David Suzuki: Saskatchewan Fires Back At Environmentalist's Foundation Over Climate Change Report

Posted: 04/12/2012 5:30 pm Updated: 04/13/2012 2:17 pm

REGINA - Saskatchewan's environment minister is fuming about a report that says the province isn't taking climate change seriously.

Dustin Duncan said Thursday that he's disappointed that the David Suzuki Foundation released the report without talking to the province about what it's doing to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

"It is an issue that we are taking seriously, despite what the Suzuki Foundation believes," said Duncan.

"We are making significant investments in technology like carbon capture and sequestion which has been recognized as leading technology when it comes to reducing emissions, while still providing jobs for people that work in the coal and in the power industry."

The report notes that Saskatchewan has the highest per capita greenhouse gas emissions in Canada. It criticizes the province for not having a plan to end its reliance on coal-fired power plants.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW SLIDESHOW

Coal-fired power plants are the primary source of energy in Saskatchewan and Duncan said there's no plan to get rid of them.

"The Suzuki Foundation has taken a position, and it's fair enough for them to take it, but they seemingly have taken a position that we need to move away from the coal industry," said Duncan.

"And that's a position that we just fundamentally disagree with as a government.

"It's important to the people that rely on that industry for their employment. We have significant coal reserves and we're pretty confident that we have a technology that can make coal a resource that we can use in the future in a cleaner way."

Carbon capture and storage has been touted as a high-tech way to help with the world's carbon problems, but has been panned as expensive and unproven. Critics say not enough is known about the consequences of burying carbon dioxide.

SaskPower is testing carbon capture technology.

The report criticizes the province for eliminating its Climate Change Secretariat and its Office of Energy Conservation. Duncan said the secretariat was announced by the previous NDP government but never created.

The report also says Saskatchewan has taken several steps backward on climate change since 2008, and although new regulations have been proposed, these policies are too weak to achieve the current provincial climate change goal.

"We have a lot of catch up to do, but we are doing significant work," said Duncan.

"We have legislation that is in place. We are currently working on our regulations, while being mindful that we have a strong economy and we want to see that continue."

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS

Filed by Michael Bolen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 214
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
01:03 PM on 04/17/2012
"...There is a concerted campaign to smear the science, according to Prof. Emmanuel.

And let me say that I think that there is a campaign of disinformation going on about this, and there has been before. We saw it before with the attempts by the tobacco industry to throw cold water on the notion that there was a connection between cigarette smoking and cancer... if [conservatives] simply deny that there's any problem at all they have automatically opted out of the conversation about what the solutions to the problems are going to be..."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marvin-meadors/why-does-the-gop-ignore-i_b_1307806.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Transitteer
and another thing . . .
04:28 AM on 04/17/2012
Climate Change is real, and happening now. Denying does'nt make it less true. The Science is proven, and consistent and has been since the 1960's. The ones that deny it are ones tied to the gas/oil/coal industry and choose to be blind about it. They probably think the Earth is Flat too if their income depends on it being flat.
The lust for money overrides reality. But it doesn't change it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
north of 60
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
04:26 PM on 04/15/2012
"overwhelming consensus" blah blah blah... Consensus is for picking prom queens. Science is based on examining at ALL the data not just the data which supports a particular political agenda. Scientists don't call those who disagree with them 'deniers', that's the behavior of evangelists and cult leaders. In the real world of scientific research those who use terms like 'consensus' and 'deniers' are simply dismissed as flakes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
4evercanadian
Still my guitar gently weeps
06:18 PM on 04/15/2012
So why don't you provide us a link to any scientific study or studies that back up your claim that climate change is not really happening. Or will you just keep harping on about how little those scientists who state that it is a reality know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
12:57 PM on 04/17/2012
"...A paper published in 2010 by the National Academy of Sciences found that 97 percent to 98 percent of climate researchers “most actively publishing in the field” agreed that climate change was occurring.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, April 9, 2010: Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data to show that (i) 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers..."

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/03/santorums-science/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:20 PM on 04/15/2012
Suzuki is just a green money maker.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mad Hatter 1
11:14 AM on 04/15/2012
Truth hurts...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Keohane
11:10 AM on 04/15/2012
Nobody takes Suzuki's fantasies seriously anyway, so who really cares what he dreams up?
12:14 PM on 04/15/2012
Who cares? People who choose to face science's hard truths instead of the oil industry's happy fantasies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
north of 60
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
08:33 PM on 04/13/2012
China produces 24% of the world's GHG emissions,
The U.S. produces 20% of the world's GHG emissions

Canada only produces 2% of the world's man-made GHGs

A recent poll shows that the happiest people in Canada live in the Prairie provinces.

Suzuki's alarmist attitudes have clearly been rejected in the arena of majority public opinion.
11:10 PM on 04/13/2012
Suzuki makes big $$$$ for spreading his _tripe and has no shortage of gullible worshipers to keep lining his pockets.

Much like every televangelist hawking $100 vials of "holy water" promising "fire-and-brimstone" on little old ladies that don't call in with their credit card handy.
photo
NTodd
Aude Sapere
11:35 PM on 04/13/2012
First of all, you have no idea how much Suzuki makes or how, as if it matters. Even if Suzuki were a millionaire, what would it matter? The issue is, is he right?

I'm not an expert in climate science, so, being a reasonably intelligent person, I trust people who have expertise in that area. And guess what? the overwhelming majority of climate scientists are of the opinion that the warming trend which has been accelerating for the last 150 years is mostly due to an increase in CO2 brought about by human activity. Now, granted Suzuki is not a climate scientist himself, but he does have scientific training and he is accurately representing the overwhelming consensus among climate scientists in the world. He's aware that he has the media's attention and is using it to bring the public's attention to something that Harper and Wall would rather not have us know.
08:11 PM on 04/14/2012
Just a comment I think most people would actually move to Saskatchewan to avoid pollution
12:16 PM on 04/15/2012
You don't valuate scientific research by how happy it makes people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean Connolly
08:13 PM on 04/13/2012
the solution is nuclear power. plain and simple, Sask has more uranium than any other sub national entity in the world, and the only country with more uranium than Sask is Kazakhstan
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sunnyokanagan
Increase compassion. Decrease suffering
07:00 PM on 04/13/2012
"And that's a position that we just fundamentally disagree with as a government.
"It's important to the people that rely on that industry for their employment."

There you have it in a nutshell, so to speak. Rather than investing in or encouraging R&D in alternatives that would employ far MORE people in a "green economy", TPTB would much rather cling to burning dirty fossil fuels and continue supporting the oil economy.

Same old, same old.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinnerator
07:50 PM on 04/13/2012
bunkem, the green economy is a sham, your either a liar or a dupe
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sunnyokanagan
Increase compassion. Decrease suffering
08:15 PM on 04/13/2012
... or a science type who has been following these issues since the 1970s and is in possession of a perspective grounded in research and development rather than bogus fossil-based ideology.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Devlin
06:48 PM on 04/13/2012
Uh, doesn't that top 10 list say China's putting out about sixteen times as much CO2 as Canada?

...I kinda think we're screwed no matter what Saskatchewan does.
My solution, which I think is kind of workable, is to simply DIE before this really becomes a problem.
photo
Another Pesky Canadian
Talk - action = 0
09:17 PM on 04/13/2012
By your logic; because other nations have committed genocide; its ok for us to murder a few people as well.

Sorry, but "the other guys are worse" argument is just another way of refusing to accept personal responsibility for what YOU can do as an individual. Same goes for "If I don't do it; someone else will."
11:17 PM on 04/13/2012
Saskatchewan has 1 million people. China has 1.3 billion people.

A more accurate comparison would be China farting in a small crowded elevator, as opposed to Saskatchewan farting in a mostly vacant Taylor Field.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djelimon17
what's this thing for?
06:42 PM on 04/13/2012
They are making significant investments in talking about the research they're doing to capture carbon

Clean coal to date has been a talking point but not much else
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:39 PM on 04/13/2012
Duncan's comments are environmentally reactive than proactive. What does he expect if he is going to make comments like this.

Again another Environment Minister without education or experience in the environmental sciences. And Dr. Suzuki is also a scientist not a history major.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinnerator
07:54 PM on 04/13/2012
And Suzuki does? He's a Zoologist (the branch of BIOLOGY that relates to the animal kingdom)not a trained environmental scientist, so try again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:51 PM on 04/13/2012
When David Suzuki started his research in genetics at UBC there wasn't a category yet for environmental science. If you had taken environmental studies courses as I have at the University of Waterloo, you would know this field is composed of many disciplines - human history not being one of them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paul m
06:21 PM on 04/13/2012
"We are making significant investments in technology like carbon capture and sequestion which has been recognized as leading technology when it comes to reducing emissions,"

OK, now you know right away that Suzuki is right when this is the first defence the come up with.
06:32 PM on 04/13/2012
Exactly.
06:16 PM on 04/13/2012
Look like Saskatchewan doesn't read the huff post: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/andrew-weaver/eu-law-oil-canada_b_1288264.html
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
06:05 PM on 04/13/2012
Watchout Suzki, Harper now has you on his radicals list now.
06:35 PM on 04/13/2012
The T-bagger birthers that Harper has working on strategy are probably frothing at the mouth already. Foreign interest groups are only allowed on one side of the debate.
photo
BCSLAVE
Got a key?
06:58 PM on 04/13/2012
How true...Just like election fraud, as long as it serves Harper its great stuff to him and his party of criminals!
08:08 PM on 04/13/2012
So do the rest of us in Saskatchewan.
photo
NTodd
Aude Sapere
11:19 PM on 04/13/2012
Who are you to speak for the rest of Saskatchewan. You do not.