Charter Of Rights Anniversary: Stephen Harper Says Charter's Divided History Keeps Him From Celebrating

Posted: 04/16/2012 5:01 pm Updated: 04/17/2012 10:38 am

Stephen Harper

SANTIAGO, Chile - The Conservative government has been notably silent on the 30th anniversary of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and Stephen Harper says there's a reason for that.

The prime minister was asked during a trip to Chile what he thinks of the Charter and why his government isn't marking it in some way. Liberals in particular have criticized the silence on the Charter — it was entrenched in the Constitution under former Liberal prime minister Pierre Trudeau.

Harper offered a qualified response on the significance of the Charter in Canadian history.

"In terms of the anniversary, the Charter was an important step forward in the development of Canadian rights policy, a process that began in earnest with (Conservative prime minister) John Diefenbaker's Bill of Rights in 1960, so it's a little over 50 years old," Harper said.

Diefenbaker's Bill of Rights was not entrenched in the Constitution and did not carry the same weight in the courts as the Charter eventually did.

Harper alluded to the fact that Quebec did not sign on to the Constitution Act of 1982, of which the Charter was a part. Two other attempts to bring Quebec into the constitutional fold — the Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accords — failed.

Quick Poll

Should the Prime Minister celebrate the anniversary of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

VOTE

"In terms of this as an anniversary, I think it's an interesting and important step, but I would point out that the Charter remains inextricably linked to the patriation of the Constitution and the divisions around that matter, which as you know are still very real in some parts of the country," Harper said.

Harper had also been asked to comment on perceived problems with the application of the Charter in the courts, but he said he didn't want to wade into that issue.

But many Conservatives have criticized the Charter, saying some have taken advantage of the document to drag out court cases. There's also a view that it has allowed judges to make laws rather than parliamentarians.

TWITTER REACTS

Former Conservative MP Randy White caused Harper grief during the 2004 election when he complained about the Charter in an interview with an independent filmmaker.

"If the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is going to be used as the crutch to carry forward all of the issues that social libertarians want, then there's got to be for us conservatives out there a way to put checks and balances in there," White said, suggesting the use of the notwithstanding clause.

The Liberals plan to celebrate the Charter's 30th anniversary with a full slate of events on Tuesday.

Interim leader Bob Rae will take part in a panel discussion at the University of Ottawa and will participate in a youth flash mob organized by the Canadian Bar Association.

Chretien is to join his party for a rally to honour the occasion on Tuesday night in Toronto.

THE QUEEN'S BEST OUTFITS
FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS

SANTIAGO, Chile - The Conservative government has been notably silent on the 30th anniversary of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and Stephen Harper says there's a reason for that.The prim...
SANTIAGO, Chile - The Conservative government has been notably silent on the 30th anniversary of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and Stephen Harper says there's a reason for that.The prim...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 208
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amorak
08:40 PM on 04/18/2012
Harper thinks he's showing empathy with Quebec (for obvious political purposes) by downplaying the Charter's anniversary. I suspect that's not too helpful to Canada's future because it just opens that old wound in Quebec.

Meanwhile, many Canadians feel that the Conservatives are not very respectful of the rule of law. They're trying to change the laws they don't like and they often dance around laws they can't easily change like. To show this lack of interest in OUR Charter reinforces my belief that the Conservatives really don't have much respect for the rule of law.

I think it's a political mistake for the Conservatives. It might sell in a coffee shop in rural Alberta but most of us support that Charter and depend upon its protections. Our Prime Minister should very clearly show his support for it because he's ultimately responsible for enforcing and protecting it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Winevqa
Life's too short to drink cheap Wine.
02:26 PM on 04/18/2012
Harper is a GOP wannabe. And you know what? They would eat him for breakfast.
photo
Spanky McFarlane
ILLEGITIMUS NON CARBORUNDUM.
10:25 AM on 04/18/2012
O Yea!, O Yea! The PM can't celebrate- so no Canadian will.....Welcome to Harperland!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
09:37 AM on 04/18/2012
Considering roughly 25% of canadians look at the signing of the charter as a betrayal, not celebrating it is a sensible position to take.
Damn carpet baggers. lol
11:15 PM on 04/17/2012
HARPO you are not even CANADIAN. Your wanna be "OBAMA" WILL NEVER HAPPEN. Regisn and get out of town - take the same train as Muckay. How come this Huff Post poll says more than 60 percent of CANADIANs real CANADIANS think the CHARTER should have been recognized. You are wrong again when you said NOT ALL Canadians recognize the CHARTER...IN the words of A CANADIAN LEADER - bahhh humbug..RESIGN and get out of town like I said..........................
05:54 AM on 04/18/2012
First, I would like to remind you that I have never voted for Harper but have voted twice for that blundering twit that gave us this so-called constitution.
Now, you state 60% of Canadians feel the charter should have been recognized, so what, most people commenting on these page state quite frequently that only 67% of the people voted in the last election- therefore Harpers win is illegal.
How come ?

Then everyone seems to think he spends too much money for monuments celebrating the war of 1812- and in the next breath accuse him of being an American.
This country evolved after the war of 1812, thats why we are here as Canadians and not Americans,
06:10 PM on 04/17/2012
The Charter is an addition to our National Constitution at a time when Nations still had some control over their own destiny. The Free Trade agreement and consequential subordination of Canadian sovereignty (Clarkson) and Prime Minister Harper's Foreign Policy consistent with American Foreign Policy tend minimize any National Charters or even the Constitution.
04:26 PM on 04/17/2012
Harper's fat has blocked his brain. Mad cow disease from too much Alberta beef? He would rip the Charter up if he could. He doesn't seem to understand that we are not all born equal and the weak need to be tended to by the strong. (for lack of a better analagy) And give thanks if you can be a giver and not have to be a taker. It's a blessing to be smart, or strong or popular. It isn't one to be born lacking or less than whole. If you are, the odds are you will suffer poverty the rest of your life. Wasn't that what the charter was protecting
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
murphyj87
04:26 PM on 04/17/2012
We see once again how anti-Canadian Stephen Harper is.
photo
cheena1
myhuffpost
03:36 PM on 04/17/2012
Harpers' pettiness is glaringly apparent in this interview - to show such disdain for our Charter, the work of the Liberals, NDP, and REAL Cons. in constructing it, and contempt towards all Canadians for their pride in it.

So transparent - even in his attempt to alter the facts of its' 30 yr history by trying to credit Diefenbaker with it 50 yrs ago.

On the other hand, he has no problem spending what? $28 million, to celebrate the war of 1812 as a Canadian victory - even tho we didn't become Canada until more than 50 years later! At the same time, denying the children and grandchildren of our soldiers that died at Vimy Ridge to become Canadians.....

Such a sad little man - I really think he has a mental problem...
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
01:03 PM on 04/17/2012
So Harper has "Little nice to say about the Charter".

'Sokay, since I have little nice to say about him.

Can we call it even, Stephen?
photo
Spanky McFarlane
ILLEGITIMUS NON CARBORUNDUM.
12:57 PM on 04/17/2012
All I can say is that if the efforts of all THREE of our major political parties (Provincially & Federally) that culminated in this landmark document represents a 'divided history', - what the hell are we being represented by his 'Government'?
wetcoastm
Free Speech As Dictated By Our Sponsors
12:48 PM on 04/17/2012
When it comes to major Canadian historical events the PM should represent all Canadians not just the 38% that voted for him. The person in this role is supposed to rise above partisanship on these occasions. I used to actually admire things about Harper, I thought he was smart and honorable even though he did not share my political view.

But even before he had the majority he has illustrated that he is a very small man who is run by his political agenda even when it is not practical for the situation he is faced with.

He may not agree with the Charter but it is very important to the majority of the population of this country. He should have stated that he understood that.

There are many people who may not have liked Trudeau but when you compare their administrations Trudeau, though flawed, comes across as a man who was fiercely proud of Canada and to be a Canadian. He believed in this country and sought to do things to elevate us as a people. And yes he had spectacular failures like the NEP.

Does anyone get that feeling when they think of Harper. Do you get the feeling that he is fiercely proud of this country?

Or do you get the feeling that it is just a job, that he has an agenda to pursue doesn't really care about the role of the PM as the best of us in conduct and vision?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:35 PM on 04/17/2012
Why celebrate unelected judges overturning and remaking laws when confronted by special-interest groups led by crusading lawyers?
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
4evercanadian
Still my guitar gently weeps
01:08 PM on 04/17/2012
Judges don't make law, they interpret it. There's a significant difference.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:48 PM on 04/17/2012
4ever: They don't just interpret the laws they change them. e.g. the recent decisions on prostitution and minimum sentencing. It doesn't matter whether you agree or disagree with those decisions, it remains that an unelected judge changed the law to his/her way of thinking. A judge could just as easily change the law on abortion, pornography, or paedophilia. We are having our laws changed by judges catering to special-interest groups invoking the Charter.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
monstersfromtheid
micro-bio is empty - and staying that way
12:13 PM on 04/17/2012
He again shows he is head of the Harpergovernment (TM) not the government of Canada. As Prime Minister he has ceremonial responsibilities beyond narrow partisan ideology which he ignores.

He axed the agency that promotes freedom and democracy abroad and now shows his disregard for the Charter of Rights and Freedoms at home.

There seems to be a pattern here.