NDP Trying To 'Bring The Centre To Us'

Posted: 04/ 9/2012 12:08 am Updated: 04/ 9/2012 12:08 am

Thomas Mulcair Ndp Centre
NDP Leader Tom Mulcair knows the fight to woo voters is in the centre of the political spectrum. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Chris Young)

NDP Leader Tom Mulcair knows the fight to woo voters is in the centre of the political spectrum.

But don't expect him to push his party full-steam in that direction, he says.

With the wind in his sails from the most recent national poll, Mulcair appeared on Quebec's most popular TV talk show, Tout le monde en parle, on Sunday for the first time since he took the helm of the New Democrats last month.

"We're going to bring the centre to us," Mulcair told host Guy A. Lepage when asked about concerns among NDP faithful that their new leader will try to move the officially socialist party to a more centrist political stance.

"If we change our ideas just to appeal to more people, and we compromise them, that's a problem."

Mulcair won the race to become the NDP's seventh leader, and leader of the Official Opposition, on March 24, replacing Jack Layton, who died last August from cancer. Layton was a guest on Tout le monde en parle during last year's national election campaign, in an appearance that was credited with helping his party capture an unprecedented 59 seats in the province.

Mulcair seized the opportunity Sunday to attack Prime Minister Stephen Harper on multiple fronts. He called the Conservatives hypocritical for pushing a law and order agenda while ignoring the country's environmental and fisheries laws, and deceitful for bringing in cuts to Old Age Security despite promises to "fully preserve" it.

"The Conservatives are taking apart all the great institutions of our country. Institutions that reflect our geography, our history," he alleged.

Mulcair's recent election to the NDP leadership has given his party a boost, particularly in his home province. A Léger Marketing poll for the Montreal newspapers Le Devoir and the Gazette suggests the NDP are in a statistical tie with the Conservatives, garnering 33 per cent support countrywide to the Tories' 32 per cent.

The survey of 1,506 Canadians also put the New Democrats atop Quebec, with a record 47 per cent support. It was conducted between last Monday and Wednesday and has a margin of error of 2.5 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

Would make MPs vote to keep gun registry
Mulcair said Sunday that it was a "monumental error" for the Tories to kill the long-gun registry, and that if a future NDP election platform included a pledge to bring it back, he would make his caucus vote for it. Layton had allowed his MPs to vote freely on the issue in 2010 when it came up as a private member's bill in Parliament, though New Democrats were expected to toe the party line and vote to save the registry when the government presented a bill to kill it in the fall and winter.

Host Lepage then asked Mulcair whether he wasn't a politician "with your heart on the left and your wallet on the right," to which the NDP leader agreed.

"Sure, I know how to manage," Mulcair replied. "A lot of people have said the NDP has the best ideas but not the ability to manage a G7 country like Canada." But the four-term NDP governments in Manitoba and, until 2003, Saskatchewan show that the party knows how to run things, he said.

"We need to convince people that we can do the same," he said.

The NDP have launched their largest non-election advertising campaign ever to promote Mulcair. French-language ads premiered late last week and tout the New Democrats as the party that can achieve "a government that listens to Quebecers" and "a greener and more prosperous economy for everyone." The ads are slated to appear on popular TV shows, including Tout le monde en parle.

English-language ads will start this week.

Loading Slideshow...
  • Thomas Mulcair

    NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair comments on the federal budget in the Foyer of the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa Thursday March 29, 2012. If there was any doubt that Thomas Mulcair's political universe revolves around Quebec, it was dispelled by his response to Thursday's federal budget. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld)

  • Thomas Mulcair

    NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair addresses the Economic Club of Canada in Ottawa, Thursday April 5, 2012. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Fred Chartrand)

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS

NDP Leader Tom Mulcair knows the fight to woo voters is in the centre of the political spectrum. But don't expect him to push his party full-steam in that direction, he says. With the wind in hi...
NDP Leader Tom Mulcair knows the fight to woo voters is in the centre of the political spectrum. But don't expect him to push his party full-steam in that direction, he says. With the wind in hi...
Filed by Jacqueline Delange  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PG13
08:03 PM on 04/09/2012
the complexities of making everyone happy in a large Federal country is a tough task.

I understand how the Liberals got themselves blanketed out of Alberta due to unpopular energy policies from the 70s have had grave generational ramification for decades to come making it near impossible to return in said province.

The NDP's current pan-Canadian approach being sensible to each region's concern is the way to go in a federal country.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
06:14 PM on 04/09/2012
he didn't say Quebeckers in the Quebec ad. Why is it that I know this, but a multi million dollar news organization does not, and continues the facade?
12:43 PM on 04/09/2012
Making the rural NDPers toe the party line will cost him big time Just the thought of it shows how out of touch he is with voters. The Liberals suffered huge losses because they were forced to vote for the gun registry. It has to be one of Harper's greatest achievements at the polls. People don't really care about the registry so much as they care about having their rights taken away and too much government in their lives. The registry was a boondoggle. If it was effective or could be proven to have worked, it may be a different story.
04:50 PM on 04/09/2012
I'm not sure how much of an role the Long Gun Registry had in the Liberal's debacle of the last election...

But it certainly did push many voters over to the Conservative side.
12:05 PM on 04/09/2012
The only Socialist I trust less than one who declares himself so, is one who doesn't
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djelimon17
what's this thing for?
02:00 PM on 04/09/2012
Do you know the difference between a democratic socialist, and a social democrat?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
11:30 AM on 04/09/2012
The worst thing any party could do is to modify core values to appease the electorate. Having a solid platform should be out front and if these core values can capture a centre vote so be it. Otherwise we are not getting any more then we already have and what we have is not working.
The proof of that will be the next election. Canadians will come out and vote, Canadians will continue to ignore the election. Canadians don't care. Who knows but the next election will definitely speak to core values and what we as Canadians want for our country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PG13
08:03 PM on 04/09/2012
so you are saying that the NDP should remain in 3rd place forever?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
08:20 PM on 04/09/2012
Are you referring to my first statement? Parties have their view and traditionally their position left, right, or centre defined them. If a party wants to win it can assume the other party's postion to gain votes and hopefully win. Once in power my worry is they won't govern from their new found position but rather govern according to their roots. I would also say that partys very seldom do what they have us believe they would do. I don't know where the NDP will end up but I will say I am open minded and I like change. The NDP is looking for the electorate of centre, those that have not voted or have shifted given the offerings. I think I have answered your question by saying if the NDP believe in what Canadians want and are prepared to deliver then that is better then what we have and what we ceertainly don't want from theLiberals In closing your picture is of Jean Chretien. Is that your position? If it is you are looking for an aforemention.
10:30 AM on 04/09/2012
I see a number of comments on the Gun Registry that seem to believe that elimination of this program is a good thing. I have one question. Would you sooner see a society such as currently exists in the U.S.?

Why is it a bad thing to register a firearm, regardless of type? We register our cars . Is it not a benefit for police and the public at large to know who owns a rifle or a shotgun as we do cars?

I must say that I am confused by the arguments of those who are opposed to registration. Perhaps someone can change my mind on this but I see far too many instances of deaths of police and civilians to believe that it is in eveyones best interests to know who owns a firearm.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
11:38 AM on 04/09/2012
I got shot down on this before when I said it. No pun intended. I have a real problem with gun ownership in cities. Not to say that owning a gun is the issue. It is all about usage. Collectors I can see to a point but possession simply for name sake, no. We don't have the right to bear arms. We hardly have rights to protect ourselves if invaded. I can see that rural people, farmers, trappers, who ever do have an arguement including hunters. Aborginal people also under their treaty rights alrthough that one is scary considering the incarceration rate of FNP. Perhaps the regulation needs to be based on usage, purpose, etc not ownership. I think that would move a lot of guns into the garbage bin. Your arguement is fair re registration but maybe you don't know when traveling on a plane you can't take a mechanical device such as a blender into a plane cabin, fixed blades or not. It won't pass security. Does that mean registering the blender makes it any better? We are looking for people using guns in a different way and the registration didn't provide any benefits. Cars are a tax issue and a money source for governments, guns are not. Maybe we should make it a money issue also but then every farmer in Canada who has a weapon will be up in arms again. No pun intended.
03:02 PM on 04/09/2012
You make some good points but I am not against anyone owning guns, except for pistols and automatic weapons. My point is that the weapons should be registered as we do cars, motorcyles or anything else that requires a license.

To me , if I were a cop, I would want to know who owns a gun whether for use or collecting , or whatever. Registration does not mean that you have to disclose why you want to own a weapon. Of course, there are many people who have a legitimate use for a gun and this should continue

I do not personally see what all the fuss is about registration, particularly if it makes society a little safer. As to registration not providing any benefits, speak to a cop who has been fired upon, hurt, or threatened by someone he had no knowledge of owning a weapon. That cop, had he known that he would be facing someone who did own a weapon, might have been able to take necessary precautions.
04:57 PM on 04/09/2012
Well, if we are to learn a thing or two from history...

Just about any countries that introduced tougher gun laws on its citizen... all ended up in with a bigger mess on their hands.
http://jpfo.org/filegen-a-m/deathgc.htm

-

You say you are concerned about the death of police officers... Would you care to come up with a few example to back up this concern?
05:19 PM on 04/10/2012
You seem to be citing situations in other countries that have some sort of draconian government in power, not democracies where changes can be made by free voting. Wherever the people themselves can freely create changes to their political atmosphere, guns are much less necessary.

You can never rule out the use of firearms for nefarious purposes, even in a democratic country, but you can still attempt to control their use for legitimate purposes. Better to know than not, and registration is one way.

As to citing instances of police being killed by registered firearms, the registration of which does not guarantee safe and legitimate use, I can cite one instance of which I have some knowledge. There have been many others.

Constable VuPham, a Vietmanese person, refugee from the Vietnamese war, who was an exemplary OPP officer was shot and killed by a man who was from Northern Ontario. This man was looking for his wife who had left him with the express intention of forcing her to return to him or be killed. Constable Pham intercepted him about 10 kms north of Seaforth. Perhaps if Constable Vu Pham was told soon enough that he was confronting someone with a weapon, a high powered rifle, he would have been more cautious.

No, the registration of a weapon does not guarantee legitimate use, only makes known that a person is an owner. But then, registering car ownership does not guarantee sensible driving does it?
10:20 AM on 04/09/2012
Any examination of the history of both the Liberals and The Consevatives cannot hope to come away with any other conclusion other than that both parties have become captives of the corporations in this country, as have both the Democrats and Republicans in the U.S.

At this point in time, I believe that the NDP are closer to the centre of the political spectrum in Canada although the Libs with Rae, as leader or not, may realize there past mistakes and change. I quite frankly don't give a d--- which one is able to remove the Cons form office, as long as they do. The Harperites will change this country I was born and raised in to be something in which I will be no longer able to be proud of.

I voted Progressive Conservative , federally and provincially all my life, but that was before the Mulroney years. The Conservative party used to be one of fiscal responsibity as well had a social conscience , particularly after World WAr 2. The current Cons have neither trait in my view. Until they are defeated and put permanently in the garbage, I will vote for whatever party can bring this country back to the centre politically and socialy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
piceaglauca
The picture says it all....
11:41 AM on 04/09/2012
Not showing a political stripe we won't know that about the NDP. As for proof in Manitoba it has survived. In BC it has been back and forth. In SK it has been back and forth. In ON it has been a dismal failure. Look at the resource base and you have the answer to success. Bob Rae's core values won't survive at the Federal level and neither will Canada. Not sure about the Conservatives personally and Mulcair is a dark horse. We can wait and see. Your choice of voting I would definitely support.
03:20 PM on 04/09/2012
All political parties morph into whatever stripe they believe will keep them elected. If they don't they do not get re-elected. This is particuarly true of those who exist in countries, such as ours, where the voters are complacent, apathetic, easy to manipulate and control. Until we change our antiquated first past the post method of electing politicians we will continually see attack ads being a determining factor on who gets elected rather than debates on real issues.

We have long been accustomed to believe that any beliefs harboured by the NDP are not good for Canada because they are too socialistic. I do not belive this to be true and particularly the current party. Yes they want the centre to move more closely to them because historically this is where most Canadians seem to reside. There is nothing wrong with many of their policy positions. As to those which might deviate too far left, you will find that the constraints on them, if they were to take power, would be many.

I am hopeful thet the next election will be contested based on the issues about which Canadians care the most. Those issues I do not have to elaborate on here. They are well known.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BCPATRIOT
British Columbia
09:53 AM on 04/09/2012
Mulcair's party will never get my vote or my family's vote as long as he and his followers want the gun registry...your a history lesson Mulcair here today gone tomorrow and with no followers from the west...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopgeorge
Paper Ballots WORK. Unverifiable e-voting doesn't
10:57 AM on 04/09/2012
I'm from B.C., and I would vote for him in a heartbeat -- especially with the gun registry (revised).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sonoffestus
Got smart & got out!
11:02 AM on 04/09/2012
X2!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BUTCHER99
11:09 AM on 04/09/2012
No followers from the west? Despite having more support, except in Alberta, you need to read the story.
09:30 AM on 04/09/2012
1. he didnt mention the NDP govts in Ont or BC. WRT Sask, they dumped the NDP for a great one.
2. Mulcair didnt mention that some NDP MP's were elected BECAUSE they supported dumping the Gun Registry.
3. Does he still think Bin L is still alive?
4. He should give up his French citizenship
05:03 PM on 04/09/2012
As in Quebec?

It was a protest vote. People were fed up with the Bloc and Jack Layton was charismatic guy, so the choice was easy.

I certainly hope the NDP (and Mr. Mulcair) will be able to hold on to those seats.
05:16 PM on 04/09/2012
No as in France, he is a french citizen, his wife was born there and both his kids are also dual citizens
08:33 AM on 04/09/2012
This new leader has a large job to complete. He has only just begun. Harper has been given 6 years and in that time he has dismantled social programmes, dismantled our Countries world reputation, and attacked our democracy. Harper has 3 more year. Can you just imagine what he will accomplish in this time. Our elder will work longer, pipelines will be put through environmentally delicate areas harming people and animals alike to sell our tar sands resource to China who has a tremendously bad human rights record, and the list goes on. I wish Mr. Mulcair all of the best. I suppose it is a choice of what evil is the lesser.
photo
Bumpers car
Fish till you die
08:31 AM on 04/09/2012
Its fine to talk the talk but there are realities at work here that Mulcair is ignoring. The first is that regardless of his competency, a very significant number of Canadians see anything with a Quebec power base as suspicious and problematic. The second is that,again, a lot of Canadians are sick and tired of dictatorial leaders telling MPs how to vote on an issue which their constuients have already elected them to represent a particular point of view. Third is that the NDP remaing left will do nothing to attract middle and slightly right of middle voters across the country and will condemn us to a series of meaningless and repetitive minority governments. This country was much better governed when we had the 2 party system. Despite its limitations and pitfalls, it was at least a clear cut choice and resulted in a true majority electing the government they wanted. As it is now, we have a little bit of everything pleasing a whole lot of nobody. Almagamate the centre left!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bbertaud
Je ne regrette rien, rien de rien
08:29 AM on 04/09/2012
Maybe the NDP will bring to the rest of Canada, here in Quebec the NDP is no different from the Bloc Quebecois
09:32 AM on 04/09/2012
Mulcair toes the line in Quebec, everything unilingual, the ROC everything bilingual.
As an Anglo Quebecer I think his signs should be bilingual as the Liberal's are
Seamus OMalley
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
05:34 AM on 04/09/2012
"Bring the centre to us", eh? Stop focusing on the Liberals, stop focusing on the next election. Do your job NOW. Spend your time holding Harper to task, not worrying about winning the election three years from now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djelimon17
what's this thing for?
08:49 AM on 04/09/2012
One can multi task you know
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jamster88
02:53 AM on 04/09/2012
such arrogance - only a few days into power!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gravescanada
07:24 AM on 04/09/2012
His arrogance pales in comparison to the Harper Regime and its disrespect for Parliament.
07:54 AM on 04/09/2012
I don't see how this is arrogant.
TheRenaissanceMan
A starry-eyed idealist with too much time
02:49 AM on 04/09/2012
I am impressed by this man.
I wish him luck in his fight against the reformacons.