Jim Flaherty: Parliamentary System An Advantage Because It Gets Things Done

Posted: 04/10/2012 5:35 pm Updated: 04/11/2012 10:04 am

Jim Flaherty Us Tax
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says Canada has an advantage over the U.S. in dealing with the economy — it has a system of government that can make decisions. (CP)

OTTAWA - Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says Canada has an advantage over the U.S. in dealing with the economy — it has a system of government that can make decisions.

The finance minister extolled the virtues of a parliamentary system to reporters in New York on Tuesday after participating at George W. Bush Institute tax conference.

Asked if his model for reducing corporate taxes could be extended to the United States, Flaherty told reporters a majority government made that easier but he acknowledged that he was able to get important policies passed even while the Conservatives had a minority mandate.

In language that might surprise Canadians, Flaherty said the minority Conservatives were able to work with the opposition over the course of five years and implement fundamental policies, including tax reductions.

"One of the advantages that Canada has is we have a government that can make decisions," he said.

"We have a majority government. But even when we had a minority government, we were able to work with the opposition over the course of five years and implement the important policies, the fundamental policies that we wanted to follow."

That's a different view the government appeared to take while in minority — at least publicly — when it often complained about obstructionism from Liberals and the NDP.

Prime Minister Harper dropped the writ in 2008, breaking the spirit of his four-year election law, because he said Parliament had become dysfunctional.

Flaherty, however, was able to get his first five budgets through the House of Commons without concessions to the minority parties.

The minister did not specifically refer to gridlock in Washington that many blame for the country's inability to deal with massive deficits and debt in his response, although the implication from the question was clear.

Months of wrangling over extending America's debt limit last summer contributed to a market panic over the possibility of a default and an eventual downgrade of the U.S. credit rating.

Flaherty gave no hints about where he stood on issues confronting the U.S., but as for Canadian corporate taxes, he said Ottawa has realized greater revenues after the cuts.

"Grow the economy. More corporate profits, more taxes," he said by way of an explanation.

"We're not going to get rich by increasing our taxes so we're going to go the other way, which we have. And it's worked."

Flaherty described Canada's economic recovery as fragile, but said he had hopes the country could realize even stronger growth this year than the estimated 2.2 per cent he used in the last month's budget.

He also said he took "with a grain of salt" last week's stellar report from Statistics Canada that 82,000 jobs were created in March. He said he had also previously been surprised by job losses in some preceding months.

And the finance minister dismissed suggestions he might be ready to intervene in Canada's hot housing market to restrain household debt.

"We've intervened three times during the course of our six years of government and there has been some moderation in the market of late," he said. "I would prefer for the market itself to correct to the extent that a correction is necessary."

Since taking office in 2006, the Conservatives tightened mortgage rules on three separate occasions in an effort to stem borrowing and lending, with limited results. The latest figures show household debt to income stands at about 151 per cent, near the all-time high.

Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney has declared household debt the number one domestic risk for the economy.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA - Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says Canada has an advantage over the U.S. in dealing with the economy — it has a system of government that can make decisions.The finance minister extolled th...
OTTAWA - Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says Canada has an advantage over the U.S. in dealing with the economy — it has a system of government that can make decisions.The finance minister extolled th...
Filed by Michael Bolen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 136
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
11:38 AM on 04/12/2012
He's right about this one.
Imagine if Obama had real Executive powers... America would be much better off. Higher taxes on the rich. Universal healthcare... Instead he faces Congressional obstructionism.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler Austin
Women = people. Corperations ≠ people.
07:54 PM on 04/11/2012
"better" is only oen way to put it. I'd say 'more efficeint' but not better.
The Parlimentarty system is better because we don't have to worry about what the majority of citizens think.
In America they are all tangled up about preventing any one person or party from taking all power that they have rotating elections and half a dozen consatutional trip wires if one side gets to powerful.
Problem is, you need a educated and engaged population to make that work.
In Canada we just sipped that step, no telling what us crazy commoners might get up to, so we just opted out of that 'freedom' thing in favour of stablity.

I'd trade our system for Americas' in an instant.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:52 PM on 04/11/2012
I always thought the Americn system particularly its near constant election style hampered its ability to react as a country and engage in even medium term planning.

Add that to the bizarre method of appointments, filibustering and fringe groups within parties, then even when you get solid govt as was the case in the US in '09/'10 the governement is still easily paralyzed.

Of course those who hate central governments will say that its ctually a blessing.

The difference Im afraid of making a mistake but not acting whereas others are afraid of making a mistake by acting.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:45 PM on 04/11/2012
Again Flaherty speaks to his children. What would we do without his wisdom and encouragement?
05:05 PM on 04/11/2012
what a croc-------your libertarian leader was held in contempt of parliament ---and he wants to change it to a form we wont recognize when he is done ---and thats almost a quote ---

if you were serious about the advabntages of the parliamentaruy system you would quit that reform alliance libertarian party call conservatives and sit as an independant
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean Connolly
03:26 PM on 04/11/2012
China's government "gets things done" Canada's government has petty arguments, and goes against the will of the majority of Canadians.

just because we get more done than the USA government... doesn't mean the Canadian government "gets things done".
photo
MarsAmbassador
Per angusta ad augusta
02:54 PM on 04/11/2012
Flaherty has been a far better leader than Harper and I'd like to see him elevated to PM next time. I do not like Harper and I hope Elections Canada drops the hammer on the Tories for their misleading robocalls that told voters they knew wouldn't vote Tory that the election polling locations had been moved, when in fact they hadn't.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
03:15 PM on 04/11/2012
Flaherty exemplifies everything that's wrong with the Harper government. He's incompetent and dances to his master's tune. How can you even suggest that he would be a good leader?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
04:08 PM on 04/11/2012
Cause he's from Mars? And he certainly knows nothing about Flaherty's past.
photo
MarsAmbassador
Per angusta ad augusta
08:21 PM on 04/11/2012
I never said he would be a good leader, I said he'd be better than Harper. Name one other Tory that has the profile and portfolio responsibility necessary to step up to the plate for the PM job next time around? There aren't any. And the Liberals are done and the NDP is back to being a joke. Jack Layton was the only decent federal politician we've seen in this country since Lester B. Pearson and he didn't leave a successor. Not that anybody would be voting NDP enough to make a difference, but he advocated for his point of view better than anyone I've seen in my lifetime.
05:28 PM on 04/11/2012
Flaherty is the one who took Canada from an operating budgetary surplus to a deficit. He apparently did the same thing in Ontario but lied during the election, then the new government was saddled with a 5.7 billion shortfall.

Far better leader? Unfortunately you may be right but I would prefer they both do time in their new prisons to test the facilities
photo
MarsAmbassador
Per angusta ad augusta
08:18 PM on 04/11/2012
Yeah, the global recession had nothing to do with it. Okay.
02:46 PM on 04/11/2012
F-35....robocalls
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Muller
02:28 PM on 04/11/2012
Typical ramblings of someone with a short man complex. What he lacks in height he will make up by the ever growing size of his nose by continuing telling lies.
photo
laymancanuck
IGNORANCE has used up its quota of TOLERANCE
02:22 PM on 04/11/2012
As Canadians let's step back from our political allegiances for a moment. In the comments I've read here,political allegiances our clouding our vision. The point has to be made, which ever party is running the country in the short term, the country is well managed. Canadians can compare ourselves to others and conclude our country works well.
03:18 PM on 04/11/2012
Maybe, but I want it to work BETTER. That means the cons must go.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
03:18 PM on 04/11/2012
It works well if a true parliamentary system was in place. Harper has rendered the system inoperative with prorogues, cutting off debate, withholding information from Parliament and corrupting what information does get through.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
02:10 PM on 04/11/2012
He could have gone farther and said that dictatorships get things done even faster than either of our systems. That doesn't make dictatorships desirable. Bu that's what we virtually have here now. This government continually withholds information, distorts what information it does share and cuts off debate for no good reason. And by the way Jimbo, your government had nothing, nada, niente to do with our recovery. It happened because we had a solid banking system that your crew would gladly have corrupted if you'd had a majority for the years leading up to the recession. Don't take credit where none is due.
02:08 PM on 04/11/2012
It was the last round of Conservative government, under Mulroney, that put Canada more in debt and deficit than ever before in her history. Then the Liberals cleaned up the mess, and balanced the budget. From the opposition and back benches, the Conservatives have been pushing for mergers in the banking system and deregulation in the financial and banking industries that would have had the Canadian economy in virtually the same meltdown as the American economy was. The Conservatives have also advocated allowing more privatized medicine, and advocated creating a full two-tiered system of healthcare.

Now in power, the Conservatives are using their ability to "get things done" to rape the countries resources, hand the profits to corporations, and leave the environmental destruction to our children to pay for. They are bolstering military spending in a profligate and reckless way. They are legislating expensive "tough on crime" measures that are similar to failed American policies. They have now joined in the disastrous War on Drugs with the Americans, another moronic measure.

As to parliament, Harper and his minions have misled the House, shut down the parliament, closed off debates, silenced committees, and muzzled civil servants and government funded scientists. The recent Harper budget has measures steeped in petty political revenge, such as the closing of Katimavik.

If Flaherty is so proud of Canada's parliamentary system, why is he subverting it?
12:13 AM on 04/14/2012
Your view is obscure and sadly realistic. Conservators are changing the system that liberals built during years. Canada is walking the same road of the US before the crisis. For the best of us all, I would like to be mistaken but the signs are there and growing up. Conservators are changing the law for international investment, political parties funding.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr e MaN
Political Atheist
01:56 PM on 04/11/2012
Great corporate tax breaks and cut cut cut. He and Harper have prolonged the housing bubble so when it pops this spring summer he won't be bragging. Then we will have to send the conservatives to China with all the other jobs we sent there by MISTAKE.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Taylor Jay
I don't align myself with any political party.
01:46 PM on 04/11/2012
wow, the republicans get their first majority in Canada and its Brag brag brag.

nothings fixed really, everything's been cut. Our middle class is is massive debt and is diminishing. Yet tax reductions on corporations happened!

this government is a joke, elected with only 25% of canada's elligible vote.
01:55 PM on 04/11/2012
As opposed to every other government in recent history, which had similar percentages? conservatives got about 40% of the votes, which in our system basically means victory. But then again every other government has done basically the same thing for a long time.
photo
Liz Wilson 2
“a small group can change the world
02:08 PM on 04/11/2012
I think the difference is in getting that percentage legally
03:21 PM on 04/11/2012
Your comment makes a lot more sense than I`ve seen on these pages for some time. Also think that there is only about 25% of the people that actually elect a government- that percentage of the people will actually think before they vote and vote accordingly,of the other 75%, a third will vote liberal, a third Conservative ,and the other third NDP- because their parents and grand parents did
01:37 PM on 04/11/2012
The pictures for this story don't show what type of shovel he is using. I could use one that spreads so well for my garden, though I wouldn't put it on so deep.