Vancouver Income Inequality Study Shows City Segregating Along Racial, Income Lines

Vancouver Income Inequality Study

First Posted: 03/12/2012 5:44 am Updated: 03/12/2012 11:53 am

Vancouver has gone from being a solidly middle-class town to a city on the verge of extremes, with neighbourhoods starkly segregated by race and income, a new study shows.

Released exclusively to The Huffington Post Canada, the University of British Columbia study is the first to use census data to explore the dramatic change in income patterns that have reshaped the city’s socio-economic landscape over the past 35 years.

From 1970 to 2005, the proportion of middle-income tracts, or neighbourhoods, in the metropolitan area of Greater Vancouver fell significantly, from 71 per cent to 53 per cent. Meanwhile, the share of very low and low-income neighbourhoods increased from 13 to 23 per cent, and high and very-high income tracts jumped from 16 to 24 per cent.

The shift has been even more pronounced in the City of Vancouver, where the share of middle-income tracts was cut by more than half, from 65 to 31 per cent. Higher income neighbourhoods doubled, from 16 per cent to 32 per cent, and lower income neighbourhoods jumped from 19 to 37 per cent.

Racial polarization has also deepened, as neighbourhoods where white and native-born residents remained the majority enjoyed the lion’s share of the income gains, while areas with the greatest share of visible minorities and immigrants were much more likely to see their fortunes decline.

Though the polarization of neighbourhoods has not been not as pronounced as in Toronto, where a similar study has been conducted, the numbers are evidence of an alarming trend, said David Ley, who co-authored the study with fellow UBC geographer Nicholas Lynch.

“Growing inequality, growing polarization do not make for social stability, or even fairness,” he said in an interview. “You can look at it as an ethical issue or as a political concern, and I think you reach the same conclusion: that these are problematic developments.”

More on income inequality at Mind The Gap:

Calgary's Growing Income Gap A Lesson In Pitfalls Of Unbridled Growth..

OECD: Canada's Income Gap Reaches Record High..

Which Provinces Have The Widest Income Gap?

FULL COVERAGE..

To delve deeper into the changing geographies of income, the researchers borrowed a method pioneered by the University of Toronto’s David Hulchanksi in his the highly publicized “Three Cities Within Toronto” report.

Using neighbourhood-level income data, Ley and Lynch divided Greater Vancouver into three income categories to show how differently these groups have fared over time -- and how economically segregated they have become.

The first group consists of the relative income winners, neighbourhoods where average individual incomes increased by more than 15 per cent above the metropolitan rate from 1970 to 2005.

Identified as “City No. 1,” these affluent and up-and-coming neighbourhoods account for 30 per cent of the total, and tend to be clustered in Vancouver’s core, in historic or gentrifying neighbourhoods such as Shaughnessy and Kitsilano, in the North Shore suburbs of North and West Vancouver and the newer areas of the Lower Fraser Valley.

Meanwhile, “City No. 2” is made up of neighbourhoods where relative incomes stayed fairly stable, hovering between 15 per cent above or below the metropolitan rate, and constitutes almost half of all tracts.

While these neighbourhoods can be found throughout Greater Vancouver, City 2 is a kind of “middle ground” that “often provides a rough separation between concentrated high-income levels in the north, west and east, and lower income levels in the central and southern parts of the region,” the researchers note.

Struggling neighbourhoods, where incomes sunk by more than 15 per cent below the metropolitan rate, were classified as “City No. 3.” These areas represent 22 per cent of all tracts, and extend from the city’s southern and eastern neighbourhoods along the Skytrain transit corridor into the suburbs.

There are no City 3 neighbourhoods on the more affluent North Shore.

As City 1, 2 and 3 move further apart economically, their ethnic make-up is also diverging. Whereas the share of immigrants in City 1 has stayed steady at 28 per cent, it has grown significantly in City 2, from 27 to 38 per cent.

The change has been more dramatic still in City 3, where the share of immigrants has more than doubled, from 24 to 51 per cent. Meanwhile, visible minorities and recent arrivals now make up a significant proportion of residents, representing 61 per cent and 11 per cent respectively.

It’s a trend that Ley describes as “the racialization of the cities,” a pattern that was also evident in Hulchanski’s Toronto study.

“City 1 is largely Canadian born, and largely white. City 3 is largely foreign born, and largely visible minority. That’s a source of anxiety,” he said. “It is proving more difficult to get aboard the Canadian dream.”

The study does not explore the underlying causes of the growing income inequality and economic segregation in Vancouver, but Ley suspects that some of the same forces that are deepening the rich poor-divide around the world are likely at play.

The erosion of middle-class jobs, declining welfare benefits and tax cuts that have disproportionately favoured the wealthy, he says, have contributed to “growing inequality at both ends.”

He says immigration also appears to be part of the story, noting that “new poverty is very significantly tied up with recent immigrants.”

Ley posits that Vancouver has experienced less income polarization than Toronto in part because a greater proportion of head offices -- and sky-high salaries -- are located in Canada’s biggest city.

Still, he says deepening economic segregation in Vancouver is likewise cause for concern.

“I don’t think there are any positive takeaways,” he said.

WHICH CANADIAN CITIES ARE SEEING THE GREATEST GHETTOIZATION?

Percentages represent the difference that the income gap has grown between the richest and poorest neighbourhoods in Canada's largest metropolitan areas. The numbers indicate the degree to which residents of those cities are segregating themselves economically.

Loading Slideshow...
  • 8: Quebec City -- 22 per cent

  • 8: Quebec City -- 22 per cent

    With a 22 per cent increase in the gap between its richest and poorest neighbourhoods, Quebec City has seen the smallest growth in neighbourhood inequality. However, the city also saw the largest proportion of neighbourhoods in decline. The numbers suggest some six in 10 neighbourhoods saw their income decline from 1980 to 2005.

  • 7: Winnipeg -- 31.5 per cent

  • 7: Winnipeg -- 31.5 per cent

    Winnipeg saw a 31.5 per cent increase in the gap between its richest and poorest neighbourhoods from 1980 to 2005, with its poorest neighbourhoods suffering a 7.6 per cent decline, while its wealthiest 10 per cent of neighbourhoods saw income grow 24 per cent.

  • 6: Montreal -- 34 per cent

  • 6: Montreal -- 34 per cent

    Montreal saw a 34 per cent increase in the gap between its richest and poorest neighbourhoods from 1980 to 2005, with its poorest neighbourhoods suffering a 10 per cent decline, while its wealthiest 10 per cent of neighbourhoods saw income grow 24 per cent. <em>Correction: An earlier version of this text misidentified Montreal as Winnipeg.</em>

  • 5: Vancouver -- 36.5 per cent

  • 5: Vancouver -- 36.5 per cent

    Vancouver saw a 36.5 per cent increase in the gap between its richest and poorest neighbourhoods from 1980 to 2005, with its poorest neighbourhoods suffering a 10.5 per cent decline, while its wealthiest 10 per cent of neighbourhoods saw income grow 26 per cent.

  • 4: Ottawa -- 37 per cent

  • 4: Ottawa -- 37 per cent

    Ottawa saw a 37 per cent increase in the gap between its richest and poorest neighbourhoods from 1980 to 2005, with its poorest neighbourhoods growing 1.3 per cent in income, while its wealthiest 10 per cent of neighbourhoods saw income grow nearly 36 per cent. Ottawa is unique in that none of its neighbourhood deciles suffered an income decline during the period.

  • 3: Edmonton -- 39 per cent

  • 3: Edmonton -- 39 per cent

    Edmonton saw a 39 per cent increase in the gap between its richest and poorest neighbourhoods from 1980 to 2005, with its poorest neighbourhoods suffering a 7.8 per cent decline, while its wealthiest 10 per cent of neighbourhoods saw income grow 31.5 per cent.

  • 2: Toronto -- 68 per cent

  • 2: Toronto -- 68 per cent

    Toronto saw a 68 per cent increase in the gap between its richest and poorest neighbourhoods from 1980 to 2005, with its poorest neighbourhoods suffering a 5.5 per cent decline, while its wealthiest 10 per cent of neighbourhoods saw income grow 62.5 per cent.

  • 1: Calgary -- 81 per cent

  • 1: Calgary -- 81 per cent

    With an 81 per cent increase in the difference between its richest and poorest neighbourhoods, Calgary wins Canada's ghettoization crown. It's worthwhile to note that Calgary's large increases in income in the wealthiest neighbourhoods has not pulled up its poorest areas, which have seen declines in income on the same scale as low-end neighbourhoods in other Canadian cities.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA BUSINESS

Vancouver has gone from being a solidly middle-class town to a city on the verge of extremes, with neighbourhoods starkly segregated by race and income, a new study shows. Released exclusively to T...
Vancouver has gone from being a solidly middle-class town to a city on the verge of extremes, with neighbourhoods starkly segregated by race and income, a new study shows. Released exclusively to T...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 69
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:46 PM on 03/14/2012
Top 1% received 93% of total income growth in 2009-2010, the first full year of the "recovery."
01:58 AM on 03/13/2012
Excellent article...very informative..kinda? There has been class divisions in every community for ever. The difference is that there is an acendency of a new monied class that is shaping the communites from emerging economies. I do not see racial tension here at all. In fact the opposite. I see a city that is representative of a changing and increasingly Global economy. The former english bastions of shaunessy and west van are being populated with a new monied Asian class. also let's not lump all whites together here folks. Kits was a greek neighborhood. East Van an Italian one. waves of immigration indeed
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
08:11 PM on 03/12/2012
Looks like the East Side is getting bigger.
07:49 PM on 03/12/2012
I've lived in Vancouver for 30 years. For sure the changes have been tremendous. And I can see the widening gap in incomes.

I'm one of the lucky ones I guess. Most of my life I've been in the middle class and I'm still there, and that's because I bought into the housing market before prices went completely pornographic. If we didn't buy in when we did, I think I would've left Vancouver years ago.

Having said that, the housing price profile in Vancouver reminds me just a little of Manhattan. Lots of very very expensive condos, and several blocks over are what could be best described as tenements. The one plus in Vancouver is that very old neighbourhoods still remain. Not everything has been overdeveloped - yet.

My expectation is that prices will plateau over the next decade. We still have a lot of Asians immigrating here and they're bringing their families with them. Immigrants from China and India both have no problem living eight people to a 1000 sq ft home. They all work until the home is paid off, then they buy another home, move half of their family to that one, and the entire family works to pay that one off as well. That kind of industriousness is perhaps why a percentage of our immigrants have managed to carve out a life here, despite all of the competition.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Knowledgeseeker
03:56 PM on 03/12/2012
I was just thinking about moving to Canada
Elmwoodmac
No matter where you go, there you are!
03:32 PM on 03/12/2012
Vancouver has indeed changed and not for the better. The cost of living including the price of homes is right through the roof yet the province still has the lowest minimum wage in the entire country.

Don't come looking for work here either. The line up , even for the most menial of jobs, is 100 people deep. You may get ahead of the pack if you know someone or perhaps can speak Mandarin.
12:50 PM on 03/12/2012
Nothing is too expensive or too cheap.

Housing or anything else is worth exactly what someone is willing to pay for it.
photo
Blodo
Time to build a better world
02:43 PM on 03/12/2012
More accurately: Housing or anything else is worth exactly what someone is willing and able to pay for it. The ability to pay is determined, in part, by government policy including the tax code.

In regard to housing, the price of any unit is also affected by municipal codes that regulate features of the neighbourhood such as the mix of units, public transit routes, etc.. Through these policies, cities can avoid ghettoization by encouraging a healthy demographic and income mix in neighbourhoods. The extreme end of non-interference is the city that consists of gated communities at one end and run-down or abandoned neighbourhoods at the other.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quax
02:52 PM on 03/12/2012
A very naive statement, as the ability and hence willingness to pay for real estate is directly dependent on the mortgage rate and the banking industry's lending standards.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charismatron
12:14 PM on 03/12/2012
Having returned here (Vancouver) after being four years abroad, it's changed so much for the worse: the spectacle of unending, amazingly over-pricedcondos make the city seem almost alien in nature (with ever more going up!), the continued poverty of the DTES, the incompetence and corruption of the police (the dead prostitutes/pig farm scandal), to the fact that it's near-impossible to own a home here due to massively inflated prices--I find it hard to imagine this city will remain desirable in the long run.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Pepperoni
Where did all the good Republicans go?
12:27 PM on 03/12/2012
You were only gone 4 years. When you left Vancouver everything you listed already existed. Pickton was arrested 10 years ago.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
agness nutter
What fresh hell is this?
01:58 PM on 03/12/2012
Quite right. I spent 35 years away. The changes are astonishing. Happily, I've been able to visit once or twice a year during that time, or I wouldn't know I was in the same place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charismatron
09:16 PM on 03/18/2012
The Pickton thing began quite some time ago, it's true. I reference it due to my shock that it's still in the news cycle today (tho considerably less than when it was discovered). As for the condos, there are far more now than when I left--far more--and so many more to come! That the DTES remains as it was is also surprising to me as pre-Olympics there was much talk about making changes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gathled
I am an extreme moderate...
12:58 AM on 03/13/2012
I was gone 14 years, how do you think I feel? This place is messed up... From lack of doctors, judges, high prices, no jobs and job that pay so little if you do get one. Never mind the extreme wait it takes to get your Asian wife permanent residency because OH GOD YOU MIGHT BE SMUGGLING IN A PROSTITUTE OR A SMALL ASIAN OSAMA BIN LADEN... Sorry .... But seriously, someone has to do something. Help? There is no help... Unless you are rich...
photo
TonyOnly
Truth matters.
11:22 AM on 03/12/2012
Fact:
Vancouver has the highest proportion of millionaires of any Canadian city.
It also has the poorest postal code in the country (Downtown Eastside).

When I lived and worked in Vancouver I found there were divisions and tensions along racial lines (White, Asian, East Indian, Native). They co existed, but didn't interact as much as you might have thought, considering the size of their communities.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peacefrogg
11:04 AM on 03/12/2012
What do you expect when you take properties that are worth are $100,000/Can and inflate there prices up to unrealistic values. The Bank of Canada should have raised those interest rates up years ago and kept raising them until folks got the message. Having a home in Canada of all places should'nt be a priviledge, there is more land here then you can shake a stick at and as far as foreigners coming and buying holiday homes, that needs to come to an end as well.

When we have Chinese and Indian investors coming over with bag loads of money that was made from slavery, how are we supposed to compete with that, I thought we didn't endorse slavery over here in Canada or have things changed recently.
11:04 AM on 03/12/2012
These cities have no control over who buys their land and for what price.

Laissez faire governments allow the city's citizens to be without control of their own environment.

Why are foreign owners allowed to buy and rent property? How does a homeowner who lives outside of the city- or country repair a leaky faucet?

Soon all of the industry and land will be foreign owned and we will have to follow their rules-
but what's the difference-? There are no rules now,
10:56 AM on 03/12/2012
I don't think that this writer has ever been in Vancouver. White neighborhoods??? There are certainly extremely wealthy neighborhoods, one drastically poor one, and several in between.
But you will find all races in each of them. And if you think that Kerrisdale and Shaughnessy are white bastions, think again. Or better yet, come visit.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
agness nutter
What fresh hell is this?
02:07 PM on 03/12/2012
I have to agree with you. I have acquaintances who moved out of Shaughnessy decades ago because it wasn't a white bastion any more. Quite the contrary.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
davidwgray08
02:18 PM on 03/12/2012
Well truth be told, both Kerrisdale and Shaughnessy are relatively white neighborhoods compared to others such as SE Van and the route along the skytrain. That being said, these neighborhoods are also being increasingly occupied by mainly Chinese families, but this is a Vancouver-particular phenomenon and there are no other visible minorities/immigrants who are changing Vancouver as significantly as they are. Still, most of the west side is definitely a white bastion. Walk around Broadway between MacDonald and Alma and see how many people on the street are white. Then go to East Broadway, around Kingsway, and to Richmond. You'd notice.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:22 AM on 03/12/2012
If drive around more upscale neigbourhoods in Vancouver aound 9 o'clock at night you might be surprised at how many houses do not have any lights on. The reason appears to be that there are actually no people living in the houses. Many wealthy Asians have invested in Vancouver real estate as a safety valve should the business climate change in their home countries. Owning a house in Vancouver also gives them an opportunity to educate their sons and daughters in a relatively safe city. Absentee ownership drives up the prices of all houses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
11:02 AM on 03/12/2012
Sounds pretty common.
05:00 PM on 05/14/2012
Very true, looked at moving to Coal Harbour downtown. Only 20-25% of condos and apartments have lights on at night. It is awful living next to empty houses ande changes the face of our neighbourhoods. There should be a very high property tax rate on homes that sit empty but for 2 weeks a year. This would lessen speculation and enable kids who grew up in Vancouver to be able to purchase a home and live here as young adults.
georgee2
My Canada Includes Everyone
10:16 AM on 03/12/2012
All you need to do to find out how we got here is go back to 1980 and read the history. Maggie, Ronnie and Brian with their trickle down economics. Guess what? It doesn't work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JeanFrancois Lord
10:59 AM on 03/12/2012
trickle down economic never trickle that much, but combine that with outsourcing/globalization, whatever could have trickled, trickles elsewhere. Not here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
11:19 AM on 03/12/2012
What trickled down was not money.