Canada GDP Growth, Standard Of Living Could Take A 20 Per Cent Hit From Aging, Says BoC

Posted: 04/ 4/2012 6:01 pm Updated: 04/ 5/2012 8:42 am

OTTAWA - The economy is starting to pay a price as a result of the aging population, and the cost will grow unless Canadians adjust, says the Bank of Canada.

In a speech to the Economic Club in Toronto, deputy governor Jean Boiven said the aging workforce will reduce potential growth in Canada by about 0.2 percentage points by 2014, and the impact grows from there.

"The aging of the population has begun and it will soon accelerate," he said in notes of the speech released in Ottawa.

"Ultimately, if we ignore the reality of aging and make no adjustments, the consequence will be a lower standard of living."

By 2031, one if four people will be over 65, he said.

By the central bank's calculations, the average income of Canadians could be as much as 20 per cent lower in two decades than it otherwise would be due to the aging population.

Boiven said the demographic squeeze — caused baby boomers, low birth rates and longer life expectancy — has major implications for both governments and businesses.

Aging will put pressure on the labour markets, he said, as well as individual savings rates, government finances and the redistribution of wealth across generations.

"The pressure points show that change is upon us no matter what we do," he said. "To avoid drastic declines in our living standards or shifting too great a burden on the next generations, there are only three options — more work, greater productivity and higher savings."

The federal government has already taken some action to adjust. In December, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty capped future growth in federal health care spending to match the growth in the economy.

And in last week's budget, Ottawa announced it will move the retirement age for the purpose of receiving Old Age Security benefits to 67 years from 65, starting in 2023, in part to encourage Canadians to work longer.

Boiven said the most effective way to minimize the impact of aging is for Canadian firms to become more productive.

As much as two-thirds of expected average income loss caused by aging could be regained, he said, if the country's productivity rate returned to its average over the past 50 years.

LEADING CAUSES OF DEATH IN CANADA
Loading Slideshow...
  • Cancer

    Rank: #1<br> Percentage: 30 per cent of deaths in Canada in 2008.<br> Prevention: More information about preventing <a href="http://www.cancer.ca/Canada-wide/Prevention.aspx?sc_lang=en" target="_hplink">cancer in Canada</a>.

  • Heart Disease

    Rank: #2<br> Percentage: 21.3 per cent of deaths in Canada in 2008 (50,722 people per year). <br> Prevention: Here are some tips to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/susan-blumenthal/heart-disease-and-stroke-prevention-_b_822661.html" target="_hplink">prevent heart and stroke disease</a>.

  • Stroke

    Rank: #3<br> Percentage: 5.8 per cent of deaths in Canada in 2008 (13,870 people per year). <br> Prevention: An apple a day could <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/16/apple-a-day-stroke-at-bay_n_964991.html" target="_hplink">reduce risk of stroke</a>.

  • Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases

    Rank: #4<br> Percentage: 4.6 per cent of deaths in Canada in 2008 (10,923 people per year). <br> Prevention: Common <a href="http://www.lung.ca/diseases-maladies/a-z/bronchitis-bronchite/index_e.php#prevention" target="_hplink">symptoms of bronchitis and how to prevent it</a>.

  • Accidents

    Rank: #5<br> Percentage: 4.3 per cent of deaths in Canada in 2008 (10,234 people per year). <br> Prevention: 10 ways to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/16/10-ways-to-prevent-accide_n_647666.html#s114084&title=Spot_Your_Pets" target="_hplink">prevent accidents in your home</a>.

  • Diabetes

    Rank: #6<br> Percentage: 3.2 per cent of deaths in Canada in 2008 (7,521 people per year). <br> Prevention: How to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/milt-bedingfield/pre-diabetes-type-2-diabetes_b_983587.html" target="_hplink">prevent pre-diabetes from becoming type 2 diabetes</a>.

  • Alzheimer's Disease

    Rank: #7 <br> Percentage: 2.8 per cent of deaths in Canada in 2008 (6,573 people per year). <br> Prevention: 10 tips to<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jean-carper/in-honor-of-world-alzheim_b_721208.html" target="_hplink"> prevent Alzheimer's disease</a>.

  • Influenza and Pneumonia

    Rank: #8 <br> Percentage: 2.3 per cent of deaths in Canada in 2008 (5,386 people per year).<br> Prevention: 9 ways to<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/08/prevent-the-flu_n_780101.html" target="_hplink"> avoid the flu this season</a>.

  • Kidney Disease

    Rank: #9 <br> Percentage: 1.6 per cent of deaths in Canada in 2008 (3,846 people per year). <br> Prevention: Here are some<a href="http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Kidney_disease_prevention" target="_hplink"> tips to prevent kidney disease</a>.

  • Suicide

    Rank: #10<br> Percentage: 1.6 per cent of deaths in Canada in 2008 (3,705 people per year).<br> Prevention: More information about preventing <a href="http://www.suicideprevention.ca/" target="_hplink">suicide in Canada</a>.

FOLLOW CANADA BUSINESS

Filed by Daniel Tencer  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:35 PM on 04/07/2012
....and what did this population contribute to Canada's wealth during their working years? Lots....we owe them!
07:17 PM on 04/06/2012
Pressure on the labour markets? You mean, not enough workers? That means higher pay! What about all these productivity increases and automation and all of that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djelimon17
what's this thing for?
09:10 PM on 04/05/2012
Immigration?
01:54 AM on 04/06/2012
We have enough of this. Canadians don't want anymore immigration. Let's just cut Social Security and other old age entitlements.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djelimon17
what's this thing for?
02:11 AM on 04/06/2012
By "canadians" i take it you mean "Canadians who agree with me"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:36 PM on 04/07/2012
There are those people who rely upon them........don't be so greedy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
02:51 PM on 04/05/2012
Don't worry, to sustain the monetary system, we will just put the old folks on floating ice and give them a shove. And that is the underlying message here. Banks and corporations concern about the bottom line. Money, money, money. Sickening.....
01:55 AM on 04/06/2012
That's life. If you're old, you better have money because young people aren't going to screw their own happiness to support you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
02:16 AM on 04/06/2012
That's economics. Not to confused with life.
photo
CarlyQ
Without followers, evil cannot spread.
02:08 PM on 04/05/2012
Germany is knocking around the idea of introducing an "aging tax" for younger workers to help support the aging demographic there. How nice for them...supporting their elders while they, themselves, will have even less in the way of savings for their own retirement.

It's just a matter of time before Canada's brilliant government considers this as well.
12:22 PM on 04/05/2012
The generation that chose not to procreate now finds itself in an economy that can't support them. Oh, well. The generation that insisted on everything for nothing now finds that there isn't enough left to keep pandering to them. Oh, well. The generation that passed on huge debts to what little progeny they did create now finds that nobody cares for them. Oh, well.

The original Me Generation is becoming the Them Generation, soon to become the Who? Generation. The greed and selfishness that has always been the hallmark of this priveleged group is what will eventually lead to them being shucked aside. It won't be ageism, either. Merely it will be the inevitable result of a generation that said the hell with society for the sake of their own personal freedoms, while all the time ignoring any responsibility.

I say don't pay for their care; they never showed any degree of concern for any but themselves to begin with. Why should we care about them now?
04:58 PM on 04/05/2012
Only a truly selfish individual would deny that their parents did nothing positive for them.
Obviously, some members of your generation , should be avoided. I would not want to be in your tender care. !!
01:36 PM on 04/06/2012
Ummm ... my parents WERE NOT baby boomers. May I have a say now?
12:20 PM on 04/05/2012
This group of Baby boomers were a hard working group of people. We did a lot of building and improving infrastructure and we paid for it. To say we are going to be a hit on the ecomomy is something written by a ????. We all paid our way, paid our taxes and contributed to CPP. Now its our turn to enjoy retirement and believe me if we have money to spend we will keep the economy flowing as well.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
12:06 PM on 04/05/2012
What a red herring. Productivity is way up since the 1970s, yet during that same time wages have stagnated. So how does increased productivity help people? Next there is the issue of jobs. Well, with so many people retiring, there are a lot more jobs opening up, which should, in a capitalist system, drive wages up. What's more, all those retired people will start to need additional help, which will result in more healthcare jobs, more social worker jobs, more jobs of any kind that deals with the elderly. So two of the three reasons given are already shot down. The last one is higher savings...but that will only happen with higher wages or lower prices...and prices rarely go down. What is the government doing about increasing wages for regular Canadians? Nothing from what I can see. Just giving more to the people who have most.
07:19 PM on 04/06/2012
Coming from the Bank of Canada that threatened to deal with the increase in Canadian private debt by deliberately triggering bankruptcies this nonsense is no surprise and everything you say here is entirely correct.
12:01 PM on 04/05/2012
Geez huffpost if you could not post my earlier comment you are reallybiased as to what your political preference is!

z
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
11:31 AM on 04/05/2012
Forgive me for being old:

Upon Becoming 60
by: Mary L. Slocum (1950- )
Shriveled wrinkled
Like I’d soaked for hours
Over watered
Rolls of fat
Jiggling round middle
Swinging arm flap
Stubble legs
Morphing transport
Behind blurry eye
Sockets shot through
With red veins
Her name hidden
In fog She should
“Cover that up”
Exposed
No longer smooth
Like that baby’s bottom
Hairs, Long white
Hairs, popping out
From extreme angles
Chin, breasts and under nose
Sprout inches overnight
Working for optical illusion
Cover it up
“Put it back on…”
The audience yells
Pasties will not
Help with talent
Swinging in two directions
At once……OSHA
Would not approve.
photo
Liz Wilson 2
“a small group can change the world
09:52 AM on 04/05/2012
I wonder which has the greater long term effect on the economy - low birth rates or aging population