Canada Budget 2012: Tories Bury New Environmental Review Rules In Budget

CP  |  By Posted: 04/26/2012 11:00 am Updated: 04/26/2012 5:23 pm

OTTAWA - The federal government has submerged a thorough overhaul to Canada's environmental protections in a much broader piece of legislation — ensuring its speedy passage but further alienating environmentalists.

The multi-faceted changes to environmental and pipeline policy are part of the omnibus budget bill tabled Thursday — mixed in with myriad changes to tax policy and other fiscal matters.

Critics say that the omnibus approach means that radical changes to the way authorities handle natural resource development won't be properly scrutinized or debated in Parliament. That's because the measures will be debated by the Commons' finance committee as part of a wider look at the entire budget.

"The Conservatives are trying to bury critical changes to environmental legislation in a bill that's over 400 pages long," said NDP environment critic Megan Leslie.

"It's clear the Conservatives are introducing massive changes to our environmental protection laws. Fully one third of the bill is dedicated to paving the way for big oil and development projects."

The budget bill, tabled Thursday, repeals the Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act, officially severing Canada's obligations to the global agreement on greenhouse gas emissions.

It also contains fundamental changes to a number of pieces of legislation dealing with the environmental assessment process.

By rewriting the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, the budget bill enshrines timelines for assessment hearings, allows Ottawa to hand off assessments to the provinces and consolidates the process in three government agencies.

It also gives federal cabinet the final say over oil and gas pipelines — a controversial concentration of power that worries environmentalists.

Similarly, the environment minister is given more power to decide which resource developments should be subjected to environmental scrutiny.

"Across a number of acts, this is going to increase ministerial discretion and cabinet discretion," said Ecojustice lawyer William Amos, director of the University of Ottawa's environmental law clinic.

A spokeswoman for Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver said putting the changes into omnibus budget legislation is "routine."

But Carly Wolff added the government also plans to create special sub-committee to study the proposals on environment protection.

The budget bill overhauls the Fisheries Act to focus only on major waterways, not every single body of water. The federal government will only oversee waters supporting major fisheries of commercial, recreational or aboriginal value.

The Species At Risk Act will be changed so that the minister of environment has greater leeway to give industry players exemptions and extensions of their permits, but also to impose conditions on industry.

At the same time, the bill sets out stiffer fines for breaking environmental regulations and laws.

And it cracks down on charities involved in political activity — a move some non-governmental environment organizations interpret as an attack on their activities.

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said he wanted to roll a wide array of policy changes into the budget bill so that it would quickly get through Parliament and into law.

"These are long-term changes," he told reporters after tabling the bill in the House of Commons. "Some of them are quite important. We need to get them done quickly."

But critics say such fundamental changes to environmental policy need separate treatment so that parliamentarians can bring in experts and scrutinize the implications.

"It is an affront to democracy to bury such far-reaching changes to laws Canadians depend upon to help protect our environment in the budget implementation bill in order to avoid public scrutiny," Greenpeace spokesman Keith Stewart wrote in an email.

The budget bill contains so many key changes to environmental legislation that it amounts to a new and major act hiding within another bill, added Amos.

The Conservatives' allies on environmental policy, however, say the budget bill gives them everything they hoped for.

Jordan Graham, spokesman for EthicalOil.org, praised the bill for getting rid of unnecessary regulatory burdens on the oilpatch.

It's not the first time the Conservative government has altered environmental policy in such an omnibus bill. In 2009, it changed the Navigable Waters Protection Act to reduce oversight of minor waterways.

And in 2010, a budget bill revised parts of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act to streamline hearings.

Those changes were made during the Conservative minority and their inclusion in the omnibus legislation helped ensure their passage.

Environmentalists argue that this round of changes is far more pervasive. And since the Conservatives have a majority, they do not need to worry about opposition members outvoting them.

Still, government ministers have been highlighting the changes for months, and public debate has been vibrant, albeit polemic.

Oil, gas and mining interests, as well as some provincial governments, have praised Ottawa for eliminating duplication in the environmental assessment process and creating a more efficient arrangement.

But First Nations are deeply concerned about being left out of the new procedures, despite legal obligations on the government to thoroughly consult First Nations on such changes.

"It is an alarming development that Canada would take such steps," Shawn Atleo, the national chief of the Assembly of First Nations, wrote in a recent letter to Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver.

Earlier on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Old Age Security Facts

    Here are some facts about Old Age Security. <em>With files from The Canadian Press</em> (Alamy)

  • Who Gets It?

    98 per cent of Canadians aged 65 or older, regardless of whether they are retired, and regardless of their pre-retirement income.

  • Amount?

    Maximum monthly benefits are $540.12, and average benefits are slightly more than $500. (CP)

  • Clawbacks?

    OAS is considered taxable income. It is also clawed back for people earning more than $69,562 a year. Anyone making more than $112,772 has to pay it all back. (Getty)

  • Importance?

    For people aged 65 to 69, OAS makes up 13 per cent of their income, on average. (Alamy)

  • Poverty?

    About a third of OAS recipients also get the Guaranteed Income Supplement top-up, targeted at low-income seniors. GIS is income tested. (Thinkstock)

  • Maximum?

    The maximum benefit for someone collecting OAS and GIS is $1,240 per month. (Jupiter Images)

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS

OTTAWA - The federal government has submerged a thorough overhaul to Canada's environmental protections in a much broader piece of legislation — ensuring its speedy passage but further alienating en...
OTTAWA - The federal government has submerged a thorough overhaul to Canada's environmental protections in a much broader piece of legislation — ensuring its speedy passage but further alienating en...
Filed by Ron Nurwisah  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DirkNeptune
I love raspberry pie, damn it.
05:39 PM on 04/27/2012
Harper and his buffoons are a disgrace to our once great country.

Among other things, more pollution means more need for health care (which Harper also plans to strip away from us.)

Harper is gladly willing to destroy our environment and endanger the health of Canadians in exchange for short term oil profits for his buddies.

This man is a traitor to Canada and everything we once stood for.
paintitblacker
shit happens life goes on
03:05 AM on 04/27/2012
he needs a parrot and an eye patch, he looks like he puckering up wonder what the target is now
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Glass Cannon
Let every eye negotiate for itself.
02:17 AM on 04/27/2012
Transparency. Accountability. Bwahaha! Right.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
09:13 PM on 04/26/2012
Any project must have it within the realm of possibility the word No. And that based on the needs of the community and if need be against that of environmental vitality. We really don't have to develop every lump of land and tree, we have a lot around us with much to consider.

Otherwise the environmental legislation has been replaced by a rubber stamp committee for all oil and industry projects. Not everyone wants to be a hewer of wood and drawer of water. Having a sense of citizenship is more important than the bottom line of multinational corporations who demand... and we give it away
07:32 PM on 04/26/2012
go back to kindergarten,because when you come out with a budget like that, you need some serious schooling in math and you need to learn the rules of supply and demand. in terms of the working class, taxes are TOO HIGH, AUTO INS IS WAY TO HIGH, AND MOST IMPOTANT GAS PRICES AT THE PUMPS IS AT BEST OBSCENE...AND WHAT DO YOU DO NOTHING BUT ROLL BACK THE OLD AGE PENSION TWO YEARS....THAT WAS PRETTY STUPID...TRY TO REMEMBER THAT YOU ARE THERE TO MAKE IT BETTER FOR CANADAINS NOT WORSE. WHICH HAS NOW GIVEN THE FINANCE MINISTER A NEW NICK NAME- WRONGWAY FLAHERTY..... NOTHING THAT A GOOD BOOT ON THE BUTT WONT CURE...A....
04:37 PM on 04/26/2012
Luckily for us the ReformCons recognized that Canada during one of its major resource utilization expansions was trying to do this while at the same time ensuring that our children would have a safe unpolluted Country to grow up in. For many of the companies envolved this could possibly result in a total Margin reduction of between 3 to 5% and is totally unacceptable, for some of their Canadian employees they were even proposing to have Canadians do additional high end Value added jobs that could benefit the Canadian economy and the workforce as a whole. Luckily for us the ReformCons will ensure that no Foriegn Company would be forced just because they are stealing ooops utilizing Canadian Raw resources that they should also be required to return something back to the country as a offer of respect and support for Canada. The only real question left for the ReformCons to answer is, when are we going to get to be a new Star on the American Flag.
04:16 PM on 04/26/2012
This is pretty sad. I am not anti-development but there is a need for balance in my opinion.

Proper review of projects prior to decisions being made. Is that too much to ask?

2015. Can't wait to vote! And help campaign. And do anything I can to change Canada for the better....

I feel pretty sad after reading this. Sorry to be a downer.
photo
Another Pesky Canadian
Talk - action = 0
08:59 PM on 04/26/2012
Re: "Proper review of projects prior to decisions being made. Is that too much to ask?"

No, that's entirely reasonable to ask.

Which is why I hope that you will not lose hope for the future.

Canada needs Canadians who care enough about the future of this country to stand up for what they believe in and to do what they can to support others who feel the same way.
paintitblacker
shit happens life goes on
03:16 AM on 04/27/2012
standing up and saying no means that your now a radical environmentalist,soon to be an indictable offence I'm sure, I can't re-call any government in Canada being more corrupt, I don't care if there tory liberal green whatever there ideology our biggest job as individuals is to force them be be honest and ethical, qualities these crapsters can only dream of , but will never have
02:21 PM on 04/26/2012
Harper and his Republicons destroy Canada's environmental protections
to facilitate more resource extraction for mines and oil.
Not my Canada, not at all.
Protections for the environment AND development, both supported by science that is allowed to speak.
This government is so fear driven by greed, it is eating up our Canadian choices.
This blue juggernaut -anti-environment, anti-opposing team player, led by castrated parliamentary zombies, and the many ways they degrade my country.
Cheating in elections. Mud slinging. Eat opponents. Dirty politics. Illegal even.
Their single and constant tune, ..."money, money, money..in a rich man's world.."
This too will pass.
photo
Another Pesky Canadian
Talk - action = 0
08:55 PM on 04/26/2012
Re: "This too will pass."

Yes it will....like a rotten burrito full of un-inspected, listeriosis-ridden meat ( due to laid off inspectors).

It will pass, but it ain't going to be pretty when it's finished.
02:45 PM on 04/28/2012
Yes, please, no stinking burrito.

Locavores Unite against Harperland's unchecked
meat factories.
You know what to eat.
02:02 PM on 04/26/2012
don't all minor watercourses eventually drain into major watercourses, hence the provision and duty to protect in the original document? I don't know of any minor watercourses in my basin that don't eventually end up in the bow
02:06 PM on 04/26/2012
oh and re: minor projects--> cumulative effects
photo
Another Pesky Canadian
Talk - action = 0
01:44 PM on 04/26/2012
The CONs treat Canadians as though we are the enemy....and we have the honour of paying them while they do so.

Harper must go.
01:37 PM on 04/26/2012
"And it overhauls the Fisheries Act to focus only on major waterways, not every single body of water."

If I didn't have so much consideration for the good folks of Newfoundland and Labrador. I would say "run the oil pipeline down the river Peter fly-fishes and gets free copter rides from." After all I'm sure it's not a major waterway, or would it be deemed to be so?
Peter, talk about all the luck, was that your group of fly-fishing guys that won the lotto. I know cuz i saw it on tv.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ochaye
01:09 PM on 04/26/2012
Are we screwed or what?
12:33 PM on 04/26/2012
Treason ---The Tories are putting the interest of Corporation over the interest of Canadians---THIS IS HIGH TREASON....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Francmon
Homo homini lupus
12:00 PM on 04/26/2012
What a surprise.... Harperites passing piggyback laws to the gain of their corporate giants friends... They have a majority that would allow them to shove anything down our throats, yet they can't resist using their twisted and morally questionnable strategies on us.