Kevin Page: Budget Watchdog Says Economy Paying Heavy Price To Eliminate Deficits

CP  |  By Posted: 04/25/2012 11:41 am Updated: 04/25/2012 6:58 pm

OTTAWA - Government spending restraint and cuts will lead to balanced budgets but also slower economic growth and 100,000 lost jobs, Canada's budget watchdog said Wednesday.

Parliamentary Budget Officer Kevin Page's latest economic and fiscal report is surprising in that it agrees with the Harper government that the budget will be balanced in 2015-16 — maybe even a year earlier.

But it says fiscal soundness carries a heavy price, with Ottawa taking $52 billion out of the economy and the provinces adding another $9 billion in drag.

"The PBO expects that restraint and reductions in government spending on programs in Canada will act as a drag on economic growth and job creation, pushing the economy further away from its potential (gross domestic product) and delaying the economic recovery," the report states.

The report was posted on the PBO website Wednesday ahead of Page's testimony before the Commons finance committee on Thursday.

The report says it incorporates Finance Department multipliers for jobs and growth for its projections, and is taking the government at its word that it will limit spending increases while chopping 19,200 public service jobs.

Ottawa's ongoing planned restraint and 6.9 per cent cut in departmental spending will reduce its share of the economy from 7.3 per cent in 2010-11 to 5.5 per cent in 2016-17.

That will have a direct impact on the economy, Page's report stresses.

It projects the spending restraints and cutbacks will reduce economic output by 0.3 per cent this year, climbing to 0.88 per cent in 2014.

Canada's economy, subsequently, will grow by only 1.6 per cent in 2013, eight tenths of a point less than forecast by the Bank of Canada and the private sector consensus.

On the jobs front, restraint will result in about 18,000 fewer jobs this year than had there been no restraint, climbing to 108,000 fewer jobs in 2015. Most of the losses are due to Ottawa's actions — including a reduction of 43,000 stemming directly from March's spending reductions — although provincial restraint is also a factor.

Unemployment, currently at 7.2 per cent, will climb to 7.9 per cent in 2013, the report predicts.

Both scenarios are significantly gloomier than private-sector forecasts, something the PBO attributes to calculating a bigger drag from public sector restraint and higher weighting for downside economic risks.

However, TD Bank chief economist Craig Alexander said the numbers are too pessimistic.

"I completely agree with the assessment that there is going to be a lot of fiscal (government) drag, the real question is how strong is the private sector going to be," he said. "Over the last several years, the PBO has had a generally more pessimistic view about economic prospects."

A spokesperson for Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said Page's analysis fails to incorporate actions the government is taking to create jobs and growth.

"We're ... also supporting private sector jobs with new measures to help grow research and development in Canadian businesses to increase innovation and productivity, streamline resource development project approvals, extend job creating tax breaks to small business, and aggressively pursue further free-trade agreements," explained Mary Ann Dewey-Plante in an email response.

The spending restraint and public service cutbacks — particularly for Ottawa — will have the desired effect on the government's books, the report projects.

Page predicts the Harper government will indeed be able to balance the budget when it says it will, in 2015-16, and may even achieve the feat a year earlier. As well, Ottawa will come in with a healthy $10.8 billion surplus by 2016-17, about $3 billion more than the budget estimate.

The PBO has been critical in the past of Ottawa's overly optimistic projections on the fiscal balance, but now seems to be on the same page with only minor differences.

As well, it says the federal government will eliminate its underlying structural deficit as early as next year, with only the slack in the economy keeping Ottawa in deficit a few years longer.

"The projected improvement in the government's budgetary balance over the medium term primarily reflects its policy actions to reduce and restrain direct program expenses and is therefore structural in nature," the report explains.

In a second report posted on the website, the PBO again chided the government for being overly secretive and asks for information on how it will cut spending so MPs can judge the impact on services to the public.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA - Government spending restraint and cuts will lead to balanced budgets but also slower economic growth and 100,000 lost jobs, Canada's budget watchdog said Wednesday.Parliamentary Budget Office...
OTTAWA - Government spending restraint and cuts will lead to balanced budgets but also slower economic growth and 100,000 lost jobs, Canada's budget watchdog said Wednesday.Parliamentary Budget Office...
Filed by Michael Bolen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 47
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
jimbo57
ni dieu ni maitre
08:45 PM on 04/25/2012
Gee, and austerity is working so well in the States and in the UK. What is with the anglosphere that makes us susceptible to stupid economics?
08:05 PM on 04/25/2012
It seems that the study is implying that the budget will be balanced even without these cuts (a larger economy and less unemployment would achieve this) . I don't know why they're so afraid to say it. Then again, balancing the budget should not be the goal. The key stat is debt to GDP ratio and a deficit smaller than the nominal growth rate means a declining debt to GDP ratio. Cutting the growth rate and the economy naturally means deterioriation on that front.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arkymorgan
Nobody knows the trouble I've been...
07:14 PM on 04/25/2012
"Creating a permanent underclass of any useful size takes work, and you all need to suck it up and do your part."
05:18 PM on 04/25/2012
This isn't so much about more jobs, just more free money.
photo
Liz Wilson 2
“a small group can change the world
07:10 PM on 04/25/2012
according to the sign this is a Christian looking for work. Perhaps he is more representative of the average unemployed worker than the cynics would like us to believe. I would say that from my personal experience I have met only one person who I could truly say did not want to support herself.
04:58 PM on 04/25/2012
Time after time and across the Western Hemisphere politicians leave their electorate wanting.

Our politicians and their G20 counter parts continue to support and promote an economic model that favours big business and the rich even though you should know that it is unsustainable. You’re playing the growth game while shipping manufacturing jobs to so-called developing countries; after 20 years of this how can you expect to maintain high growth levels? High growth will go to the countries receiving the higher paying jobs we lost. The economic model used in Canada systemically replaces high manufacturing jobs with lower paying jobs often accompanied by less job security. The middle class is shrinking, the poor are getting poorer and yet you expect more growth. And this is just the beginning.

Our Canadian economy requires diversification in order to satisfy the different aspirations of its citizens. Not everyone is made to work in the service industry. Not everyone wants or can qualify for high tech positions.

This is the wrong government at the wrong time with the wrong policies.

Mark Aubere Morrissey
04:34 PM on 04/25/2012
Sounds balanced to me. The only time to go in deficit is during a catastrophe or to take advantage of a new direction for government. Deficit spending shouldn't be steady as she goes like the last 45 years.
photo
albertarick
These are questions for wise men with skinny arms
04:52 PM on 04/25/2012
Oh Bobo, you forgot about 1997 to 2007 when the liberals had us in surplus every year.
05:15 PM on 04/25/2012
By shifting traditional federal expenditures onto the backs of the provinces.
05:51 PM on 04/25/2012
True, but they achieved this mostly by downloading to the Provinces. The recipe for dealing with it was mostly Mike Harris.
03:57 PM on 04/25/2012
Looks to me like I have to keep my comments short I want to be accepted by huff...
03:56 PM on 04/25/2012
The "NEED WORK" guy in the photograph , is he a cop from Ottawa disguised a homeless ???
03:55 PM on 04/25/2012
I notice that this guy has a nice ring and what look like a very nice watch..... I wonder if he smokes too ...???
photo
Liz Wilson 2
“a small group can change the world
04:02 PM on 04/25/2012
he is looking for work - so what is your point?
photo
Bumpers car
Fish till you die
04:35 PM on 04/25/2012
It might be a posed photo, who knows.
08:28 PM on 04/25/2012
He has a ring, he has a watch, both can be purchased for under $20. What's your point.
03:51 PM on 04/25/2012
The "NEED WORK" guy in the photograph , is he a cop from Ottawa disguised a homeless ??? Last week , I saw a homeless man with a cell phone .... why does he need a cell phone ?? He has no home!!! Who does he call ?? Other homeless guys to get tips on where the best $ tips are ?? I'm walking on thin ice with these comments, because most of my comments are rejected by that huff gal .....
compro01
Conservatism : Policy-based evidence making
04:59 PM on 04/25/2012
Yeah, there's no need for someone looking for work to be able to be contacted. Employers never call people about job interviews or anything.
photo
albertarick
These are questions for wise men with skinny arms
05:00 PM on 04/25/2012
Since you magically know everything about every individual you see on the street, we can save billions on policing, welfare, social services, just let us know which ones are cheating. Tell me do your detective skills work with corporate malfeseance as well or are they exclusively effective at sussing out the fraudulent homeless?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yishai ettebe
03:38 PM on 04/25/2012
Either way, we are screwed and everyone will complain no matter what.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
02:48 PM on 04/25/2012
Right now there are 45,800 unfilled job vacancies in Alberta alone.
photo
albertarick
These are questions for wise men with skinny arms
03:45 PM on 04/25/2012
The vast majority of those jobs, do not pay enough to live here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jason Bullock
04:26 PM on 04/25/2012
I've heard that. Cost of living keeps going up, but the pay raises don't.
04:27 PM on 04/25/2012
Problem being these jobs exist in every province in Canada, and the problem is nobody wants them-must be beneath their dignity and they would rather panhandle on the streets, no bloody wonder employers have to bring in foreign workers
photo
Liz Wilson 2
“a small group can change the world
04:26 PM on 04/25/2012
Fequently the posted jobs are for unskilled or highly skilled positions or remain on the board long after the jobs have been filled. the cost of relocation can be a bit onerous and attending interviews can be almost impossible.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
01:55 PM on 04/25/2012
Put the GST back to normal and it's all done without further erosion
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
02:49 PM on 04/25/2012
No thanks dude.
I live in Nova Scotia and pay 15%hst already
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tokenblackman
04:03 PM on 04/25/2012
Sounds good to me! When the CONS took the 2% off the GST they lost $10 Billion a year. Sure could use that now.
04:30 PM on 04/25/2012
Yea, they did take 2% off the GST, and guess what- its the first govenment that I can remember that actually reduced a tax! and you have a problem with that???
or are you one of the people who dont pay taxes?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
01:47 PM on 04/25/2012
Tell that to the 82,000 people who got new jobs in March.
But, lets see what April brings.
Aside from showers and flowers ect.
82,000 jobs in Canada would translate into 820,000 jobs in the US.
If that were the case, the republicans would be sunk and Obama would be on the roof crowing like a banty rooster.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jason Bullock
12:54 AM on 04/26/2012
82,000? That just means Harper just needs to get back the other 249,200 that his policies have cost people. Then he can be in the black, and start actualy creating jobs.