B.C. Premier Plans Liquefied Natural Gas Exports

Christy Clark

First Posted: 02/ 3/2012 4:45 pm Updated: 02/ 6/2012 11:35 am


Liquefied natural gas is the future of energy exports in B.C., Premier Christy Clark announced on Friday morning.


Clark was at Burnaby's BCIT campus to set out a new 10-year energy plan for the province, which includes the construction of two liquid natural gas plants in northern B.C. by 2020.


The premier said the plants in Kitimat would generate $2 billion in new revenue for the government each year.


"Like all commodities, natural gas prices go up and down. But one thing is clear to us: it is worth a lot more to us in Asia than it is in North America — a market to which we are currently captive," said Clark.


A pipeline that would deliver the gas from northeast B.C. to Kitimat has already been approved, and the National Energy Board has also approved the export permits needed to send the liquefied natural gas overseas.


The B.C. government said future liquid natural gas exploration and development could produce around $20 billion in investment and create thousands of new long-term jobs.


In a related announcement the premier revealed a change in the province's standard for energy self-sufficiency, which will clear the way for the liquid natural gas plants to get the enormous power requirements they need to convert the gas.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

Liquefied natural gas is the future of energy exports in B.C., Premier Christy Clark announced on Friday morning. Clark was at Burnaby's BCIT campus to set out a new 10-year e...
Liquefied natural gas is the future of energy exports in B.C., Premier Christy Clark announced on Friday morning. Clark was at Burnaby's BCIT campus to set out a new 10-year e...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Voices in the Wilderness
10:18 AM on 02/06/2012
I wonder if anyone ever thinks these things through. Sure Natural gas prices are higher in Asia than North America - NOW. But everyone and his dog is now planning on building LNG plants to export to Asia. Ultimately, natural gas prices will fall in Asia and rise in North America. Will all those LNG facilities be viable at lower prices? Will Tar Sands output be viable with more expensive natural gas? The energy output of the tar sands is composed of 30% natural gas inputs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
11:53 PM on 02/04/2012
Christie Clark is like the Sarah Palin of BC Politics, eh?
09:34 AM on 02/04/2012
china has invested 20 billion in the tar sands --as part of the deal they get to dictate when the stuff is refined -------so when you see the alberta premiere dancing around the issue ---keep in mind she has a little secret -
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gravescanada
09:07 AM on 02/04/2012
Here is how we solve our dependance on oil in the short term, till we have real long term alternative in green energy. Power Diesel Trucks and Locomotives with LNG. Let those who want to keep driving Minivans and Pickup Trucks to switch to LNG. Get Electric Cars into full production at a reasonable price and the demand for oil dwindles. Over time innovation will provide us with wind and solar power and other alternatives to oil such as hydrogen engines. Oil Products will always be needed, but not necessarily as fuel. That is our future.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
chuck nathaniel
Your micro-bio is pending approval
11:54 PM on 02/04/2012
Natural Gas is in no way a 'green' replacement for oil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JBSCanada
They paved Paradise and put up a parking lot!
12:14 AM on 02/05/2012
No oil spills.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gravescanada
08:06 AM on 02/05/2012
Just the facts.
Natural gas is an extremely important source of energy for reducing pollution and maintaining a clean and healthy environment. In addition to being a domestically abundant and secure source of energy, the use of natural gas also offers a number of environmental benefits over other sources of energy, particularly other fossil fuels.

http://www.naturalgas.org/environment/naturalgas.asp
06:59 AM on 02/04/2012
how long before a LNG tank explodes sending kitimat to the middle of the pacific
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JBSCanada
They paved Paradise and put up a parking lot!
11:40 PM on 02/04/2012
WHAT?... WHAT?...

I still can't hear that guy...

;)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
06:09 AM on 02/04/2012
Now is the wrong time to be making any deals regarding natural gas. The price has been in the toilet for years now. Alberta is basicly giving it away just to sustain the drilling industry. Which keeps the price low. Which puts pressure on the drilling industry
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gravescanada
09:02 AM on 02/04/2012
Heated Diluted Bitumen literally eats the pipeline in flow through, due to its acidic and corrosive properties. Liquid Natural Gas is easy to pipe, does not do the devastating damage if their is a leak and will be worth billions in Asia. Considering your past stance on Diluted Bitumen, I would have thought you would have been for this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
10:52 AM on 02/04/2012
They have been allowing the gas industry in Alberta to produce for almost 5 years now without having to pay royalties. This applies to new wells. So the industry just shuts in the old wells and only produces on the new wells. That means the province is getting screwed out of a lot of money. Now is not the time to expand on that practice.
01:32 AM on 02/04/2012
British Columbia has some of the world's greatest potential for generating clean, sustainable electricity from the tides, and in fact have some of the best research/technologists designing and licensing technologies that are actually put in place in other countries. LNG sounds like a good start, but start to think outside your fossil fuel "box". There are alternatives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JBSCanada
They paved Paradise and put up a parking lot!
02:18 AM on 02/04/2012
Agreed!

F&F for you!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
north of 60
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
11:22 PM on 02/03/2012
Kitimat is the wrong port for any hydrocarbon product. Spend some time with Google maps and look at how sensible it would be to follow the existing highway and railway right-of-way to Prince Rupert and totally avoid the treacherously navigable and environmentally sensitive fjord from Kitimat to the coast.

The problem isn't the pipeline, the problem is where they want to put it. Kitimat is wrong-headed for everyone but Alcoa.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opprobrious
More speech. Less Flagging.
09:35 PM on 02/03/2012
Liquified nat gas in Kitimat of all places. Anyone care to guess her opinion on the Northern Gateway pipeline?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
northof49th
08:46 PM on 02/03/2012
Is that a out of focus Allison Redford the premier of Alberta in the back ground. Wow does that add more chances of a oil and now gas spill in the straight where Kitimant is situated.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:29 PM on 02/03/2012
the real "natural gas" , naturally occuring , accessable , chemical free ... a good move .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JBSCanada
They paved Paradise and put up a parking lot!
08:26 PM on 02/03/2012
Christy hits a home-run!

Of course, it goes without saying that we should all wean ourselves off of fossil fuels, including natural gas which is (arguably) the cleanest of all the fossil fuels.

I'm hoping that one day, especially as solar, wind, geothermal and hydrogen, approach price parity with conventional power plant fuels - that fossil fuel use will decline.

Until then, for each gigawatt of power produced by power plants in China, natural gas is many times cleaner that the fuels they are using at the moment.

Switching to natural gas benefits China's environment, but on account of the vast quantities of dirty fuel they presently burn for power, it has a world-wide (positive) effect when they switch to a much cleaner fuel.

One of the best things about LNG, in case of pipeline accident, LNG dissipates into the atmosphere instead of flowing into creeks, rivers, drinking water wells, onto pasture-land and into the ocean as crude oil does during a spill event. No mass deaths of living animals such as was seen during the Exxon Valdez oil spill.

Unless ignited, (high-pressure LNG does burn) merely shutting off the tap and waiting for the vapours to clear, is enough to solve the problem until the pipeline can be repaired.

So much better than a crude oil pipeline to our "tourist-magnet" BC coastline! There is really no comparison.

Congratulations, Premier Clark.
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
01:08 AM on 02/04/2012
I mostly agree with you about the benefits of shipping LNG over Alberta Tar out of a BC port. But your cheer leading for Premier Kristy Kreme is very off-putting. Who is going to build, own and maintain the major facilities required at the new energy Port of Kittimat, the Province of BC or some American Energy Corporation? Will Kristy Kreme hold out for top dollar return on royalties from the gas fields, the transmission lines, port fees, and forego giving ever more tax breaks to hugely profitable corporations who claim the right to give us the business? If she manages to do that instead of the steady sell out like the Province of Alberta then perhaps half of your praise might be justified. I will not hold my breath.
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
01:19 AM on 02/04/2012
And one more thing, you forgot the one universal and basic first lesson of capitalism; that structure is best that provides the most profit and requires the least capital. Once a Port for Energy transhipment to Asia is established for LNG in Kitimat then Kitimat will be the end point, and shipping point, for the tar you seem to loath traveling our shores. "Congratulations Premier Clark"? "So much better than a crude oil pipeline to our "tourist-m­agnet" BC coastline! There is really no comparison­." those are the words you will live to eat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JBSCanada
They paved Paradise and put up a parking lot!
02:14 AM on 02/04/2012
Sorry to be, ahem, "off-putting" - I was always told I was "off purring" - somewhere.

But in our democracy, the freedom to hold one's own political beliefs are an important freedom. I won't be giving up my rights anytime soon.

I do agree that Prince Rupert is a much safer and better LNG terminus than Kitimat - as the pipeline is not yet built, I fully intend to push for a Prince Rupert terminus.

Care to join me and others in that?

Its my position that when politicians or anyone does any "good" thing, they should be rewarded. In fact, I must do that, as I am among the loudest to complain when things do go "wrong."

If "they" try to sneak in a crude oil pipeline on the back of this LNG pipeline, in the words of CBC's Kady O'Malley, "Governments *will* fall."

"They" will deserve it.

Until then, Cheers fellow feline fan!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr e MaN
Political Atheist
07:59 PM on 02/03/2012
As long as the plan does not include the odious act of fracking. But I have read thar BC is one of the worst frackers of all. For more see the movie Gasland
09:07 PM on 02/03/2012
Please explain fracking...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bonnie davis
09:33 PM on 02/03/2012
all over the media- just Google it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opprobrious
More speech. Less Flagging.
09:34 PM on 02/03/2012
Short answer...
Hydraulic fracking is used to release gas from bedrock. A combination of highly pressurized water and chemicals (whose makeup is not known as companies are not required to disclose) is injected into the ground causing fissures in the rock and, in turn, a release of natural gas.
The issue concerning fracking (other than the amount of water used to achieve this) is the risk of contamination to the water table. The industry claims that there is no risk and environmentalists and those whose water has suddenly become undrinkable say other wise. New fracking sites are now being deployed at accelerated rates throughout Canada and the US and in places where no such drilling has taken place before, including places where population density is relatively high. In BC, the federal and provincial governments have waived environmental impact studies as a requirement before drilling may commence.
photo
BentleysPal
We'd be better off if Springers ruled the world
07:36 PM on 02/03/2012
Great news. Market diversification...good call, Premier!
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
01:30 AM on 02/04/2012
My, yet another Premiers Office Employee heard from. Can't you guys and gals try at least a little subterfuge? Great poll results for you today..eh? ;>}
photo
BentleysPal
We'd be better off if Springers ruled the world
08:13 AM on 02/04/2012
Ummmm....nice try. Not a BC resident. You missed by about 3500 km. YOu would be correct however, in accusing me of supporting NG as the best transition fuel to alternatives. Guilty as charged.
07:19 PM on 02/03/2012
natural gas prices go up and down -----yes according to supply and demand ------

that was before fracking flooded the market for the next 100 years ----

good luck with the "go up" part
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
01:32 AM on 02/04/2012
Once the infrastructure is in place for the LNG, Alberta Tar will follow, it is the capitalist way. This is the wedge in the door, and the Elders bought it.