Omnibus Crime Bill: 9 Key Measures In Bill C-10 (PHOTOS)

First Posted: 03/12/2012 3:13 pm Updated: 05/30/2012 8:59 pm

OTTAWA - Bill C-10, dubbed the "Safe Streets and Communities Act" by the Conservative government, receives final approval in the House of Commons on Monday.

Quick Poll

Do you support the crime bill?

VOTE

PHOTOS: 15 THINGS CRITICS FEAR IN THE CRIME BILL

Here's a summary of nine key measures in the legislation.

Loading Slideshow...
  • The 9 Key Changes In The Tory Crime Bill

    With files from <em>The Canadian Press</em>. (CP/Alamy)

  • 9. Bringing Prisoners Home

    Provides the government, through the minister of Public Safety, more discretion to decide if a Canadian imprisoned abroad can transfer home to serve his or her sentence. (Getty)

  • 8. Rights For Terror Victims

    Introduces new measures to allow victims of terrorist acts to sue responsible individuals, groups or state sponsors in Canadian courts. (Alamy)

  • 7. Denying Work Permits

    Gives the Immigration minister new powers to deny work permits to foreigners based on the rationale they may be exploited. (Alamy)

  • 6. Victims Get More Say In Parole

    Provides victims of crime more say in parole decisions under the Corrections and Conditional Release Act. Increases size of parole board by 25 per cent. (Alamy)

  • 5. Fewer Conditional Sentences

    Reduces sharply the use of conditional sentences, such as house arrest, for a variety of property and other offences. (Jupiter Images)

  • 4. Pardons Harder To Get

    Changes the pardons system and makes certain ex-convicts, such as some sex offenders and repeat offenders, ineligible for life. Essentially doubles the waiting period for pardon eligibility to five years for summary offences and 10 years for indictable offences. Replaces the term "pardon" by "record suspension." (Alamy)

  • 3. Harsher Sentences For Young Offenders

    Sets tougher penalties for young offenders, including mandatory consideration of adult sentences and possible publication ban removal for violent crimes. Expands the definition of violent crime to include reckless acts that don't actually cause harm. (Alamy)

  • 2. Mandatory Minimums For Sex Crimes

    Establishes new mandatory minimum sentences and longer maximums for sex crimes against minors, including the addition of two new offences related to grooming or luring minors. (Alamy)

  • 1. Mandatory Minimums For Drug Crimes

    Provides new mandatory minimum sentences for drug offences related to production and distribution, including mandatory sentences for growing as few as six pot plants. Doubles maximum sentences to 14 years from seven. Offers potential exemptions for those entering drug treatment programs. (Getty)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA - Bill C-10, dubbed the "Safe Streets and Communities Act" by the Conservative government, receives final approval in the House of Commons on Monday. PHOTOS: 15 THINGS CRITICS FEAR IN T...
OTTAWA - Bill C-10, dubbed the "Safe Streets and Communities Act" by the Conservative government, receives final approval in the House of Commons on Monday. PHOTOS: 15 THINGS CRITICS FEAR IN T...
Filed by Michael Bolen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 40
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Opygollopy
The more I talk to people, the more I love my dogs
10:07 AM on 03/13/2012
Steven Harper is going to destroy our beloved country, one inch at a time.

You get what you vote for. By the time he is through, we are going to be owned by China, broke and he will be wealthy and living in the States just like his mentor Mulroney and paying ten bucks for a gallon of OUR OWN GAS.
photo
Opygollopy
The more I talk to people, the more I love my dogs
10:05 AM on 03/13/2012
I totally disagree with the drugs mandatory sentences. I am a 60 year old woman who has never smoked pot or did drugs. Ever.

I am totally for legalizing pot. I have seen people stoned on pot and I have seen people drunk. There is nothing worse than a drunk.

Legalize pot, tax it, that would throw a monkey wrench into the drug cartels, make the government money TO PAY OUT ALL THOSE SWEET PENSIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKERS.
03:30 AM on 03/13/2012
they should call this the more bigger jails bill. no money for crime prevention or rehabilitation. Bill will allow incarceration of more poor = government could reduce more crime by alleviating poverty
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anne Mccormick
01:33 AM on 03/13/2012
really, Canada does not want to follow the pattern of mandatory minimums for drug offenses. all Canadians have to do is look at the American prison system
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RavenHawk
02:19 AM on 03/13/2012
Thats what they want? Privatize the prison system since the cost of additionnal offenders will be too high for a unions federal workforce - backed by a lobby of Haliburtonian groups
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
12:56 AM on 03/13/2012
Time to do something un-Canadian. REVOLT!
10:09 PM on 03/12/2012
The simple problem with the Bill is that it will take soft nonviolent crimes and actually punish them worse than serious offenses and the dumbest of all has to be the 6 plant stupidity. They may not be harden criminals coming into the Canadain Penal system but they sure will be coming out, not to mention the costs associated with the additional incarceration, with absolutely no safety benefit to the canadian population I guess this is the easiest way for the Conservatives to handle the Mentally ill.
08:57 PM on 03/12/2012
This is a super annoying way of presenting an article.
08:59 AM on 03/13/2012
i hate slide shows on any site trying to present a story, 99 percent of the time, i just google the same story elsewhere so i dont have to go through the tedious process.
08:07 PM on 03/12/2012
Glad to see the changes brought about by this crime bill. Commit the crime, do the time.
09:07 PM on 03/12/2012
Totally agree as long as it is mandatory for everyone, rich or poor.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
10:40 PM on 03/12/2012
LOLOLOL well, the instigators of this bill have repeatedly displayed contempt for laws and the constitution, so......apparently these laws aren't for everyone. Rich people who don't support the Tories are probably no more exempt than poor people who don't support them either. And poor people who stupidly support the Tories aren't going to be given a free ride....only the Tory power-players are.

This is not a country ruled by laws. But only by expediency on the part of those who have seized power (by illegal means).
11:24 PM on 03/12/2012
One major problem--those with the greater financial resources, will be able to afford better legal representation;and, therefore, usually get outcomes more in their favor. Don't believe this? Ask Chief Justice Mclaughlin.
09:14 AM on 03/13/2012
Canada does not have the prison capacity for these measures, its showboating, half of these guys are gonna be sentenced to years the prison system simply cant accomodate and your taxes are going to go way up to cover it, its about 112 dollars per prisoner per day plus the cost of constructing new prisons which will not only take decades to build but would not cover the increasing numbers of prisoners.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2010/11/04/prison-report004.html

If prisons are overcrowded now, where some people are 3 men in a one man cell how are they going to handle the influx? They can't.

There are parts of the bill that is good, like the parts for human trafficking, terrorism and child sex crimes but putting 10 year delays on getting pardons, so people cant get jobs to turn their lives around does not make anyone safer it gives no incentive to go to school or university because upon finishing they will not have a chance to pass a record check to get a decent job. So they will take up crime as a career.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
07:35 PM on 03/12/2012
It's the provinces that have to foot the Con bill, so they'll balk and be forced to not follow the laws. Legal challenges and much hilarity will ensue.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Marie N
06:33 PM on 03/12/2012
Seriously? There's a bit about punishing people with marijuana plants? Did we just go back in time before we learned that weed isn't bad?
06:52 PM on 03/12/2012
No, it's about the pharmaceutical industry not losing their monopoly on "medicating us".
07:26 PM on 03/12/2012
When proposition 19 was tabled and voted upon in California, the organizations opposed were financed by the pharmaceutical and liquor industries. Not a thing to do with science or research.
I will post the link when I find it, read it on Democratic Underground back when it was news.
07:34 PM on 03/12/2012
If we had any transparency in Canada I am sure we would see who the real opponents of marijuana are.
# 1 Pharmaceutical industry
# 2 Liquor industry
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
12:54 AM on 03/13/2012
No. It's all about packing the prisons so they can be privatized easier.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler Austin
Women = people. Corperations ≠ people.
09:00 AM on 03/13/2012
Both. The neo-cons are conencted to teh American 'private detention' companies same as the GOP. Also they're connected though Clement (owned 25% of one while minister of Health) to big pharma comapnies.

AND they also get to appear 'tough on crime' and reduce the number of social worekrs and otehr lefty types fro mteh justice system.

It's win win win win for thier party, but a huge loss for Canada.
In ten years we're goig nto have the same trouble that the Americans did in the mid 1990 and have to repeal all these stupid laws anyways.
05:55 PM on 03/12/2012
Wonder when this will become their "new mantra",

" Why Mental Health Professionals Diagnose Anti-Authoritarians with Mental Illness"

So that the pharmaceutical companies can buy their "shares" in the new prisons.

http://www.madinamerica.com/2012/02/why-anti-authoritarians-are-diagnosed-as-mentally-ill/
05:43 PM on 03/12/2012
the media contiues to ignore the fact,that under this new law,someone growing 6 plants(no professional crime group is growing only 6 plants)will get twice as much time as someone who flashes a kid on a public playground.90 days for flashing a kid,6 months for growing 6 plants.
So,if you area responsible parent and happen to grow a few plants for personal reasons,you are considered more dangerous than someone who pubicly flashes a kid.Am I the only person outraged by this.Everybody knows someone who smokes/grows a little pot and they are basically good people,can you say the same about pedophiles?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marg Wood
Peace
10:17 PM on 03/12/2012
Good point ! If people go to jail for minor offenses for three years and their only crime is smoking pot or growing a few plants. Then drunk drivers should get three years to. I have never seen anyone get abusive on marijuana, but I have seen drunks get mean and abusive on alcohol ! Drunk drivers kill people!
The Harper Government will not listen to common sense!, or the rest of Canada!
05:32 PM on 03/12/2012
It's too bad we can't vote on each separate issue here instead of one vote for all points mentioned.
07:43 PM on 03/12/2012
Omnibus. There is a reason why they happen. Unfortunately.
05:12 PM on 03/12/2012
Some words to reflect upon.....
"The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power."
- Franklin D. Roosevelt in an April 29, 1938 message to Congress
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
05:58 PM on 03/12/2012
Harper would say "who was Franklin?" Remember he already wrote him out of the Second World War by saying conservatives won the war over Hitler and Japan. Nothing could be farther from the truth of course but that's the kind of self serving monster we have running the country under a fraudulent mandate.
05:01 PM on 03/12/2012
Until this Govt confirms its legitimacy through a public inquiry into the Election Fraud scam, and through byelections in the ridings where fraud occurred, it has no business conducting the nation's business and the Opposition parties should refuse to recognize it as the legitimate govt!
By even listening to Mr. Harper and his people, the Opposition is recognizing the CONs as the legitimate govt. They are lending them a legitimacy they may not actually possess.
Its time for the Opposition to grow spines and lay down the law. No further bills or debate should occur in the house until the govt demonstrates it was legitimately elected!
These people should be held in contempt and not given any credence whatsoever!
And until Mr. Harper orders a full investigation and inquiry, and calls byelections in the ridings that were affected by the fraud, he should be held in contempt of parliament and the people of Canada!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
05:16 PM on 03/12/2012
So in the meantime we can run riot?
05:34 PM on 03/12/2012
How so? I agree with Webster. Nothing will change by not passing this bill.
07:43 PM on 03/12/2012
How will making sure the election was valid and waiting to pass this bill, cause us to run riot?

As Harley likes to say please explain and prove it with facts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marg Wood
Peace
10:24 PM on 03/12/2012
The problem is they have a majority, they don't need the other parties! It could also backfire!