Restaurant Calories On Menus: Group Pushing For Clear Nutritional Facts

Restaurant Calories On Menu

First Posted: 02/28/2012 4:02 am Updated: 03/ 2/2012 11:02 am

TORONTO - Canada's restaurants are doing their patrons a grave disservice by keeping nutritional facts off their menus, an Ottawa-based advocacy group suggested Tuesday.

The Centre for Science in the Public Interest said all levels of government must step in and make it mandatory to share the sort of dietary details that eateries so often keep under wraps.

A basic breakdown of calorie totals and sodium values, the centre argued, could go a long way towards stemming the rising tide of obesity in the country.

The centre's findings are outlined in "Writing on the Wall," a 90-page report analysing the impact that restaurants have on public health.

CSPI national co-ordinator Bill Jeffery said restaurant diners should have access to the sort of fundamental nutrition facts legally required to appear on all supermarket food packaging.

"Who would settle for seeing nutrition information in grocery stores in the manager's office or stacked up by the cash register?" Jeffery said in a telephone interview from Ottawa.

"It's just not acceptable. You need the information readily apparent at the point where you're making the decision, and having to jump through hoops to get that information just means that fewer people are going to use it."

The CSPI report assessed basic nutrition facts voluntarily compiled by more than 30 of the country's major chains, including Burger King, Casey's, Tim Hortons and East Side Mario's.

Many menu offerings contain two and three times the recommended daily calorie and sodium quantities an adult should ingest, with some dishes having up to two days worth of sodium in one serving.

The report said a fifth of Canadians' weekly food intake comes from restaurant meals, suggesting they play a significant role in rising incidents of hypertension and other obesity-related conditions.

Jeffery said much of this nutritional information is available to customers, but only if they actively seek it out.

Requesting nutritional brochures or researching meal options online ahead of time is impractical, he argued, suggesting that restaurants disclose a calorie total next to all items and add a high-sodium flag where appropriate.

A notice at the bottom of the menu stating the daily target of 2,000 calories and 1,500 milligrams of sodium would help diners put their choices in context, he said.

"Even trained dieticians are terrible at estimating the calorie counts and sodium levels for restaurant foods," Jeffery said. "This is the kind of thing where you really need objective information from the company that makes the product."

Joyce Reynolds of the Canadian Restaurant and Foodservices Association agreed a national framework for calorie disclosure would be a valuable service to patrons.

Unlike Jeffery, however, she believes menus are the wrong medium through which to communicate such information.

Customers want to consider many factors beyond calories and sodium when making their choices, she said, adding that menus don't offer enough space to properly display the necessary values.

"There's other organizations saying it should be trans-fats, and others are saying it should be allergins," she said. "There's no end to the number of pieces of information that would be a nice-to-have on the menu, but it's not possible."

Reynolds said the association is in talks with the federal government to devise a national framework for nutritional disclosure in restaurants.

Mobile apps may offer patrons a convenient way to research their food choices in the years ahead, she said.

Jeffery said the onus is on governments to set food disclosure rules, since eateries are loath to make such information accessible for fear of losing business.

"Restaurants recognize if people see how high the sodium levels and calorie levels are in their foods, they're going to expect that those foods be reformulated to suit their expectations about healthfulness," he said.

"It may be that some restaurant patrons decide that it's better for them to just make food at home."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA LIVING

TORONTO - Canada's restaurants are doing their patrons a grave disservice by keeping nutritional facts off their menus, an Ottawa-based advocacy group suggested Tuesday.The Centre for Science in the P...
TORONTO - Canada's restaurants are doing their patrons a grave disservice by keeping nutritional facts off their menus, an Ottawa-based advocacy group suggested Tuesday.The Centre for Science in the P...
Filed by Rebecca Zamon  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jaggy123
The attraction is the distraction!
01:31 PM on 03/05/2012
a few restaurants in my area started posting the calories-i was shocked into changing my diet. overeating is the real battle, for me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Anderson LMHC
Licensed Psychotherapist, Weight Control Expert
08:18 AM on 03/05/2012
In the first week of my successful weight loss program, clients are instructed to eat normally, not make any changes or deny themselves anything they want. However, as the first step in building a consciousness of what they are doing and a database to work from, they look up and keep track of the calories in everything they eat. Without exception, they all lose a few pounds and are amazed because they denied themselves nothing they wanted, thought they did not eat any less than they usually do, and were stunned by what they learned about what they were eating. They were particularly surprised by the restaurant food. Then they begin to alter what they eat and the pounds fly off, without "dieting".

Informing people of what is in the food they are selling, especially if the stuff is harmful to health, is a no-brainer, and would make it much easier for people to control their weight. Also, I'd eat out a lot more often if it were easier to eat well.

William Anderson, LMHC
Author of 'The Anderson Method - Secrets of Permanent Weight Loss'
www.TheAndersonMethod.com
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:43 PM on 03/01/2012
All restaurants should have walking and running tracks around them..
order dinner A you have to do five laps to even out...
dinner B...twelve...

I am not a numbers person
when it comes to food...
I tried that...
and starved myself.

Energy in...
energy out.
02:54 AM on 02/29/2012
The craziest thing yet.

Follow MyPlate's recommendations and you will hit your recommended target calories for your age, gender, activity level. If you gain weight eat less.

Eating just 30 calories a day more than you need can translate into being 60 pounds overweight in 20 years.It's impossible to tell if you are eating too much. And, menu labels are inaccurate. Most Americans are "on demand" eaters and don't follow a routine.

80%+are clueless about how many calories they need for a healthy weight. So what's the point of putting calories on a menu?

America didn't have a children obesity problem until the federal government started meddling with school lunches and handing out food stamps without checking whether the the people they give them to actually needed them. Giving school kids 2 free meals a day + giving their parents a full complement of food stamps + giving some WIC money + outreach programs piling more free food on those poor children are all together we're feeding some children into a short and unhealthy life.

The federal government has already screwed up our schools and our health care. Now it's trying to screw up our food.

It's time to throw the Democrats out of Washington. The same for Republicans when they start acting like Democrats.
02:27 AM on 03/01/2012
I don't think food stamps are the issue...
People who can't afford food tend to be more overweight since they can't afford the healthier options and tend to go for the cheaper unhealthy stuff.
03:29 AM on 03/02/2012
Yes and no.

Discount junk food is dirt cheap. It's easy enough to buy 2,000 calories worth of assorted "on sale" chips, discount colas, and cheap pastries for less than $2.00. That means one can be overweight and malnurished for less than $15 a week.

A food stamp budget has a base of about $40 a person a week. That's plenty enough to eat healthy. Add free meals at school and it's enough to eat quite well.

The problem is when food stamps are used to cover extended household members (like boyfriend) and when food stamps are used to buy higher-end junk food and convenience food and the youthful poor mistakenly believe that's healthy eating.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Anderson LMHC
Licensed Psychotherapist, Weight Control Expert
08:23 AM on 03/05/2012
This story is from Canada.
12:45 AM on 02/29/2012
Honestly this is a bit over the top. If you care that much don't eat out that often and you'll be fine.
01:17 PM on 02/28/2012
I have a work lunch scheduled for Thursday - non optional and I have no choice on the restaurant. I have checked out their website but no nutritional information is available. This is annoying as I want to make the best dietary choice I can. I have emailed requesting the information but I should not have to do this. They have 2 days to get back to me or I will have to face making a choice in the restaurant which amounts to a best guess. This restaurant is a chain and if they do not give me the info I requested I will be disappointed. It would be nice to at least find this online!
03:05 AM on 02/29/2012
Go to the Choose MyPlate and see for yourself how many cups and ounces from the different food groups are recommended to meet your unique calorie needs. Also read the advice on fat, saturated fat, sodium, and fiber.

A restaurant menu can never tell you what's the healthiest choices because what's healthy for you may not be helthy for someone else. Some people may only need 1500 calories a day and others may need 3000. Also what's healthy for lunch depends in part on what you ate for breakfast and what you expect to eat for supper.