Divorce In Canada: Group Suggests It May Be Too Easy To Split Up

Divorce Canada Laws

First Posted: 02/22/2012 4:03 pm Updated: 02/22/2012 4:17 pm

TORONTO – When the going gets tough, married couples too easily turn to divorce as a way out, a socially conservative Canadian think tank said Wednesday.

Divorce proceedings in Canada are not complicated enough, the Institute of Marriage and Family Canada suggests in its report "Finding fault with no-fault divorce."

Under current laws, one person can decide to get divorced for “no reason at all” two weeks into their marriage or simply initiate proceedings by moving out, the report's author Andrea Mrozek said.

“Canadian law actually values marriage as a short-term prospect through no-fault divorce,” she argued.

According to the federal Divorce Act, spouses simply need to prove a breakdown in their marriage, either by showing they are living separately or that someone has committed adultery or is mentally or physical abusing the other.

Mrozek’s report suggests that no-fault divorces have contributed to higher rates of divorce, increased poverty and the early initiation of children into adulthood — but it stops short of calling for a revamp of Canada’s divorce law.

“It wasn’t meant to be a hugely political piece. I think it is something that we would consider, (but) asking that type of thing would have to be well thought out,” she said. “We would want to enlist the help of lawyers to ensure that it was thought out properly.”

Rather, Mrozek said, what she wants to stress is that no-fault divorce hasn’t achieved its intended purpose: to decrease the acrimony that arises from the process, limit the involvement of children in court proceedings and allow individuals to get on more quickly with their lives.

The Institute of Marriage and Family suggests there are non-legal solutions, such as a notification document, that couples who feel their problems are insurmountable could use before officially pulling the plug.

“When you enter into the legal realm, you have enlisted a lawyer already. To many people, I suppose, it can feel like a road you can never exit from, but when you have serious enough problems you need to convey them somehow so this (notification document) could be a precursor to that,” Mrozek said.

The notification document would be sent from one partner to the other warning them that without resolution — and reconciliation — they’ll seek a divorce.

“It’s a proposal to reduce unnecessary divorce,” she said.

Data collected by Statistics Canada show the divorce rate spiking in the 1980s but holding relatively steady in the earlier part of this decade. The latest available data published in 2004 suggests that 41.3 per cent of marriages are expected to end in divorce before their 50th anniversary. Statistic Canada spokeswoman Marie Lavallée-Farah said the government no longer collects divorce statistics.

Related on HuffPost:

Happy Kids Divorce More
1  of  12
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
A University of Cambridge study released in February 2011 found that happy teens are more likely to divorce than their less-happy counterparts. Researchers used data from 2,776 teens ages 13-15 who participated in a 1946 British cohort study, in which their teachers rated their happiness levels at the time. The researchers then went back to those same people at ages 36, 43, and 53 and measured their incidence of mental disorder, life satisfaction, and social lives -- including divorce. The teens who had received the highest happiness ratings divorced at a higher rate (20.4 %) than the other, less-happy study participants.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

TORONTO – When the going gets tough, married couples too easily turn to divorce as a way out, a socially conservative Canadian think tank said Wednesday. Divorce proceedings in Canada are not co...
TORONTO – When the going gets tough, married couples too easily turn to divorce as a way out, a socially conservative Canadian think tank said Wednesday. Divorce proceedings in Canada are not co...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 71
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Don McLeod
07:54 PM on 02/23/2012
This is another flawed faith based idea bringing religion back with out any popular demand for it. We have moved away from faith because it is flawed. At it worse it need to lie attracts and empowers that 1% of us without empathy, those "snakes in suits', psychopaths. With no empathy, they lie they care. That with daily practice becomes manipulation. They will tell a believer anything they want to hear, including the question the olympic ad asks "Do you believe?". Is this what Canadians want to find Christ in a Harper created time of personal crisis?Conservatives and psychopaths attract and Harper will proof me correct.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:15 PM on 02/23/2012
Is English your second language?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:48 PM on 02/23/2012
What a completely fluff article, who wrote it, a lawyer looking to make more money off divorce by making it more complicated. Stupid. People nowadays are going to get divorced because there isn't the commitment that there was in the older generations due to finances or religion. Also, making divorce more difficult, you end up with more domestic violence.
02:46 PM on 02/23/2012
So sending out another document, threatening divorce without a resolution to the upset partners demands? I can assure you that if a couple need to send a document to tell the partner that there is something wrong, the marriage is doomed already.
The fact they would need to use a document to share their feelings suggests that they do not communicate properly or well enough to resolve this situation.
Does she think people just wake up and run to the lawyers? I don't know many failed marriages that spent at least a year or two trying to work things out, it's usually durng this process someone becomes resentful and hurt, and the games begin. Another con telling people what to do , when they themselves most likely have never experienced the situation. (unless they are a politician of course)
photo
jf12
Esta vez saldré como las otras y me escaparé.
11:47 AM on 02/23/2012
This is exactly correct:
"no-fault divorce hasn’t achieved its intended purpose: to decrease the acrimony that arises from the process, limit the involvement of children in court proceedings and allow individuals to get on more quickly with their lives"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Bobrowski
12:10 PM on 02/23/2012
So, what is the answer -- introduce fault back into divorce and the chronic lying about fault that was in place before? Is it in society's interest to force someone to remain married?

There are enough penalties in divorce -- economic and social -- that should keep sane people from divorcing unless circumstances are pretty horrific. Nothing about divorce is easy.

So, would you suggest that a judge should tell people whether they worked hard enough on their marriage? Where woudl you find reliable evidence. The parties testify -- and the parties are the ones with "skin in the game". Unfortunately, it is not that uncommon for people to lie in court and withhold or destroy evidence these days.

Why are people so fast to judge and engineer the lives of others?
photo
jf12
Esta vez saldré como las otras y me escaparé.
01:04 PM on 02/23/2012
What is a marriage vow good for, in these times of no-fault divorce? "To have and to hold until I don't want to" is no binding vow at all; it's a fraud, a sham, a pretence, a modern parody of what used to be.
photo
jf12
Esta vez saldré como las otras y me escaparé.
05:49 PM on 02/23/2012
To me, living separately is tantamount to divorce. I still don't know what's an in-between state. Partly moved out? Spending some nights back in the ol' bed together?
03:21 PM on 02/23/2012
And how is a piece of paper or legilation supposed to make two peole act like human beings? As usual cons wanting someone or something else to do the work for them. Always trying to lay blame on someone or something else.
If people want to act like jerks in their divorce then they will act like jerks.
11:41 AM on 02/23/2012
What? Divorce too easy? Next, keep women from accessing contraception. We'll be back in the 1950's in no time. Who would benefit from running a story like this?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BCPATRIOT
British Columbia
11:27 AM on 02/23/2012
Governments & lawyers thrive on marriages & divorces.

Marriage is becoming a thing of the past... I know of about 30 couples that are living common law and they are very happy together.

I know of about 19 couples who are married that are very miserable living together.

I believe divorces should be made very easy to get and cost nothing, after all we are not here to feed lawyers.
08:58 AM on 02/23/2012
How about making it harder to get married?... or better yet, make it harder to have children...

-

A new level of government bureaucracy, that ought to do it!
[/sarcasm off]
08:15 AM on 02/23/2012
I really loathe the watchdog groups who think it necessary to push their view of the world onto everybody. Divorce should stay the way it is and it's ugly and nasty, sure, but making it harder to do will not make fewer people get divorced it will just make divorce more ugly. I think, if anything, maybe it should be a little harder to get married. Not that I think my views should be pushed onto anybody, but I think that if people had to live together before getting married, go to couples counselling, and get a prenup (which is actually the smart thing to do regardless of your annual after-tax income). I think with those three things you can pretty easily decipher if you want to marry the person. Although, I really don't believe that those should be implemented into anything because that would be a little too much government input in lives for me.
photo
djbaldwin
livin, lovin, laffin, learnin...
04:01 AM on 02/23/2012
Marriage is the only cause of divorce.

Perhaps it is time to replace proverbial nonsense with realism.
photo
Spanky McFarlane
ILLEGITIMUS NON CARBORUNDUM.
11:46 PM on 02/22/2012
How timely,

I hope this isn't in response to the PM's wife living at the Chateau Laurier, as former Mulroney 'Cheif of Staff' Norman Spectre tried to report, but had his piece zapped by the G&M?

With only a hammer to offer in the 'Conservative tool box', isn't it strange how every problem resembles a 'nail' ?
SamEasy
You really don`t want to know.
10:05 PM on 02/22/2012
Should they make getting married harder, too?
09:58 PM on 02/22/2012
Divorce is not "easy" no matter what anyone says. And just making divorce harder won't keep people living together if they don't want to. If 2 adults no longer want to live together it's not the government's business to tell them they have to stay under the same roof. And as for the "reason" why people get divorced, I didn't want my personal business to be made part of the public record for anyone to read, so the one thing my ex and I did agree on, was to click the 'incompatible' box ... or something to that effect. It really is a private matter.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
cinemaven
Follow me on Twitter :)
09:22 PM on 02/22/2012
I'm lucky to be blissfully wed for 32 years and divorce has never been a thought for me but having seen friends and family go through it, I'd say it's still too hard (and this group should keep their noses out of people's bedrooms).
I don't know anyone who took a divorce lightly, not even couples I know without kids and speaking as someone who's happy in love and marriage, I think everyone deserves a chance to be this happy and that sometimes means ending a poor marriage to find your happiness.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marg Wood
Peace
12:47 PM on 02/23/2012
Divorce should be easy! People no longer have to stay together in unhappy marriages and women are no longer possessions! For the sake of the children is not really a good idea. Children are happier when their parents are happy!
03:51 PM on 02/24/2012
"Children are happier when their parents are happy" is a remarkably simplistic view. How far do you extend that particular theorum? Addicts are happier when they're using, think their kids are happier in those circumstances? My Mom left myself and my Dad when I was 13 to take up with another man. She did so for her own reasons, made her happier for a time, certainly didn't for me. Children are Happier when they feel like their parents make them a priority, not something that takes a backseat to their own selfish needs. That said, Divorce should be made easier and women are most certainly not possessions, on that we agree.
09:20 PM on 02/22/2012
the problem is society, and how we allow the media to run our lives... if we knew more truths and if our goal as a society was about self realization, and if wisdom was a virtue we wouldn't be in the mess we're in. Most people have no clue, rightfully so, of who they really are, what makes them really tick, who they're compatible with, how their hormones work, what commitment means, how to live authentically, what a sexual equal means, how to share a budget, how to balance life, work and family needs, how to maintain your own identity withing a partnership, how to think selflessly, etc. There are so many new pressures on young couples today, and with no true guidance, from society, it's even harder on marriage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
see-ellen2001
08:59 PM on 02/22/2012
Make divorce harder? Make lawyers' lives easier.