Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird Compares Iranian Threats To Israel And Nuclear Ambition To Holocaust

Baird Holocaust Iran Israel

First Posted: 02/ 5/2012 1:46 pm Updated: 02/ 5/2012 9:38 pm

OTTAWA - Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird invoked images of the Holocaust in defending the notion of possible Israeli military action against Iran.

Appearing on CTV's Question Period Sunday, he suggested the Jewish state has every right to feel threatened and pointed to recent comments by the Islamic republic's supreme leader, who vowed to remove a "cancer" from the Middle East.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in a speech broadcast across Iran on Friday, also pledged to aid any nation or group that challenges Israel.

"Obviously you can understand why the Jewish people and why Israel would take him seriously," Baird said in an interview with the news program from Israel.

"Hitler wrote Mein Kampf more than a decade before he became Chancellor of Germany. And they take these issues pretty seriously here."

The book Mein Kampf laid the foundation of Nazi ideology, which led to the Second World War and eventually the Holocaust.

Baird's comments added to the escalating war of words during the weekend over Iran's nuclear enrichment program.

The deputy head of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guard also warned in an interview with the semi-official Fars news agency that any country in the Middle East whose territory is used to launch a military strike will face retaliation.

Hossein Salami was quoted as saying Tehran will use "retaliatory aggression" against its neighbours if they aid in such an attack.

The Iranian Charge d'Affaires, Kambiz Sheikh-Hassani, recently criticized both Baird and Prime Minister Stephen Harper in an email to the Ottawa publication Embassy Magazine, calling their statements on Iran "uninformed, undocumented, and inflammatory" rhetoric.

Harper has been on-the-record several times over the last few weeks describing the regime in Tehran as "a grave threat to peace and security" and warning that it would have no hesitation about using nuclear weapons.

Baird, who wrapped up a visit to Israel and is now on his way to join Harper in China, emphasized that Canada supports U.S. President Barack Obama in keeping "all options," including military action, on the table.

"At the same time, I think we have an incredible responsibility to take every single diplomatic effort necessary," he said.

Repeatedly throughout his visit to the Middle East, Baird has said the new wave of sanctions imposed on Iran by the international community, including a European embargo against Iranian oil, are having a significant impact on the hard-line regime.

The concern with the possibility of Tehran acquiring nuclear weapons is not limited to Israel, he said.

"The fear in the Arab world, the entire Gulf, the entire Middle East is palpable on this issue and it is increasingly a significant security threat for the West," Baird said.

Also in the interview, Baird expressed "deep disappointment" with both Russia and China's decision to veto a United Nations resolution that called on Syrian President Bashar Assad to give up power.

He wouldn't say whether the issue would be raised during Harper's visit this week to Beijing and tread softly when asked whether Canada will ask the Communist government to reconsider its action.

There would be a "full range of discussions," Baird said.

The UN vote on Saturday came following reports by activists that claimed Syrian forces had fired artillery into the City of Homs, which has been at the epicentre of the uprising against Assad.

Reports say the barrage killed more than 200 people.

The 7 Storylines To Watch As MPs Get Back To Work
1  of  9
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Here's a look at some of the storylines and hot-button issues expected to set the tone for Parliament over the coming months. (CP)

With files from CBC
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA - Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird invoked images of the Holocaust in defending the notion of possible Israeli military action against Iran.Appearing on CTV's Question Period Sunday, he sugg...
OTTAWA - Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird invoked images of the Holocaust in defending the notion of possible Israeli military action against Iran.Appearing on CTV's Question Period Sunday, he sugg...
Filed by Lauren Strapagiel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 114
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
08:37 PM on 02/19/2012
I have to ask myself if these morons actually believe what they're saying, and if they do, someone please send them a history book and explain it to them, because they obviously haven't grasped the concepts.

Islamic nations are against Israel because it was forced into existence based on religious views, and fundamentalist Christians who thought it'd hasten the return of Christ.

In the west we never hear how Israeli settlers are being paid to run Palestinians off their own land, or kill them. Our media has completely overlooked the horrendous aspects of the Israeli State, and continue to focus clearly on one side of the conflict.

There's a reason no modern President has been elected without supporting Israel or fundamentalist Christians. Separation of Church and State is a concept lost to history.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Nwo2012
Sue me, I boycott products from the settlements
07:25 AM on 02/11/2012
Its an orchestrated propaganda campaign. Just ignore it.

"But when articles invoking the Holocaust and urging “creative destruction” in Iran appear on the same day (Feb. 7) in the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Newsweek and Bloomberg News, a skeptical observer might be forgiven for suspecting a well-coordinated propaganda campaign."

http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/israels_real_target_obama/singleton/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:11 PM on 02/07/2012
I must of missed the part in the history books where the European Jewish community spent a decade or two threatening to attack Germany like Israel has been doing to Iran. Other than that ya it's exactly the same. Pity the poor neocon warmongers it's such a chore to justify starting a war of aggression for a foreign nationalistic govt.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:22 PM on 02/06/2012
The military industrial complex is having a bad quarter. Time to use up all that old stockpiled supply so they can sell some brand new WMD. Iran.... "open for business". Syria "over before Christmas". The Middle East, "just a case of marching". Slogans may be recycled. War is an explosive business opportunity. Mr. Baird, we appreciate any help you can provide!
12:00 PM on 02/06/2012
Please name me one time Iran started a war. In the 50's Iran's Democratically elected government was overthrown by the US and great Britain on behalf of Exxon and BP.Please name me how many wars has the US and Great Britian started in that region. Israel already has nukes, why would Iran not want them as a deterrent. MAD worked in the Cold war, so why would not work here. Just remember who created this situation in the Middle East. That would be the Corporatist and there puppet governments all in a never ending thirst for oil and capital.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
03:06 PM on 02/06/2012
It's been about 300 years.
10:04 AM on 02/06/2012
Most of the readers seem to miss the point.

Baird was pointing out that in Mein Kampf Hitler declared his desire to liquidate the Jews. Ah, its only a book you say, but it was a very open exposition of his plan should he receive power. What is compelling about Baird's observation is that the Iranians use the same terminology as Hitler did; eradicate a virus and the same message - the jews are too blame for everything. Baird was being honest; many of his critics are not
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stroodle
@upcripplecreek
11:26 AM on 02/06/2012
Most of the readers just read the headline.
12:04 PM on 02/06/2012
Biards supporting actor role in "UN Palestinia­n Recognitio­n' September 2011- was my least favorite performanc­e from Biard. In it he lambasted opponents of Israel as "no better than the appeasers who allowed fascism and communism to flourish before the Second World War." His lines were directed at defenders of people who ask for recognitio­n. His performanc­e was certianly less sinister and chilling compared to those nominees who, gave the performanc­e of their lives, in "Republica­n Leadership Race - Florida."
The best horror film ever! In front of a Palestinia­n man at the Florida debates, who asked the nominees "do they recognize Palestinia­n people?"; "there are no Palestinia­n people!" was their dramatic response. Followed by thunderous applause. Now take these comments and tell me who is more scary. No the Jews are not to blame for everything-there to blame for the illegal occupation that has excited the region. If your looking for context in a book you wasting you time, I would suggest look to what is actually happening on the ground in the West Bank.
photo
grizzly bear55
King of the forest
08:29 AM on 02/06/2012
During the Holocaust, the jews were defenseless, now they have 300 nukes enough to destroy the entire middle east 100 times over.

And a huge conventional army, nay, air force.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
02:07 AM on 02/06/2012
"Calling Israel a danger to Islam, the conservative website Alef, with ties to Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said the opportunity must not be lost to remove “this corrupting material. It is a ‘jurisprudential justification” to kill all the Jews and annihilate Israel, and in that, the Islamic government of Iran must take the helm.”

The article, written by Alireza Forghani, a conservative analyst and a strategy specialist in Khamenei’s camp, now is being run on most state-owned conservative sites, including the Revolutionary Guards’ Fars News Agency, showing that the regime endorses this doctrine."

http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/ayatollah-kill-all-jews-annihilate-israel/
12:16 PM on 02/06/2012
"The article, written by Alireza Forghani, a conservative analyst and a strategy specialist in Khamenei’s camp, now is being run on most state-owned conservative sites, including the Revolutionary Guards’ Fars News Agency, showing that the regime endores this doctrine."
WRONG propoganda lying again. The article was indeed writting by Alireza Forghani, however no where it it located on the Far News Agency. The only place where you will find its source is at WND website written by Alireza Forghani - sounds like he wants to see Iranians dead fast....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
03:14 PM on 02/06/2012
The poster is only interested in the spread of propaganda.

“We do not suggest launching a classic war by the armies of Muslim countries, or throwing immigrant Jews into the sea”

— Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, October 2, 2011
03:31 PM on 02/06/2012
Having read that article, it is hard not to side with Baird. A religion preaching preemptive action against Israel and Jews world wide is insane. Religious justification for violence crosses the line as far as ratcheting up the political hype and bravado. What a stupid public statement by the Iranians. I am surprised the planes aren't already in the air.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Metcalfe
Caught at 1st. slip trying to cut
11:57 PM on 02/06/2012
They preach preemptive action Israel does it. All Iran needs to do to legally aquire nukes is withdraw from the NPT. The fact that they don't suggests they won't or can't.

There are a number of governments that have nukes that are just as nutty as Iran's. They havn't used them because it would mean the destruction of their country. If the Iranians used nukes on Israel they'd be distinctly unpopular with fellow muslims as they'd kill millions of them too.

Iranian leaders are nutty but no-one should ever dismiss them as stupid. They run rings around western diplomacy a lot.
12:53 AM on 02/06/2012
I was waiting for the bus tonight and it was 7 minutes late. It was just like the Holocaust. I swear.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
01:30 AM on 02/06/2012
hahah fanned
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stroodle
@upcripplecreek
11:25 AM on 02/06/2012
Have you read mein kampf? Or just the title of this article?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
hollace
I told you I was sick
12:51 AM on 02/06/2012
Isn't this how Bush got his start....,,blah blah blah...fear....blah blah blah.........disposable people ....blah blah...I'll be in retirement in ten years and no one will remember....blah blah....you pay..
12:13 AM on 02/06/2012
John Baird is the quintessential Drama Queen. Pay him no mind.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:24 AM on 02/06/2012
The United States needs Iran under it's heel so it can get to the oil easier and then kill anyone it needs to when peak oil hits the Middle East! That way, the Great Empire can control the oil fields that are left and apportion it all out as it sees fit to make certain all "bow to the king". Sooner or later, this is gonna turn into one BIG war all around!
11:04 PM on 02/05/2012
Why murder people if you are not going to eradicate the "threat"? (see Afghanistan) All these unjustified wars do is generate more hate, more resentment, more ambition for revenge.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler Austin
Women = people. Corperations ≠ people.
11:01 PM on 02/05/2012
How is Iran trying to get a WMD to balence out the regional millitarty power web akin to the industiralized murder of 12 million people by the most advanced nation on earth at the time?

Am *I* going to be called an anti-semite (that'd be ironic) because I say that not everything do with Israels defence is automaticly Holocuast related?

If Baird is so concerned, he can get Germany to bomb Iran.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:27 AM on 02/06/2012
Oh, but that wouldn't show The Empire as leader of the pack! And the USA would have to make a deal for the oil with Germany, and that just won't do! I mean, everyone else has to suffer and die off so the "Christian" (read: xtians) of America will be "taken up" as they were NEVER promised in their buy-bull!
10:53 PM on 02/05/2012
It's appalling how the Holocaust is trivialized continually. Any time anyone remotely hints at criticizing Israel, the wolves come out. Many intellectuals (including JEWISH intellectuals) have written extensively about this trivialization. They criticize Israel, the United States, and I'm guessing that they would criticize Baird for once again invoking the Holocaust to score cheap political points. Ezra Levant of SunTv (aka FoxNewsNorth) is also an expert at using this cheap, demeaning tactic. Any criticism of Israel is met with calls of ''anti-semite'', ''remember the Holocaust'' etc...It's insulting to the memory of the victims of that tragedy. The French historian Georges Bensoussan, an expert on the Holocaust and historical memory, has written extensively on the topic. I'm not sure if his works have been translated into English, but if you are fluent in French, they are worth picking up.

As for the Israel/Iran conflict, why not let those two nations try to resolve any tensions diplomatically before trying to import a solution? Too simplistic?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
06:31 AM on 02/06/2012
"Too simplistic­?"

Industrialists don't make profits from diplomacy.
photo
ladameennoir
Child of the Reagan 80s
10:33 PM on 02/05/2012
Question: if Tel Aviv disappears under a mushroom cloud, would that be a tragedy on a par with the Holocaust? Case closed.
11:08 PM on 02/05/2012
Question: if Tehran disappears under the incessant bombing of a superior war machine, would that be a tragedy on par with the Holocaust?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
01:38 AM on 02/06/2012
Not even close.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:34 AM on 02/06/2012
Any action that eliminates specified human life is a holocaust.
Webster's dictionary:

Definition of HOLOCAUST
1
: a sacrifice consumed by fire
2
: a thorough destruction involving extensive loss of life especially through fire
3
a often capitalized : the mass slaughter of European civilians and especially Jews by the Nazis during World War II —usually used with the b : a mass slaughter of people; especially : genocide

Guess it was a word before the Jews got involved....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
11:11 PM on 02/05/2012
"Case closed"? You didn't even OPEN it...but thanks for playing.