Canada Budget 2012: Opposition And Stakeholders Give Their Responses To Federal Spending Cuts

The Huffington Post Canada  |  By   |  Posted: 03/29/2012 7:00 pm Updated: 03/29/2012 7:05 pm

Now that federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has delivered Canada's 2012 federal budget, opposition parties and key stakeholders are beginning to respond to the Conservative government's spending plans.

Here are responses from some of the notables.

BUDGET REACTIONS
1  of  18
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Here are some responses from notable politicians and key players to Canada's 2012 federal budget.

(CP photo)

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS

Now that federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has delivered Canada's 2012 federal budget, opposition parties and key stakeholders are beginning to respond to the Conservative government's spending pl...
Now that federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has delivered Canada's 2012 federal budget, opposition parties and key stakeholders are beginning to respond to the Conservative government's spending pl...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Poster999
A promise made is a debt unpaid.
02:13 PM on 03/30/2012
Pretty bland budget. Not nearly as draconian as predicted. It's pro business, no surprise there it was put forward by the Tories after all. They pretty much left the baby boomers alone as far as the OAS goes and a lot of the government worker cuts will be through attrition. Nothing like some of the austerity budgets in Europe.
02:09 PM on 03/30/2012
stephen harper will be happy when Canada is a barren wasteland enviromentally
09:59 AM on 03/30/2012
Mulcair said....How come not more for Quebec and eh eh eh oh yes Canada
07:55 AM on 03/30/2012
the budget is big on research and development -------i wonder how much will be poured into carbon sequestration studies and pipeline design -----by the taxpayers -------

these are things the corporate sector should be doing on their own dime ----

but it is another case of public liability and private profit just wearing a different dress
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:15 PM on 03/30/2012
The budget also changes R&D funding from tax credits to targeted grants. Politicizes the R&D investment program and I dont think the Cons are looking to invest in those types of technologies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Taylor Jay
I don't align myself with any political party.
08:25 PM on 03/30/2012
because we can research there business for them negate the environment and stop monitoring what our citizens eat, because as long as they pay there taxes frankly we dont care :D
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norma Ward
07:40 AM on 03/30/2012
Here's what Mr. Mulcair should be more concerned about:

http://viableopposition.blogspot.ca/2012/03/canadas-ndp-mps-and-their-hair.html

Government waste in action.
11:13 PM on 03/29/2012
The International Climate Science's Media Release on the Budget

Canadian federal Budget a step forward on climate change

Ottawa, Canada, March 29, 2012: “The International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC) congratulates the Government of Canada for removing from the federal Budget the misleading language of previous Budgets concerning clean air and climate change,” said Tom Harris, executive director ICSC which is headquartered in Ottawa, Canada. “In past years, this serious science mistake, appearing repeatedly in such an important document, contributed to public confusion about the distinctly different approaches needed to address these two issues. This mistake has now been corrected and therefore a more productive debate about environmental protection will be possible moving forward.”

“We also express our support for the elimination of the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy (NRTEE),” stated Dr. Tim Ball, ICSC science advisor and former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. “The NRTEE’s biased approach to the climate issue, looking at the impacts on Canada of warming, but ignoring the far more dangerous, and more probable, cooling, contributed to a distortion of the discussion about how best to prepare for future climate change.”

see http://tinyurl.com/cq22nkl for the rest.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sdgreen
07:35 AM on 03/30/2012
Lizzy May must have really pouted when she read that gem.
photo
BBlitzer
My micro-bio is empty
08:24 AM on 03/30/2012
Ah yes Mr. Harris. You have managed to find a fringe group of scientists that denies the link between human pollution and global warming. It is very reminiscent of the scientists that denied that HIV had any relation to AIDS back in the 90's.

The fact that your group has come out in support of this budget pretty much confirms for me that it is bad for the environment. Just because you give your group an official sounding name does not mean that you represent the majority of consensus view of scientists. Far from it. No matter what the overwhelming majority of facts show, there will always be deniers. Just like the group in Manitoba about a decade ago that told people they should not wear seatbelts because they were able to identify 2 or 3 accidents where people died because they were waring them (as opposed to the thousands of cases where people were saved by them - or died because they were not wearing them).

Your list of "Core Principles" really shows what you are all about: http://www.climatescienceinternational.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=121&Itemid=67

So I thank you for Illuminating us.
02:01 PM on 03/30/2012
Read that list of Academics . How can you call them a Fringe Group? I bet they have 1000 times the peer reviewed papers on record than the more common Fruit Fly Expert and TV host that gets the most press on Climate in Canada.
http://www.climatescienceinternational.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=280