HuffPost Social Reading

MP Says Her Baby Was Kicked Out Of House

First Posted: 02/ 8/2012 12:30 pm Updated: 02/16/2012 7:26 am

Sana Hassainia Baby
Quebec MP Sana Hassainia is calling for change after she says she was asked to remove her three-month-old baby from the House of Commons during a vote. (Sana Hassainia)


A Quebec MP is calling for change after she says she was asked to remove her three-month-old baby from the House of Commons during a vote.


NDP MP Sana Hassainia said she was called back quickly to a vote in the House Tuesday and had to bring her baby boy along.


A page came up to her and said the Speaker wanted her to remove the baby from the chamber, she said.


“The rules are that no strangers are allowed in,” Hassainia told CBC News. “So certainly, yes, my baby is a stranger. But, it’s not like he was a threat to national security.”


She said the baby wasn’t crying or making noise and remained in her arms until she was told to remove him.


Hassainia, who is still breastfeeding her baby, said her husband is usually around to assist when she attends to her duties in the House, but she couldn't find him in time on Tuesday to make it back before the vote.


Photography caused disruption


Heather Bradley, director of communications for Speaker Andrew Scheer, said the Speaker did not instruct Hassainia to remove the baby.


Just as the vote was about to begin, Scheer noticed several MPs snapping pictures of Hassainia and her son.


The vote clock was at zero and the Speaker had asked members to take their seats.


A page was dispatched to ask them to sit down so the vote could get underway, Bradley said.


The rule is that the House floor is reserved for elected members of Parliament, but babies of MPs have been in the House before. There is no rule specifically addressing babies in the House, just general decorum rules that govern everything from behaviour to attire to voting.


It’s the Speaker’s responsibility to ensure that there are no distractions during votes, Bradley said. It's up to the Speaker to determine what constitutes a distraction.


Hassainia acknowledged people were snapping pictures, but maintained the message she received was that she was to remove the baby and that photos were not addressed.


One MP told CBC News the head of the House pages came to speak to Hassainia and told her the baby couldn't stay for the vote.


The MP said Hassainia passed her baby to a "pretty nervous looking page, who wasn't too sure about how to hold the baby," who then passed him to lobby staff.


Lack of support


It's already difficult for working mothers in the House as there is nothing set up to support them taking care of their children while attending to their duties, Hassainia said, adding that she often had to duck into offices to breastfeed.


“As MPs, we don’t have a lot of time for maternity leave. So, it’s a return to work that you could say is premature compared to what most Canadian mothers do,” she said.


“It’s important for me to do, but the message that the Conservatives are giving is either you work or you look after your family. It’s too bad because it discourages women, young women, from going into politics if there is nothing planned for that.”


She said more consideration should be given to how mothers can return to work to attend to their parliamentary obligations without sacrificing their obligations to their infants.


“I hope that this incident will allow the Speaker to think about these kinds of situations,” she said.


“I hope that the next time I will need to be there with my baby and I don’t have a choice, the Speaker will allow him to remain with me.”


Interim NDP Leader Nycole Turmel said Wednesday the incident doesn't send a good message to aspiring young female MPs and others who are trying to balance their professional and family life.


She said there should be a specific rule that addresses the issue of babies in the House, as well as other considerations that should be given to MPs who are parents of young children.


"It's quite difficult for them, I must say," she said.


Tuesday morning's vote in the House was on a motion to bring time allocation to debate on a bill to eliminate the long-gun registry.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

Filed by Michael Bolen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 69
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
11:36 AM on 02/09/2012
Does she think she works in a nursery?! If you're too busy with a young child to do your duties you shouldn't be an MP... This is dumb.. Why would it be ok to bring a baby into the House of Commons?

Any baby would be kicked out of there. This is probably one of the NDP MPs who never even thought she'd win... Oh, Jack, your party is going to drown without you.
photo
SeeTheFnords
Look out - there's one behind you!
06:20 AM on 02/09/2012
"...called back quickly to a vote in the House..."

The only time anybody does anything "quickly" in the government usually involves one party trying to pull something over on the rest of the parties. Was this some super special previously unannounced surprise vote or something? I was under the impression that our elected MPs were supposed to attend sessions regularly, and vote on every thing that comes to chambers - in which case, why wasn't she there already? What was she doing that was more important than her job?

(yes, I know how it really operates, I've seen the mostly-empty chairs day after day)

But honestly, most women do not bring their infants to work with them; they don't expect to be able to, nor would they even consider it. She needs to honour her workplace rules and hire a nanny.
06:28 AM on 02/09/2012
Agreed! and I think that with the kind of $$$ MP`s are paid they could have the respect of the job to be at "work" (and the word work is used loosely here) at least during normal working hours. Everyone else in this country with a job has specific hours to keep, and not many of us are premitted to slip home for one thing or another when we feel like it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
11:43 AM on 02/09/2012
Yea, and none of us can bring our young infant to work with us.

This MP should be embarassed rather than complain. She should be embarassed that she actually thought that would be ok... She's supposed to be in there helping to run the country, not babysitting.
03:26 AM on 02/09/2012
I do not find it inappropriate. Parliament is a place that is making laws for Canadian families. Why punish someone for taking care of her baby? If she's able to perform her duties, it does not matter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
11:57 AM on 02/09/2012
how is it at all approrpriate to bring your baby to ANY workplace??

Your acting like being an MP is less serious than every other job in Canada where you can't bring your infant to work with you.... it's just unprofessional and idiotic.
This woman should be embarassed.
12:32 PM on 02/09/2012
It has nothing to do with "seriousness" of a job - all jobs are important.

It isn't the first time it has happened, and in at least a couple other countries it's deemed perfectly acceptable. (It is in many other professions here and elsewhere as well).

If there is no safety risk to the child or others and she is able to perform her duties, there is no problem. I'd cite something about the potential for disruption, but I don't think that 3-ring circus is a place where we're concerned about that.

Do you really think the parliamentary house proceedings are very "professional" as you say?

A mother with a baby is probably the least disruptive, idiotic or embarrassing thing that goes on there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robertmiller252
09:09 PM on 02/08/2012
This young MP's position is completely indefensible. Children have no place in the work place environment. And she was in her workplace. Period.

Either quit or stay home and look after your child.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carlyn Craig
Post Hypnotic Press Audiobooks
11:17 PM on 02/08/2012
Yes, spoken like a man, that! If men had children, they'd be an integral part of our work environments.

But seriously, did you read the article? This could just as easily, in our current culture where parents more often than not both work and share the child rearing responsibilities, have been the dad called in suddenly and unable to find childcare fast enough. Would you then have been calling for the father to "quit or stay home and look your child"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robertmiller252
09:12 AM on 02/09/2012
If you have ever been inside the House of Commons, as I was fairly recently, you would know that immediately behind both sets of benches are large sitting rooms that run the length of the Commons. That baby could have been left there in the care of a helper. As well, most MPs have more than one office in the buildings beside the Parliament Buildings. They usually have more than one staff person on hand.

It was a publicity stunt. Nothing more and nothing less.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logicanada
Blogger, radio co-host, writer, editor, voice-over
07:43 PM on 02/08/2012
Apparently the baby has a right to life but not the mother.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:00 PM on 02/08/2012
I am going to cry....booohoooo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logicanada
Blogger, radio co-host, writer, editor, voice-over
07:41 PM on 02/08/2012
Pitty. The child would have voted more astutely and fairly than any tory.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
07:26 PM on 02/08/2012
In this regimes world, they only tolerate the baby while in the womb.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
06:55 PM on 02/08/2012
Kid looks like a real trouble maker.
Shifty eyes...
Devil may care attitude.
yeah......
I'd say a real trouble maker
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
emphatico
.....is very politically incorrect.
06:20 PM on 02/08/2012
Wow!! The mother is quite hot, if you know what I mean.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:39 PM on 02/08/2012
I do NOT.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:15 PM on 02/08/2012
And they complain and complain, complain.......
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamster88
06:06 PM on 02/08/2012
Those NDP, they have their act together!
photo
fromdnorth
OK I checked my micro-bio (didn't know I had one
05:51 PM on 02/08/2012
Shills trolls and other such have no emapthy... that we know...

If the child is not disruptive, it should stay

We take them to church...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robertmiller252
09:11 PM on 02/08/2012
Suffer the little children to come unto me and forbid them not, for of such is the kingdom of heaven. Yes in Church but absolutely not in Parliament.
photo
fromdnorth
OK I checked my micro-bio (didn't know I had one
06:58 AM on 02/09/2012
As Jesus said, the Devil will quote scriptures for his own good...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamster88
05:47 PM on 02/08/2012
You can't take your newborn baby into the workplace for more than a few minutes without upsetting everyone around you.
photo
fromdnorth
OK I checked my micro-bio (didn't know I had one
06:04 PM on 02/08/2012
You work in a slaughter house?
06:05 PM on 02/08/2012
no just that other peoples babies gets on nerves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamster88
06:09 PM on 02/08/2012
? What ?

I work in a very normal office.

A baby crying in the office would disrupt our work.

Nobody would mind someone running into grab or check something with their baby - in fact, that might be nice, but everybody would mind a kid of any age hanging around the office, it's entirely inappropriate.

I don't get your point.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
06:47 PM on 02/08/2012
Particularly these MP's.

They hate to be outsmarted.
photo
fromdnorth
OK I checked my micro-bio (didn't know I had one
05:25 PM on 02/08/2012
The Enormity Of Their Stupidity Is Just Overwhelming'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robertmiller252
09:12 PM on 02/08/2012
Who's? The mother?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
05:14 PM on 02/08/2012
Ironic isn't it?

Children throwing out children.