big corporations simply want to take as much from the lower ranks as they can, so that they can hand it out to share holders, and the higher ranks. Good luck selling your product (or service) when no one is making enough money to afford to buy it. It won't matter how cheap you produce your product, you will not be selling any!

Eventually the pendulum will swing the other way, unfortunately, I nor my children will likely be here to see it. What a shame...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Cole
12:11 PM on 01/29/2012
It's about damn time.
01:59 PM on 01/28/2012
One has to hope that unions will organize in the same way that business has done. It is the only way, but it will require union leaders to sacrifice some power and get past parochial issues . Interesting that the Scandinavian countries are so heavily organize isnt it? Can you imagine a company like Csaterpillar trying to do the things they are in Sweden or Finland?
The other part of the problem, which unions have not sorted out yet, is that of organizing a much wider base of membership. They need very much to get their message across to those in the service area including those who work from home.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FogBelter
Illegitimis non carborundum
03:14 AM on 01/28/2012
If not Global Unions than a Transnational labor party that actually focuses on the needs of workers.
02:01 PM on 01/28/2012
Could not agree more. Long overdue. a party thar encompasses all labour, not just those who work with their handa.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:00 AM on 01/28/2012
From 2002...

http://www.epi.org/publication/webfeatures_viewpoints_global_strat_labor/
A Global Strategy for Labor

"...Thus, the fundamental purpose of neo-liberal polices of the past 20 years has been to discipline labor in every country in order to free capital from having to bargain with workers over the gains from rising productivity. Such bargaining is the essence of a democratic market system. Although labor is obviously better served when it is organized into trade unions to bargain with a unified voice, the bargaining between labor and capital goes on even if workers are unorganized.

As in any bargaining, both sides are constantly maneuvering for advantage. But Labor is typically at a disadvantage because it usually bargains under conditions of excess supply of unemployed workers. Moreover, the forced liberalization of finance and trade provides enormous leverage to capital by giving it a threat of fleeing the economy altogether — by freeing it from responsibility to the firm, the community or the nation.

Uncontrolled globalization, in one stroke, puts government’s domestic policies decisively on the side of capital. In an economy that is growing based on its domestic market, rising wages help everyone because they increase purchasing power and consumer demand — which is the major driver of economic growth in a modern economy. But in an economy whose growth depends on foreign markets, rising domestic wages are a problem, because they make it more difficult to compete internationally..."
photo
WI Patriot
Defending the Constitution.
11:01 PM on 01/27/2012
Yes, unions, especially public-sector unions, need to get going in China - so they can bankrupt them also.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FogBelter
Illegitimis non carborundum
03:20 AM on 01/28/2012
You do love carrying water for the Bankers don't you?
03:24 AM on 01/28/2012
Sorry, your argument is not supported by facts. Income equality is bankrupting the nation. The wealthy hoarding and hiding their money from being taxed is bankrupting the nation. The truth is now coming out that companies getting tax breaks do not increase employment. They are still downsizing even as they are raking in record profits during this recession, so who's broke? Who's bankrupt? Only the little guy. When we had stronger unions thirty or so years ago one wage earner could support a family and buy a house. You think that is coincidence?

Someone must have spoon fed you this rhetoric because it doesn't stand up to the simple fact that standard of living is going down and cost of living is rising. It is well known that unions raise pay and working conditions and most of our basic labour laws (minimum wage, etc.,) came from the early years of collective bargaining. Are you so conservative that you agree child labour laws are "stupid" as some Governors in the US now state? They are talking about having children get real jobs in mines and crap! Clearly you have lived your life with the labour gains of your grandparents without having to fight for basic rights. You would have us go back 100 years, because if we don't have the ability to collective bargain and unionize, these companies that use sweatshop labour in other countries would have no problem bringing back jobs to this country for about $1/hour!
08:55 PM on 01/27/2012
I've often wondered why we can't shut the oil tap off except to companies doing business in Canada and to Canadian citizens. It doesn't cost $100/barrel to extract oil from Alberta sands but we pay prices based on world speculated prices/barrel. Then we as a country could have an energy advantage just like China has a labor advantage. The rest of the world may have energy problems but we don't. Aren't we allowed to play the game from our strengths? We can't dictate to any country about a world hourly pay wage but we have to pay a dictated world price for oil. This game is set up so that very few people become extremely wealthy at the expense of the many. We have tremendous advantages over most countries in terms of resources yet for some strange reason, some world entity says we have to play with our hands tied behind our backs. We always seem to be playing by unfair rules; just like deciding the World Juniors when the top nation plays without 8 or 9 of its elite players.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
03:35 PM on 01/27/2012
As Sid Ryan, president of the Ontario Federation of Labour, explains, “There’s only one way we can fight globalization, and that’s to reach out to unions

I believe we have to if we want a working wage to be a living wage. Too often the trade off has been, if you are working for $2.00/hour in Mexico why not Canada. Wow! Is that a threat?
02:06 PM on 01/27/2012
I think what Syd Ryan means is, "workers of the world unite."
This comment has been removed.
09:19 AM on 01/27/2012
Asia needs unions just as the west needed them to make it possible for the worker to earn enough to make a decent life for himself. The West needs unions to restore decent wages. Right now corporations run government and drive wages down as profits and bonuses rise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
11:15 AM on 01/27/2012
You're forgetting Asia, or specifically China, uses currency manipulation to ensure that their citizens are able to live of the meager wages they make.. It interesting, because in the West corporations run the government and are turning our democracy into an oligarchy, but in the East (or China) government runs the corporations... Which is better?

I'd choose neither in favour of democracy... Alas, the West's democracy may be dying along with the labour unions...
03:53 AM on 01/28/2012
I support worker-owned companies that hire the management rather than vice versa.
05:15 AM on 01/28/2012
Or compell corporations to have unions on the board. I also think unions have to think more in terms of society so that they are not able to get their wage and benefits demands met at the cost of the general well being of society. And the corporation may not refuse wage and benefits demands if it has survived because the unions gave up their demands so the corporation wouldn't go under
12:39 PM on 01/29/2012
That's a great Idea, so if the ~700 workers at ElectroMotive in London combined with all the Electromotive worker worldwide (~3200) could just scrape a couple of bucks together then they could buy the plant from caterpillar.

Okay lets see... in 2010 EMD was bought for 810 million, it has increase in value since then, so lets estimate it at 850 million... that's only $265 625 each, Wow, these guys should be able to pull that pocket change out (btw good luck getting financing for the venture). Oh wait, There is also going to be costs for the purchase... and then restructuring to the type of management system... and if this goes through then this extremely untested management system will probably drastically drop share prices impacting operating revenue, so the owners will probably have to back it up, probably at least to the tune of 50-100K each minimum.

So great idea; if you can get 3200 people to agree on how to manage a multinational corporation, and get off the 350K they each have just laying around.

By the way, communism is a great idea too when you look at it, but just try to put it into practice.
08:33 AM on 01/27/2012
Lets send Kenny and Sid to Mars to organize a few units and leave them there
This comment has been removed.