U.S., Canada Poised To OK Omar Khadr Transfer

Omar Khadr

First Posted: 03/28/2012 6:10 pm Updated: 03/28/2012 6:56 pm

A "frustrated" Omar Khadr could be back in Canada by the end of May, with both Ottawa and Washington poised to approve his transfer from Guantanamo Bay, where the convicted war criminal has been held for almost a decade, The Canadian Press has learned.


A source familiar with the file said U.S. Secretary of Defence Leon Panetta was expected to sign off on the transfer within a week.


"It's on his desk, it's ready," the source said Wednesday.


"The U.S. has no concerns about (Khadr)."


Khadr has been caught up in a bureaucratic "Catch-22" since becoming eligible to leave the American prison on Cuba last October under terms of a plea agreement struck a year earlier.


The Toronto-born Khadr, 25, pleaded guilty before a much maligned U.S. military commission to five war crimes he committed as a 15-year-old in Afghanistan in July 2002.


In exchange, the Canadian citizen was given an eight-year sentence, with one year to be served in Guantanamo Bay and the remainder in Canada.


Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government has been in no hurry to approve the transfer request, which Khadr's lawyers submitted to both governments a year ago.


Instead, the source said, Ottawa has been scrutinizing the application far more closely than required, looking at issues such as his parole eligibility, which would essentially be almost immediate.


"I think they have stalled the proceedings — the U.S. would have sent him home a lot earlier if things had been worked out in Canada," the source said.


"The U.S. does not want to act summarily and sign off on his transfer without Canada having everything prepared and ready. It's a matter of diplomatic courtesy."


Given the process that must unfold, Khadr's return should come by the end of May, the source added.


Panetta waiting for Ottawa to agree to transfer


Pentagon spokesman Lt.-Col. Todd Breasseale confirmed Panetta was waiting for Ottawa to agree to Khadr's transfer, and the process was moving forward.


"It's a matter of ongoing, very sensitive discussion and consideration that involves everything from public safety to diplomacy," Breasseale said.


Panetta has only said negotiations were continuing.


"I don't have a specific timeline for signing it, but once those arrangements have been made, obviously we will approve the transfer to Canada," Panetta said in Ottawa this week.


In the Commons Wednesday, Public Safetey Minister Vic Toews said only that the Americans had made no formal application for Khadr's transfer, and no decisions had been made.


"If an application were received, it will be determined in accordance with law," Toews said.


Khadr's Pentagon-appointed lawyer, Lt.-Col. Jon Jackson, who brokered the plea deal, said his client has had more difficulty dealing with the transfer delay than he did when he agreed to admit guilt.


"Omar is very frustrated — it doesn't matter to him who's arguing about it," Jackson said Wednesday from Washington, D.C.


"He just knows he's still at Gitmo, and that's all that matters to him."


The lesson for Guantanamo, Jackson said, is that "no matter what you have in writing," getting anything done is going to be "problematic" once governments get involved.


In an agreed statement of facts, Khadr admitted among other things to the murder of Sgt. 1st Class Chris Speer and to being an al-Qaeda terrorist who wanted to kill as many Americans as possible.


Held in maximum security facility


Since his conviction, Khadr has been held in Guantanamo's maximum security Camp 5.


However, the prison's youngest inmate and sole westerner has earned some privileges, such as recreation time and access to a media room, and has contact with a few other inmates.


Privately, some defence lawyers say their Gitmo clients have become leery of striking their own plea deals given the delay in returning Khadr.


Panetta appeared to acknowledge the concern, saying moving Khadr out would be "an important step."


"We've got others there, obviously, we would like to be able to move as well," Panetta said.


Once the defence secretary signs off, U.S. President Barack Obama is required to give 30 days notice to Congress of the pending transfer. Congress is not required to give its approval given the pretrial agreement.


To date, Khadr's legal team, which includes Toronto lawyer John Norris, has refrained from launching any court action to force the governments to expedite the move on the grounds that doing so would only cause further delays.


But patience is wearing thin.


"We've been patient enough," Jackson said. "If he's not back by the end of May, I think there are going to be serious problems."


More than anything, another source said, Khadr wants to be reunited with his mother and other family members in Toronto.


"The most important thing for Omar is family — to be with (his) mom, to be with his grandma," the source said.


WATCH: A teenage Omar Khadr sobs uncontrollably as Canadian spy agents question him at the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba in 2008.
Guantanamo Protesters March From White House To Supreme Court
1  of  10
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Protesters wearing orange prison jump suits and black hoods march during a protest against holding detainees at the military prison in Guantanamo Bay during a demonstration on Capitol Hill on Jan. 11, 2012, the 10th anniversary of the arrival of the first group of detainees to be held at the prison. Protesters marched down Pennsylvania Avenue from the White House, past the U.S. Capitol before finishing at the U.S. Supreme Court.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA

A "frustrated" Omar Khadr could be back in Canada by the end of May, with both Ottawa and Washington poised to approve his transfer from Guantanamo Bay, where the convicted war criminal ha...
A "frustrated" Omar Khadr could be back in Canada by the end of May, with both Ottawa and Washington poised to approve his transfer from Guantanamo Bay, where the convicted war criminal ha...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 192
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
02:10 AM on 04/04/2012
Our legal system is a joke.Bringing this thing back to Canada is a joke,Ship the loser back to his homeland and i,m not talking Canada,,,,, mabee he could be a suicide bomber and make us all happy blowing up a few of his fellow man.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:43 AM on 03/31/2012
At last, it seems like sane heads have prevailed. Both America and Canada are trying to do the right thing on the Khadr case.

Pray to God and Jesus that they wont be underminded by the mindless haters, who refuse to believe any of the facts of this case.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:52 PM on 03/29/2012
My prediction is that he will return to Canada and sue us all for the $20million that he obviously deserves. Why are we such suckers? We are too nice that's for sure.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ansdlmol
06:44 PM on 03/29/2012
Let him rot in Guantanamo.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
geminivoyager
05:43 PM on 03/29/2012
I'll chip in $10 to keep him in Gitmo forever. And $100 for the rest of him family to join him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timothy Hedden
12:44 PM on 03/29/2012
He looks like a hairy Laurence Fishburne
11:58 AM on 03/29/2012
He wants back to Canada and... he hates Canada and Canadians;
He wants Canadian Government to help him and... he hates Canada;
He has Canadian Passport and... he was fighting against Canada as part of NATO;
Do we really need this human waste back in Canada?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RobLuzecky
12:24 PM on 03/29/2012
And you know he hates Canada, by what evidence? Have you looked into his mind? In point of fact he was not fighting against Canada as Canadian forces were not involved in the operation which saw his capture.
12:58 PM on 03/29/2012
I guess u never saw his backward family being interviewed??!!! he will come here, never get a job go on social welfare and raise 7 kids.
01:00 PM on 03/29/2012
His father, his brothers were fighting against "infidels" and against NATO forces.
As per their definition Canada is a big part of both – part of “infidel” world and part of NATO. Anything else to add? – Oh yeah, he tossed a hand grenade at military doctor, who had a red cross on his uniform. At all times it was an act of dishonour – to attack military doctors. I guess in his tiny brain red cross meant an enemy, this is how it functioned.
So, back to my original question: do we really need to bring this human waste back into Canada?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RobLuzecky
11:38 AM on 03/29/2012
He was 15 when he was imprisoned and tortured, and now we are getting him back -- 10 years later. We should be ashamed that we allowed this to happen to one of our citizens. There are governments that sanction the imprisonment of children while denying them the basic right of habeas.There are governments that legitimate the torture of children in the name of national security and a putative war against an abstraction. There are governments that flout all notions of human rights and international convention in the name of there own national aims. We should be wary of these governments. We should reject the authority of these governments in the same way that they have rejected their own founding principles. Unfortunately, these governments are our own.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TerryLeBlancMan
10:08 AM on 03/29/2012
Please- keep him.
He and his gnarly family have been nothing but a huge expense, and embarassment to Canada. Thanks for that, Jean Cretin!
10:04 AM on 03/29/2012
I'm more than a little embarrassed that this has been allowed to go on as long as it has. The guy is a Canadian citizen, and child soldier to boot. That we allowed him to be detained for as long as he was without a trial or hearing is more than a little scary for those who feel that in order for charter rights to have any force and effect, they have to be enjoyed by all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:35 AM on 03/29/2012
adopt this "child" soldier, charter of rights will let you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles the Great
Canadian/Israeli Goy in Alert,Nunavut
11:09 AM on 03/29/2012
He admitted to his crime and the Charter of Rights does not apply outside of Canada. I know many Canadians do not get this
12:01 PM on 03/29/2012
...but it applies to the the Canadian government officials who participated in his detention and interrogation, even if they are acting outside of Canada - See Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr (2010).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RobLuzecky
12:28 PM on 03/29/2012
The Geneva Conventions do apply outside of Canada, and he was not afforded these protections either. Moreover, he 'admitted his crime' only after being subjected to what both the United Nations and Amnesty International have described as conditions of torture. Do you think that such admissions are to be regarded as containing any veracity?
09:31 AM on 03/29/2012
What we need is an impartial investigation into the events of 911. Building 7 (47 story wtc 7 building, not hit by a plane and implodes into itself in 6.5 seconds on 911?), Norad stand down, explosives in white van on george washington bridge (the real perps were caught and let go?) etc etc. The US government needs to be brought to account on these rediculous findings.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:54 AM on 03/29/2012
you tell Mr. Obama.
11:35 AM on 03/29/2012
Well, Charlie Sheen tried and we know how that worked out. He did a public address to Obama to have a meeting with him backed by thousands of architects and engineers etc. Watch his movie "Hollywood speaks out" and see why so many actors are persecuted.
10:27 AM on 03/29/2012
You want the truth? You can't handle the truth!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PiperSniper
08:32 AM on 03/29/2012
I'm sure the 10+ years Khadr spent at Gitmo has more than helped him grow into the person that the "powers that be" already determined he was. This young man never stood a chance in life. First his family and then the government. Now, all he has to do is come home, get himself a good education, a wonderful job and his future will be bright.
09:09 AM on 03/29/2012
Would you hire him?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PiperSniper
09:36 AM on 03/29/2012
It's called sarcasm
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ansdlmol
06:48 PM on 03/29/2012
The chances of that happening are less than the likilyhood of you growing a second head.
07:58 AM on 03/29/2012
The pun headline is pretty inappropriate!
07:55 AM on 03/29/2012
"Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ascoli
07:22 AM on 03/29/2012
He killed a poor baby USA soldier.
Well at least he didn't kill .....................17 Afghan civilians including women and 9 children.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:19 AM on 03/29/2012
very COLD and shivering.
08:30 AM on 03/29/2012
One does not take away from the other. Regardless of people's feelings about this war or the US's wars, he is a Canadian citizen who killed an allied soldier in a war we participate in. No one has to agree with any of this but seeing it in light of how things are is something all of us should be able to do.
12:53 AM on 03/31/2012
Except one is a universally recognized war crime and the other was unilaterally fabricated and recognized only by the US years AFTER the incident is alleged to have happened. This case and the arguments supporting it are wrong on so many levels and can easily be demolished from numerous angles: ------"Glazier, an expert on international law and the laws of armed conflict, argues that the military commission trial of Omar Khadr is itself a war crime.

That's because Khadr is charged with crimes that were only defined as war crimes by the Military Commissions Act, first enacted in 2006. Khadr is charged with conspiracy and material support for terrorism for helping his father's friends make and plant improvised explosive devices, and for "murder in violation of the laws of war" for throwing a grenade that killed a U.S. soldier during a firefight started by U.S. forces. All of these acts allegedly occurred in the summer of 2002. Back then, making bombs, planting anti-tank mines and killing the other side's soldiers who were trying to kill you first didn't violate any rules of war.

Congress and the defense department have tried to get around this fact. In 2006 and again in 2009, Congress unilaterally re-wrote international law by defining conspiracy and material support for terrorism -- which encompasses pretty much anything an enemy force or its supporters might do -- as war crimes."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daphne-eviatar/the-trial-of-omar-khadr-i_b_702195.html