Anonymous Claims Hack On Ontario Police Chiefs Site

First Posted: 02/25/2012 10:13 am Updated: 02/28/2012 8:27 am

Anonymous C30
he group representing Ontario's top police brass appears to be the latest victim of "hacktivist" organization Anonymous, after the website for the Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police (OACP) was downed in an apparent cyber attack. (AP/Jupiter Images)


The group representing Ontario's top police brass appears to be the latest victim of "hacktivist" organization Anonymous, after the website for the Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police (OACP) was downed in an apparent cyber attack.


In another sign of backlash against the federal government's proposed internet surveillance bill, C-30, hackers on Saturday posted what they claimed to be an online "database leak," which purportedly revealed login usernames and passwords for several administrators' accounts for the OACP website.


The database leak, which has been widely shared via micro-blogging website Twitter, lists the web address for the association as a "target."


A memo about the purported leak begins with a quote alluding to privacy concerns surrounding the reach of the online surveillance bill: "Snoop on to them as they snoop on to you."


The Conservative government's contentious crime-busting legislation, the Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act, would force internet service providers to hand over customer information to police — without a warrant — for the purposes of monitoring clients in order to catch online child predators.


Many police chiefs across Canada supported the bill, reasoning that it was necessary to help fight child pornography.


But a large public outcry ensued, with concerned citizens saying there would be nothing to stop law-abiding web surfers from also being tracked without their knowledge or consent.


CBC's John Northcott said Saturday's information dump includes "a series of email addresses, passwords, full names, user names, information from allegedly the Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police website."


'Meant to embarrass' police chiefs


A visit to the website's address on Saturday showed a mostly blank page with an "under maintenance" message at the top.


Joe Couto, a spokesperson with the OACP, said the association wouldn't be intimidated by this sort of activity.


"I can ensure citizens of this province that police will continue to provide opinions to lawmakers on this and any other piece of legislation that comes forward that affects policing in this province," Couto said.


"We pulled our site down so it's not accessible. It appears this was really meant to embarrass, to send a message to Ontario's police leaders."


Public Safety Minister Vic Toews introduced the bill earlier this month.


Loading Slideshow...
  • What's In Online-Snooping Bill

    Like similar legislation introduced in the past by both Conservative and Liberal governments, the new bill includes provisions that would: <em>With files from CBC</em> (Shutterstock)

  • Warantless Online Info

    Require telecommunications and internet providers to give subscriber data to police, national security agencies and the Competition Bureau without a warrant, including names, phone numbers and IP addresses. (CP)

  • Back Door Access

    Force internet providers and other makers of technology to provide a "back door" to make communications accessible to police. (Getty)

  • Location, Location, Location

    Allow police to get warrants to obtain information transmitted over the internet and data related to its transmission, including locations of individuals and transactions. (Alamy)

  • Preserve Data

    Allow courts to compel other parties to preserve electronic evidence. (Alamy)

  • New Bill Is Different

    However, unlike the most recent previous version of the bill, the new legislation: (Alamy)

  • Less Data

    Requires telecommunications providers to disclose, without a warrant, just six types of identifiers from subscriber data instead of 11. (Alamy)

  • Oversight

    Provides for an internal audit of warrantless requests that will go to a government minister and oversight review body. Minister of Public Safety Vic Toews is pictured. (CP)

  • Review After 5 Years

    Includes a provision for a review after five years. (Alamy)

  • More Time To Implement

    Allows telecommunications service providers to take 18 months instead of 12 months to buy equipment that would allow police to intercept communications. (Alamy)

  • Expanded Definitions

    Changes the definition of hate propaganda to include communication targeting sex, age and gender. (Alamy)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

The group representing Ontario's top police brass appears to be the latest victim of "hacktivist" organization Anonymous, after the website for the Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police...
The group representing Ontario's top police brass appears to be the latest victim of "hacktivist" organization Anonymous, after the website for the Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police...
Filed by Michael Bolen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:56 PM on 02/26/2012
From this article (and elsewhere) "I can ensure citizens of this province that police will continue to provide opinions to lawmakers on this and any other piece of legislation that comes forward that affects policing in this province," Couto said.

Couto, you meant "assure". So used to ensuring you don't know the difference? LOL

Seriously, though. Here's a law enforcement site whose tech folks are so lame that they allow ridiculously weak passwords ("love"? you have to be kidding me... I've worked at places that this would never be acceptable as a password and guess what: the software disallows it. Ha.) to be stored unencrypted in their open source database. Read: technically clueless and incompetent and... wait for it: they want to have unfettered access to potentially sensitive (at least to the citizen) personal information on anyone anytime for no defensible reason. No worries there, huh?

I certainly don't want this calibre of personnel in charge of sifting through personal communications and passing it amongst themselves (see the latest scandal in Vancouver Police Department re: accessing and sharing porn on the police network).

Thanks Anonymous. You've proven our law enforcement organizations have a long way to go in this digital world.
04:05 PM on 02/26/2012
Oh, you may be wondering how I knew one of the passwords was "love". It's in the pastebin document that the hacker deposited to communicate his success. Here's a link if you're doubting that the site was actually breached. http://pastebin.com/8uh4KPx1

The fact that the CBC video (go through their site since it's not on here I don't think) shows Mr. Couto being unsuccessful in his attempt to login to his own web site give credibility to this report. His is one of the passwords exposed, so I presume the hacker changed that one (at least) just to make his point and assure (see, I used it correctly -- haha) any doubting Thomases at the OACP that he really was there.

What was Couto's password before the breach you ask? This: dirgov

I think Minister Toews really needs to start paying attention, don't you?
04:14 PM on 02/26/2012
As for this quote from Couto: "We pulled our site down so it's not accessible. " I think they 'pulled the site down' (by which they simply replaced the home page with a page of text saying it's under maintenance... more like in intensive care) because they had no way of getting into the database and are very likely in the process of backing up to a previous version (presuming -- and it's a huge presumption -- they made any backups :) so as to reset the passwords and gain rightful access again. LOL

I think Minister Toews really needs to start paying attention. Not only to the demands of the people and Anonymous, but to the incompetence within the law enforcement agencies (technical that is).
10:26 AM on 02/26/2012
This is DUMB! This is exactly what Vic is looking for, for anonymous and others to rebel and hack bunch of C-30 supporters on0line, so VIC at the end will go to working class people who don't know any batter, and easily convince them that C-30 is the answer!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
relentless63
10:59 AM on 02/26/2012
I hope working class people are not half as stupid as you seem to think they are. This working class person believes in a democratic Canada that is just, free and fair. Any person, corporation or, in this case government, intentionally and with malice. tramples on our inalienable rights for political purposes, to make police work 'easier', for whatever reason, must be resisted. Impotence in the face of the changing face away from the balanced and harmonious Canada that we love is not an option.
11:16 AM on 02/26/2012
Tell you what, last election have seen more elder people and those who near the retirement, than young minds, who chose that night to spend else where. You speak only for yourself, and the faith of Canada on the election day is still not behind the youngsters who may have greater idea of implications of the C-30, but behind those who solemnly believe in the News Network, and the good and convincing article or speech by the party that has the better writers.

It is unfortunate that some will view the hacking attacks to be the answer, when the C-30 promotes control of exactly that! To stop this bill, people against it need to get their butt off the chair and go out and voice their opinion. Outrage comments and so called "legion", is not the answer. All they can do (anonymous), to help, is to bring awareness to more people and promote the protests.

As it stands, what they are doing is actually not in our favour.
03:05 PM on 02/26/2012
Not to worry. I am 99.9% certain Minister Toews has no freaking idea how the internet works and I doubt he welcomes Anonymous (although I'll grant he has antagonized them and again I'll bet he's clueless as to how dangerous that really is.... expect them indeed!) or anyone else showing up his heroes (the police organizations who are really behind the bill and are the reason the government has been attempting to get it passed -- not once, not twice, but three times over the past decade).

This latest embarrassment of OACP simply proves to me that the reason the cops are angling to get more latitude to monitor electronic communications is that they are not interested in getting up to speed with it and understand it well enough to do what Anonymous and others demonstrate is completely possible with the technology we all have at our fingertips.

Instead of chasing the folks who share images of child porn (which is all this bill will help with) they should be freeing up their own resources to pursue the actual felons: those who are abusing children in the first place. Abandoning the extremely unproductive war on drug use would be a start.
08:30 AM on 02/26/2012
Long live Anonymous!

It's time to take the fight to the man and wipe our all this worlds corrupt leaders!
fisch123
For those of you who don't know 1T = 1000B.
01:11 AM on 02/26/2012
The conservatives claim it's all about stopping child abuse, and they will only investigate people when they already have some evidence. If this was really the case all they'd have to do is pass a law lowering the bar when it comes to getting a warrent from a judge, no need to pass this bill which would allow access to anyones private life whom they wish to investigate, or discredit.

The conservative party has such questionable ethics when it comes to so many things. The on going election fraud, election finance violations, personal use of military aircraft, manipulating wheatboard regulations etc I can't image the abuses if they get the powers allowed by C-30.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
relentless63
11:05 AM on 02/26/2012
F/F
I share your fears. The model of governance seems to ape the trend to consolidate as much power, in as few hands, with as absolute a power, as soon as possible. No time for transparency or inclusion of the people's will in any of their handlings. The outcry against C-30 would have stalled its passage for reconsidseration, if Harper had any interest in our concerns.
09:50 PM on 02/25/2012
If you actually care about stopping child abuse, pointless bills like C-30 are the absolute wrong way to go.

Most child abuse doesn't happen online. Most of it will NEVER wind up online.

There are lots of real, very simple predictors to catch child abuse. We've known about them for a long time. Kids who have higher than average unexplained abscences, kids who show sexual interest at an early age, kids who act out violently to abnormal triggers... we can train parents, teachers and other caregivers to recognize the signs, empower CPS to investigate, and stop it BEFORE it goes so far that someone thinks they can get away with posting it online.

If you're trying to help children by tracking abuse after it's already been recorded, shared online and passed around, it's too little, too bloody late.

Of course, anyone with any sense long realized that C-30 has bugger-all to do with actual child abuse and everything to do with silencing dissent online.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
freddychef
Tue,4 Nov '14 Dems take House! & Majority Senate!!
06:00 PM on 02/25/2012
conservative supporters ...
hope you enjoy being lied to..
every promise a con canidate makes, except the opposite in action.
03:33 AM on 02/26/2012
Come on Freddy... Make a point. My point is if my internet history was revealed, this site would be my biggest embarrassment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
relentless63
11:15 AM on 02/26/2012
buylow2, Freddy's point is that the conservative government hasn't delivered what it promised and he, like many of us, no longer trust it. My question to you is, why are you here 'embarrassing' yourself? We don't have the right to your internet history, don't want your internet history, have no interest in your internet history. I'm horrified by citizens who so easily reliquish the freedoms that make this country great.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Runey
religion is why we can't have nice things.
03:01 PM on 02/26/2012
shall you be given a cookie?
04:18 PM on 02/25/2012
Why is it when a majority of police chiefs supports gun registration the lefties get all excited but when the chiefs support bill C30 the lefties (anonymous) start hacking. Once again they only listen to people who back up their own agendas. Sound familiar? There are people on both sides of every issue but as Canadians we deal with it by democratic elections not by hiding under a rock and threatening politicians.
08:39 PM on 02/25/2012
Persons from the entire political spectrum are against C30, and like many of the bills the CPC tries to pass this time around, it's full of problems and there's a huge number of agencies and smart individuals saying so. They don't want to take the high road with politics and don't have any interest in fostering intelligent debate for the betterment of Canada. They instead are only interested in riding the ideology unicorn and ramming their ideas down our throats even when it is dangerous to Canada.

When it comes to Anonymous.. I really have no issue with their activities. They've done a lot of positive things around the world that have influenced positive change. My concern with any operations in Canada is that maybe they're ahead of themselves. The idea of civil disobedience CAN be important when things go south, but it seems a bit early for this kind of activity as there's still a chance for people, regardless of party, to do the right thing. If not, there are still lots of legal recourse available as there are complicated charter-related challenges and things that will definitely take place.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
relentless63
11:20 AM on 02/26/2012
F/F
Great post. Thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djelimon17
what's this thing for?
08:38 AM on 02/26/2012
Anonymous is leftist? Do tell.
03:42 PM on 02/25/2012
I get what they're doing, but I'm worried this sort of thing will make the cons seem sympathetic. Not to me, but to the general public. Sometimes this kind of stuff has the opposite effect.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
All Seeing Guy
Center of the storm
04:32 PM on 02/25/2012
These being the same cons who used military staff to try and discredit a Liberal MP? Tit-for-tat, lets see what anonymous can dig up.
10:07 PM on 02/25/2012
as long as it doesn't backfire, cons seem to be able to twist anything in their favour, sadly.
02:01 PM on 02/25/2012
The bill has been sent for rewriting in order to address the privacy concerns. (????)
Dear Mr. Vic , you don't get it. - We don't need this Bill. You are intentionally muddying the water. To open area's in the law, that can be exploited by Government entities. The PoLICe already have the ability to look into peoples hard drives.. all they have to do is convince "A JUDGE" and ask for a warrant. Step on and quit being a shill to oppression.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
11:52 AM on 02/25/2012
The Internet has to maintain its freedom at any cost in a global world. People who try to gain control for political means need to be stopped. The govt is wrong in its control. To think the innocent are being accused of being guilty before the fact is wrong. I resent people who question the integrity of the innocent to find the guilty. Like schools every one was in then the option was to opt out but they didn't eventually have a place for them so they hung out in the halls. Now everyone can opt in and those that don't are left. We all should have been singing the national anthem but they are the new opt out and are in the gym whereas before they were in class. If we allow the govt to control what the Internet stands for which in part is freedom of thought and expression and as a tool to enhance our lives it will be like schools with a social agenda that destroys are freedom and directs our lives and this is very wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keramos
Guns don't kill, bullets do. Tax the bullets
11:48 AM on 02/25/2012
Hooray for Anonymous.  Here's hoping that this is a prelude to an assault on the Big Brother Bureaus here - especially homeland security.
12:16 PM on 02/25/2012
Schadenfreude rules!