Diesel Exhaust Exposure: Increases Risk Of Death From Lung Cancer, Study Finds

Miners And Lung Cancer

Posted: 03/ 2/2012 6:29 pm

WASHINGTON - There is new evidence that exposure to exhaust from diesel engines increases the risk of lung cancer.

Diesel exhaust has long been classified as a probable carcinogen. But the 20-year study from the National Cancer Institute took a closer look by tracking more than 12,000 workers in certain kinds of mines — facilities that mined for potash, lime and other nonmetals. They breathed varying levels of exhaust from diesel-powered equipment, levels higher than the general population encounters.

The most heavily exposed miners had three times the risk of death from lung cancer compared to workers with the lowest exposures, said the study released Friday by the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Even workers with lower exposures had a 50 per cent increased risk, wrote lead author Debra Silverman, an NCI epidemiologist.

"Our findings are important not only for miners but also for the 1.4 million American workers and the 3 million European workers exposed to diesel exhaust, and for urban populations worldwide," Silverman wrote.

She pointed to some highly polluted cities in China, Mexico and Portugal that in past years have reported diesel exposure levels that over long periods could be comparable to those experienced by miners with lower exposures.

Litigation from some mining companies had delayed release of the study findings.

A separate industry group not involved in that litigation said Friday that the study looked back at mines using decades-old equipment, and there is far less pollution from diesel engines today.

"Diesel engine and equipment makers, fuel refiners and emissions control technology manufacturers have invested billions of dollars in research to develop and deploy technologies and strategies that reduce engine emissions, now ultimately to near zero levels to meet increasingly stringent clean air standards here in the United States and around the world," said Allen Schaeffer of the non-profit Diesel Technology Forum.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA LIVING

WASHINGTON - There is new evidence that exposure to exhaust from diesel engines increases the risk of lung cancer.Diesel exhaust has long been classified as a probable carcinogen. But the 20-year stud...
WASHINGTON - There is new evidence that exposure to exhaust from diesel engines increases the risk of lung cancer.Diesel exhaust has long been classified as a probable carcinogen. But the 20-year stud...
Filed by Arti Patel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 69
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
db025
11:05 AM on 03/06/2012
No, no, no. This is all wrong. It's been "proven" that it's only second hand smoke that causes lung cancer. 50 years of scientific research can't be wrong. 50 years and all the California anti-smoking ads.
10:36 AM on 03/06/2012
STOP THE PRESSES...the only gaurantee you have in life is you won't get out alive!! Bank on it!!
09:20 AM on 03/06/2012
I have proven data on how to reduce these emissions and any fossil fuel emissions but nobody cares. It has fallen on deaf ears!
08:13 AM on 03/06/2012
Just one more thing the epa dems want to take away from us so they can control us i think its a scam are they going blot out the sun so we dont get skin cancer
10:01 AM on 03/06/2012
Well said. These government agencies need to create excuses for their existence. Social parasites. Get a real job that produces something, or provides a useful service.
07:52 AM on 03/06/2012
Were all worried about 2'nd hand smoke. But diesel and gas fumes are much more dangerous than cig. smoke. Here in the states most school busses exit out the bottom of the bus dumping toxic fumes at child level. But cig. smoke is the cause of sick kids with breathing problem? Could it be the school bus fumes cause cancer, and other breathing illnesses that the children are having.
mhwyman7
No good deed goes unpunished
06:43 AM on 03/06/2012
I'm sure breathing in all that potash, lime and OTHER non-metals had no effects on these people either.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
03:27 AM on 03/06/2012
Rudolph Diesel's Mysterious Death
On September 29, 1913, Rudolph Diesel walked on board the steamer Dresden in Antwerp harbour. He was on his way to meet with representatives of Consolidated Diesel Manufacturing Ltd. in London with the view of opening a factory to build his engine. He dined aboard ship and then retired for the evening, leaving a 6:15 a.m. wake-up call. He was never seen alive again.

On October 9 the crew of the Dutch fishing boat Coertsen, pulled the badly decomposed body of a man from the channel. They removed his personal effects and returned the corpse to the sea. The items, which included an eyeglass case, a wallet, a pocket knife and a pill case were later identified by Diesel’s son, Eugen as having belonged to his father. Speculation was rife in the newspapers as reporters sought answers to the mystery. Some concluded that he was murdered by German agents to prevent his engine system from falling into British hands on the eve of the First World War. Another theory was that he was killed by hitmen hired by the petroleum industry.
http://www.suite101.com/content/mysterious-death-of-rudolph-diesel-a63830#ixzz1Qu96K0c9
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
03:25 AM on 03/06/2012
Henry Ford and Rudolf Diesel’s Vision of a Hemp Diesel Revolution

Rudolf Diesel expected that his engine would be powered by vegetable oils (including hemp) and seed oils. At the 1900 World’s Fair, Diesel ran his engines on peanut oil. Later, George Schlichten invented a hemp ‘decorticating’ machine that stood poised to revolutionize paper making. And Henry Ford demonstrated that cars can be made of, and run on, hemp. However, evidence suggests a special-interest group that included the DuPont petrochemical company, Secretary of the Treasury Andrew Mellon (Dupont’s major financial backer), and the newspaper man William Randolph Hearst mounted a yellow journalism campaign against hemp. Hearst deliberately confused psychoactive marijuana with industrial hemp, one of humankind’s oldest and most useful resources. DuPont and Hearst were heavily invested in timber and petroleum resources, and saw hemp as a threat to their empires. Also petroleum companies knew that petroleum emits noxious, toxic byproducts when incompletely burned, as in an auto engine. Pollution was important to Rudolf Diesel and he saw his engine as a solution to the inefficient, highly polluting engines of his time. But in 1937 DuPont, Mellon and Hearst were able to push a “marijuana” prohibition bill through Congress in less than three months, which destroyed our domestic hemp industry.

http://mendonews.wordpress.com/2010/08/30/henry-ford-and-rudolf-diesels-vision-of-a-hemp-diesel-revolution/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:04 AM on 03/06/2012
Thats been known for decades.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Suzanne Mcnabb Tobin
Please all please none
10:52 PM on 03/05/2012
Notice this article came from the Canadian press. It is well known that Canada is biased against cancer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
north of 60
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
12:58 AM on 03/06/2012
There are countries that are biased FOR cancer?
06:49 PM on 03/05/2012
I work in a potash mine and this is not new to the workers. What is demoralizing is the fact that our bosses will not attribute diesel exhaust to long term medical issues. All that is said is "it's fine, keep working". I hope this study can help get mine workers better working conditions instead of knowing that by working in a mine your life expectancy is shortened.
06:17 PM on 03/05/2012
Shouldnt this filed under duh! Damn you free radicals, stop stealing my electrons.
09:37 PM on 03/05/2012
Whatever causes your electron loss has to be stopped, otherwise there will be prevalent mutations..... = cancer cells.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Crabtree
06:17 PM on 03/05/2012
Whoops maybe we were a tad hasty on blaming all of these lung cancer death on smoking alone..now finding out radon gas may be the killer after all
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robin Hood of the North
05:24 PM on 03/05/2012
This is really old news. This has been my point with second hand cigarette smoke. How do you eleminate the background carcinogens like diesel fumes?? They are twice as cancer causing as second hand cigerette smoke but the rich won't let you ban the diesel trucks that go by the bar while you are having a beer!
photo
tjdwill02
There is no free lunch
05:35 PM on 03/05/2012
Diesel engine and equipment makers, fuel refiners and emissions control technology manufacturers have invested billions of dollars in research to develop and deploy technologies and strategies that reduce engine emissions, now ultimately to near zero level......... You apparently can't read or are too ADD to finish reading. Besides, the cost of diesel is forcing the trucking industry to turn to natural gas. It's only a matter of "when" not 'if" this conversion occurs..... Then what will the greenies like you find to b/i/t*ch about !?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
06:15 PM on 03/05/2012
Well, gee, if the Oil Cartels and Car Manufacturers had spent spent those BILLIONS on the release of The Hydrogen Economy, then these issues would be long gone by now because all that comes out of the tail pipe on a Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric vehicle is a few drops of water.

I guess you missed that school class where it was related that there is more energy in a single barrel of water than there are in all the barrels of oil in the world when you take that water molecule apart and let it snap back together again while capturing the electricity produced in the process.

Maybe you would like to discuss the 4.5% sulpher content of DIESEL bunker fuel used by the shipping industry which pollutes more than the entire domestic vehicle population.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Suzanne Mcnabb Tobin
Please all please none
10:50 PM on 03/05/2012
Long Live Diesel Exhaust ... these greenie queens gotta learn to take their cancer like a man!!
04:47 PM on 03/05/2012
50% increased risk? Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) only provides a 1% risk in office exposures. At 50%, we should ban diesel engines immediately.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paul m
02:11 AM on 03/06/2012
Yep.