Nanisivik Naval Facility: Arctic Station Plans Too Costly, Ottawa Says

Arctic

First Posted: 03/24/2012 8:48 pm Updated: 03/24/2012 9:52 pm

The federal government says budget concerns are behind cuts to a planned Arctic naval facility.

A defence department official says downgrades to plans for the Nanisivik station on the eastern gate of the Northwest Passage were necessary because of the unexpected high costs of building in the North.

Kim Tulipan says the cuts were made to keep the project within its $100 million budget.

Defence Minister Peter MacKay said last week the cuts wouldn't make any difference to northern military operations.

MacKay says the facility will still be an improvement.

Original plans included office, accommodation and workshop buildings as well as improvements to the wharf. They've now been reduced to an unheated warehouse and a small tank farm.

Improvements to the aging 1970s-era jetty have been put off for years.

"Any infrastructure work in the Arctic poses a number of unique challenges due to the remoteness of the location and various other difficulties, such as a shorter construction season and permafrost. Therefore, the original scope of [Nanisivik] had to be reduced to ensure the project remained on budget," Tulipan wrote in an email.

Nanisivik was a centrepiece of Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Arctic "use it or lose it" speech in 2007.

Dennis Bevington, the New Democrat MP for the Western Arctic, said last week that the downgrade is an example of a plan that wasn't well thought out in the first place.

Tulipan said the costly challenges couldn't have been foreseen in 2007. She said knowledge about the challenges has been gained only through the work that was undertaken in the years since 2007 as project officers became more familiar with the site.

MacKay noted the Harper government has invested more in Arctic infrastructure than any in recent history.

Tulipan said the primary role of the station will be to refuel the navy's arctic offshore patrol ships as well as other government vessels. The berth also allows government ships to conduct some alongside repairs, and will provide the Canadian Coast Guard with a cargo laydown area to support their Arctic re-supply mission.

In addition, she said it will allow the navy and coast guard to transfer a modest amount of stores and provisions as well as facilitate the transfer of small numbers of personnel using the airport at Arctic Bay.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

The federal government says budget concerns are behind cuts to a planned Arctic naval facility.A defence department official says downgrades to plans for the Nanisivik station on the eastern gate of t...
The federal government says budget concerns are behind cuts to a planned Arctic naval facility.A defence department official says downgrades to plans for the Nanisivik station on the eastern gate of t...
Filed by Jacqueline Delange  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sunnyokanagan
Increase compassion. Decrease suffering
11:48 AM on 03/25/2012
State sovereignty is of little or no importance to Corporatists aligned only with profiteers.If you think the Harper government is concerned for the well-being of this Nation outside of its resources' exploitation, give your head a shake.
03:12 PM on 03/25/2012
Natural resources are the main reason behind all the interest in the north- Russia, now the worlds largest oil producer wants to produce more of it!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sunnyokanagan
Increase compassion. Decrease suffering
04:04 PM on 03/25/2012
Certainly that is so. And arguably it is the cohort of Putin-Supported Russian oligarchs (who invest these profits heavily in US and other companies) and the ruling plutocracy who will benefit most.

Global, trans-national corporate business interests are also the Harperites' shot-callers and, wherever in the world *they* come from, it is *them* to whom Harper is beholden.

That is why it really is neither here nor there to his ilk whether *Canada* has the ability to police or defend its Arctic sovereignty. Those lines on the map don't mean much at this "Bilderbergian" level of play.
11:34 AM on 03/25/2012
What a load of c---! We better start spending on an infrastructure of some permanemce up in the Artic now rather than later. If we don't we might as well concede soveriegnty to the Russians.
I'm sick and tired of hearing we can't afford to establish our presence in the far north. We can consider 35 billion for fighters that can't perform up there, but not establish naval facilities when in the next year or two, the northwest passage will be fully open . What the h--- are they thinking!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Transitteer
and another thing . . .
02:35 AM on 03/25/2012
No Arctic Naval Base (poor research, poorer planning), and no workable submarines. Maybe we should just ask the Russians to keep an eye on the place for us - we can't afford to - after all, they probably already have a fleet of subs working up there anyway . . . . .
01:39 AM on 03/25/2012
“Tulipan said the costly challenges couldn't have been foreseen in 2007.”
What has changed since 2007 – the location is the same, the short construction season was there in 2007, the permafrost was there in 2007, it was a remote area in 2007. Seems to me that someone forgot to do their homework, or at least find out where Nanisivik actually is.
photo
Spanky McFarlane
ILLEGITIMUS NON CARBORUNDUM.
01:14 AM on 03/25/2012
Promise made ,promise kept? lmao.

Oh well at least he got his photo Ops & to all 'Conservatives' isn't that what's really important?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yishai ettebe
12:12 AM on 03/25/2012
Lovely. One of the most important facilities that we need, now they want to scale back. Guess we will stick to the citizens in the territories keeping an eye on who is really in our backyard.