Labrador Mining Boom: Housing Prices Skyrocket, Families Evicted To Make Way For Miners

Labrador Mining Housing Evictions

First Posted: 03/ 3/2012 5:00 am Updated: 03/ 3/2012 10:48 am

ST. JOHN'S, N.L. - If there's a downside to Labrador's mining boom, Carrie Cabot and her family are living it.

"We're very stuck," she said from Wabush, N.L.

Cabot, her husband Damico and their two daughters, aged one and three, are being forced out of their apartment to make way for Labrador mine workers.

As expanding iron ore companies pay big money to buy up houses and apartment buildings in small communities closest to the mines, the Cabots are among those struggling to find affordable homes.

Rents have soared in Labrador West since the latest mining boom started four years ago, fuelled by demand for iron ore overseas. Provincial legislation does not restrict yearly increases.

Competition for scarce housing is so intense, it's not unusual for homeowners in Labrador City and Wabush to live in their summer cabins or basements while contractors pay $5,000 a month or more to rent their places.

The Cabots got an eviction notice on Dec. 1 and have to be out by the end of July. Tenants usually have to move within three months, but in this case were given extra time and assistance by the purchasing company to find new homes.

The trouble, Cabot says, is that even though her husband earns more than $65,000 a year working as a mechanic's assistant, housing prices of about $300,000 are out of reach until they've saved a down payment.

And there aren't many rentals they can afford, she said.

The family was paying just over $1,000 a month for a three-bedroom apartment before the building was sold. The best they've found so far, Cabot said, is a two-bedroom basement apartment with one window for $1,600 a month.

"If you're lucky enough to find something advertised, it's either for contracting companies only or it's so highly priced that an average family can't afford to rent it."

Even when displaced tenants manage to find something, many live in fear that it won't last.

Kathryn Hymers Batstone, who earns about $15 an hour at a retail job, was evicted from her apartment in Wabush last year when it was sold. She found a smaller unit in Labrador City when friends intervened to help, but she never feels secure.

"You're living on pins and needles all the time because you just don't know anymore," she said. "I know people who've had their rent doubled. You're paying $750 a month and all of a sudden it's $1,400 or $1,500.

"Most everybody I've known has left."

Demand for iron ore in China and India is driving a boom that is pricing many people out of a home, said Karen Oldford, deputy mayor of Labrador City and a volunteer with a local housing and homelessness coalition.

Not all landlords are gouging, but many people who've lived through cyclical boom-and-bust times are making money while they can, she said.

"We have townhouses that are being rented for $6,000 a month with four bedrooms."

Bungalows that sold for about $100,000 in 2007 are now fetching $350,000 "with no work done," Oldford said.

Labrador City and its twin community Wabush, with growing populations of about 10,000 and 2,000 respectively, are known as Labrador West. Construction of more than 500 homes and apartment units in the region has not kept up with demand, Oldford said.

Expansion is tricky because mining companies hold rights to much of the undeveloped land, she added.

"There's not the willingness to part with lands to allow us to grow in a timely fashion."

Still, there's intense resistance against Labrador West becoming a "fly in, fly out" hub of transient workers such as Fort McMurray, Alta., Oldford said. She cited concerns about lax community ties and increased crime.

The push for a more mobile workforce was a key sticking point in contract talks between the Iron Ore Company of Canada and the local United Steelworkers union before the company pulled a "fly in, fly out" proposal from the table.

As for those at the mercy of the rental market, Oldford wants more legal protections.

Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Nick McGrath, responsible for Labrador, isn't convinced that rent controls are the best way to handle what he calls a housing bottleneck.

"That's something that would have to be discussed at a government level."

McGrath has lived through mining recessions in the '80s and '90s.

"I remember one particular street, there were 88 vacant houses," he recalled. "You have to be very careful when you're developing.

"I think all levels of government as well as private enterprise are aware of the housing difficulties in Labrador West and they're working together to try to alleviate the problem."

Newfoundland and Labrador Housing Corp. raised its income threshold in Labrador West to $65,000 from $32,500 to help more people access affordable units.

CEO Len Simms says there are nine people on the regional low-income wait list. Anyone making more than $65,000 — but not enough to afford local housing prices — is caught in a different dilemma than his priority groups, he said.

"We deal with low-income families. The other issue that comes up is housing affordability."

Cabot says she may have to take a more affordable place in Happy Valley-Goose Bay, about 530 kilometres away, while her husband boards in Wabush and visits when he can. Or they may leave the province.

"It looks great on the outside," she said of the Labrador mining boom. "But come here and deal with it."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

Filed by Daniel Tencer  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
walkerhds
09:40 AM on 03/04/2012
Same story with the oil boom in the Dakotas. Great for the landlords with rental property, good for the general economy in the area; not so good for those residents who were there during the trough between 1985 and 2010 and aren't working in the patch.

and building housing on 30 year mortgages, even if all the materials can be shipped in and erected during the short construction season, means having to extend utilities and roads and the local gov't, having to sell bonds or raise taxes... and then be left with excess infrastructure and or bond payments when the boom collapses.
12:23 AM on 03/04/2012
Sounds a lot like Fort MacMurray where the rent for a room is out of sight and there are a lot of problems with drugs, drinking and alcohol. I would rather live poor than be rich in Fort MacMurray
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
see-ellen2001
08:05 AM on 03/04/2012
Very true. A friend is in Dawson Creek and one bedroom aprts went up to $1100 a month.
10:26 PM on 03/05/2012
Is it Pacey or Joey?
photo
Liz Wilson 2
“a small group can change the world
09:51 PM on 03/03/2012
Is that an actual picture of the mine? Poor mother earth.
11:11 PM on 03/03/2012
Yes,and in solidarity with “Mother”,may I suggest that you put your money where your mouth is and,henseforth,stop using your car which uses ore mined for its metal underside。

And for that matter, cease using all manner of public transportation such as subways, planes, and buses which all use metal, too.

Horseback for you...or walking.
photo
Liz Wilson 2
“a small group can change the world
06:14 AM on 03/04/2012
Its always all or nothing with people who unconditionally support economic activity. Some people who hold that view currently are considering legislation to relabel groups that hold a different opionon domestic terrorists.

Balance should always be part of the equation. Many mining practices are extremely destructive. As an example, expecting mining companies to invest in practices that do not destroy water systems should be the norm not the exception.

Fraking is an excellent example of an extraction practice that might not be in anyones interest. Earth quakes in areas where earth quakes have never occured before and a oddly strong coincidence of flamable water in areas where fraking is practiced.
photo
Liz Wilson 2
“a small group can change the world
09:50 PM on 03/03/2012
Rapid growth often brings a whole lot of social problems with it, housing issues is just the start. Drugs, alcohol, rowdy behaviour, and too many young people with lots of money. It would be great if communities would have access to some support to deal with these issues before they become bigger problems. Money really isnt the end all, most of us still want to live in a place where we can make our nest, raise our children in relative safety, and feel good about being part of a community. that doesnt have to be lost because of economic development.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dclintn648
Conservatism is dread
09:46 PM on 03/03/2012
Harper is turning this country into a garbage dump that will be abandoned the minute the corporations have squeezed out all the profits. Harper's rich American and foreign friends will take all the profits and Canadian taxpayers will be left with the cleanup.

If you care about the country, don't vote Conservative. There's nothing conservative about them!
photo
freeSpeakr
I stand on the shoulders of giants
06:51 PM on 03/03/2012
god bless capitalism.
11:12 PM on 03/03/2012
Agreed.

Capitalism has fed and made the lives of the world's poor infinitely better than other known economic system.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
12:20 AM on 03/04/2012
I am sure the families forced out of their homes and having disposable incomes reduced due to high rents would agree with you. Everybody in Canada ought to take a pay cut since that's what makes people happier.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gravescanada
11:18 AM on 03/03/2012
Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Nick McGrath, responsible for Labrador, isn't convinced that rent controls are the best way to handle what he calls a housing bottleneck.

So how do you protect the permanent residence of a community when their is a boom? When this boom goes bust, the mining company will leave and how many of the residents that lived there will be left? People should not have to move because an area booms, I live in Ontario, rent increases are capped, as they should be. A boom in a town like this leaves so many families damaged.
04:02 PM on 03/03/2012
I agree that the locals, aka. the permanent residents should not have to move, but I would be hesitant to put in rent controls. Here's why...if you were a permanent resident and owned a house or apartment, I would not want to stop you from capitalizing from the boom. But that still does not address the problem with local renters and the market inflation of housing prices tripling. Perhaps as a condition of being allowed to mine, the company should build houses or an apartment complex, or even a hotel that they could use to house employees. When the boom is over, they could rent them out or even sell to the locals. Another problem in this story is simply supply and demand. When the mining company owns the rights to the surrounding land, the town cannot expand, so demand exceeds supply. Again, I think a condition for the mine to supply at least some of the housing(not by buying it up) would be reasonable. No solution will please everyone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
see-ellen2001
08:07 AM on 03/04/2012
Mining companies are never given conditions like these. They have carte blanche. The government doesn't care. Sad but true. Profits before people.