QUEBEC - The NDP leadership candidates had their French-language skills put to the test at a leadership debate Sunday in Quebec, where the party is hoping to regain the momentum that led to its official opposition status.
There were few heated exchanges in the debate, aside from a few notable jabs by party strategist Brian Topp to fellow leadership candidates Paul Dewar and Martin Singh.
Topp himself acknowledged the cordial tone of the debate, held before a few hundred people in a Quebec City hall.
"If there's one thing we learned from the Liberals, it's that we shouldn't have a civil war in our party," Topp told reporters afterward. "We try to not be too mean to each other."
While the focus of the debate was Canada's role in the world, there weren't many clear disagreements over foreign policy as some of the candidates struggled to express themselves in French.
French skills are expected to be an important factor in the leadership race, with the party losing ground in opinion polls in Quebec since grabbing 59 seats in last May's election.
The leadership debate was the first to take place in French, with only a brief segment in English during the 90-minute session.
NDP deputy leader Thomas Mulcair and former party president Brian Topp appeared most comfortable, while Ottawa MP Paul Dewar had trouble at times.
Dewar faced questions from Topp over his decision to appoint fellow NDP MP Charlie Angus, another anglophone, as deputy leader of his campaign.
Toronto MP Peggy Nash also took aim at Dewar over the issue, stressing the party should recognize the support it received from Quebec in the last election.
"It is for him to determine whether (the appointment of Angus) is respectful to Quebec, but I think the diversity of our country is very important," she told reporters afterward.
Dewar shot back at Topp saying he doesn't even have a seat in the House of Commons, and questioned what he would do if he lost in a by-election.
Mulcair, meanwhile, played up his Quebec ties right from the start, recalling his experience as a cabinet minister in the provincial Liberal government before making the jump to federal politics.
With Romeo Saganash dropping out on Friday, there are now seven candidates in the running to succeed Jack Layton.
The other candidates are British Columbia MP Nathan Cullen, businessman Martin Singh, and Manitoba MP Niki Ashton, the youngest candidate in the race, who has a solid grasp of French.
Speaking with reporters, Topp acknowledged the NDP could do more in Quebec, saying the party should have taken a stronger stance when the Conservative government appointed an auditor general who can't speak French.
Topp said the new leader will have to work hard to prove to Quebecers they made the right choice in the last election.
"We will have three years to do the job of four years," he said. "It's tough, but that's the consequence of losing your leader."
This was the third of six debates before a March convention in Toronto, where the party will select Layton's permanent successor.
Related on HuffPost:
NDP HOPEFULS TALK TO HUFFPOST
Brian Topp - What does the party need to do to win the next election?
1 of 8
FIRST SLIDE
PREVIOUS SLIDE
NEXT SLIDESHOW
This is a question I get from party members everywhere I go. New Democrats want to win in 2015. And they want to know that the candidates have a plan to win and then to govern well. I believe that the key to winning is to offer a clear and positive social democratic agenda for change. We don't have to become Liberals to win. We don't have to defeat ourselves even as we win by adopting the priorities and agendas of our opponents -- by becoming what we are fighting to change.
And we don't have to borrow from the Conservative playbook by practicing the cynical politics of division and anger. For every criticism we make of or opponents, we have to offer a positive solution in its place. In my campaign I have offered a series of detailed proposals to improve the fairness of our tax system and I will be releasing major policy initiatives aimed at building a more equal, greener and just Canada. In the end, New Democrats win by staying positive, by offering a clear and practical agenda for change, and by having the courage of our convictions.
This is a question I get from party members everywhere I go. New Democrats want to win in 2015. And they want to know that the candidates have a plan to win and then to govern well. I believe that the key to winning is to offer a clear and positive social democratic agenda for change. We don't have to become Liberals to win. We don't have to defeat ourselves even as we win by adopting the priorities and agendas of our opponents -- by becoming what we are fighting to change.
And we don't have to borrow from the Conservative playbook by practicing the cynical politics of division and anger. For every criticism we make of or opponents, we have to offer a positive solution in its place. In my campaign I have offered a series of detailed proposals to improve the fairness of our tax system and I will be releasing major policy initiatives aimed at building a more equal, greener and just Canada. In the end, New Democrats win by staying positive, by offering a clear and practical agenda for change, and by having the courage of our convictions.
Brian Topp - What does the party need to do to win the next election?
1
/ 8
SHARE THIS SLIDE
This is a question I get from party members everywhere I go. New Democrats want to win in 2015. And they want to know that the candidates have a plan to win and then to govern well. I believe that the key to winning is to offer a clear and positive social democratic agenda for change. We don't have to become Liberals to win. We don't have to defeat ourselves even as we win by adopting the priorities and agendas of our opponents -- by becoming what we are fighting to change.
And we don't have to borrow from the Conservative playbook by practicing the cynical politics of division and anger. For every criticism we make of or opponents, we have to offer a positive solution in its place. In my campaign I have offered a series of detailed proposals to improve the fairness of our tax system and I will be releasing major policy initiatives aimed at building a more equal, greener and just Canada. In the end, New Democrats win by staying positive, by offering a clear and practical agenda for change, and by having the courage of our convictions.
QUEBEC - The NDP leadership candidates had their French-language skills put to the test at a leadership debate Sunday in Quebec, where the party is hoping to regain the momentum that led to its offici...
QUEBEC - The NDP leadership candidates had their French-language skills put to the test at a leadership debate Sunday in Quebec, where the party is hoping to regain the momentum that led to its offici...
Canadians often take pride in the civility of our political system in comparison to that of our southern neighbours. Unfortunately, that civility often leads to...
OTTAWA — There were no knockout punches during the NDP’s first leadership debate Sunday in Ottawa, but those watching were left with a better impression...
The word RESPECT as far as I know, does NOT MEAN - that ONLY Francophone Quebecois concerns are to be recipients of Respect, no? After all, the former life long Liberal voters - the 2.5 MILLION English Speaking Quebeckers - of the Greater Montreal Area - ARE the ones who GIFTED the NDP with the VOTES NEEDED to become the Opposition! And for the NDP Leadership to IGNORE that and us - by NOT having BILINGUAL Debates: sends a CLEAR Message to Our (400 year long history of our presence in Our Province) population that - the NDP leadership is DETERMINED to "Discriminate against us - by pretending we don't exist" JUST like the Liberals did! And perhaps THAT'S WHY the NDP support is headed for into "free fall" in Our Province. What's stunning really - is that the "Candidates" seemingly are out of touch with the True Reality of Quebec. As for the "video" Good Grief - that's about as ridiculous as it gets; my opinion of course. I'm seriously reconsidering - having become a member and supporting the Party and - KNOW - I'm NOT Alone.
DidiM: The word RESPECT as far as I know, does NOT
DidiM, You should make your concerns known to the NDP and encourage others to do so! I agree the debates should be bilingual! I for one will be emailing them!
Marg_Wood: DidiM, You should make your concerns known to the NDP
The NDP won 102 seats in the last election and had nearly 31% of the national vote. Until recently, this would have been a MOMENTUS victory for the reforms and later on the Conservatives. How quickly we forget.
Many people in Canada don't share your political views and believe it or not, the use of the French language is important to some people in Canada also.
So perhaps you don't care, and that is fine. I RESPECT, your opinion. Could you show the same respect for people that do care about the NDP leadership debate?
RDX: The NDP won 102 seats in the last election and
Do I understand you correctly, that you "don't care", about what's going on in your country and with you property and/or the FACT that: Grotesque and illegal 'laws' like 'Ethnic Cleansing' - English Canadians OUT of Your/Our Canadian Province - doesn't concern you? Wow, and sigh. Very sad indeed. I hope you remember that - when it reaches 'Your Doorstep', and there's no one left to help you.
DidiM: Do I understand you correctly, that you "don't care", about
It's called bigotry and discrimination against the English speaking population in Quebec - 2.5 million of us - that have had our English Language illegally ERASED in the Province: Something that's been going on for 35+ years. Our English Language USED TO BE "Official" - but erasing it - has and is erasing our presence - our culture, our ability to work etc.. And these political yahoos have been "Selling it as "Respecting The French Language". It's only since social media took off - that the Truth about the 'use of the word -respect-' is finally being made public. It's of course difficult for anyone in their 'Right Mind' - to comprehend and/or to believe that 'ethnic cleansing' has become 'law' in Canada.. and our Members Of Parliament -- dare to define it as respect'.
DidiM: It's called bigotry and discrimination against the English speaking population
First Posted: 02/12/2012 4:46 pm Updated: 02/13/2012 8:41 pm