Trita Parsi, Iran Expert, Tells Stephen Harper To Dial Back 'Hysterical' Rhetoric On Nukes

First Posted: 02/14/2012 3:28 pm Updated: 02/14/2012 11:01 pm

OTTAWA - The Harper government's tough talk on Iran's nuclear ambitions is fuelling hysteria and boosting the likelihood of an armed conflict, an Iranian-born Middle East expert says.

Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, warned Tuesday that the vilification of Iran's leaders increases the likelihood of a war between Iran and Israel or its allies, including the United States.

Parsi, who has argued in favour of greater engagement with Iran, said recent remarks by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird amount to repeating talking points by the Israeli government or parroting the rhetoric of candidates in the U.S. Republican primaries.

Parsi is the second international observer within a week to take Canada's government to task for the nature of its anti-Iran posture. Last week, a former Clinton adviser and the head of Middle East policy for the International Crisis Group made the same point in an interview last week with The Canadian Press.

Harper has called Iran the greatest threat to world peace and predicted it would not hesitate to use nuclear weapons, while Baird has compared the Tehran regime to Nazi Germany.

Parsi noted the Obama administration has purposely tried to dial down inflammatory rhetoric in order to find a diplomatic solution to Iran's nuclear standoff with the West.

He also blamed Iran's mullahs for ratcheting up tensions through their own use of inflammatory language, but he said that doesn't mean Canada should abandon its traditional role as a pragmatic, moderate voice on the world stage.

"Canada is coming across as a little bit of an outlier, echoing some of the talking points of the Likud government in Israel right now," said Parsi, whose family was forced to flee Iran for political reasons when he was four years old.

"Bringing the issue to a level of hysteria does not make it easier to resolve. All it does is increase the likelihood that the only remaining options are confrontational ones. And I don't think that is to the benefit of anyone including the Israelis or the Canadians."

Parsi interviewed diplomats from the U.S. and Israel, among others, for his new book, 'A Single Roll of the Dice,' on Barack Obama's efforts to engage Iran diplomatically.

"The Iranians are not helping the situation in any shape or form. That is their contribution to the hysterical discourse," said Parsi.

"But to divine from that there would be an intent to use nuclear weapons, sounds to me more an exercise in faith than exercise in political science," said Parsi. "And in fact when talking to Israeli officials, they make it quite clear their real fear is not that the Iranians would use it, it's because of all the other consequences."

A nuclear-armed Iran would be much more confident and aggressive and would limit Israel's manoeuvrability, particularly when it comes to intervening militarily in Lebanon or the Palestinian territories, he said.

"The arguments that are being presented are that the Iranian government is suicidal. You can say a lot of things about the Iranian government, particularly its human rights record, but to say that it's suicidal begs the question: why have they, in the last 33 years, passed on the opportunity to commit suicide?

"On the contrary, you have a government that is dead-set on survival."

Roland Paris, the head of the University of Ottawa's foreign policy school, hosted Parsi on Tuesday. He questioned whether Harper is laying the ground work for preparing the Canadian public for taking part in an eventual military conflict with Iran.

"The question is: why at a moment when our closest ally, the United States, is counselling restraint and trying to use measured language about Iran, is the government of Canada using tendentious language and speculating about nightmare visions?" Paris said.

"It raises a red flag. It's highlighting a scenario where Iran would preemptively use nuclear weapons in an attack. If Iran is indeed suicidal, then it creates a possible need to militarily intervene to prevent Iran from acquiring that capability."

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA - The Harper government's tough talk on Iran's nuclear ambitions is fuelling hysteria and boosting the likelihood of an armed conflict, an Iranian-born Middle East expert says.Trita Parsi, pres...
OTTAWA - The Harper government's tough talk on Iran's nuclear ambitions is fuelling hysteria and boosting the likelihood of an armed conflict, an Iranian-born Middle East expert says.Trita Parsi, pres...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 70
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
09:34 AM on 02/24/2012
Iran faces a delicate issue. On the one hand it wants to show the world all it’s got and put it at ease, while on the other hand it fears that such show 'n tell will give its enemies a roadmap to bomb it.
Saddam Hussein faced a similar dilemma ten years ago. Though he wanted the world to know he had nothing to hide, he also wanted to bluff his archenemy Iran into believing Iraq still had WMD.
Bluffing did not go well for Saddam, and it might not go well for Ahmadinejad.
But since the price tag for ridding Saddam proved high, maybe we ought to reflect what we are asking of Iran now. On the eve of a threatened attack, we are asking it to take us to the depths of its arsenal and show us all it's got.
Such great expectations are a sign we have been talking to our friends too long and are in need of a broader perspective. Exactly when was the last time we asked Pakistan, India, China or Russia to show us their arsenal?
“But those countries are not advocating the destruction of Israel.”
True, but Israel is not a thorn on their side either.
Surely, however, we can see beyond the hyperboles and figure out their underlying purpose. Or have we forgotten that not all Iranians are thrilled with Ahmadinejad?
He sure hasn’t forgotten.
Nor has he forgotten that that his countrymen hate Israel even more. * * *
09:33 AM on 02/24/2012
*** So he tells them that Israel will be wiped from the face of the earth. Expectantly, this nonsense unites them against a common enemy. It is even a diversion from the misery and isolation brought on by his theocratic regime.
Quite clever work by Ahmadinejad -- and not a rial spent or a bullet fired.
So why are we letting the crazy talk about destroying Israel get us all worked-up -- to the point of turning the world topsy-turvy again.
Can we not see the desperate attempts of an unpopular regime simply trying to hold on?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bec DeCorbeau
Le langage de l'invisible est le silence
09:05 PM on 02/17/2012
Do you think that any country in the world will take you seriously? Canadians are the laughing stocks of the planet since the reformists are in power.

What, attack Iran with our 3 rusted submarines sitting at the bottom of the sea!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Willow2
An Old Bat who Follows Current Affairs
08:06 PM on 02/17/2012
Unhappily for the rest of us, Harper (as is much of the American government) is letting the Israeli tail wag the American/Canadian dog. A short time ago, our Ministery of Foreign Affairs made comments that were equally one sided.
I do not know if Iran is building a bomb. American intelligence as thus far released is far from definative on that point. The thought of yet another war based on media hype and propaganda is repugnant to me. The one sided postion of the Canadian government on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict appears to be a product of religious thought rather than an honest broker role that once was Canada's.
07:32 PM on 02/17/2012
Oh gee, if I were Iran I'd definitely be worried that we might be attacked by Canada. LOL. It's just political trash talk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rolor
'round and 'round we go
07:30 PM on 02/17/2012
Typical conservative bumbling about always seems to require spelling out less violent options to restrain their "bull in a china shop" international diplomacy tactics.
photo
Spanky McFarlane
ILLEGITIMUS NON CARBORUNDUM.
07:09 PM on 02/17/2012
If Harper were sincere about Nuclear proliferation & human rights he would have raised issue North Korea with the Chinese- he didn't

Just another oppurtunity lost. Rather strange how the Iranian President has never missed a chance to address the UN General Assembly on his Country's view of things but Mr.Harper would rather drive to a Cdn Donut Shop to welcome it's HQ back to Canada.

Is it any wonder we are where we are Globally with leaders like this drawing the pay & not doing the work?
02:41 PM on 02/15/2012
"Parsi, who has argued in favour of greater engagement with Iran, said recent remarks by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird amount to repeating talking points by the Israeli government or parroting the rhetoric of candidates in the U.S. Republican primaries"

Yeah red-neck does what red-neck do what else would you expect from a red-neck government?

It is sad that our own government is repeating a Zionist apartheid government's talking point!!!

I hope Canadians will realise they made a mistake by electing the unelectable!!!!!!!! And we will recall this government now can not wait 4 more years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:46 AM on 02/15/2012
I fear that too many of our
leaders
are part of the
"we're going to die anyway"
group...
who had illicit sex and did dangerous drugs...

I'm going for 100...
I don't trust any of them.
08:58 AM on 02/15/2012
Harper is an Apocalyptic Christian who longs for world-ending conflict in the Holy Land.
07:42 AM on 02/15/2012
Harper's relentless drive to compound all neocon impulses impedes him from understanding what most sentient beings have long realized: Globalization is dead in the water, Canada is not a center-right country, and Canadians are sick 'n tired of paying for useless, illegal wars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norma Ward
07:38 AM on 02/15/2012
Here is an article that outlines a probable timeline for Iran to enrich sufficient quantities of highly enriched uranium to create a nuclear weapon:

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2012/02/nuclear-iran-worlds-new-reality.html
11:08 AM on 02/15/2012
it means nothing, Canada enrich uranium at the Chalk River site.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Hatch
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
11:12 AM on 02/15/2012
And here's the real reason Iran wants a nuclear energy program:

http://atomicinsights.com/2012/02/fighting-over-fuels-and-markets-dumb-wasteful-when-we-have-essentially-unlimited-energy.html
03:55 PM on 02/15/2012
The same reasons that North Korea did. And look at their prosperity now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinnerator
07:37 AM on 02/15/2012
You go Stevie!! Everyone knows Obama is an anti-semite who has no problem watching Israel glow in the dark from Iranian nukes. As long as the Democrats control the White House Israel needs the Republican Lite party in Canada to stand by it. Oh and while you're at it keep pissing off Justin Trudeau so he's forced to Separate.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
northof49th
06:56 AM on 02/15/2012
Harper always talks tough from afar, He does it away when he talking about Canadians as well.He does not speak for the majority of Canadians he was elected by only 40% of us so He and our system as you can see it are flawed.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
Poster999
A promise made is a debt unpaid.
06:46 AM on 02/15/2012
Seems like Harper is trying to paint Canada as some sort of right wing country. What ever happened to Canada as the peacekeepers. We are not the US and unlike them we don't have the muscle to back up jingoistic rhetoric. The Tories were elected for their perceived abilities on economic issues not to take our country to the right on social issues and foreign policy.
03:50 PM on 02/15/2012
Peace keeping in a World of conflict and war is mutating, and sticking to your 1960 rhetoric isn't going to change that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
05:52 PM on 02/15/2012
Nor is returning to 1950s rhetoric and 1890s values, as the Tories are doing.....

There was honour in peacekeeping. There's no honour in being lackeys to a country that starts wars based on lies and misinformation. None at all. Our troops are being used to help bloat Tory egos, and that's shameful.
02:54 PM on 02/17/2012
I don't know who you are talking to, but I am a Classical Liberal.

Reality is that the conflict in the World is escalating in a different manner, and those who want to cling to a bygone era and send our people into conflict zones armed with solely with a good reputation are fools.