Obama Says U.S. Will Use Force Vs. Iran If Needed

Obama Force Against Iran Israel

First Posted: 03/ 4/2012 12:18 pm Updated: 03/ 5/2012 7:26 am


President Barack Obama said Sunday the United States won't hesitate to use force to halt Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, something he says could trigger an arms race in one of the world’s most volatile regions.


"I will not hesitate to use force when it's necessary to defend the United States and its interests," says Obama, speaking to thousands of delegates to the policy conference of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in Washington.


Obama also stressed that "too much loose talk of war" in recent weeks has only helped Tehran and boosted oil prices.


The Israeli government has recently been suggesting that Israel is considering launching a military attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran, however, maintains its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.


But while the U.S. is ready to unleash against Iran if need be, Obama said he also urged Israel to allow further sanctions against Iran to take hold, and put pressure on Tehran, rather than have the threat of nuclear war result in a unilateral Israeli strike against Iran's nuclear facilities.


"For the sake of Israel's security, America's security, and the peace and security of the world, now is not the time for bluster," Obama said. "Now is the time to let our increased pressure sink in, and to sustain the broad international coalition that we have built."


Canada, the U.S. and the U.K. are limiting Iran's access to much of the world's financial system in an attempt to isolate the country's regime, with the toughest sanctions, targeting Iran's oil business and central bank, are to take effect this summer.


Obama added that he is sympathetic to Israel's concerns.


"No Israeli government can tolerate a nuclear weapon in the hands of a regime that denies the Holocaust ... and sponsors terrorist groups committed to Israel's destruction," added Obama.


"So I understand the profound historical obligation that weighs on the shoulders of [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanhayu and all of Israel's leaders."


While any Iranian nuclear efforts run counter to Israeli security interests, as well as those of the U.S., and "Israel as a Jewish and democratic state must be protected ... the entire world has an interest in preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon," Obama stressed.


In Israel, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said American pressure would not affect Israeli thinking on how to cope with the threat.


"We are an independent sovereign state, and at the end of the day, the state of Israel will make the most correct decisions as we understand them."


Obama's speech came the day before his meeting at the White House with Netanyahu, and two days after the Israeli prime minister met with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper in Ottawa.


Netanyahu 'heartened' by Obama speech: Fogel


During a joint news conference with Netanyahu, Harper said Canada wants a "peaceful resolution" to prevent further development of Iran's nuclear program. Netanyahu, however, said "all options" to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons should be on the table.


Netanyahu said there is a "sea of troubles" in his region, but most disturbing among them is the "relentless Iranian pursuit of arming themselves with nuclear weapons."


Harper was asked whether Canada would support a pre-emptive strike on Iran, and he said the country's intentions and capabilities remain "a serious concern" to Canada.


Netanyahu left Ottawa for Washington on Sunday afternoon, after meeting with CEO Shimon Fogel of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs. Fogel told CBC News he discussed the situation in Iran, the peace process with the Palestinianas and other issues with Netanyahu.


Fogel said he believes Netanyahu "was pretty heartened by the messages that he heard Barack Obama convey" Sunday morning.


"What came out of the Obama speech was a re-enforcement of those things that actually point to an emerging consensus between Israel, Canada, the U.S., the European community about the need to confront Iran — that there is nothing off the table, and that a nuclear Iran is not a situation that can be contemplated by the West."


However, Fogel said, "everybody, Israel included, really does want to see every effort expended towards achieving a dilomatic or political solution."


Netanyahu plans to address the AIPAC conference late Monday. As well, three of the four Republican presidential candidates — Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich — were scheduled to speak to the conference via satellite on Tuesday, a critical day in the campaign when 10 states vote.


The candidates have accused Obama of failing to slow down Iran's nuclear pursuit. But Obama says world is more united than ever against Iran, and he blames Republicans for trying to drive a wedge between him and Jewish voters.


"You've had no evidence that the president is prepared to take steps to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons. They talk and the Iranians build. They talk and the Iranians build," said Gingrich said before Obama's speech. "We're being played for fools."


FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

President Barack Obama said Sunday the United States won't hesitate to use force to halt Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, something he says could trigger an arms race in one of the w...
President Barack Obama said Sunday the United States won't hesitate to use force to halt Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, something he says could trigger an arms race in one of the w...
Filed by Lauren Strapagiel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:14 AM on 03/05/2012
Our government has failed us! Not only the Conservatives but the NDP and Liberals! It's time Canadians take Canada back! Shout out for changes in the government! Changes that will put the power back in the hands of the people! We need laws that allow us to force referendums on the politicians when they get out of hand and laws to punish the politicians for when they go to far! The first politician we should hold accountable is Vic Toews. Just in case you forgot what you did, Mr. Toews, you are a liar! You lied to the people of this country, now you should pay the price.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ia54A5B7auY

www.cananon.info

http://www.youtube.com/user/OperationVicTory
photo
Capitalism Is King
Obama Has Made Things Worse!
06:48 PM on 03/04/2012
Everybody calm down. Remember it's just Obama talking. He's going to do exactly jack and squat. The man always talks the talk but never walks the walk.
08:01 PM on 03/04/2012
" He's going to do exactly jack and squat. The man always talks the talk but never walks the walk. "
.

Osama bin Laden would not agree with you, that is if OBL could either talk or walk.
03:25 PM on 03/04/2012
The US will use force against Iran if Israel decides it should. Unless Iran is a direct imminent threat to the US such use of force constitutes war crimes according to international law.
photo
Felix99
Born to be mild!!!!
07:03 PM on 03/04/2012
That never bothered Bushie why should it bother Obama???
07:55 PM on 03/04/2012
" Unless Iran is a direct imminent threat to the US such use of force constitutes war crimes according to international law. "
.

“ A direct imminent threat “ is subjective based upon perception. A threat to pollute the energy resources in the Middle-East with nuclear weapons is a threat to the economic safety of the U.S., and therefore it is a threat to its National Security. A threat to U.S. National Security constitutes an ensuing threat to the nations and countries that rely on the U.S. for protection. The use of force is therefore justifiable.
03:14 PM on 03/04/2012
Iran, a theocratic State, wants to rule with a fistful of nuclear weapons – Persia personified. The Arab Gulf States have just as much to worry about as Israel. A slow squeeze (sanctions) might encourage some of Iran’s leaders to change their mind about developing a nuclear arsenal; however, I am inclined to believe that it’s like masking the pain of an abscessed tooth – a day for surgery has to be scheduled.

In spite of the options and controversy, I think President Obama’s position on this matter is the best course of action. Israel’s back is covered.
04:37 PM on 03/04/2012
Jew firster I presume?
07:32 PM on 03/04/2012
Annihilation? Yes, that’s Iran’s plan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
single malt
I can't spell. I blame msn.
03:06 PM on 03/04/2012
You can't really blame Iran for wanting MAD. We all would if we were in their shoes. The idea of the west controlling all the oil in the world must not seem very appealing to China and Russia. If the west attacks Iran it would mean over the last 10 years they have secured oil interested in Iraq, Libya and now Iran. Is the concern more about Iran having nukes or about the cascading effect of Iran having nukes? Meaning everyone would want one. Is it even really possible to stop a nation from having them? T
02:56 PM on 03/04/2012
President Obama's speech at AIPAC was a disaster. President Obama again said that the danger of Iran getting nuclear weapons is in proliferation. He does not understand that the danger is from IRAN ITSELF

We in Israel are in the danger of getting nuked while he still continues to believe in diplomacy! How can the leader of the most powerful country in the world be so out of step with reality? See MAD is Dead www.madisdead.blogspot.com

After all this pressure in telling Israel not to attack Iran but to trust in the US he finally realizes that there is nothing he can do to stop Israel to defend itself he acknowledges the obvious - and that is now hailed as a strong message of support!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
single malt
I can't spell. I blame msn.
03:14 PM on 03/04/2012
If Israel has nukes, hasn't Iran been in danger of being nuked by you all first? It is a very one sided perspective. Iran has seen the US attack and essentially take over Iraq. I think everyone wants nukes to ensure they are free as a nation to make their own choices. It really is the only deterrent against imperialistic forces. The concern I think the world has is what about China and Russia. The west already controls Iraq and Libya oil. A war with Iran could cause a cascading effect in a time when nobody can afford war. The US can't really afford another prolonged expensive war. Asking the US to attack Iran is asking them to go further in debt which will only hurt the world's economy. The problem is bigger than just Israel.
03:27 PM on 03/04/2012
This is it in a nutshell problem is a certain tail wagging a certain dog, and the problem is that the rule of law no longer obtains in either place.