Keystone XL Pipeline: TransCanada Says New Route Ready In Weeks

Transcanada Keystone New Route Spring Construction

First Posted: 03/ 6/2012 11:21 am Updated: 03/ 8/2012 2:42 pm

CALGARY - A new route for the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline through Nebraska should be ready within weeks with "relatively modest" changes, an executive with the project's backer said Tuesday.

Calgary-based TransCanada Corp. (TSX:TRP) is working closely with the Nebraska government to find a path that avoids the ecologically sensitive Sandhills region of Nebraska, Alex Pourbaix, president of TransCanada's energy and oil pipelines division, told an energy conference in Houston.

The company has identified several corridors that will be made public in a few weeks. It appears the new plan will require about 32 kilometres of additional pipe and about a 160 to 176-kilometre reroute around the Sandhills, he said.

"We're talking about a relatively modest jog around the Sandhills," Pourbaix said.

Jane Kleeb, a vocal critic of Keystone XL, scoffed at the idea that the pipeline can simply "jog" around the Sandhills, an area of grass-covered sand dunes that covers a large swath of the state.

"I would love for him to say that to ranchers, because he would be running out of Nebraska if he tried to say that," the director of progressive advocacy group Bold Nebraska said in an interview from Hastings, Neb.

"That kind of arrogance and disrespect for the Sandhills and our land is outrageous, and you can't just jog around the Sandhills."

Kleeb added there's no law in place in Nebraska that allows for a reroute review, so it's doubtful the new path will be sorted out as quickly as TransCanada expects.

And while Bold Nebraska and other groups were concerned about the Sandhills, a reroute does not allay their worries about the effects the pipeline could have on the Ogallala aquifer, a vast underground water source that supplies eight states.

"That is the backbone and the lifeblood of our state's economy, the (agriculture) economy," she said. "And any risk to that is just something that we're not going to allow happen."

The U.S. State Department has dealt TransCanada two setbacks in recent months in its efforts to build the US$7.6-billion pipeline between Alberta and Texas refineries.

In the fall, the State Department delayed a decision until early 2013 so TransCanada could work out the new Nebraska route.

Then, in January, it denied TransCanada a permit for the project, but left the door open for the company to apply for a new one.

The Obama administration said a Republican-imposed deadline to make a decision by Feb. 21 didn't allow enough time to adequately study the Nebraska reroute, so it had no choice but to reject the project.

Both the president and the State Department said the decision had less to do with the pipeline's merits than with the arbitrary deadline.

TransCanada announced last week it plans to effectively chop Keystone XL into two separate projects, pursuing the most urgently needed portion of the line first.

The US$2.3-billion leg between an oversupplied storage hub at Cushing, Okla., to the Gulf Coast, should be in service by mid-to-late 2013.

TransCanada has said it will soon file a new presidential permit application for the northern part of Keystone XL from the Canada-U.S. border at Montana to Steele City, Neb.

Pourbaix said Tuesday construction of the southern portion of Keystone XL, which doesn't require a special permit because it doesn't cross the Canada-U.S. border, will begin by late spring or early summer.

A lot of Canadian barrels get stuck at Cushing, so Alberta producers will benefit as soon as the southern leg is up and running, said Ralph Glass, with consultancy AJM Deloitte in Calgary.

"Anything to alleviate that oversupply in that area to get it down into the refinery markets I think would be an advantage." he said.

But the northern portion of the line is still necessary, and Glass said he expects it will be approved once election season is over.

"I still think it's a critical component because there's a lot of expansion still going on the oilsands side of it," he said.

But it's not only access to the Gulf of Mexico Canadian producers need. Glass said it's necessary for Canada to be able to export its oil off the West Coast to Asian markets, via Enbridge Inc.'s (TSX:ENB) Northern Gateway proposal, or an expansion to Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain line.

Energy demand in the United States is flat or declining, so Canada needs an outlet to the international market to get better pricing for its oil, Glass said.

"I honestly think we need both, and I think the push will still be there from the oilsands producers to get access to the world market."

— With files from The Associated Press

Keystone Protest Retrospective
1  of  53
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
From Getty: SAN FRANCISCO, CA - OCTOBER 25: Protestors against the construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline hold signs and stand on a Keith Haring sculpture as they demonstrate outside of the W Hotel before the arrival of U.S. President Barack Obama on October 25, 2011 in San Francisco, California. Hundreds of protestors from a wide variety of activist groups staged protests outside of the W Hotel where President Obama was holding a $7,500 per person fundraiser. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

CALGARY - A new route for the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline through Nebraska should be ready within weeks with "relatively modest" changes, an executive with the project's backer said Tuesday...
CALGARY - A new route for the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline through Nebraska should be ready within weeks with "relatively modest" changes, an executive with the project's backer said Tuesday...
Filed by Daniel Tencer  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
OutAtFirst
Mountain goat, desert rat and sea dog
05:43 PM on 03/06/2012
Send it through Utah, we'll take anything that destroys the environment as long as our state legislators get a cut.
03:33 PM on 03/06/2012
With reduced rainfall in much of the U.S. the Keystone XL pipeline is obviously a threat in addition, so it's COMPLETELY inadvisable to continue this in increments (sneaking it in there, eh?) or in total. It will be regrettable to see this take place, and more threatening still to the lives of millions of people and the ecosystem that is already challenged by drought, global warming, increased pests, industrial/agricultural chemicals, and other things too fierce to mention. It's looking like a recipe for a wasteland.

There has to be better intelligence than this going for us! Lean on the side of abstinence in sowing seeds for increased oil sands trafficking. Please see the following link on drought and rainfall:
http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2012/03/01/maya-drought-rainfall/
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
11:48 PM on 03/06/2012
Such an excellent post! Thanks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:58 PM on 03/06/2012
Man the greenos got played like chumps on this one!

They had their little victory dance - woo hoo!

And now they're going to get smoked with the re-route and their collective lack of organization and will power. All those folks going to go back to Washington again for another march? Don't think so.

Hahahahaha.... hilarious
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trepasky
Sanity is neither free nor easy
03:06 PM on 03/06/2012
Now we'll get to see if the GOP/TP propaganda was true about the 20,000 jobs this is supposed to create.

But I doubt there will be much fan fare in a year or so when the first leaks occur.

Thinner pipe higher pressures are not a sign of safety or success.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:11 PM on 03/06/2012
I agree the leaks will be sort of an "out of sight, out of mind" affair. Of course the reason for that is that the leaks are pretty small with little significance... sort of like a tree falling the forest that no one can hear
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
hazbro24
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro- HST
05:17 PM on 03/06/2012
It will raise the price of oil and cost jobs in the mid-west.

And cause pollution. It's a lose lose deal for Americans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mater
mater
11:50 AM on 03/06/2012
Supporters are not living in the areas of destruction, drinking the water, watching their crops and livestock areas become obsolete. Canada is not stupid enough to violate it's own country's environment and we are not apparently not smart enough to keep them from crossing this line. It isn't going to take ONE DOLLAR off our gasoline prices. Boehner and others, who allegedly have bough stock in these contractor companies, are exploiting the American people , as surely as the Trans-Canada deniers. I really am disappointed and disgusted at the maneuvering our Govt has let pass as "shovel-ready" jobs--it isn't and they know it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:02 PM on 03/06/2012
"Supporters are not living in the areas of destruction, drinking the water, watching their crops and livestock areas become obsolete."

The U.S., including the region through which this pipeline is supposed to go through,
is riddled with pipelines. Do they make "livestock areas become obsolete"?

And the idea that the U.S. will not benefit economically from this pipeline is preposterous.

Arguments opposing this pipeline have become detached from reality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mater
mater
05:09 PM on 03/06/2012
Then, detached I am, and I bet YOU don't live anywhere near a site of pipelines and the mess and harm they create.
photo
baxtron
tek phlarpt
09:45 AM on 03/07/2012
it will move through the pipeline to TX. they will refine it and sell it on the world market and not specifically in the US. welcome to reality. enjoy your BLISS.