High Arctic Research Station Forced To Close

Canada Research Station

First Posted: 02/28/2012 2:27 pm Updated: 03/ 1/2012 1:36 pm


Canada's northernmost research laboratory is shutting down due to lack of funding.


The Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory (PEARL) in Eureka, Nunavut, which made key measurements last winter used to detect and analyze the largest ozone hole ever detected over the Arctic, will cease year-round operations on April 30. At that time, its equipment will be removed and the building will remain available only for intermittent, short-term projects.


"When you run out of money, there's no alternative but to close the lab," Jim Drummond, a Dalhousie University researcher who is the principal investigator for PEARL, said Tuesday.


The station has been tracking ozone depletion, air quality and climate change in the High Arctic since 2005. But the Canadian Network for Detection of Atmospheric Change, an informal network of university researchers that runs the station, hasn't been able to secure the $1.5 million annual funding required to continue running the station all year round.


That is largely due to the discontinuation of government funding to the Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences, which had been covering three-quarters of the station's costs, and the end to the International Polar Year program.


Drummond said the network has since applied for various government funding programs and has been turned down for all of them, despite the government's frequent assertion that the Arctic is a priority for Canada.


PEARL is the biggest lab in Canada's High Arctic and, at 80 degrees north latitude, one of the closest in the world to the North Pole.


"Shutting it down causes a big gap in the measurements," Drummond said. "We're losing the ability to know what's going on up there."


Many environmental changes happening on a global scale, such as many related to climate, are occurring first in the Arctic, he said, adding "this is an early warning system that we're letting go."


The network said it is trying to pursue funding for short-term research campaigns that would keep the station running for part of the year. In the meantime, it is making intermittent scientific measurements in the summer.


However, an end to year-round operations means the station can no longer take measurements during the polar night — the prolonged, weeks-long darkness of the Arctic winter — and contribute the data it has been collecting for international measurements of aerosols, atmospheric composition and carbon.


'Essential' measurements


Matthias Schneider, a German researcher who leads a global network that uses data from around the world to understand atmospheric water cycle and its role in climate, said PEARL's closure will eliminate a "unique set" of High Arctic measurements "essential" to the global effort.


University of Toronto researcher Kimberly Strong said the end to those and other measurements come "just as our need for high-quality data in the changing Arctic is becoming ever more important."


The closure could also scuttle plans for a polar telescope and magnetic observatory at the site.


The government is expected to set up a new High Arctic research station 1,300 kilometres south of PEARL in Cambridge Bay. However, that won't happen until 2017, and because it is so much farther south, Drummond doesn't think it would be able to make up for the loss of PEARL.


Environment Minister Peter Kent points out that his department does provide some direct support worth about $250,000 toward the polar lab's $1.5-million annual budget. But he says the scientists failed to get grants for the rest of the money needed to keep it going.


"We certainly continue to support the concept of PEARL, but I certainly as minister of Environment Canada do not have a million and a half dollars in my back pocket," Kent said.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 155
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
12:17 PM on 03/01/2012
Nice Tory spin on the "bait-and-switch". Tell them that you will not fund them directly but make them apply for funding thru a third party entity that you do fund. Then deny the third party any funds. So the Tories support the "concept" of arctic research just not the actual research? (Is that like supporting the "concept" of democracy but trying to stop people from voting?) Seems Peter Kent is not doing much for the environment. Just what does his department do these days??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
suddenfun
Subvert the dominant paradigm
01:09 PM on 02/29/2012
With a the millions the super-pac billionaires are blowing on the election that Romney will eventually loose...isn't there a spare mil n'a half out there to keep this vital operation up and running...just shows how perverse and messed up are the effects of a corrupt economic and political system.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Juanne Michaud
Proud Canadian, loony lefty
01:09 PM on 02/29/2012
This is why, day by day and in every way, I hate the Tories more and more. They can't spend the money to monitor the environment, but they can waste millions on offices and agencies that literally do nothing; buy military hardware of dubious value and plan on building prisons we don't need. (Or make the provinces pay for them. I hope the rest of the country pulls a Quebec and says, Forget you, we ain't paying for these jails.)

Maybe PEARL should approach private sources? Some celebs? Or maybe a Warren Buffet or Bill Gates? The money it costs to run the place would be chump change to someone like that, and if nothing else, keeping track of climate change would most certainly fall under the category of enlightened self-interest, and it seems to me that would be a no-brainer to any entrepreneur.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjc
Avoid printing any..
10:21 AM on 02/29/2012
Sad that the priorities don't include understanding our planet's environment enough to fund an arctic research station but in the US we have candidates running for the presidential nomination who fully believe that there is no human caused environmental disaster coming. It's an attitude that seems to be catching: close your eyes and pretend that our offspring will be okay if we just don't look.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alexjones1
11:13 AM on 02/29/2012
Many of us who do not believe in AGW are still very concerned about pollution and the effects of humans to the planet's health. If you really look into the "cap and trade" issue, you see that it is simply a money making scheme pushed by the same criminals who are responsible for many of the worst crimes against the planet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WomenOnGuard
10:20 AM on 02/29/2012
The problem is that who ever funded them, probably doesn't want to hear, that things are just getting worse. Especially since most countries are not willing to stop polluting our world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tikiman
Just out taking my dogma for a walk.
10:14 AM on 02/29/2012
What do you wanna bet if Transcanada wanted to do more research on Tar Sands exploitation in the northern reachs the govt would come up with the money in a heartbeat?

I used to respect Canadians and now they are a reflection of us. How sad.
09:49 AM on 02/29/2012
In relative terms, a million and a half dollars isn't that much. I'm sure we could all summon our inner convictions, and finnaly put our money where our mouth is. As I am but a low income acolyte in the realm of social intellectuals (and their ilk), I will defer the costs to our more financially capable brothers and sisters. Perhaps ten professors from ten prominent universities. All organized labour could surley solve this problem. The Suzuki Foundation, The Seirra Club, Bob Rae, Margaret Atwood, Elizabeth Manley... It's far past the time of our "leaders" talking about making change. It is time that they kick their own asses out of the lap of leisure, and actually do some of the heavy lifting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
11:08 AM on 02/29/2012
Many times ordinary citizens do what their governments should/could do. There are so many initiatives powered/funded this way.
Sadly, not enough people listened to our public intellectuals--and this government got a majority. Now they are going after the CBC, and shoving Sun TV in our faces, loud, cunningly dumb and proud of it.
It is often those with lower income who formalise their concern and give what they can to worthy initiatives.
THey only have so much they can give.
photo
Shadow Diver
When The Going Gets Weird, The Weird Turn Pro
09:48 AM on 02/29/2012
2 billion a week on Afghanistan and yet nobody thinks this work is important enough to fund?
09:34 AM on 02/29/2012
Ah yes we have better things to spend money on........F35's!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bleedingheart9
one small step for man...
09:32 AM on 02/29/2012
Under Bush II, the US government cut funding for new weather satellites which would have given us a better understanding of our changing climate. Big Oil strikes again.
photo
miaontia
56%'er that votes...
09:28 AM on 02/29/2012
Looks like Canada has seen the light. Hopefully the US will follow suit in November.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:37 AM on 02/29/2012
Yeah, breathing is underrated.
photo
Shadow Diver
When The Going Gets Weird, The Weird Turn Pro
09:49 AM on 02/29/2012
So you yearn for the Dark Ages? Figures. You GOTP types cannot handle modern life. It scares the heck out of you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bleedingheart9
one small step for man...
09:58 AM on 02/29/2012
Ignorance is bliss, especially if you think god likes dummies. Can you say unlightenment?
09:22 AM on 02/29/2012
"Canada's northernmost research laboratory is shutting down." What about the Environment Canada research site in Alert NT? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alert,_Nunavut Before you say it's just a weather Station, no... it's not. Scientist from around the globe conduct climate related experiments there. They may not be of the same type, or scale, as PEARL, but it is still a research site.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
09:18 AM on 02/29/2012
Kim Jong Harper has to go.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:07 AM on 02/29/2012
"but I certainly as minister of Environment Canada do not have a million and a half dollars in my back pocket," Kent said."
.....well where have you been spending it? I seem to recall some money recently totally wasted when hot to trot federal conservation officers had the time and money to bother seizing one Canada goose from a woman in Northern BC who had raised it from an orphaned gosling. After a month of terrorizing this woman and this innocent bird they had to return it. Seriously...we don't need some of these 'conservation' officers. We do need someone in the Arctic.

I also recall reading recently that about 145 bears had to be killed by 'conservation officers' this year in the Alberta tar sands because these people up there couldn't be bothered to bear proof their garbage. How much money does it cost to kill 145 bears in the tar sands? Yeah right we don't have 1.5 million.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:58 AM on 02/29/2012
With these cutbacks Pete Kent the Minister of the Environment says he plans to make sure his department monitors any potential loss in the ozone (layer). The best, and least expensive way to do that, is have his doctor check between his ears every once in a while.