Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Shortfall Hits $9.6 Billion; Teachers' Retirements At Stake

Posted: 04/ 3/2012 12:13 pm Updated: 04/ 3/2012 12:16 pm

TORONTO -- The Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan says it had a $9.6-billion funding shortfall to start 2012, even though its net assets reached an all-time high in 2011.

The fund, which invests on behalf of and administers the pensions of 300,000 active and retired teachers in Ontario, said Tuesday the shortfall came despite a rise in contribution rates and lowered benefits as persistently low interest rates and changing demographic trends chipped away financially at the plan.

"Our liabilities, that is, the projected cost of providing future pensions, continue to outpace our projected asset growth,'' president and chief executive Jim Leech said in a statement.

"Accordingly, we are working with our sponsors, Ontario Teachers' Federation and the Ontario government, to advise them on the various options for closing this gap at a reasonable cost,''

The plan reported net assets of $117.1 billion as of Dec. 31, 2011, with $11.7 billion added to the fund thanks to an 11.2 per cent rate of return.

The improvement, the fund noted, came in the face of market uncertainty and volatility during the height of the European debt crisis.

That return beat its own internal goal of 9.8 per cent by 1.4 percentage points or about $1.4 billion.

"Our team's 2011 performance was especially impressive, given the market volatility and economic uncertainty that accompanied the Eurozone debt situation, and was compounded by the year's natural disasters,'' Leech said.

The combined value of the plan's public and private equities was $51.7 billion at year-end, compared to $47.5 billion at the same point a year earlier.

Private equity assets managed by Teachers' Private Capital totalled $12.2 billion, up slightly from a year-before $12 billion. return on the private investments was 16.8 per cent.

Fixed income assets rose to $55.8 billion from $45.9 billion, 19.9 per cent. Commodities investments rose to $5.7 billion in 2011 from $5.2 billion.

The value of real assets, including real estate, infrastructure and timberland, dropped to $25.8 billion from $26.2 billion.

FOLLOW CANADA BUSINESS

Filed by Daniel Tencer  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
11:35 PM on 04/03/2012
One thing needs to be made clear and what these guys don't tell you is what they are paying out to each of their retired members who have qualified to retire. These pensions are paying out in excess of 80% of what their best five years was. A teacher in group 4 in District 12 who makes $94 000 / annum would receive a pension of over $70 000 per annum,. Imagine a principal or superintendent of schools. If they tell you otherwise ask them to prove it. The OSSTF pension is one of the richest in the world. They have the money to prove it but now not necessarily the money to pay it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
04:11 PM on 04/03/2012
Well there you have it.
OTPP....
The most sucsessfull privately managed pension fund in Canada is unbable to cope with the exponential growth in liabilities.
And thse guys have, if you'll pardon the expression "the Midas touch".
Even as wildly successfull as their investment strategys have been, they are unable to grow the fund fast enough to compensate for the rise in demand on the fund.
"beware the power of the exponential"
Last year they had a 11 billion dollar funding shortfall
this year its 9 billion.
There are 180,000 members contributing to the pension and 120,000 pensioners.
Those numbers are expected to meet parity by 2018.
How big will the shortfall be then?
How much slack will non members be forced to pickup?
How do the rest of the pension plans provincial, municipal, and corporate rate next to OTPP?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:39 PM on 04/03/2012
The assumptions that this projection is based on are the most conservative (unrealistic) possible. Guessing 70 years into the future and assuming 8 % inflation for cola; income in the future limited to the current real government bond rate of return; that all retirees will retire to a 70% pension from the highest category of income; amongst other assumptions make this number a sick joke on the contributors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
11:38 PM on 04/03/2012
70 % of group 4 where max has been achieved at 90 000k / annum is 56k plus CPP and OAS and maybe income splitting. A tidy sum. Let's see 56 + 12 + 6 = 72k per annum. Whose losing here? Tax payers be ware. No other pension in Canada pays this much to its teachers.