F-35 Purchase: Auditor General Slams Defence Department Over Jet Procurement

F35

First Posted: 04/ 3/2012 10:10 am Updated: 04/ 4/2012 12:29 pm

OTTAWA - The Harper government froze spending Tuesday on the multi-billion-dollar plan to buy new jet fighters minutes after the auditor general produced a withering report accusing the Department of National Defence of keeping Parliament in the dark about spiralling problems with the F-35 purchase.

The government also announced it would take away DND's ability to buy new weapons systems and hand it to Public Works — all in an effort to shield itself from the ensuing assault in the House of Commons that followed the release of the report by new Auditor General Michael Ferguson.

The Defence Department faced wide-ranging scorn over its management of the a plan to buy 65 new F-35 radar-evading stealth fighters for what the military initially insisted would cost $9 billion. The cost of the purchase, which is already the largest single purchase of military hardware in Canadian history, will almost certainly be far higher than originally budgeted, Ferguson said.

He added that Public Works should have done a better job of overseeing the purchase, but Ferguson was particularly scathing about DND's failure to come clean on potential problems with buying the F-35.

“Briefing material did not inform senior decision makers, central agencies, and the Minister of the problems and associated risks of relying on the F-35 to replace the CF-18," Ferguson said in his report. "Nor did National Defence provide complete cost information to parliamentarians."

DND pointedly rejected criticism that it did not exercise due diligence in managing the project.

The auditor general's criticism does not mean the government will scrap the F-35 purchase or even consider opening up the sole-source procurement to other competitive bids.

Ferguson's mandate limits his criticism to the conduct of bureaucrats, but his findings could be incendiary for the Harper government. The audit came just one week after Finance Minister Jim Flaherty announced $5.2 billion in cuts to public spending in his deficit-fighting budget.

NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair said the report raised ethical questions with its "litany of poor public administration, bad decision making and lack of accountability by Conservative ministers.

"But the key question to the prime minister is: how could he allow Parliament to be intentionally misled on the F-35s? Either he knew, and it's unconscionable, or he didn't know and it's incompetence. Which is it?"

Prime Minister Stephen Harper said that was a misrepresentation of Ferguson's findings.

"The government has not yet purchased this airplane, and has not yet signed a contract. The auditor general has identified a need for greater independence and supervision over some of the activities of the Department of National Defence. in this regard, the government will put that supervision in place before we proceed."

Harper left the remaining barrage of questions from the NDP and Liberals to two of his ministers, Associate Defence Minister Julian Fantino and Public Works Minister Rona Ambrose. Both ministers stuck closely to the government's earlier talking points — the freezing of funding and the creation of a new secretariat of top bureaucrats to shepherd the jet purchase from now on. Defence Minister Peter MacKay did not respond to any queries on the auditor general's report.

The Conservatives steadfastly defended the F-35 purchase during last year's election campaign that gave them a majority despite a growing body of evidence that suggested the project could never be kept on budget. The program is designed to replace the country's aging fleet of CF-18 jet fighters.

The late NDP leader Jack Layton, as well as ex-Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff, repeatedly attacked the F-35 purchase during last year's election campaign.

At one campaign event, Harper affirmed his support for the F-35 purchase, and said "latitude" had been built into the government's cost estimates.

"I think it's in a way sad that the new jets have become an issue in this campaign," the prime minister said during an April 8, 2011, stop in British Columbia.

"We've got our men and women in uniform up there flying airplanes that we know at the end of this decade are going to have to be replaced, and the thing we owe to them is to replace those airplanes.''

Ferguson's report vindicates parliamentary budget officer Kevin Page, who became embroiled in a heated public battle with the Defence Department in March 2011 when he released a report that said the cost of the F-35 could reach $30 billion over three decades.

An assistant deputy minister at Defence told an elaborate briefing for journalists that Page made a "mathematical error'' in calculating the unit cost of the planes, and that his estimates on long-term maintenance were erroneous as well.

Ferguson said Tuesday that Defence should have come clean with the real figures at that time. He pegged the projected 20-year cost of the program, including maintenance, at $25 billion.

"As a response to what the Parliamentary Budget Office did, that's when National Defence should have brought forward that full costing," Ferguson said.

Liberal defence critic John McKay accused the government Tuesday of trying to hide the true cost of the program from Canadians.

"Now they appear ready to throw bureaucrats and our armed forces under yet another bus, but Canadians won't be fooled. Responsibility for this fiasco lies squarely on the prime minister's desk."

The United States oversees the nine-country Joint Strike Fighter Program. The planes would be built by the U.S. defence giant Lockheed Martin, but the rollout of the plane has been plagued by delays, technical problems and a 64-per-cent cost increase. Those problems have been well-documented in reports by the U.S. Government Accountability Office, an investigative branch of Congress.

Harper and his government were briefed in advance on the criticisms in the auditor general's report, allowing them to prepare their response in advance. Along with a freeze on spending above $9 billion, the government created a new oversight mechanism for the F-35 procurement — an inter-departmental secretariat of deputy ministers to oversee the project.

The Tories received accolades for establishing such a secretariat to administer its recently announced $33-billion National Shipbuilding Program.

The Harper government has said it expects to pay US$75 million dollars for each of the F-35s. But others — including Canada's parliamentary budget officer — have said the actual cost could be close to double that figure.

The government has not signed a contract with the U.S. to buy the F-35s. But it has invested $335 million so far to meet various commitments over the 15-year history of the U.S.-led JSF initiative.

Related on HuffPost:

READ THE FULL AUDITOR GENERAL REPORT.
Loading Slideshow...
  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    FIIn this file photo taken on July 14, 2011 and released by U.S. Air Force, a USAF F-35 Lightning II joint strike fighter (JSF) aircraft soars over Destin, Fla., before landing at its new home at Eglin Air Force Base. Japan selected the Lockheed Martin F-35 stealth fighter Tuesday, Dec. 20, 2011, to replace aging jets in its air force and bolster its defense capability amid regional uncertainty. (AP Photo/U.S. Air Force, Staff Sgt. Joely Santiago)

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    A F-35 Lightning II sits on stage during the United Kingdom F-35 Lightning II delivery ceremony on July 19, 2012 at Lockheed Martin Corporation in Fort Worth, Texas. The ceremony marked the first international delivery of an F-35 Joint Strike Fighter to a partner nation. (Photo by Tom Pennington/Getty Images)

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    (Photo by Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images)

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    Plane models stand outside the Lockheed Martin Corporation during the United Kingdom F-35 Lightning II Delivery Ceremony on July 19, 2012 in Fort Worth, Texas. The ceremony marked the first international delivery of an F-35 Joint Strike Fighter to a partner nation. (Photo by Tom Pennington/Getty Images)

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter jet sits in front the entrance of the Asian Aerospace 2004 show in Singapore 24 February 2004. The Asia Pacific offers one of the world's strongest prospects for defence-related spending, US aerospace giant Lockheed Martin said Tuesday as it expressed confidence in remaining a major supplier to the region's governments (AFP PHOTO/ROSLAN RAHMAN)

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    (AFP PHOTO/CARL DE SOUZA)

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    A Lockheed Martin's F-35 Lighning II fighter jet sits on the tarmac for static display at the Singapore Airshow in Singapore on February 12, 2012. Boeing's much-delayed 787 Dreamliner is set to star at the Singapore Airshow this week where companies touting private jets and defence hardware to the Asian market will also be out in force. (ROSLAN RAHMAN/AFP/Getty Images)

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    (ROSLAN RAHMAN/AFP/Getty Images)

  • F35 JSF Take Off

  • F-35A Flight with External Stores

    On Feb. 16, 2012, the first external weapons test mission was flown by an F-35A conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) aircraft at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. The F-35A is designed to carry up to 18000 pounds on 10 weapon stations featuring four weapon stations inside two weapon bays, for maximum stealth capability, and an additional three weapon stations on each wing.

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter

    IN AIR, NAVAL AIR STATION PATUXENT RIVER, MD - FEBRUARY 11: (EDITORS NOTE: Image has been received by U.S. Military prior to transmission) In this image released by the U.S. Navy courtesy of Lockheed Martin, the U.S. Navy variant of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the F-35C, conducts a test flight February 11, 2011 over the Chesapeake Bay. Lt. Cmdr. Eric 'Magic' Buus flew the F-35C for two hours, checking instruments that will measure structural loads on the airframe during flight maneuvers. The F-35C is distinct from the F-35A and F-35B variants with larger wing surfaces and reinforced landing gear for greater control when operating in the demanding carrier take-off and landing environment. (Photo by U.S. Navy photo courtesy Lockheed Martin via Getty Images)

  • F-35 First Ship Landing

    Courtesy: NAVAIR/JSF Program/Lockheed Martin

  • F35 Hovering

  • F-35 Flight Test Highlights

    Highlights of F-35 flight testing at NAS Patuxent River, Md., NAS Fort Worth Joint Reserve Base, and Edwards AFB, Calif.

  • F-35 Performs First Night Flight

    The first night flight in the history of the Lockheed Martin F-35 program was completed on Jan. 19, 2012 in the skies above Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. Piloted by Lockheed Martin Test Pilot Mark Ward, AF-6, an F-35A conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) variant, launched at 5:05 pm PST and landed after sunset at 6:22 pm

  • F-35 Airstart Testing

    An F-35 test pilot talks about airstart testing at Edwards AFB, Calif., in early 2012.

  • F35 Air Show

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA - The Harper government froze spending Tuesday on the multi-billion-dollar plan to buy new jet fighters minutes after the auditor general produced a withering report accusing the Department of ...
OTTAWA - The Harper government froze spending Tuesday on the multi-billion-dollar plan to buy new jet fighters minutes after the auditor general produced a withering report accusing the Department of ...
Filed by Ron Nurwisah  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 128
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gravescanada
04:36 PM on 04/06/2012
The person who can remove the Prime Minister or any other Minister within Parliament before an election (other than the legal system) is the Governor General.

I'm sure that if a petition were written up properly and legally and maintained legal cohesiveness (IE, it can't be an internet one, it has to follow specific requirements under the laws for it to be legally binding) and it stated that the Canadian people listed below want the Prime Minister removed from office, there would be enough pressure on the Governor General to do so, since s/he is there to protect Parliament and the Canadian people.
07:44 PM on 04/04/2012
Good report from the auditor general it has substance, but it lacks convictions on the F 35 purchase. If we walk away from this program as is, roughly $1 billion will have been lost. It we stick it out, multiple billions more will be spent on the overpriced underperforming jet that has not been battle tested. This is where accountability has to come in to play, a police or judicial investigation is needed. The saddest part is that there's still no plan B, the Conservtive are still hang up on plan A. Yes they have froze spending on F 35 but they have not completely back of the purchase. It's too bad that keeping the House of Commons in the dark when the information was readily available is not a crime.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BUTCHER99
03:25 PM on 04/04/2012
Want a big tax saving? Just disband the military.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marg Wood
Peace
01:35 PM on 04/04/2012
What has to happen to get these Cons out soon, before they do irreversible harm???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gravescanada
04:31 PM on 04/06/2012
I think it will take a massive swelling of Canadians demanding Harper step down. Is there no mechanism in place to do this?
01:21 PM on 04/04/2012
The new AG seems to be off to a good start, good to see someone who will speak up
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
09:40 AM on 04/04/2012
I see the HarpoCons are making the case/excuse that none of this matters because no actual contract has been signed to purchase this hypothetical aircraft. I feel so much better now that I know the Harper Government thinks it is good to spend $335 million in developmental costs for a fighter which might never be purchased. Thank Dog the CONS are such fine fiscal managers, with any other Partei in office we might have REALLY gotten skinned!
photo
hculliton
Match bearings and shoot!
11:03 AM on 04/04/2012
Before you get too indignant, remember how badly the Libs screwed up the EH-101. They were also responsible for the Ross Rifle. The Torys do have to take the wrap for the Arrow and the McAdam Shovel though.
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
12:34 PM on 04/04/2012
Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BUTCHER99
03:24 PM on 04/04/2012
The Ross rifle? Come on now. Anyone who was around for the Ross rifle would be at a minimum 110 years old. There is no one alive anywhere who actually fired one in combat. Nice to know you follow military history but try to stay in this century at least
photo
hculliton
Match bearings and shoot!
09:35 AM on 04/04/2012
Weapons procurment has aways been a contentous politicical issue in Canada. We need a good, servicable, twin-engin all-weather air superiority/ground support fighter with NATO-compatable avionics. The F-35 sounds great, but this dog don't hunt! The CF-18 fleet isn't getting any younger. We need to toss this Edsil and keep looking while there's still time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeeTadBit
09:32 AM on 04/04/2012
To dream of a kinder, gentler time when Canadians were looked upon as sensible, fair minded and peaceful, and our military reflected this image, proudly, to the world. A time when we could chuckle at our military might being depicted as a smiling beaver, rowing a canoe, on a pristine, calm lake.

Sadly, we are going to be treated to an orchestrated play we can aptly name: "The Dance of Deceit." The conservatives in the starring roles, will no doubt expect an "Oscar" for their brilliant performance to be in the bag.
photo
hculliton
Match bearings and shoot!
10:13 AM on 04/04/2012
There was never such a time. We've been up to our butts in Realpolitik for the last 100 years. The "soft power" you wax reminiscent over was based on the professionalism and bravery of the Canadian Corps and 1 Cdn Army and the 60,000 plus who didn't come back. As well as those who continue to maintain the sharp end of our foreign policy on Afghanistan's far plains and elsewhere. You have the luxury of chuckling because that generally poorly-funded military was doing such a good job of helping the world while duct taping their kit. Remember that there are at least 10 families missing a dad because of the politically screwed-up EH-101 debacle which left the Navy with 45 year old Sea King helicopters. Trust me, when your butt's dangling beneath a 40 year old airframe during a VERTREP above a January Atlantic, you don't care what party's in power. Let's just do it right and get our people the best kit for the job with a minimum of Bravo Sierra.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeeTadBit
02:01 PM on 04/04/2012
Sir, my comment was not in relation to whether we do, or do not, need to upgrade our military, nor was the article I commented on. I'm sorry if you missed my point.

My reference was a fond remembrance of our military as peacekeepers. You are right in highlighting deplorable working conditions, and honourable duty, and I apologize if I've shown disrespect. It certainly wasn't my intention.

As for my reference to the Harper government, I stand by my comment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tokenblackman
09:20 AM on 04/04/2012
Did anyone expect anything different from this? How many times were they told that they had the facts wrong? How many times did they mock Kevin Page, the Opposition, and military experts. This Harper Gov't does not listen to anyone but themselves. The worst part of this is that no one in the gov't is going to take any responsibility for this. Hey Cons being in leadership means taking responsibility when things go right and when they go wrong.
07:54 AM on 04/04/2012
Largest Military procurement of all time, and it's now obvious the Harpo government doesn't have a clue. Scary Kids!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Turner
07:46 AM on 04/04/2012
Welcome to the United States of Canada
photo
hculliton
Match bearings and shoot!
09:29 AM on 04/04/2012
How so?
photo
Another Pesky Canadian
Talk - action = 0
11:43 AM on 04/04/2012
Not yet, my friend. Don't give up hope yet, as Canada needs more people who care about her.
06:36 AM on 04/04/2012
last week ontarian were treated to the finger wagging jabbering from the federal minister of finance -----mr flaherty -------about reckless overspending in the province----today we find out that the federal conservatives are more than guilty of reckles spending of taxpayer dollars -----held in contempt of parliament for not revealing the cost of the F35 JETS ,WE NOW KNOW THE COST ESTIMATES WERE AT A MINIMUM 10 BILLION TOO LOW --

in other words his government is about to squander ,without telling any one, the cost ,almost as much taxpayer money on ONE SINGLE SECRECT DEAL ---as the ontario government overspent in a year ----and the conservatives were found to be IN CONTEMPT of parliament for hiding the costs

where was mr flaherty when opposition members were demanding to know the costs of the F35'S ---

AS MINISTER OF FINANCE HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN ,HIMSELF , DEMANDING TO KNOW HOW MUCH WAS TO BE SPENT --

if you voted conservative this is what you voted for
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kritikos
Intelligence is not a science
11:40 PM on 04/03/2012
Yet another useless MIC toy.
08:53 PM on 04/03/2012
I'd rather have the best schools and hospitals than the best airplanes...
02:17 PM on 04/04/2012
Amen!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
viennawoods
An optimistic cynic.
07:23 PM on 04/03/2012
WHY is this not the top story? Our government once again is revealed as a bunch of bagmen circumventing government process. It is astounding the breadth of the hubris of these Cons. I am left speechless.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael747
10:19 PM on 04/03/2012
It's not the top story for the same reason the "robocall" scandal has been effectively buried by Conservative operatives and sympathizers in media- Harper and his corporate masters now control information and decide what we should know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
4evercanadian
Still my guitar gently weeps
10:13 AM on 04/04/2012
It was the top story on the National last night, and they had a special "At Issue" to cover it as well. I was really surprised to hear Andrew Coyne saying that it was absolutely necessary for heads to roll on this one, including ministers and their handlers. They seemed to think the opposition will keep prodding at this one because they can smell blood.