Transport Canada OK's Northern Gateway Supertankers

First Posted: 02/23/2012 2:47 pm Updated: 04/24/2012 5:12 am


Transport Canada has "no regulatory concerns" with Enbridge's proposed marine operations for the Northern Gateway pipeline, clearing the way for supertankers to carry Canadian crude across the Pacific.


Thursday, Transport Canada told the federal Joint Review Panel examining the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project, that it had finished its review of the proposed tanker traffic that would sail through waters off B.C.'s North Coast, taking crude from the Alberta oilsands to overseas markets in China.


"While there will always be residual risk in any project, after reviewing the proponent's studies and taking into account the proponent's commitments, no regulatory concerns have been identified for the vessels, vessel operations, the proposed routes, navigability, other waterway users and the marine terminal operations associated with vessels supporting the Northern Gateway Project," reads the Transport Canada review.


The $5.5-billion project would see an additional 250 oil tankers arriving at Kitimat each year, which means Transport Canada would have to step up its monitoring, the report said.


Northern Gateway has attracted fierce opposition from First Nations, environmental and other groups who fear an oil spill from the pipeline itself or from tankers sailing through narrow coastal channels could cause grave ecological harm.


"The proposed shipping routes are appropriate for the oil tankers that will be used at the proposed terminal," said the report, adding "there are no charted obstructions that would pose a safety hazard to fully loaded oil tankers."


Fishing advocates worry about human error


The marine operations review was signed off on by Transport Canada, Environment Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, the Canadian Coast Guard and Pacific Pilotage Authority Canada.


It does point out there are some narrow areas where extra caution is needed for two-way traffic. It also said there may be an increased threat to marine mammals, such as whales, along the shipping route, and encourages Enbridge to take steps to minimize harm.


But Prince Rupert fishing advocates say the potential for human error is too great, and because of that, locals will continue to oppose the project.


"It exists, it will happen. That's a reality and each and every time that is the deciding factor," said Des Nobels with the T. Buck Suzuki Environmental Foundation.


"So, as safe as any shipping lane is, it's only as safe as any individual driving down it. The whole question of a spill is not a question of if, it's a question of when," said Nobels.


But Enbridge says the Transport Canada endorsement shows the company has done due diligence when it comes to safety for all shipping on B.C.'s North Coast.


"It is important for the public, particularly B.C. residents, to know that we've done our homework and that our marine plan has been thoroughly reviewed," said Janet Holder, Enbridge's senior executive with responsibility for the Northern Gateway Project.


"I think the TERMPOL report underlines that what we are proposing is well planned and safe, and indeed would enhance safety for all shipping on B.C.'s North Coast," said Holder.


Kitimat port safest option, says Enbridge CEO


The Northern Gateway Project consists of twin pipelines — one that would carry 525,000 barrels per day of oilsands crude westward for export, and one that would bring 193,000 barrels per day of imported condensates inland for use in the oilsands.


The company has been asked repeatedly why it didn't instead opt to end the pipeline at Prince Rupert, which has a shorter route to open ocean than does Kitimat.


On Enbridge's most recent quarterly conference call, CEO Pat Daniel said the company would look at other options, but that it's convinced its route to Kitimat is the safest one.


A federal government joint review panel examining the Northern Gateway Project has been making stops across Alberta and B.C. since January, and will be in Old Masset in Haida Gwaii beginning Feb. 28.


The joint review panel will consider Transport Canada's study of the supertanker marine route when making its recommendation on the proposed pipeline.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 64
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
north of 60
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
12:53 AM on 02/25/2012
A few thousand people will protest as ineffectively as the 'occupy protests'. Millions support the government's economic policies. The pipelines will be built, the oil will be exported, and the revenue it brings will pay for all the free government benefits everyone, including the protestors, believe their entitled to. Welcome to the real world of global economics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
4evercanadian
Still my guitar gently weeps
06:00 PM on 02/26/2012
Occupy has been completely ineffective???. When police intentionally shoot peaceful protestors in the head with tear gas canisters and pepperspray peaceful protestors, more people start to side with the protestors. Or are you an Andrew Breitbart supporter, who is only capable of spewing lies and hatred?

Not sure about you, but I lived through the Vietnam war protests, and believe me they were extremely effective. Occupy is just getting started. The war protests took a few years to really gain strength and momentum. That will happen for Occupy too.
03:03 PM on 02/24/2012
i've lived through a wonderfull time in history 42/2112,but we the people have to do something ,rebellioius if need be ,i pray my grandchildren would have a better life ,i don't think so ,we the people have to start organising as in other countries ,however we' ll be called terrorists hmmm
02:44 PM on 02/24/2012
This project hasn't be "approved" at an official level yet, nor will it be approved. This is a favored government/corporate tactic. "Approve" it on every prepping level you can get it approved except for the one that counts and claim that its an unstoppable force.

I think many have already stated it but you're going to see a massive social uprising over the whole Northern Gateway and OilSands pipeline project. No one wants this thing (or at least the gross majority think its an absolutely terrible idea). This thing is just at the beginning.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:01 PM on 02/24/2012
I hope to gawd you are right, our future depends on stopping this. I am going to the hearings in my area to express my objections to the whole project.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
north of 60
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
12:57 AM on 02/25/2012
"massive social uprising over the whole Northern Gateway and OilSands pipeline project"

In your dreams... There's a real world outside your mom's basement, and it doesn't take you seriously. It's composed of millions who think selling our oil to the US and Asia is a good idea.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
4evercanadian
Still my guitar gently weeps
05:55 PM on 02/26/2012
Do you have a poll to back up your claim that millions of people support this project? I don't live in my mums basement and I think I will be joining the protestors. Northern Gateway isn't going to happen.
photo
njdanie
old retired nerd
12:47 PM on 02/24/2012
There is so much money at stake I can't see any power on earth stopping this. I hope there's something in this for BC, given that they take all the environmental risk and not all the revenue is just gonna go to Alberta.
12:58 PM on 02/24/2012
Don't kid yourself - the lion's share of the revenue is going right out of this country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alicks
11:33 AM on 02/24/2012
I wish more effort and dollars were being put towards investing in alternative energy sources. Six point six billion for this project seems like such a waste.
12:55 PM on 02/24/2012
Not to mention the untold (literally) millions spent on lobbying in the US, China and now the EU by the Canadian government on behalf of this industry.
11:25 AM on 02/24/2012
In 2010 an Enbridge pipeline spilled 1 million gallons of Alberta tar sands diluted bitumen into the Kalamazoo River watershed before Enbridge realized there was a spill. Unrefined tar sands oil (diluted bitumen) is more corrosive and toxic than conventional crudes.

In 2006 the BC Ferry Queen of the North ran aground on Gil Island and sank in Wright Sound, 135 km south of Prince Rupert - the same area proposed as one of the tanker routes into Kitimat. There is a good reason why places in that area are named Terror Point, Calamity Bay, and Grief Point - frequent gale force winds and freezing spray (that coats vessels with ice making them unstable).

The harper government in co-operation with international companies heavily invested in Alberta's tar/bitumen industry is proposing to put the BC coast, known as "the Galapagos of the north', at risk of an inevitable leak or spill. No one can guarantee that a spill or leak won't happen - they just hope it won't happen on their watch.

If BC Premier Clark can't decide where she stands on this disaster-wating-to-happen, then it's time BC for voters tell her where they stand.
photo
ratiocinate
What we tolerate, our children embrace.
12:49 PM on 02/24/2012
The Kalamazoo river runs through our area and it was a nightmare. Homes, water supplies and families destroyed from this. My thoughts are that they are pushing the Northern Gateway because we are fighting the Keystone Pipe line. Some of us are concerned about our environment and what we are doing to our air, land and water. We can't eat oil and when our farm lands are destroyed what will you do then? What are we doing to our children's children?

I agree, we the people, of both Canada and American need to stand up against the big oil companies who's only care is big money regardless of the destruction that occurs in it's path. We need to put the same money the governments waste trying to convince us piping oil is safe and use it towards green renewable energy. Our dependent on oil needs to stop.
02:12 PM on 02/24/2012
Your former government and currently ours dance to the tune of big oil. But if our current government's reaction to the overwhelming public condemnation of their online snooping bill is any indication, the people do have power - they only have to use it (the government has now decided to send the bill to committee for amendments instead of ramming it through Parliament as they usually do). Power to the people.
02:14 PM on 02/24/2012
What is shocking is the language in this release. Transport Canada has "no regulatory concerns" yet they "encourage" Enbridge to protect marine life and take other precautions.

Sounds like Canada just gave them a carte blanche. Is this even Canada anymore?
11:15 AM on 02/24/2012
Transport Canada is really stupid for allowing this to happen. There are too many oil spills that have happened due to human error. Funny how making lots of money, makes certain people do really stupid things.
10:30 AM on 02/24/2012
Supertankers are great for the following reasons:
1) When the spill comes its concentrated in one place.
2) Bigger targets for the incompetent terrorists.
3) better TV news pictures.
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
10:23 AM on 02/24/2012
Rise up people, contact your MP, the litany of falsehoods, deceptions, and out right mendacity is boiling over. The supertanker approval is just one more.
http://tidalstation.blogspot.com/2012/02/54-north-and-plan-to-nowhere-part-1.html
10:16 AM on 02/24/2012
bull ahead no matter what ---

C10 -----experts sat we've donr that dont do it -----but its bull ahead

pipeline ---empirical evidence says its bad dont do it ---but its bull ahead

C30 ------no doubt will be subject to bull ahead
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JeanFrancois Lord
10:09 AM on 02/24/2012
a gorvenment that works for only 1 industry , hurts all others.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norma Ward
10:04 AM on 02/24/2012
The Harper government's single-minded attempt to turn Canada into a petrostate is frightening. Rather than modestly increases in Canada's oil sands production to supply growing domestic needs, they are only interested in drawing down Canada's oil reserves as quickly as possible, an idea that is foolish at best as shown here:

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2012/01/canadas-oil-sands-are-we-exporting.html

Canada's domestic supply of conventional crude has been on the decline since the early 1970s and despite the country's exports of synthetic crude, imports of nearly 800,000 BOPD are required to meet growing consumption. Perhaps the Harper government should be considering Canada's energy security ahead of security for both China and the United States.
photo
Poster999
A promise made is a debt unpaid.
09:53 AM on 02/24/2012
From what I've been reading research is inconclusive concerning the dilbit which will be sent westward in this pipeline. Some say it is much more corrosive than conventional oil products that the pipeline is designed to ship. Also it would appear that cleanup in the event of a spill is much more difficult than a conventional spill. The condensate which will be sent east is a gas full of dangerous hydrocarbons which poses it's own unique risks.

Once the initial construction is completed and the few thousand jobs are gone we will be left with an estimated 40 or 50 permanent jobs. So one has to wonder if the gain is going to be worth the pain and how many taxpayer dollars are going to be required to maintain this pipeline and activities related to it. Of course there are more things to consider than these few points I've made.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snewell
09:35 AM on 02/24/2012
Canada sure has changed now that the oil companies have taken over.
10:04 AM on 02/24/2012
Yup, more taxes to provide free money to people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
11:10 AM on 02/24/2012
really? How much are you getting?
11:27 AM on 02/24/2012
I'm not sure I would agree with your definition of "free".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjlowry
09:22 AM on 02/24/2012
That's one enormous environmental disaster just waiting to happen...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ansdlmol
02:27 PM on 02/24/2012
Are you predicting or secretly hoping?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjlowry
09:32 AM on 02/29/2012
Predicting obviously... I would never wish that kind of disaster on my worst enemy, let alone the wildlife that any kind of spill will eradicate. I don't hope for this to happen, but tankers like that look to clumsy to move around well and in the ring of fire one good tsunami and that bugger is going belly up. Not a good idea, I don't support this at all.