Graduated Licensing For Canada Seniors Floated By Top Medical Journal

Posted: 04/ 2/2012 6:57 pm Updated: 04/ 2/2012 6:57 pm

Elderly Driver

An editorial in the Canadian Medical Association Journal is calling for a graduated licensing system for the country's seniors.

The editorial says some seniors keep driving despite "substantial physical or mental deterioration that makes them medically unfit to drive."

Many jurisdictions already have graduated licensing in place for young and new drivers.

The editorial didn't outline the specific of restrictions, but author Donald Redelmeier says common restrictions for young drivers include prohibitions on driving around midnight, driving during bad weather and driving after drinking alcohol.

He said some jurisdictions also place limits on young drivers' access to major highways.

Redelmeier, a professor of medicine at the University of Toronto, suggests a full driver's licence automatically default to a restricted license once seniors reach a certain age — which has yet to be determined.

At that point, he proposes capable senior drivers can gain full driving privileges by getting a physician to certify their good health.

Redelmeier says this reframes the interaction between a senior and their doctor by placing the physician in the positive position of endorsing a full driver's licence rather than taking away privileges.

"The idea here is to preserve licensing during regular daylight hours so that the person can still do their grocery shopping and visit the hardware store and see their grandchildren," Redelmeier says.

The editorial cites a Transport Canada report that says 389 of the 2,209 Canadians who died in vehicle accidents in 2009 were over the age of 65. According to the editorial, that represents "a higher incidence than any other age group and far higher than those half their age."

Ezra Hauer, who has written a commentary in the journal defending older drivers, says more seniors die in fatal crashes because of their frailty, not their ability to drive safely.

He says when looking at all crashes — not just fatal ones — seniors drive just as safely as other drivers.

Hauer says a graduated licensing system would be nothing but age discrimination and restricting driving privileges for elderly Canadians would be a serious blow for some.

With files from CBC News

FOLLOW CANADA LIVING

Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
10:17 PM on 04/03/2012
Old people are the worst drivers in the world. They're a frickin' menace to society. But they vote. So we have to pretend that the daily near-miss with Miss Daisy was some sort of fluke. When I turn 70, I'm turning in my license. I was a cabbie. I don't think I ever saw anyone over the age of 65 who didn't drive like a drunk 7 year old.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wbischo
09:28 PM on 04/03/2012
I think the people who dreamed this up for seniors have too much time on their hands. I believe most seniors who can't still drive savely, realize this and stop driving. I am 74 years old, have been driving for almost sixty years, and have never had an accident, nor a ticket. I have driven many different cars in both Europe and this country. I have been licensed in two countries, and seven states. I feel safer driving myself, than riding with most of my children or grandchildren. I would hope that the tests administered when we get our licenses renewed would be adequate indicators of how good our sight, and reflexes are and if they are not, then give us a more extensive test. Don't just arbitrarily take away our right to drive, before we lose the ability to drive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
10:15 PM on 04/03/2012
You're the only wrinkly in the world who doesn't drive like a blind, drunken sailor, apparently.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wbischo
09:15 PM on 04/03/2012
Why are the senior a ''menace'' when they are the ones who are dying in the greatest numbers?
It is probably the speeding, drunk, high, texting, cell calling ''younger'' drivers who are killing the seniors who were just aren't expecting so many red light runners or sigsag driving idiots on the road.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wbischo
08:42 PM on 04/03/2012
About 20% of all people who died in vehicle accidents in Canada were over 65. That doesn't mean that the seniors were driving themselves. Also, when a person over 65 IS in an accident, their age and their physical condition overall might contribute to the death, which might not be directly caused by the accident. A stroke or heart attack would more likely happen to a senior in such a traumatic situation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
unami
sonic truth
12:12 PM on 04/03/2012
My God, someone in the Government (not our's of course) has finally noticed this serious issue. Something should have been done decades ago. These people are a menace to society.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
10:19 PM on 04/03/2012
Amen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wooty99
I like my dogs better than most people.
09:17 AM on 04/03/2012
Instead of singling out seniors, why not make everyone have to re-certify every 10 years or so. Redo both written and road testing. There are plenty of middle aged and young people who should have it done.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
10:19 PM on 04/03/2012
Because its super expensive to make society recertify 26 year olds, whereas it would probably save us trillions to throw a 60 year olds keys into a volcano.
07:49 AM on 04/03/2012
By my own choice I do not drive in the wintery bad weather anymore..By my own choice I am no longer driving after dark or on busy freeways...By my own choice I recognized my limitations that seemd to be creeping up on me and acknowledge not only my safety on the roads but everyone elses. This is a good Idea for both teen drivers and the senior citizens... it will not deter those that insist on drinking and driving..I fear them the most.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
All Seeing Guy
Center of the storm
08:23 PM on 04/02/2012
Three times in the past week I've had to take serious evasive action to avoid being the victim of someone's granny. Twice on the road, and once, just in time to avoid being run over in a parking lot.
photo
Bumpers car
Fish till you die
10:41 PM on 04/02/2012
Its a good thing they were old with slow reactions or you might not be here to post this. Seriously, I have come closer to being killed in car accidents far more often as a result of young drivers then older. 401 being a prime example of their preferred habitat. I drive at 115 to 120 on multi lane roads and on Ontario's highways, regardless of posted speed, I average 3 or 4 near misses between Ottawa and Toronto. Mostly coming up from behind. It is a whole lot worse on #17 between North Bay and Ottawa where on every drive 10 to 15 scary near misses and head on avoidence take place when ever I drive it. None of these idiots are much over 45 and most are young men. In our rural area, every pick up with a person under 30 has a case of beer going and stop signs just mean there is a ditch there. Yes, I see elderly drivers causing problems but only 1 or 2 a month. Oddly enough, they are usually women but the young idiots are the biggest threat to my life on the roads. Want safwer roads? pay for more enforcement. BTW? graduated licences in Ontario have done nothing to curb speeding or impaired youths. Look up the stats, both are on the rise again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
All Seeing Guy
Center of the storm
12:42 AM on 04/03/2012
Different strokes for different folks. My near broken bone and bumper moments have involved senility and the aged who should definitely take the bus. You can gain experience, you can provide driver training, you can't fight age.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
retromoderne
Born right the first time
08:21 PM on 04/02/2012
I think the point about the driver's frailty being a factor in fatalities is an excellent one to consider. In my experience most people "restrict" their driving on their own as they age. My parents stopped driving at night several years ago.

Putting doctors on the spot is not the answer. What happens when an older driver tests fine, then has a stroke or develops another problem a few months later? If the person causes an accident, does the doctor get sued?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
portsport
For if it profit none dare call it treason.
08:11 PM on 04/02/2012
I am 66 years of age and I absolutely agree with this proposal. I have to work harder at driving now than I did even just a few years ago. I am still a good driver because I make sure that I pay closer attention to what I am doing when behind the wheel. Our cognitive abilities and reaction speed does dull as we age and that is a fact of life. I will happily take a drivers test and live with restrictions when I am older because I do not want to be responsible for putting other people's lives at risk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scratchingmyhead
03:02 PM on 04/03/2012
thanx for the great post.
08:08 PM on 04/02/2012
That lady in the picture should be looked at carefully by her doctor. She's driving a car from the passenger side. :D
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
retromoderne
Born right the first time
08:17 PM on 04/02/2012
I wonder sometimes who HuffPo has picking out stock photos. On the story about the toddler drowning in his family's washing machine it shows a pic of a coin-op machine.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Christian Cotroneo
07:51 PM on 04/03/2012
Uh huh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
07:48 PM on 04/02/2012
Sure, there are some o that need to be loked at like any age group but let's not forget for those who are physically and capable of driving we don't need to be adding more paper work to their lives. The government needs to create graduated licencing for drunk drivers and drug users who are driving under the influence. We know that taking away a driver's licence for this group never works. We also need to look at how we deal with these people in the courts since the penalities for drunk drvers has never been treated seriously even in criminal negligence cases. More empathy has been placed on loss of income, effects on families and social problems such as addictions. Sorry you are targeting the wrong group.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
All Seeing Guy
Center of the storm
08:25 PM on 04/02/2012
"Sorry you are targeting the wrong group."

My frayed nerves wholeheartedly disagree.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
10:40 AM on 04/04/2012
You must live in Victoria. Those people who are over 80 probably never understood merge and yield.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:44 PM on 04/02/2012
Its a false equivalence.
Why not just led children drive without a license? Because they are incapable of making proper decisions until they prove it on a road test.
If old people have their decision making and reaction time affected by age, why are we controlling teens and not old people?
Drugs and alcohol are a problem, and needs to be dealt with, but that doesn't mean we take away driving tests for teens and it should not mean we ignore the effects of age.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
10:48 PM on 04/02/2012
My point is simply this. We can't deal with the problems we have but we continue to look for more problems to deal with.