International Polar Year Conference: Federal Scientists Closely Monitored At Conference

CBC  |  Posted: 04/24/2012 7:56 pm Updated: 04/27/2012 8:24 am

Science


Media liaison staffers have been sent to an international polar conference in Montreal to shadow Canadian government scientists during interviews, in what critics are calling the latest example of extreme information control by the Harper Conservatives.


Hundreds of researchers from around the globe arrived in Montreal this week to attend the International Polar Year Conference, but those scientists working for Environment Canada were also accompanied by so-called "media relations contacts" tasked with monitoring and recording interactions with the press.


Ahead of the conference, the Canadian participants were reportedly sent a memo ordering them to have a government liaison present during conversations with reporters.


While none of the government scientists would speak on record about their media monitors, one researcher told CBC's Dan Halton off-camera that the strict communications measures were an embarrassment to Canada.


Some leading researchers worry the media intervention may undermine Canada's scientific reputation abroad.


Climatologist Andrew Weaver, with the University of Victoria, called the tactics excessive.


"The current administration probably has a fear about science," said Weaver, who compared the monitoring of scientists to something out of the Soviet era.


Science and media groups call for freer relationship


Concerns about the perceived "muzzling" of some of Canada's brightest scientific minds have been aired for some time.


In an open letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper posted last February, groups representing scientists and journalists appealed for an end to "government muzzling of publicly funded scientists."


The groups noted that last fall Environment Canada had prevented David Tarasick from speaking about his ozone layer research, which had been published in the journal Nature, and that earlier the Privy Council Office had stopped Kristina Miller, a researcher at Fisheries and Oceans, from granting interviews about her work on sockeye salmon decline in B.C., findings previously published in the journal Science.


In February, at the annual meeting of the American Association of the Advancement of Science in Vancouver, delegates appealed for a more open relationship between journalists and government scientists.


The government has said its scientists are not muzzled and that journalists do have timely access to researchers.


But at the Vancouver conference, Kathryn O'Hara, a Carleton University journalism professor, noted at the time that Gary Goodyear, the minister of state for science and technology, didn't respond to a request to participate in the conference discussion, and that all other federal government officials invited to participate said they were not available.


FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS

Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 38
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Ian Llangan
Your Invisible Sky Friend Is Morally Abhorrent
01:20 PM on 04/25/2012
The part about this that is so laughable is that a a conference, when scientists present their findings, there is an audience, which includes the media, who are free to ask questions during the Q&A after each presentation. No distinction is made as to who raises their hand. What is the government planning to do? Send media-minders running through the aisles to check the ID of every person who asks a question and then shout out "Oh, you can't answer this guy! He's a (gasp!) reporter!" Conservatives are not just in denial about climate change - they are in denial about how scientific conferences work, and about REALITY. Next thing you know, Harpo won't even be letting them attend conferences (if he hasn't fired them all by then).
11:59 AM on 04/25/2012
How... disturbing.
photo
Another Pesky Canadian
Talk - action = 0
09:52 AM on 04/25/2012
Re: "..."media relations contacts" tasked with monitoring and recording interactions with the press."

Reminds me of the official "handlers" escorting reporters in Iraq and Libya back when Saddam and Gaddafi were in charge.

Harper must go.
photo
fromdnorth
OK I checked my micro-bio (didn't know I had one
09:47 AM on 04/25/2012
Gerrymandering does not honour Canada
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DirkNeptune
I love raspberry pie, damn it.
08:39 AM on 04/25/2012
Putting the Harper apologists aside (where they belong,) this should be the only reason Canadians need to vote these evil buffoons out of office.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:22 AM on 04/25/2012
So whats the problem, the scientists work for the government, the government wants to hear what they are telling others. The scientists are not being "muzzled" they simply need to consider if their position is defensivable as a representative of their employee, that is the government of Canada.

As the government of Canada is elected by the people, everyone who does not like scientists to be accountable for what they simply need to vote for a another party or individual at the local level.
08:15 AM on 04/25/2012
Scientists work for the government? Most scientists work through universities. They may get grants from the government or from corporations but their work must be peer reviewed . Results from experiments or research should not be biased or withheld. if they don't support an agenda. That is not science.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:34 AM on 04/25/2012
read the article - this is about government scientists. Of course the government has no authority over those doing private work.
08:17 AM on 04/25/2012
No. No. No.

These are not scientists that are working for, say, Apple, Toyota or Bayer, and whose research belongs to their employer.

These scientists are tasked by the Canadian Government (and by direct extension, the people of Canada) to research the natural world and make discoveries that are important to everyone. Their findings belong to all of Canada. If the government decides to monitor and threaten scientists from speaking about their research because they worry that the findings are counter-productive to their policy objectives, then there is a MAJOR problem here!

This is also not a problem that can be voted away - over the next three years before our next election, scientists can lose their jobs and Canada's reputation in the scientific world can be greatly harmed. Why would young people choose to work for Canada's scientific agencies if they know that their jobs and their research is one election away from being terminated, because they've discovered something inconvenient to the ruling party.

This is a travesty!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:40 AM on 04/25/2012
NO No No.

You do not know better than the Government of Canada. And if you think you do work next election to be not in the minority of people but the majority and have your perceptions become those of the government. Scientists like everyone else who I (and you) spend there tax dollars for should be accountable. Just because they are scientists does not mean infailable or political or simply "weird."
01:16 AM on 04/25/2012
Here's the sort of stuff that we may never hear about from our scientists. He's talking about methane release from the Arctic seabed.

"Earlier we found torch-like structures like this but they were only tens of metres in diameter. This is the first time that we've found continuous, powerful and impressive seeping structures more than 1,000 metres in diameter. It's amazing," Dr Semiletov said.

"I was most impressed by the sheer scale and the high density of the plumes. Over a relatively small area we found more than 100, but over a wider area there should be thousands of them," he said.

Google Vast methane plumes if you want to read the whole story.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:33 AM on 04/25/2012
From the article "Each methane molecule is about 70 times more potent in terms of trapping heat than a molecule of carbon dioxide"

Cows for food, emit 10 times the amount of methane than the total of all car and vehicle CO2 emisssions. If you are really serious about global warming you need to stop eating beef and drinking milk or eating cheese. Period.

We will continue as is until there is a global disaster because no one is going to say no more eating, and have some people die. So we might as well stop flapping our gums about global warming.
08:22 AM on 04/25/2012
"Cows for food, emit 10 times the amount of methane than the total of all car and vehicle CO2 emisssions. If you are really serious about global warming you need to stop eating beef and drinking milk or eating cheese. Period."

Actually, if you are really serious about global warning, you need to cut down on eating animal products AND cut down on CO2 emissions. The two are not mutually exclusive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
4evercanadian
Still my guitar gently weeps
10:21 AM on 04/25/2012
There is more methane in permafrost than there is in flatulent cows. It is one of the tipping points that climate scientists warned us about, and it's happening now:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/17/science/earth/warming-arctic-permafrost-fuels-climate-change-worries.html?pagewanted=all
TheRenaissanceMan
A starry-eyed idealist with too much time
01:00 AM on 04/25/2012
Disgusting.
I hate Harper so much.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
markhahn
rational progressive
11:56 PM on 04/24/2012
The scary thing is that to Harper-think, these climate scientists are as dangerous as military blabbing secrets. The difference, of course, is that our military (and police, judges, etc) work for the COUNTRY, not for some passing bad choice of a PM.

Making policy that willfully ignores or suppresses relevant science, that's just not good for us. Maybe in the next election we'll have an opportunity to vote for someone who makes policy based on facts and outcomes, rather than ideology.
11:50 PM on 04/24/2012
Through such policies, the Harperites have shown themselves unfit to lead a Western democracy.
10:06 PM on 04/24/2012
Harper may allow the scientists to speak with reporters if he was able to include a disclaimer and denial of science by a fundamentalist Christian preacher in the interview.
photo
TonyOnly
Truth matters.
09:54 PM on 04/24/2012
Harper's gag order must also apply to "I don't care" Mulcair. Government scientists and food safety inspecters are raising serious questions about HarperCon attempts to deceive Canadians. And opposition leader Mulcair is nowhere to be found.

Both are members of the public sector unions the NDP claim to represent. So where's Mulcair? Mulcair's home province, which gave him his job, is alight with civil unrest. But not a peep from the creep.

I guess he must be sitting up in Stornaway, planning the NDP's next assault on the Liberals.
09:47 PM on 04/24/2012
These are the hallmarks of an all controlling strongman who denigrates science and prizes blind obedience of the Party line. Imagine using these Harper jihadi media monitors, revisionist historians, to spy on scientists and keep their statements muzzled at an impotant international scientific conference like this one? Why are taxpayers paying for these odious PMO peeping tom Message Event Protocolers? The PM's and other critical cabinet ministers' fundamentalist religious beliefs are have taken on a completely unacceptable influence on public policy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
10:56 PM on 04/24/2012
part of the exchanges with China seem to have included the manual to Maoist suppression techniques.....ironic huh?
09:45 PM on 04/24/2012
This was a common practice in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. Scientists attending international conferences were always accompanied by the KGB, who acted as monitors and spokespeople. Authoritarian governments are typically paranoid and thus feel compelled to control free and open exchange of information because they fear legitimate criticism and disapproval.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rob Vann
Hope for the best,Plan for the worst,Take what cms
08:59 PM on 04/24/2012
""The current administration probably has a fear about science," said Weaver"

These scientists are paid for by tax payer's dollars and accountable to the Canadian public. No doubt their emails and cell phone conversations are being monitored as well. Tough being a scientist working under a Gestapo government.

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Fascism/14_Characteristics_Fascism.html

The Harper Cons will have something to be fearful about at the next election.