'Nature' Journal: Canada Scientists Need To Be Set Free

Scientist

First Posted: 03/ 1/2012 5:05 pm Updated: 03/ 2/2012 11:02 am

TORONTO - One of the world's leading scientific journals has criticized the federal government for policies that limit its scientists from speaking publicly about their research.

The journal, Nature, says in an editorial in this week's issue that it is time for the Canadian government to set its scientists free.

It notes that Canada and the United States have undergone role reversals in the past six years, with the U.S. adopting more open practices since the end of George W. Bush's presidency while Canada has been going in the opposite direction.

The editorial says that since taking power in 2006, Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government has tightened the media protocols applied to federal government scientists and employees.

Nature says policy directives on government communications that have been released through access to information requests have revealed the Harper government has little understanding of the importance of the free flow of scientific knowledge.

The journal says its own news reporters have experienced firsthand the obstacles the Canadian government puts in the way of people trying to gain access to science generated by government scientists on the public payroll.

"The Harper government's poor record on openness has been raised by this publication before ... and Nature's news reporters, who have an obvious interest in access to scientific information and expert opinion, have experienced directly the cumbersome approval process that stalls or prevents meaningful contact with Canada's publicly funded scientists," the editorial says.

The editorial was referring to a column outlining the problems federal scientists face that it published in September 2010. The column was written by Kathryn O'Hara, a professor of science broadcast journalism at Carleton University in Ottawa and a former president of the Canadian Science Writers' Association.

"Little has changed in the past two years." the editorial continued. "Rather than address the matter, the Canadian government seems inclined to stick with its restrictive course and ride out all objections."

Two weeks ago the Canadian Science Writers' Association, the World Federation of Science Journalists and several other groups sent an open letter to Harper, calling on him to unmuzzle federal scientists.

The letter cited a couple of high-profile examples of the federal policy in action. Last fall Environment Canada barred Dr. David Tarasick from speaking to journalists about his ozone layer research when it was published in Nature. And the Privy Council Office stopped Kristina Miller, a researcher at Fisheries and Oceans Canada, from doing interviews about a study she published in Science on the causes of sockeye salmon decline in British Columbia.

Nature said the Canadian policy surprised international attendees of the recent conference in Vancouver of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The problem was the subject of a session at the meeting.

"Scientists and other visitors from around the globe discovered, to their surprise, that Canada's generally positive foreign reputation as a progressive, scientific nation masks some startlingly poor behaviour," Nature says.

"The way forward is clear: it is time for the Canadian government to set its scientists free."

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

TORONTO - One of the world's leading scientific journals has criticized the federal government for policies that limit its scientists from speaking publicly about their research.The journal, Nature, s...
TORONTO - One of the world's leading scientific journals has criticized the federal government for policies that limit its scientists from speaking publicly about their research.The journal, Nature, s...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 68
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
04:19 AM on 03/04/2012
Policy is based on science, not the other way around and for science professionals to be prohibited from representing their area of expertise is very dangerous. The weather severity in the US is an example of this.

Weather is the basic interaction of cold and warm air with water vapor. Warming the air unnaturally changes weather. Building code tells us to watch out for solar radiation, we couldn't see impact before. Here is what we missed in the calculator and weather station in an infrared time-lapsed video. http://youtu.be/dKGHKTkqeMc
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deckercat
change the world
11:19 PM on 03/02/2012
plus they don't breed well in captivity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gx5000
Life's too short, be happy..
02:59 PM on 03/02/2012
The pay is ridiculously low, and they are less and less of them every year.....
Scan the Jobs Canada site just for fun and see what's up for grabs, scary...
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
09:33 AM on 03/02/2012
We elected a control freak from the anti-science party - what did we think was going to happen ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gx5000
Life's too short, be happy..
02:59 PM on 03/02/2012
The Rapture ?

Have a good week end dude !
photo
freeSpeakr
I stand on the shoulders of giants
09:03 AM on 03/02/2012
Yo! Mr. Harper! The Flintstones ain't a documentary.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gx5000
Life's too short, be happy..
03:01 PM on 03/02/2012
But Idiocracy will be soon.....maybe even "God bless America".. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ul4CZrnEFxU
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeeTadBit
08:10 AM on 03/02/2012
"The Harper government has little understanding." It might be a truer statement to say they have "full understanding," but are foxy enough to quell any message that doesn't fit their agenda.

Their tactical approach is to either silence or smear the messenger, or; deceive, hide, or skew the message. Either way, democracy takes a direct hit, and it's shameful.
photo
Poster999
A promise made is a debt unpaid.
08:06 AM on 03/02/2012
Science, we don't need no stinking science. All you have to do his read your bible and pray and all will be revealed from on high. We are the Harper government are the chosen ones.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gx5000
Life's too short, be happy..
03:06 PM on 03/02/2012
There was a time when the Bible was all you needed.
By the time you knew better you were too old or dead....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:39 AM on 03/02/2012
We teach our children not to lie. We assume they are not listening to US.

Then government treats us like children. They assume we are not paying attention.

Due to the human condition and our disconnect with actions and words, it is imperative at some stage in our maturity that we encourage unbridled journalism and science to get the conversation going again. Perhaps then we will at least be able to embarrass the government into more accountability. And if they don't behave, we will have to teach them a lesson at the polls.
06:53 AM on 03/02/2012
Batten down the hatches. Ride out the storm. By the next election Canadians will have forgotten all about it. Election scams, war on environmental science, short term memories will out.
06:14 AM on 03/02/2012
conservatives ----big brother
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
keep it solid
Have a great day :)
03:17 AM on 03/02/2012
Historically, the stifling of scientists was a practice of oppressive regimes and science does triumph in the end. Is there any particular reason why the harper&co choose to be on the wrong side of history?
02:00 AM on 03/02/2012
I'm willing to call this scientific proof that Harper is turning Canada into Bush Jr's America.
02:07 AM on 03/02/2012
Let's hope not.
01:20 AM on 03/02/2012
Already there is so much bad press that it must be sitting very badly with some not so right wing members of the party. They are soon going to realize their own little butts are going to go the same way Mulroney's went, only this time for a much longer period. I would not be surprised if some crossed the floor. I don't see how any member can feel useful in such a paranoid party.
photo
Another Pesky Canadian
Talk - action = 0
03:21 AM on 03/02/2012
Re: "I don't see how any member can feel useful in such a paranoid party."

...assuming they have a conscience.
01:06 AM on 03/02/2012
Many governments try to 'control the message'. But the Harperites have taken their extreme need to control the message to extremes. Especially with regards to science, this need to control 'truth' has perverse ramifications. Trying to shut down science, or the voices of science, is not only about shutting down knowledge, it is also tantamount to trying to shut down the human mind, and with it mental integrity. What good can come of this?
01:05 AM on 03/02/2012
I remember science. Hard to believe it isn't relevant anymore. Who'd have guessed?