Volcker Rule: Jim Flaherty, Mark Carney Say U.S. Is Interfering In Canadian Bank Practices

Volcker Rule Canada Flaherty Carney

First Posted: 02/13/2012 10:40 am Updated: 02/13/2012 8:45 pm

OTTAWA - Canada is launching a full-court press in an attempt to prevent the United States from passing new bank reforms that may impact Canadian investors, financial markets and the economy.

In separate letters to Washington policy-makers, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty and Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney complain that sweeping reforms under the so-called "Volcker rule" would reach well beyond their intended scope, and beyond borders.

In some cases, because of the differences between the two countries' financial systems and exemptions that apply only in the U.S., the negative impact could be greater in Canada, officials say.

"The rule, as currently drafted, would have an unprecedented extraterritorial reach and significant cross-border effects ... given the close inter-linkages between the Canadian and U.S. financial systems," Flaherty wrote Monday.

"I am particularly concerned that the proposed rule could severely impact the liquidity of Canadian government debt markets and interfere with the risk management practices of Canadian banks."

Bank of Montreal economist Douglas Porter said while the proposed changes are complex and the impacts difficult to quantify, the fact Flaherty and Carney would write their counterparts with concerns is a good indicator the affect could be severe. The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions has also formally requested changes to the bill.

Not only Canada has complained, so has the United Kingdom, Japan and the European Commission, among others.

For Canada, the major concern is that the banks' ability to trade and make markets in government and corporate bonds could be curtailed, causing borrowing costs to rise.

"If the liquidity of corporate debt and government debt is somehow compromised, that will have a ripple effect on the economy as a whole and will impact corporations' ability to grow and create jobs," said Terry Campbell, president of the Canadian Bankers Association.

"The problem is that the rule does not just apply to Canadian bank operations in the United States, it would apply to their operations around the world."

The changes, which seek to separate the traditional deposit-taking functions of banks from their more risky investment operations, are part of wider reforms being proposed to limit risk-taking by U.S. banks in response to the abuses that led to the recent recession.

Flaherty and Carney said they respect the intent of the law, but not how it would impact institutions outside the country. Most Canadians banks have operations in the United States so interlinked that even strictly Canadian activities could come under the broad sweep of the changes.

"The proposed rule ... imposes significant restrictions on Canadian banking entities by limiting their use of U.S.-based resources, personnel and market infrastructure and by preventing them from trading with U.S. counterparties," Carney said in his letter.

Carney noted that market funding supplies about two-thirds of Canadian corporations' financial needs, so the Volcker rule could have severe impact on liquidity and borrowing.

As well, while U.S. government treasury sales are exempted, Canadian government bonds are not.

And the letters say the rule could limit Canadian banks ability to service their customers with mutual fund accounts.

"I would encourage you, your staff, and the relevant U.S. regulatory agencies to take careful note of these submissions," Flaherty said in his letter.

"I urge you and your colleagues to take careful consideration of any unintended consequences that U.S. rule making could have on broader financial systems around the world, including Canada."

A spokesman for the finance minister said the letters were sent Monday because it was the last day for submitting opinions on the proposed legislation.

Campbell said he was hopeful that given the outcry from around the world, a solution could be found to limit the impact inside the borders of the U.S.

He said even U.S. drafters of the proposed new regulations must have realized the complexity of the issue because they asked "hundreds and hundreds of questions" during the consultation process.

"So I think they realize they had a problem here. Our hope the volume and the seriousness the concerns expressed will impress the U.S. authorities."

If enacted, the new regulations would go into effect in July.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA - Canada is launching a full-court press in an attempt to prevent the United States from passing new bank reforms that may impact Canadian investors, financial markets and the economy.In separa...
OTTAWA - Canada is launching a full-court press in an attempt to prevent the United States from passing new bank reforms that may impact Canadian investors, financial markets and the economy.In separa...
Filed by Daniel Tencer  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:56 PM on 02/15/2012
Anything bankers don't like means it's positive for the average person.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
04:47 PM on 02/14/2012
Every major financial calamity and deficit has had Flaherty painted all over it. Ontario remembers your lies.

Harpo and his gang have just about sold off our sovereignty from the border to our private files to our airspace to our natural resources and soon our prisons, media and healthcare. Wake the eff up and read their playbook.
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
07:47 AM on 02/14/2012
The G20's final communique instructs governments to slash their deficits in half by 2013. Critics say this burden will fall disproportionately on those who can least afford it, including students, people living in poverty and pensioners.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/g8-g20/opinion/sticking-the-public-with-the-bill-for-the-bankers-crisis/article1620729/
03:11 PM on 02/13/2012
are these two joining the american banks in the push back against re-regulating the banks ---or is this a genuine issue based on self interest

if it is the latter -they would have more success by emphasising their support of re-regulation , with a ----however ,we see this item as a problem
if you simply say --no way will i support you because of this --you are likely to get someones back up and they will tune you out and the problem never gets fixed
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
02:49 PM on 02/13/2012
Maybe the Canadian government should have considered this before allowing our two countries finanicial systems to become to intertwined. The US will do what is in the self-interest of the US, whether it hurts or helps us. It is irresponsible of the government to allow foreigners to have such a degree of control over our financial institutions.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
typeterson
02:08 PM on 02/13/2012
its like the US has allowed banking institutions within the US as well as around the world to run a gang bang on the global economy with their absurd lack of regulations. now that they want to close their legs a little bit, everyone is crying that their not 'finished yet'. what exactly is the end game?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
12:57 PM on 02/13/2012
If Canadian institutions don't like the rules they can come back across the border. If they are in the states doing business then comply. As an adverse there are too many American rules spreading into other economies such as the SOPA now shelved. When are Canadian Law makers going to revoke these predator laws that create a strangle hold on our economy? Who are these people behind the driving force?
11:36 AM on 02/13/2012
BS. The foreign banks are in no danger of purchasing federal debt in their own country. The US can make the law but no bank and no foreign country would allow it to affect their own country, I guarantee it. The banks are just trying to blow smoke on the issue, because they are worried about not being able to do their risky busy as they used to. Whitewash, that's all this is. Don't believe these PR pawns, basically hired by the banks to spew this garbage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
toofarleft4thisworld
The Right Is So Wrong
02:57 PM on 02/13/2012
if it's coming from the Tories BS is assumed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:06 PM on 02/14/2012
AH, two know it all bankers?
correct?