Peter Kent: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Stable Despite Canada's Economic Growth

Posted: 04/11/2012 11:46 am Updated: 04/11/2012 5:44 pm

Peter Kent Greenhouse Emissions
Environment Minister Peter Kent announced Wednesday that Canada's greenhouse-gas emissions remained stable in 2010 even as the economy grew. (CP)

OTTAWA - The Conservative government is pointing to a new greenhouse-gas report as a sign that the economy's rebound from recession did not come at the expense of the environment.

New figures released Wednesday show greenhouse gases remained stable in 2010 even as the economy grew. Emissions rose by just two megatonnes, or 0.25 per cent, to 692 megatonnes, while the economy grew by 3.2 per cent.

Emissions fell in 2008 and 2009 during the global recession and were expected to rise as the economy recovered.

"Through a responsible and practical approach to managing both the environment and the economy we will continue on this path," Environment Minister Peter Kent said in Toronto.

"This is not a blip, this is a continuing trend."

Canada has signed on to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and must report each year on its greenhouse gases.

Last year's report caused a stir because it left out data showing a rise in greenhouse-gas emissions from the oilsands. The previous year's inventory included a breakdown of oilsands emissions.

This year's report is being released just days after Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservatives axed an independent advisory body that used to track greenhouse-gas emissions, among other things.

The National Roundtable on the Environment and the Economy was a casualty of the latest Tory budget. The roundtable has publicly challenged the Conservatives in the past on the effectiveness of its policies to reduce greenhouse gases.

Canada's emissions peaked at 751 megatonnes in 2007. The energy and transportation sectors are responsible for the rise in emissions over the last two decades.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservatives have set a goal of lowering greenhouse-gas emissions 17 per cent below 2005 levels by 2020, or down to 607 megatonnes.

But a report posted on Environment Canada's website says even if all the government's actions are taken into account, and all the provinces' actions are factored in, Canada will only get a quarter of the way to meeting its 2020 goal.

"Environment Canada admits that the current policies of federal and provincial governments will only achieve one quarter of the necessary reduction to hit the Harper government's own climate target," Keith Stewart of Greenpeace Canada wrote in an email.

But the environment minister insisted Canada is actually closer to reaching its 2020 goal.

"That was last year's data," Kent said. "In the middle of last year, our scientists estimated that we were, with current regulations in place at the time, that we were about a quarter of the way.

"Although I don't have the hard figures yet for this year ... I think that you will see that we are somewhere between 30 and 40 per cent now towards hitting our 2020 targets."

That target has changed over the years. Under the Kyoto Protocol signed by Jean Chretien's Liberal government, Canada would have been required to meet a tougher target. But the Liberals and later the Conservatives ignored the Kyoto target.

The Tories always insisted that meeting Canada's Kyoto commitments would tank the economy. A few hours after returning from marathon UN climate talks in South Africa in December, Kent announced Canada was pulling out of Kyoto for good.

Environmental groups accused the Conservatives of using the annual inventory report to put a shine on soot.

"Who cares," said John Bennett of the Sierra Club. "Without a cap on industrial emission leading to a rapid decline in emissions, a minor drop is meaningless.

"Canada promised future generations to lower its emissions to about 550 megatonnes by 2012 (and) they are at 692. There is nothing to brag about here."

— With files from Diana Mehta in Toronto

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA - The Conservative government is pointing to a new greenhouse-gas report as a sign that the economy's rebound from recession did not come at the expense of the environment.New figures released ...
OTTAWA - The Conservative government is pointing to a new greenhouse-gas report as a sign that the economy's rebound from recession did not come at the expense of the environment.New figures released ...
Filed by Michael Bolen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 42
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
Ian Llangan
Your Invisible Sky Friend Is Morally Abhorrent
11:23 AM on 04/12/2012
Ah the selfservative conservabots are again congratulating themselves over an incomplete report that leaves out the most vital statistics (in this case oilsands emissions). And we should be surprised by this revelation... why exactly?
11:37 AM on 04/12/2012
When you begin a comment with "selfervative conservabots", everyone with a shred of common sense knows extremely biased nonsense will follow.

You are the "_bot", my friend.
Dinsdale Pirahna
"lookin' out the 'ole in the wall"
11:57 AM on 04/12/2012
Although the name calling is regrettable, it doesn't necessarily mean the information following is "extremely biased"...

"...Last year's report caused a stir because it left out data showing a rise in greenhouse-gas emissions from the oilsands. The previous year's inventory included a breakdown of oilsands emissions.

This year's report is being released just days after Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservatives axed an independent advisory body that used to track greenhouse-gas emissions, among other things..."
Dinsdale Pirahna
"lookin' out the 'ole in the wall"
11:04 AM on 04/12/2012
Kent and Harper are trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rob Vann
Hope for the best,Plan for the worst,Take what cms
10:14 AM on 04/12/2012
Another example of how Harper's Cons are moving the goal posts then intend to claim compliance with environmental regulations.

http://us2.campaign-archive1.com/?u=e1325d570d1922afa769cfa1c&id=d6427151cf&e=35cc1869de
photo
cheena1
myhuffpost
05:08 AM on 04/12/2012
This is just more BS! And the Cons damned well know it! Read this article and you'll know why he's dumping the scientists! as well as all the rest of his lies!! And, as much as I thoroughly dislike Kent, the buck stops at the PM's Office! We all know how he is a control freak and micro-manager - nothing is said or done w/o his knowledge ...... well, read this:

http://twoinformcanada.ca/secret-environment-canada-presentation-warns-of-oilsands-impact-on-habitat/
10:28 PM on 04/11/2012
How do they know.
They keep firing the scientists and running off the people that know.

In a couple of years we should be able to hit any target they can think of.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rob Vann
Hope for the best,Plan for the worst,Take what cms
08:31 PM on 04/11/2012
Perhaps Sheila Fraser should set up shop and help Canadians sift through the Harper Government lies and doublespeak.
07:00 PM on 04/11/2012
""""while the economy grew by 3.2 per cent.""""

what does that mean exactly -----does a ten percent rise in the price of goods and services mean the economy grew by ten percent ----

price rises dont produce pollution
07:00 PM on 04/11/2012
I find this obsession over C02 over all other types of real pollution odd. Is the guy who just got a fridge to store milk for his family going to dwell on this? Not likely. Go economic growth Go.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rob Vann
Hope for the best,Plan for the worst,Take what cms
08:15 PM on 04/11/2012
His family probably consists of a couple of kids whose projected life expectancy might be as high as 95 years. If he isn't .. maybe he should be concerned for his kids.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:55 PM on 04/11/2012
What report? One would think a Minister of the Environment should know something about the environment. He obviously does not or he would actually say something you might expect to hear from a cabinet minister, rather than quoting a phantom report. If it does exist I would like to see it peer-reviewed by scientists that actually know something.
photo
Ian Llangan
Your Invisible Sky Friend Is Morally Abhorrent
11:20 AM on 04/12/2012
Why should you expect the Minister of The Environment to know anything about the environment? The Minister of Defence has already demonstrated beyond all doubt that he knows nothing about his department.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:06 PM on 04/12/2012
I know it sounds naive to expect the top man in the country responsible for the Ministry of Environment to know something about it, just call me old fashion.

One thing for sure, if I was looking for a job and I told you I had no experience or education in your field, would you hire me?
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
06:52 PM on 04/11/2012
perhaps they haven't a clue what a cleaner and healthier environment is to begin with? Because it's not tarsands. So if the answer to every question is tarsands, then they are just going through the motions of media manipulation. That's all the media are good for now
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
06:41 PM on 04/11/2012
what a piece of Kent. What do they hope to gain by being this obtuse? They will go down in history as the criminals that they are. Desperate to avoid change at any price, on the backs of their own children.

Change need not be such a drastic Armageddon, but can be gradual. But that takes education and understanding.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Capital Ottawa
06:30 PM on 04/11/2012
When a liar tells the truth, it's usually to set up another lie.

At least Mr. Kent is doing what he has always done: reading aloud somebody else's script.

By the way, most journalistic reports of this story would include the name of the report and who wrote it. A little too much to ask for from HuffPo, it would seem. Oh, the inconvenience.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DarrylBrowne
Common sense is not so common.
05:33 PM on 04/11/2012
If Kent says so, I don't believe it!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Taylor Jay
I don't align myself with any political party.
05:16 PM on 04/11/2012
200 years of industrialization and we've mucked the planet up pretty bad. its not realistic to think this world can sustain us, something bad is gonna happen.
07:03 PM on 04/11/2012
Was this what was said as the Virgin was thrown into the Volcano? BTW, the cleaner places on the planet are more likely the early industrialized ones. Germany, England, Switzerland, Japan. The dirty ones are the ones that are late to the party, where fecal matter mixes with water and wood cooks the dinner.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rob Vann
Hope for the best,Plan for the worst,Take what cms
08:22 PM on 04/11/2012
I take it the US and Canada are still partying.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnanimation
09:14 PM on 04/11/2012
Your posts are quite humorous. You seem to just throw out notions and
opinions with no real concern for any kind of factual back up. Go, Bobo go!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
04:39 PM on 04/11/2012
Gee, that's wonderful for the economy. Unfortunately, a healthy economy does not equal a healthy society. In fact, the more people who are sick and dying, the better it is for the economy. Doesn't anyone wonder why our production levels are ever climbing, yet jobs that pay enough for people to buy a home are going the way of the dodo? Can you not see the inevitable out come?
Peter Kent certainly can't. But he probably doesn't care, hes old and will be dead soon.