Oil Pipeline Decision Not Foregone Conclusion, Says B.C.

Pipeline

First Posted: 01/28/2012 1:20 pm Updated: 01/30/2012 11:35 pm


B.C. Environment Minister Terry Lake says critics are wrong to suggest the provincial government has already decided to support the Northern Gateway pipeline that would carry oil from Alberta to Kitimat.


Internal documents released in response to a Freedom of Information request show the industry was lobbying the government well before the start of a federal review this month, but publicly, the province has refused to take a stand.


The 371 pages of documents include stacks of notes and e-mails, including a brief by Enbridge to the environment minister last year, saying the pipeline would bring billions of dollars in benefits.


But any options or recommendations from ministry staff have been blanked out, as NDP environment critic Rob Fleming points out.


"Really, the good parts have been left out of these documents for the public to see," Fleming said.


But Lake says it's not true to suggest the government is quietly supporting the project. Environmental hearings on the project are now under way.


'We absolutely have not made up our minds on this. It's important we go through the process," said Lake.


Calls NDP 'irresponsible'


“It's an interesting contrast that the NDP has made up their minds before the information is complete. I think that's irresponsible.”


Lake said only after the province has weighed all the technical issues will it say yes or no to the Northern Gateway.


Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Natural resources Minister Joe Oliver stirred up a controversy earlier this month when they suggested that “foreigners” could “hijack” the review process.


The federal government’s concern is that well-funded environmental groups from Europe and the U.S. who are opposed to the project could dominate the hearings.


The $5.5-billion project is a proposal by Canadian oil and gas company Enbridge to build two pipelines stretching 1,177 kilometres between the Alberta oilsands and the West Coast.


Northern Gateway would have the capacity to transport 525,000 barrels of oil per day.


Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

B.C. Environment Minister Terry Lake says critics are wrong to suggest the provincial government has already decided to support the Northern Gateway pipeline that would carry oil from Alb...
B.C. Environment Minister Terry Lake says critics are wrong to suggest the provincial government has already decided to support the Northern Gateway pipeline that would carry oil from Alb...
Filed by Jacqueline Delange  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 38
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:24 PM on 03/21/2012
The provincial government is waiting for all the facts before deciding yea or nay on the Northern Gateway Pipeline? If true that would be a first! Here are some of the facts they should consider;
(1) 525,000 barrels of bitumen a day through the pipe requires 1,050,000,000 gallons of pure water per day to be polluted to extract that bitumen.
(2) there is a constant swelling of the ranks on the anti pipeline side and there are already enough of us radical environmentalists to effect the outcome of the next provincial election.
(3) The CSIS issued a report indicating that if the First Nations and environmentalists joined in common cause against the pipeline it would become a nightmare for the pro side. This has happened in B.C.
(4) Assuming that both the federal and Provincial governments are monitoring the social media they are by now aware that the Lakota and Bella Bella have joined together to fight the pipe through a shared 48 hour Fasting.

If i was the presently elected Premier of B.C. and wanted to be so again I would pay attention to the above facts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gravescanada
06:24 AM on 01/29/2012
I have two problems with this. First "But any options or recommendations from ministry staff have been blanked out, as NDP environment critic Rob Fleming points out." So what were they hiding?
Second, "Northern Gateway would have the capacity to transport 525,000 barrels of oil per day." Its not oil, its Diluted Bitumen. They are NOT the same thing. Diluted Bitumen is more corrosive, acidic and must be heated and pumped through the pipeline. The Large diameter pipelines in Alberta have rates of internal corrosion that are comparable to those in the United States. This is actually a sign of trouble, as the U.S. pipeline system is on average twice as old as the Alberta pipeline system. Because the risk of internal corrosion increases with pipeline age, the newer Alberta pipeline system should also have a significantly lower rate of internal corrosion. That it doesn’t is evidence of a potential problem

http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/aswift/alberta_innovates_report_shows.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SeanMartin
Everything in moderation.
11:22 PM on 01/28/2012
>> "But any options or recommendations from ministry staff have been blanked out"

I thought that only matters of "national security" were blanked out in something sent in response to a Freedom of Information request. Are we now expanding that to include "damn, there goes my re-election!"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FredSanders
I Have An F- Rating From The NRA
08:02 PM on 01/28/2012
Campaign contributions by Corporations and the threat_of no more campaign contributions, and ears in Ottawa are bent, in secret:
_____________

Freedom of Information request show the industry was lobbying the government well before the start of a federal review this month, but publicly, the province has refused to take a stand.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FredSanders
I Have An F- Rating From The NRA
08:00 PM on 01/28/2012
How come he still gets to call himself the Environment Minister?
Shouldn't it be Ethical Oil and Carbon_Burning Minister, friend only of the Unethical Oil and Gas and Coal Barons?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opprobrious
More speech. Less Flagging.
07:56 PM on 01/28/2012
Okay so, you're in Vegas and the house is taking bets on whether the BC Liberals will support the pipeline or not. Care to bet your house on "no"? The fact is, they'd support this project in a heartbeat if it weren't for all those pesky BC voters who probably aren't all that thrilled with the idea.
07:07 PM on 01/28/2012
Want to talk about foreign interests? What about China? They have a lot vested in the construction of this pipeline. What about Keystone in the States? They would love to use this pipeline as precedent for the approval of the new Transcanada pipeline route. What about Kinder Morgan, whose Texan CEO's (ex-Enron execs) own the oil port in Burrard Inlet and would love to see the increase in oil exports through the Northwest Passage.

If Harper can only manage to create jobs and increase our GDP through the building of this pipeline, I think it's a bit sad- and shortsighted.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastkid
07:02 PM on 01/28/2012
How come the comments aren't displayed for this article?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastkid
06:05 PM on 01/28/2012
This pipeline will never be built.

The people of BC will never let it happen.

Unacceptable environmental risks for little gain outside of the oil industry inner circles.

BC shoulders all the risk and Alberta (but mainly oil company executives) take all the rewards.

No thanks!

Northern Gateway will NEVER be built!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ansdlmol
07:13 PM on 01/28/2012
Don't bet your last dollar on that. I feel sure that the Keystone XL will prevail but if it doesn't then the Northern Gateway WILL be built. It is only a very vocal but insignificant lobby who are ranting about this project. The vast,silent, majority just want the economic spin off so they can continue to live the lifestyle they have become accustomed to.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
08:30 AM on 01/29/2012
If the silent do not use their right to speak, the weight of what YOU ( who claim to speak for ALL of them) have to say on their (supposed) behalf is irrelevant.

The lobby you're talking about is not insignificant by any measure. You, however, ARE.
08:16 PM on 01/28/2012
"BC shoulders all the risk and Alberta (but mainly oil company executives­) take all the rewards."

You obviously are from the West Coast. First of all, pipelines aren't built to fail yet the green propaganda machine has a lot of people thinking this - total nonsense. How to you think the gas in the gas stations in Vancouver got there ? Given the ratio of barrels of product delivered vs spills the 250,000 miles of pipelines in N.America have a better safety record than the airlines .

http://vector1media.com/spatialsustain/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/all_pipe.jpg

The Univ. of Calgary's School of Public Policy has estimated that in its first 15 years of production , the pipeline will add 131 BILLION dollars to Canada's economic bottom line.
That's a lot of tax revenue to pay for schools, hospitals, roads, etc.
" for mainly oil executives" ? - nearly 30% of the TSX is invested in the OIlsands - that's part of every pension plan in Canada for teachers, nurses, public workers, police , etc. as well as parts of private pension plans. Millions of people's retirement plans are tied to the OilSands because it's a solid investment compared to horrors of Wall Street .
Lastly , there are 3 main world benchmarks for oil , Texas Intermediate, Brent Sea, Saudi Light.
Those that control them are paying tens of millions to Big Green to stop Canada from establishing another - it's global corporate sabotage , period.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeterTheChanter
08:33 PM on 01/28/2012
You're clearly a petro-gangster, or deep in the pockets of the petro-gangsters..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Creox
Life is too important to take seriously.
10:22 PM on 01/28/2012
Every pipe line leaks. Every one.

There have been several hundred leaks in Enbridge pipelines since they have been making them.