HuffPost Social Reading

Ottawa School Board's Wi-Fi Plan Scares Parents

Classroom

First Posted: 02/21/2012 8:21 am Updated: 02/21/2012 8:26 pm


Some west Ottawa parents are speaking out about their concerns with wireless internet connections in their children's school, saying not enough is known about long-term exposure to Wi-Fi.


For both Ruth Ann Semple and Jessica Van Hees, the unknown is frightening.


"Our children should be dissecting rats, they shouldn't be functioning as lab rats," Van Hees said, "And this constitutes as a massive experiment on children."


About one-third of schools at the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board are already equipped for Wi-Fi, but the plan is to have all schools, including portables, ready by the end of 2012. Semple and Van Hees Both say their school has not informed them about installing Wi-Fi, which is set for March.


There is conflicting information about whether exposure to radio frequencies from a wireless internet connection is a health hazard.


A World Health Organization report from May 2011 indicates the frequencies may be linked to some forms of cancer. In December, Health Canada updated its website to acknowledge the alternative viewpoint from international agencies but insists more research is needed and Wi-Fi is no cause for concern.


Public board sides with Health Canada, Ontario premier


The man behind the public board's plan to wire the schools is siding with Health Canada. He also said most parents are excited by the prospect of their children using wireless internet to learn.


"Mostly, we are hearing calls about when are we going to get this installed, and how come it hasn't been done by now," said Dave Miller, manager of business and learning technologies at the school board. They ask, "How come I'm not ahead of the other guy?"


Recently, a sub-committee of Ontario's Catholic teachers union wanted Wi-Fi out of the classroom until more studies were completed. The public teachers union is also looking into Wi-Fi concerns.


But just last week, Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty sided with Health Canada.


The west Ottawa parents say they could pull their children from the school if the board continues with the Wi-Fi plan and switch to home schooling.


Quick Poll

Does wi-fi in schools worry you?

VOTE

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

Filed by Ron Nurwisah  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:16 AM on 02/22/2012
When medical agencies approved Thalidomide for sale in the market, it was also based on "inconclusive" lab results. Some studies showed harm and some did not. After 10,000-20,000 babies were born with broken limbs, they said, "Ooops, we were wrong...". Canada was the last country to keep Thalidomide on the market. Oh, and asbestos is still official non-toxic according to Canadian Federal government (being one of the largest exporter of it). I guess we just need to accept that Canada is a "lenient" government where toxic substances are concerned.
02:59 PM on 02/21/2012
The power levels required for a base station to saturate buildings the size of a typical school -- plus the aggregate exposure within the classroom of 20+ computers (that need to return info to the base station) do not correlate to the home environment. That alone should be of concern.

I do not want my kid to be exposed to Wi-Fi, day-long, for the sake of a convenience. Cabled Ethernet is cheap, routers are cheap, and jacks are already in place in most classrooms.
02:50 PM on 02/21/2012
From what I understand 20 minutes on a cell phone is equal to one years radiation exposure from WIFI.
11:42 PM on 02/21/2012
That is FACTUALLY incorrect! A cell phone call can last for 20 minutes, but Wi-Fi base stations emit a beacon signal at full power 7x24.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CanadianSkeptic
Amazingly, thinking can solve most problems
02:36 PM on 02/21/2012
Seriously? I bet these parents are the same ones who don't trust vaccines or fluoridated water.

I'm no physicist but I thought non-ionizing radiation (i.e. radiowaves, microwaves, etc) has never been conclusively or even consistently linked to cancer.

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/cellphones (an NIH website)
08:57 PM on 02/22/2012
Just as there is a higher rate of lung cancer among smokers, so too, is there a higher rate of brain cancer among cell phone users.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CanadianSkeptic
Amazingly, thinking can solve most problems
09:52 PM on 02/22/2012
Any research to support that? If you can send me a link to scientific peer-reviewed papers, you can probably convince me of that. But from the ones I have read the evidence for cell phones causing cancer appears no more convincing than the claims of fluoridated water causing disease, and no where even close to the effectiveness of vaccines or the dangers so smoking. But again, if there is something I have missed...
12:19 AM on 02/23/2012
I should note that;
The Hardell Study shows the numbers of cell phone users with brain cancer,glioma and the numbers in the general population and the cell phone users have a higher rate. Unfortunately, the biological effects of wireless radiation cover a broad spectrum of illness,including effects on the heart rate.
photo
GrantS
I'm liberal through and through.
01:44 PM on 02/21/2012
If you have a cordless phone then you can't complain about Wi-Fi because they run on the same frequency. It's also the same as your microwave incidentally (but microwaves run at a substantially higher power level).

There are a lot of different types of waves running around out there. Proximity, power level are the major factors to consider. Wi-Fi is considered acceptable levels. If you are concerned then lower the power level on your modem to the minimum (and hope you don't lose internet connection).
12:24 AM on 02/23/2012
Wireless technology is not necessary in many of the applications. But its true, we are in a metal hungry age but it's just kind of silly that people can't be bothered to use the key to open their car door. I find the bleep, bleep very annoying and I resent being caught in the beam.
01:12 PM on 02/21/2012
There are a few studies that show there is danger in Wi-fi. And using it where children work every day is actually an experiment.

I would even say: let them do it.

BUT

If they are wrong about safety as they have been so many times they have to go to jail for murder if someone dies and inflicting grievous bodily harm otherwise - punishment added for every single case.

They do not install that stuff because they think it is safe. They install it because they are not accountable if it is NOT.