Household Debt: Bank Of Canada Warns Home Equity Loans Pose Threat To Financial Security

Household Debt Bank Of Canada

First Posted: 02/23/2012 10:51 am Updated: 02/23/2012 7:30 pm

OTTAWA - Canadians are becoming increasingly vulnerable to a housing correction, exposing them to a perfect storm of high debt and falling assets, the Bank of Canada warns.

In a book of four research papers released Thursday, the central bank suggests many Canadians have constructed their finances on a house of cards, with ever rising home values the key and vulnerable support.

The bank economists point out that home prices have risen sharply in the past dozen or so years along with debt, as households needed both bigger mortgages to buy homes and used equity from higher home values to finance other purchases.

"These facts are interrelated, since rising house prices can facilitate the accumulation of debt," the report notes. "Households therefore experience a significant shock if house prices were to reverse."

It adds that falling home prices could have a "relatively large impact on consumption" as equity disappears and the ability of householders to borrow is diminished.

It calculates that a 10 per cent drop in home prices could generate a one per cent decline in consumption, which would slow economic growth.

TD Bank chief economist Craig Alexander said the fact the central bank devoted it's winter review on a single topic — debt — demonstrates how seriously it takes the issue.

And he says the bank's example of a 10 per cent correction is not unrealistic given that it is the over-valuation figure the International Monetary Fund gives for Canadian housing stock. Alexander himself believes it could be as much as 15 per cent.

He agrees that the central bank has every reason to be worried, because a correction could knock the stuffing out of Canada's fragile recovery.

"When it comes to the housing market and personal debt, I'm not worried that a housing market correction will lead to a problem in the Canadian financial system," he said.

"I worry more about the economy. I worry that if you have a drop in home prices and you wind up with consumers struggling to deleverage, it will lead to an economic contraction."

The bank does not suggest a U.S.-style housing collapse for Canada is in the offing, nor does Alexander. A big part of the problem south of the border was due to easy credit conditions, something Canadian banks have avoided.

But the bank's economists are clearly concerned nevertheless about the pitfalls from the steady increase in household debt, which has risen as a percentage of income from 110 per cent in 1999 to 153 per cent currently.

And debt to household equity has risen as well even as home prices have soared.

Part of that is well grounded on growing incomes, it says, but part is also due to super-low interest rates and unrealistic expectations that home values will keep rising.

Of particular concern to the central bank is that much of the increase in household debt was not mortgages, but loans secured by home equity which Canadians in turn spent on consumer items and renovating their homes.

"These findings suggest that household indebtedness constitutes an important source of risk to household spending, since it makes households more vulnerable to substantial negative economic consequences in the event of a correction in house prices," one paper states.

The Bank of Canada papers were released hours after a new analysis by the TransUnion management firm found that non-mortgage borrowing had slowed sharply in the past year to a one per cent increase, the lowest since 2004.

While that represents only a small fraction of what Canadians owe, analysts have noted that overall debt accumulation has also been slowing of late and that expectations for home prices have moderated.

That's a good indicator that Canadians are starting to heed the message, said Alexander.

One paper issued by the central bank suggested that home prices have been influenced not only by low mortgage rates but also on expectations that values will keep rising. History shows that's a bad bet, the paper states.

"Over history, these other factors are associated with the medium-run tendency of house prices to rise faster than their long-run trend for a number of years and then subsequently adjust back to trend."

Those corrections could be as great as 20 to 30 per cent relative to the growth in the economy, it said.

The Bank of Canada also notes that increasing debt levels have made Canadians more vulnerable to bankruptcies and insolvencies. Since 2000, about 100,000 Canadians a year have filed for insolvency or bankruptcy, triple the number in the 1980s.

But the bank points out that in most cases, these were not homeowners. The vast majority are renters and the unemployed who have taken on too much in the way of credit card debt and bank loans.

5 ECONOMIC LANDMINES THAT COULD IMPACT CANADA IN 2012
Loading Slideshow...
  • 1. RISING HOUSEHOLD DEBT

    Canada's household debt burden climbed to yet another record high in the third-quarter, prompting Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney to call it <a href="http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Mark+Carney+again+sounds+alarm+rising+Canadian+household+debt/5856418/story.html" target="_hplink">"the greatest risk to the domestic economy</a>." At 150.8, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/14/us-economy-debt-idUSTRE7BC2DY20111214" target="_hplink">Canada's debt-to-income ratio is now higher than in the U.S. or the U.K</a>. Meanwhile, household net worth fell, which, as many observers have warned, has made Canadians more vulnerable to adverse economic shocks.

  • 2. SLUGGISH CONSUMER DEMAND

    Though BMO's Doug Porter maintains that low interest rates and modest job growth should prevent household debt issue from becoming "a clear and present danger to the outlook in the year ahead," he predicts that the debt burden is likely to increase. Unlike in the U.S., Canada's consumer recession was "very mild," leaving scant room for growth in consumer spending, he says. "At best, we see consumer spending growing in line with income next year," he said. "We've actually pegged it a little bit below income growth next year ... at less than two per cent in 2012." (FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP/Getty Images)

  • 3. EUROZONE INSTABILITY

    When TD cut its 2012 outlook for the Canadian economy earlier this week to 1.7 per cent, the bank cited a deepening fiscal crisis in the eurozone as one of the primary factors. More bearish than BMO, which on Thursday held its expectation for Canada's GDP growth next year at two per cent, TD is forecasting "a deterioration of financial conditions and a significant European recession in the first half of next year." "<a href="http://www.td.com/document/PDF/economics/qef/qefdec11_can.pdf" target="_hplink">A deepening recession in the region will exert a significant drag on the global economy</a>," the bank maintained. "Canada will be negatively impacted through weaker commodity prices, confidence and export growth. Labour markets will also soften as a result." (ERIC FEFERBERG/AFP/Getty Images)

  • 4. CHINA LOSING STEAM

    The signs are abundant that the world's largest economy is cooling. Mounting local government debt and slowdowns in everything from industrial production to <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2011/12/09/china-economy-slows.html" target="_hplink">the housing market has led many to predict softer economic growth in 2012</a>. "<a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/12/13/143623874/after-boom-chinas-property-market-heads-lower" target="_hplink">Real estate is a locomotive industry that leads at least 58 other industries</a>," Cai Weimin, who runs a real estate think tank in Shanghai, told NPR. "Doomsday probably won't come true in 2012, but for the Chinese economy, 2012 will be a very tough year. (Aaron tam/AFP/Getty Images)

  • 5. GROWING INCOME GAP

    As Canada's rich-poor divide widens, some experts warn that the concentration of wealth at the top of the income distribution and stagnating wages for everyone else could be a drag on the economy. Though Canada's income gap is not as pronounced as in the U.S., Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives economist Armine Yalnizyan argues that the growing divide is bad for business all the same. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/news/mind-the-gap" target="_hplink"><strong>Mind The Gap: Our examination of Canada's growing income divide</strong></a> "<a href="http://www.canadianbusiness.com/article/39123--inequality-is-bad-for-business" target="_hplink">Real growth in purchasing power has been restricted to a small fraction of Canadian consumers</a> in what is already a small market," she maintained in an op-ed in Canadian Business magazine. "Throttling aggregate demand slows the economy for everyone." Anne Golden, president and CEO of the Conference Board of Canada, echoes this sentiment. "Growing inequality distorts consumer patterns," she told The Huffington Post in a recent interview. "Most businesses, except maybe for Porsche [dealerships], rely on rising purchasing power of the many, not the few, to deliver growth and profits." (ADRIAN DENNIS/AFP/Getty Images)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

Filed by Daniel Tencer  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:36 PM on 03/15/2012
This is why the Liberal Government is using its immense knowledge of the various economic forces in play and putting a gaming and lottery station everywhere it can find in the province. It knows that once people start to watch thier housing prices along with their income collapse the government will need a way to still, steal, (oops i meant honest gamble), drag or cojole as much of their remaining dollars out of them as possible hence the OLG for everyone (sucker) program. Who says that this isn't a government without a clue on how to create jobs and grow an economy it knows when everything looks bleakest you can still talk people into chaining themselves to a slot or a card table for that 1 chance in a Billion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haselcheck
Had enuff...Get active....
06:22 PM on 02/24/2012
BOC is afraid to destroy that Wealth Effect that the Cities like Toronto and Vancouver are feeling....Once the real estate market in these cities come back to reality....people will wake up...and the spending will slow down or halt.....Don't rely on your house to provide your retirement lifestyle.....It should be a place to live not an asset built like a bubble...
02:51 PM on 02/24/2012
Tell us something we don't know. It was a house of cards in 2008 and it still is. Instead of free market forces correcting the situation and rebuilding the foundation all they did was add more cards to the tower. They manipulated the market with cheap cash at emergency interest rates to bail out the banks and economy, and baited the people with stories of economic recovery. All completely irresponsible.
photo
ratiocinate
What we tolerate, our children embrace.
01:23 PM on 02/24/2012
The housing bubble in America has cost millions and left that many homeless. I live in Michigan, when I bought my house in 2005, I paid $112,000 at 6% interest....I just received my new tax value adjustment and my house is now valued at $54,000....I owe twice that and the banks will not let you refinance nor can you sell it for what you owe. Since 2005, I have invested into my home, new roof, energy efficient furnace/appliances, new windows, new garage & more....this is money I will never get back out in a sale due to the market. My plans to sell and move in 2015 will never happen because of the housing fiasco.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
uneeda
Make Peace in Our Time
10:54 AM on 02/24/2012
it should be clear to everyone by now that the debt economy is finished
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norma Ward
10:07 AM on 02/24/2012
As was the case in the United States, certain of Canada's real estate markets are becoming increasingly less affordable by average families. As shown in this article, out of 35 major real estate markets in Canada, only 9 are considered affordable with 6 being considered severely unaffordable when measured in terms of median price to median household income:

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2012/01/demographia-international-housing.html

This is in large part why Canadian families are heavily in debt.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patrickwwalker
04:51 PM on 02/23/2012
File this under: Sh*t Everyone Knew for a Long Time

The incompetence of the finance industry knows no bounds. I could have told them that in 500 words or less. It's also funny how they think there was a recovery in Canada. As J.R. Saul wrote, reality is not in the world, it's in the measurements made by professionals. And these professionals made sure the measurements were made to reinforce what they wanted to see.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
02:02 PM on 02/23/2012
Canadians are not mindful of these matters. These notices sound like school warnings. Cross at the intersection. Whose going to walk to the end of the block when you can take short cut. Either you have the attitude to be economically conservative our you bight the bullet. Mark Carney and Jim Flaherty have been preaching this song and dance about consumer debt but that's not what people do. They want it now. So if the housing bubble breaks, a lesson taught is a lesson learned. As for cycles, interest rates rise and fall but over the last thirty years interest rates have continued to drop and stagnate. Predictions of rising mortgage rates and loan rates have not materialized. The Bank of Canada has made sure of that. They have also with the banks kept investment returns low so people are forced to release funds they normally would turn over. They don't want you to save and therefore will continue this path. Whether an increase in economic growth will change this is anyone's guess but don't be fooled. If you don't save because of low returns and you borrow on your house to live when this bubble pops the banks win. You lose.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dread
01:17 PM on 02/23/2012
Home equity loans generally are bad. That is how the US housing market got in the mess that it's in. Unless it is required for home improvement ( a new roof ) it is a dangerous undertaking.
photo
Poster999
A promise made is a debt unpaid.
12:46 PM on 02/23/2012
My daughter payed a lot for a house in Calgary a few years ago. I think she will do OK but she could run into trouble if interest rates rise too much. Of course Calgary is a boom city but they are also building a lot of houses there and if something happens to the oil boom it could all go south pretty quickly. Of course there is no sure thing, but it would seem real estate is not the sure fire investment it once was.
10:39 AM on 02/24/2012
Your last line is a key issue, real estate has never been a sure fire investment. The illusion of this popular belive was created by people not realizing that the in the last 15+ years several times when prices should have corrected a bit the correction was postponed via artficial means (plunging rates, tax incentives to plow money into your home) passing the inevitable down the line, and even though some people have been trying to make it public knowledge (ie this article) I still hear most people chanting the mantras of "prices only rise" "gaurenteed to get your money back" with respect to all things housing. This could get a lot uglier than it ever should have with the demographic shift over the next 10 years and the huge amount of baby boomers with no retirement savings outside of selling their home.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Glass Cannon
Let every eye negotiate for itself.
12:14 PM on 02/23/2012
I owe 200K on a 300K house. If the value of the house drops catastrophically then I will owe 200K on a 250K house. If home values drop worse than that I will likely have much greater problems than the value of my home. Like the end of the world, no jobs for anyone, etc.

My banker calls her lending practices conservative. I hope she wasn't joking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
02:16 PM on 02/23/2012
Yes that has happened in the 1980s in Calgary. People left their keys on the bank managers desk and walked out. I don't think you cando that now, i.e you still will have to deal with the mortgage mind you , you could remortgage and pay less like rent. also in Manitoba people's homes dropped in value in the late 90s. You were selling lower than you bought. The difference between you and me then, you are in for 200 grand I was in it for 80 grand. I stuck it out but it wasn't a good feeling. At the time they were cutting employees. I escaped that but it was close. Horseshoes, plain horseshoes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Glass Cannon
Let every eye negotiate for itself.
02:24 PM on 02/23/2012
If this was 1981 none of this would be happening. The interest rates were like 12%. Can you even imagine the financial destruction if we went back there again?
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
12:10 PM on 02/23/2012
Debauchery - Mutual fund companies often try to convince their clients to take equity out of their homes via a refinance or a home equity line of credit, and invest it in mutual funds.

Their pitch makes mathematical sense - you'll only pay 3-5% on the money borrowed against your home, and based on historical earnings, you can find yourself making 5-7% returns on longer term MF investments.

But what if you need cash and your unit values are down ? Are you going to sell at below market value and end up paying interest on money you never had ? What if your house value drops ? You suddenly owe more than your house is worth, and find yourself hoping to hit good returns just to pay for the equity you took out.

We're asking people to gamble their homes and sometimes their lives in the pursuit of 'free easy money'. The lure of ‘easy living’ is making fools out of uneducated and/or undisciplined people, and we’re doing everything in our power to make it easier, using favourable tax policies and sometimes even forcing people into them (my wife was offered a RSP plan at work – the catch ? it could only be invested in mutual funds…. She lost a couple thousand bucks).