New Brunswick Budget 2012: 4,500 Government Jobs To Be Cut: Source

New Brunswick Budget Job Cuts

First Posted: 03/26/2012 4:09 pm Updated: 03/29/2012 2:57 pm

FREDERICTON - The New Brunswick government plans to cut 4,500 jobs from the province's civil service over the next three years to tackle its deficit, a government source told The Canadian Press on Monday.

The source said Tuesday's provincial budget will outline the elimination of 1,500 jobs a year through attrition, which would reduce the size of the public service by five per cent at the end of the cuts.

The province's Progressive Conservative government has been searching for ways to streamline the delivery of government services since it was elected 18 months ago in an effort to cut spending and fulfil a campaign pledge to balance the budget by the end of its mandate in 2014.

Danny Legere, president of CUPE New Brunswick, said he was "shocked and disappointed" that job cuts will be announced in the budget.

"Government talked about cutting the fat but certainly 1,500 jobs every year for three years is far beyond that," he said.

"We're getting right down where the services are definitely going to be cut and going to have a significant impact on the daily lives of New Brunswickers."

In an interview earlier Monday, Premier David Alward said many people in the civil service are nearing retirement age, which allows the government to trim positions that aren't considered essential.

"We're committed to bringing New Brunswick's fiscal house in order and living within our means," he added.

The province faces a projected $471 million deficit for the 2011-12 fiscal year and its debt is expected to top $10 billion.

The source said the government also plans to put an airplane it owns up for sale. The plane has become a political lightning rod after the Opposition accused government members of using it inappropriately last year, something Alward has denied.

Liberal finance critic Donald Arseneault said he doesn't see how Alward can cut the jobs without reducing services.

"He needs to be up front with New Brunswickers and say which civil servants are not going to be replaced or which civil servants are going to be fired," Arseneault said. "This is definitely going to have an impact on the service and the programs that the government offers to New Brunswickers."

Arseneault said the government should focus on job creation and boosting economic growth to combat the deficit.

Legere said Alward and Finance Minister Blaine Higgs haven't listened to the union's push for the government to increase revenues, which would include collecting more in income tax, particularly from thewealthy.

"A progressive tax system would have more of a smooth effect where everybody pays their fair share along the lines of their ability to pay," he said.

David Murrell, an economics professor at the University of New Brunswick in Fredericton, said he believes the government should also increase the harmonized sales tax — at least temporarily.

"I would raise it by one percentage point until the deficit is eliminated," Murrell said.

Alward said he has no intention of raising the HST or gas tax. He also dismissed suggestions the government could introduce highway tolls.

Gas taxes increased by 2.9 cents a litre in Higgs's last budget. And in recent months, the government has increased user fees on public services ranging from camp site rentals to motor vehicle registrations. Those increases are expected to generate about $6 million a year.

Earlier this month, the government merged a number of departments and created a new Government Services Department to consolidate some internal government services — a move Alward said would result in savings of about $100 million over three years.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

Filed by Brodie Fenlon  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
CarlyQ
Without followers, evil cannot spread.
12:31 PM on 03/27/2012
With austerity being all the rage with conservative governments around the world these days, there is no shortage of explanations for why it is needed.

How, then, do I continue to be baffled by the concept?

It seems obvious to me that if the average person's wages have stagnated for a few decades while personal debt has exploded, there is precious little "disposable" income to be squeezed from such a person's pockets.

When governments claim the economy will improve by slashing jobs, raising taxes and creating highway tolls, it presumes there is plenty of "disposable" income out there already. I don't understand this line of reasoning because when jobs are slashed, those people either find work - usually lower paying - or don't. This ends up taking money OUT of the economy because businesses can't sell as many products. Eventually, in response, businesses will resort to laying off people, adding to the problem of taking money out of the economy.

I've tried to get a rational explanation from conservatives about why they think austerity works and all I've ever gotten in response is a snipe about people picking themselves up by their bootstraps and quit milking the system.

Thoughts, anyone?
01:16 PM on 03/27/2012
Consider that most civil servants are paying 1/3 of their earnings in taxation, earnings coming from HST-free top-down organizations. They are, in essence, only paying for a third of their own earnings. By comparison, the same person in the private sector is pulling that income from profitable private economies that are resource and service driven. Revenue is real in the private sector, figurative in the public sector. Public jobs are not contributory jobs, they cost the province money.

In an elementary approach, you need then, to balance the number of private sector employees to the size of government. At least 2 employees in the private sector are required, at equal pay, to the public sector individual in order to break even. In New Brunswick, that is precisely the ratio: 2-1. Then we have private HST and special taxes which all companies and goods pay. Essentially, these taxes should float the government's regulatory costs. And it does.

The problem then comes from the federal cut, a deficit with carried interest, operations costs, and a declining population. In NB the deficit is more-or-less manageable. The real problem is our operations costs and declining population. Compared to profitable provincial economies you need to look at population density to understand that infrastructure is 5 times that of the Ontario per capita. Unless our density increases and population goes up, it's necessary to reduce the number of civil servants per capita to erase the disparity.
01:18 PM on 03/27/2012
Unless of course your ready to cut essential services to 2/5ths of our infrastructure. That'd solve the problem too.
11:41 AM on 03/27/2012
4500 = 5%
90000 = 100%
population of NB = 750,000.
12% of total population works for province (much higher % for working age population - estimate 500,000 - 18%)
If municipal and federal gov. employees are added I'm sure 25% at least of all working age NBers work for government.
This appears hard to support logically.
Am I mistaken in my calculations???
01:22 PM on 03/27/2012
35% in Saint John, 36% in Miramichi-present, 25% in Moncton, and 30% in Fredericton. Your pegging the public sector around 1/4, its closer to 1/3
11:29 AM on 03/27/2012
Read about the 1930s Great Depression, never thought would live through a another one.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
11:02 AM on 03/27/2012
It will be intersting to see what the job figures bring with budgets in NB, ON and the Federal government.
07:21 AM on 03/27/2012
Conveniently, they can cause people to complain about insufficient government services which will be used to justify privatisation that will be a sort of transfusion of money to well-connected private interests. Legalised corruption.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CreepyThinMan
More dapper than Don Draper.
07:16 AM on 03/27/2012
The Canadian government sabotages our economy by helping greedy corporations, who have no loyalty to our nation or our values of proving people with a fair wage, to ship our manufacturing base to third world nations in the name of "a global economy" which is code for "a race to the bottom" to see which industrialized nation can effectively bring back slavery. Canada, the USA and the UK are basically plutocracies now and what was formerly known as the middle class is now being reduced to serfdom.