Prosperity Mine: Review Underway For Another Environmentally Controversial B.C. Project

Pipeline

First Posted: 01/29/2012 4:00 am Updated: 01/30/2012 9:08 am

WILLIAMS LAKE, B.C. - With all eyes on hearings for the controversial Northern Gateway pipeline that would link Alberta's oil sands to tankers on the B.C. coast, a federal environmental review of another contentious B.C. project is quietly getting underway.

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency has released guidelines and terms of reference that will form the framework for an environmental review of Taseko Mines Ltd.'s (TSX:TKO) proposed Prosperity gold and copper mine in the B.C. Interior.

The agency is seeking comments on the documents until Feb. 22.

But the approach of Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government toward the federal hearings on the Northern Gateway doesn't give First Nations opponents much faith in the environmental review of the mine.

"We feel the writing's on the wall," Chief Joe Alphonse, leader of the Tsilqhot'in National Government, said in an interview.

"Mr. Harper is making statements around the Enbridge project that anyone opposing the project is an enemy of Canada. That's the same situation."

Alphonse said he fears that approval of the Prosperity Mine, 125 kilometres southwest of Williams Lake, B.C., is a foregone conclusion.

The Tsilqhot'in will still take part in the review, however, "as distasteful as that might be," Alphonse said.

"Our position is that we have to participate to protect our interests... we still have to go through the motions because, at the end of the day, when that political process fails us, we still have to turn to the courts for justice and the moment we walk into a courtroom they're going to tell us: you had to participate."

Taseko's original proposal for the $1.5-billion project was accepted by the province but rejected by a federal environmental panel last year because the company wanted to drain Fish Lake for use as a tailings pond.

The revised proposal would see the company spend $300 million to build its own tailings pond, rather than use the trout-bearing lake, known to local First Nations as Tetzan Biny.

In December, the Tsilqhot'in First Nation was granted a court injunction to stop Taseko from undertaking exploratory work on the mine pending the review.

Although the Tsilqhot'in will participate in the review, the band did not apply for money from a federal fund for aboriginal groups to participate, nor did most other First Nations groups in the area.

The federal agency announced last week that nine groups will split nearly $138,000 in federal funding to participate in the review.

But while more than $200,000 was available to aboriginal groups to allow them to participate, only one group made an application. The Esketemc First Nation asked for and received $27,800.

The Metis Nation of British Columbia, whose application was transferred from a general funding program, will also receive $19,000.

Seven other interest groups will receive a total of $91,000 from the separate, general participant funding program, including Friends of Nemaiah Valley, which will receive $19,000, and the Sierra Club of British Columbia, which will receive $18,600.

MiningWatch Canada, the Williams Lake and District Chamber of Commerce, Share the Cariboo-Chilcotin Resources Society, and the Environmental Mining Education Foundation will also receive funds, as well as an individual named Federico G. Osorio.

Brian Battison, vice-president of corporate affairs for Taseko, said the company is looking at the guidelines and preparing its response, which is "a tremendous amount of work."

Battison said much of the original mine proposal was accepted by the first review panel, and those aspects will not have to be reviewed again. What has changed are the two aspects around the use of Fish Lake as a tailings pond.

"It's a significant difference. It's a $300-million difference in terms of cost, to save the lake."

Battison said the project has community support in the Cariboo region, where it will have a significant economic impact.

Agency spokesperson Lucille Jamault said members of the public have until Feb. 22 to submit written comments on the draft guidelines and the terms of reference, then the next step will be for the federal environment minister to name the panel, which was given a year to complete the review when it was announced last November.

A band election in Tsi Del Del, in Alexis Creek, earlier this month served as a referendum of sorts on the issue. Chief Percy Guichon, a vocal critic of the mine development, soundly defeated a challenger who was in favour of the mine in a campaign dominated by the issue.

Taseko says Prosperity - the largest undeveloped gold-copper deposit in Canada and seventh largest in the world - will generate 71,000 jobs over the course of its operation and put $10 billion in government coffers.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

WILLIAMS LAKE, B.C. - With all eyes on hearings for the controversial Northern Gateway pipeline that would link Alberta's oil sands to tankers on the B.C. coast, a federal environmental review of anot...
WILLIAMS LAKE, B.C. - With all eyes on hearings for the controversial Northern Gateway pipeline that would link Alberta's oil sands to tankers on the B.C. coast, a federal environmental review of anot...
Filed by Lauren Strapagiel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:54 PM on 01/29/2012
Canada is moving forward and the US is becoming a skunk when it comes to prosperity and success.
photo
Liz Wilson 2
“a small group can change the world
09:22 AM on 01/30/2012
I would not consider projects with little regard for the long term impact on the environment to be progress or forward movement.

Jobs can be secured, ore mined, the environment protected, and profit made if we had a government that stipulated that the environment was the primary consideration. Right now we use the equivilant of brute force to extract ore because fast and furious is considered essential for profit. If companies had to pay the true costs for the ore they take I suspect that better mining practises would be developed in a very short time. I would even support the development of centers of excellence where scientists and dedicated others could work to find better ways to extract ore and protect the environment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
06:39 PM on 01/29/2012
You want electric cars?
You need copper.
You want to live off the grid and generate your own juice?
You need copper.
You want to fill your life with electronic gizmos?
You need copper.
You want to use less 'dirty' fossil fuels?
You are gonna need a s**tload of copper.
07:07 PM on 01/29/2012
amen. thats the side people dont want to see, well said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
07:14 PM on 01/29/2012
Thanks
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Molly D
06:38 AM on 01/30/2012
As an American liberal I have to remind people gasoline doesn't appear magically, nor anything else they like to consume. People that recycle a bit of plastic and paper, think they've squared with consumerism and can use unlimited quantities of anything and they are in harmony with nature.
03:52 PM on 01/29/2012
I am confident that the process currently in place to regulate this particular development will be effective. These projects are required to proceed, for the very well being of local residents. If we know, without a doubt, the project will proceed, than it becomes our only duty to ensure it is done properly. Harper isn't to blame, the Cons, aren't to blame. We, the people, demanded economic action, with real projects and growth. Mining is what we know how to do, and we do a damn good job of it. These environmental reviews need to be done more efficiently, and ongoing regulation of Taseko is required, that is all. Unfettered resource extraction will not occur in this country, not on our watch, but sustainable, environmentally protected industry will proceed. We need to stop wasting time arguing back and forth, and get Canadians to work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
04:01 PM on 01/29/2012
Zombie talk from a mining p.r. shill......

We do mining so well that we're persona non grata in more than a dozen countries where our companies are violating even the loose labour and environmental regs in those countries. This is so much the case in Latin America that in areas there where Canadian mining companies are established it's not a good thing to let people know you're Canadian....

And for the mining industry to say "environmentally protected industry" when for years their barstool pundits were loudly talking about how environmental regs were bullshit and miners should do what they want etc.......I mean, how much of your own bafflegab can you swallow before you start vomiting yourself?

We need real economic development. Not more foreign-owned resource extraction schemes funded by the Canadian taxpayer and shoved down our throats by politicians in the pay of the mining companies.
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
11:43 PM on 01/29/2012
Fanned by the SiameseTrainer for Truth!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
06:20 PM on 01/29/2012
We are going to need copper in the future.
That is pretty much 100% a sure thing.
We need to do it.
We need to do it properly.
I agree with your comments 100%
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
09:03 AM on 01/30/2012
It's not like this is the only copper mine in BC, or that somehow we're DESPERATE for copper. And this isn't just about copper, it's about gold.....

We're also going to need fresh air and water in future. You maybe have a way to smelt copper that doesn't use air or water??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:19 PM on 01/29/2012
Just another way to skrew the natives by the Harper government. 5.5 Billion for the Chinnese purchase of the tar sands isn't really that bad is it? Considering they are pumping that amout to Chicago every 18 days or so. Pretty good return for the Chinese poluters that we have to pay the carbon taxes on. Another great deal will be the pipeline to Kittimat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
03:12 PM on 01/29/2012
Did we inadvertently elect a totalitarian government?

http://www.leadnow.ca/fair-hearings
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sdgreen
01:54 PM on 01/29/2012
OK let us not sell resources, then I must ask where does revenue come from to support essential government programs?

Let us just go back to the cave man days. Our Cities, Towns, and villages will deteriorate; healthcare and education will fail, utilities will fail. Canada is and always has been a nation of resource based industries.

If anything we need to continue to pump oil, dig for minerals, and do the wood thing, what else have we got that replaces the revenues these industries provide?
03:18 PM on 01/29/2012
Nonsense. First of all, environmental reviews are necessary to assess whether or not a resource extraction project has adequate plans in place to prevent pollution, unnecessary habitat destruction, and detrimental effects on the local residents. The process requires public input and detailed data on vegetation, soils, wildlife, water, etc. in the areas to be affected. Some projects are rejected, while the rest have to incorporate the recommendations of the review process to proceed. Otherwise, there would be no restraints on the destruction that could be wreaked by resource-hungry companies. I've seen first-hand the results of unfettered mining projects, and it is truly appalling. And some now-closed mines require huge amounts of government money to clean up the mess they left, which can take many many years.

Second, no one in their right mind is saying there can be no mining, logging, whatever. Obviously, we need metals, oil, wood, etc. There are always extremists on both sides of environmental issues, and what is needed is for reason and common sense to prevail, and that means recognition by the companies that they don't own the water, air, soil, wildlife, etc., and must abide by rules that ensure the absolute minimal destruction of those things.

Third, continuing to pollute the earth is the way we'll ultimately wind up living like cave men. We humans need to curb our wastefulness and find less destructive ways of getting what we need if we want our so-called civilization to survive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
03:21 PM on 01/29/2012
Extraction of resources is not in question.

Unfettered extraction is!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastkid
01:07 PM on 01/29/2012
Wow, 71,000 jobs! No way that is a gross exaggeration...

That would only be 6,000 more jobs than the current largest employer in Canada - the Ontario Public Service.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/careers/top-employers/top-employers-2012/the-list-canadas-top-100-employers-for-2012/article2169342/

This must be one heck of a mine!

Why stop there. I'm sure they could makes some great headlines with even bigger numbers - seeing as how we are suspending all reality anyways.....

Enbridge should take a page out of Taseko's book if they really want to get their pipeline done:

pssssst!! I heard the Northern Gateway pipeline will create 100 million jobs! Tell your friends!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hunted
12:44 PM on 01/29/2012
To the far right of the conservatives lurks facism. How far will will Harper try to take Canada?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
03:11 PM on 01/29/2012
All the way if nobody stands up.
10:00 PM on 01/29/2012
bull**it !!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:06 PM on 01/29/2012
this is fantastic news. cant wait to put more people back to work and reap the benifits of this venture on a global scale. its time to brush aside the hippies and get to work. as far as the so called "natives" stance on this and other projects, this is gtetting a bit pathetic. im tired of certain groups of people in my country getting special treatment. i thought we all had the same oppertunity. if people want things in this country then they work for it, not one person in canada should be above this. pay your taxes and then you get a say, like a share holder in a company gets their say. lets get to work !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Keith E
Earth Warrior
12:19 PM on 01/29/2012
Most jobs are temporary. The exploiting of our resources is the main goal here. By foreign investors ironically (or not).

Maybe you have something to gain here but in the big picture this is nothing less then stealing from Canada to benefit very few.
goleafsgo
A Lie stands on one leg, Truth on two.
12:19 PM on 01/29/2012
Who the hll are you talking about???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
12:30 PM on 01/29/2012
His 3 fans.
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Keith E
Earth Warrior
11:56 AM on 01/29/2012
And tell your friends our government considers someone who cares about our environment "Radical" and "An enemy of Canada".

If thats not a red flag i don't know what is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Keith E
Earth Warrior
11:53 AM on 01/29/2012
This great country is being exploited by foreign powers. And I'm not talking about Greenpeace. Bottom feeders like the Koch's have big interest in stealing our resources. Follow the money and you'll find there is barely any incentives for the 99ers in Canada. Harper is merely the frontman for these scoundrels.

Corporations are dictating the rules. I recently installed a Bell-hub internet device for a neighbor and couldn't believe how complicated the fine print in the contract was. So many ways to get overcharged it was sickening. And the penalties are severe. In some cases $30 dollars per megabyte penalties can be levied. Most users of the bell-hub are outside of normal internet connections where the only alternative is dial-up. They take advantage of rural areas essentially.

That is just one example.

Plans are in the works to sell out municipal water services to be profitized by private investors. Hydro costs continue to rise. Middle class jobs are shrinking. Harper see's no problem with an American corporation Caterpiller in cutting decent middle income wage jobs to near minimum wage overnight while the company rakes in record profits in the billions.

My understanding is most people don't understand whats going on but when you point it out they find it just as disturbing as I do. Spread the word Canadians.
goleafsgo
A Lie stands on one leg, Truth on two.
12:21 PM on 01/29/2012
I hear you loud and clear, Keith.
Fanned and faved
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
11:47 AM on 01/29/2012
The media keep on talking about this mine as if it were in the Cariboo, it's not. The region it's in is called the Chilcotin, which has been tied up with the Cariboo historically, particularly in electoral districts and regional districts, but is a very different area. The Cariboo is ONLY east of the Fraser, the Chilcotin is what's west of it.

Talking about the economic benefits to the Cariboo when the environmental and social costs are in the Chilcotin is just a shell-game. It's like saying it's OK to devastate Prince Edward Island in order to create some jobs in New Brunswick......
This comment has been removed.
10:37 AM on 01/29/2012
71,000 jobs? That seems rather high for a mining project. While I understand that it's stated to be over the course of it's operation, even Magna doesn't employ that many people. Are they seriously stating this will become one of the top employers in Canada?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
11:44 AM on 01/29/2012
There's only 11,150 people in Williams Lake, the town which stands most to benefit from this....I heard a figure like 150 or 300 fulltime jobs, no much more during initial construction....maybe of those 17,000 jobs they mean the waitress and dishpig jobs at diners on Highway 97? Or do they mean jobs for stockbrokers and realtors in some distant city profiting off the destruction of a remote mountain most of them don't even know where it is?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KNW
11:48 AM on 01/29/2012
They're probably factoring in spin-off jobs that come with a community's sudden increase in disposable income.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:10 PM on 01/29/2012
Just as the figures for the XL Pipeline, the jobs figures are made up to get people riled up. I love the bridge building crew locally in my rural town. Supposedly 200 jobs over 5 years (when the bond issue was coming up). The job took 8 months - 4months a year for two years. Crews amounted to 15 -25 guys a few days a week. Some jobs were one day with two trucks and 6 guys. Face it - If someone wants to make bundles of money, get the government to pitch in and support it, claim thousands of jobs for ever 20 there will be, and nobody will know how to react. And when it goes sour, and people are displaced, we will see the same fuzzy maths in reverse - every 1000 First Nation citizens get to be 20 or so. Ask a US White guy the name of the battle where General Custer was killed. Ask him how many Native people were there. How many soldiers. I learned it was 20,000 Natives and 100 soldiers. Hmmm. Who wrote the history books?