Environmental Charities 'Laundering' Foreign Funds, Kent Says

CBC  |  Posted: 05/ 1/2012 11:49 pm Updated: 05/ 3/2012 11:24 am

Kyoto Protocol Canada Peter Kent
Environment Minister Peter Kent says the government is concerned that charities are laundering off-shore funds.


Some charitable environmental groups in Canada are "laundering" funds from offshore donors to obstruct Canada's environmental assessment process, Environment Minister Peter Kent says.


Kent made the comment Tuesday in a wide-ranging interview on CBC's Power & Politics when asked by host Evan Solomon to clarify a comment he made earlier on CBC Radio's The House.


In The House interview that aired Saturday, Kent said the government has been concerned charitable agencies have been used "to launder offshore foreign funds for inappropriate use against Canadian interest."


Kent stood by that characterization on Power & Politics Tuesday.


"Essentially what our government is doing through the finance committee is investigating allegations that offshore funds have improperly been funnelled through — laundered if you will, that's a fairly accurate word — through Canadian organizations that have charitable status to be used in ways that would be improper given that charitable status," Kent told Solomon Tuesday.


Pressed whether the use of the word "laundering" suggests criminal activity, Kent said: "There are allegations — and we have very strong suspicions — that some funds have come into the country improperly to obstruct, not to assist, in the environmental assessment process," Kent said.


The environmental review process is intended to determine whether a project poses adverse environment effects and whether those effects can be mitigated.


Kent declined to name the organizations under suspicion, but pointed to recent Senate finance committee hearings into the charitable status of some organizations.


"I suggest following the committee hearings — in due course some names have already been raised … and I think others will as the committee does its work," he said.


Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver sparked an angry response from environmental groups in January when he said "environmental and other radical groups" were using foreign funds to try to block major projects and undermine Canada's economy.


Tides Canada is one environmental group that has been singled out for receiving foreign donations. Ross McMillan, Tides' CEO, said Kent's comment was "part of a well-planned, orchestrated attempt to distract Canadians from the real issues" of cuts and changes to environmental laws.


"(The comment) is desperate and preposterous. There is no evidence that any of this is taking place. He should apologize," McMillan told CBC News' Margo McDiarmid on Wednesday.


"These are serious public policy issues and (Kent's comment) simply steels our resolve to communicate them to Canadians," McMillan said.


The March 29 budget included $8 million to enforce rules that prevent charitable organizations from spending more than 10 per cent of their funds on political action.


The budget implementation legislation also sets out the government's intent to streamline and speed up the environmental assessment process so major industrial projects receive only one review that must be completed within two years of the application.


Also on HuffPost:

PHOTOS: WORLD'S TOP POLLUTERS
FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS

Some charitable environmental groups in Canada are "laundering" funds from offshore donors to obstruct Canada's environmental assessment process, Environment Minister Peter Kent says. ...
Some charitable environmental groups in Canada are "laundering" funds from offshore donors to obstruct Canada's environmental assessment process, Environment Minister Peter Kent says. ...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 84
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:15 PM on 05/04/2012
"The March 29 budget included $8 million to enforce rules that prevent charitable organizations from spending more than 10 per cent of their funds on political action."

Just wondering what the limit is on the amount that business can spend on political action? Anyone?
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
09:35 PM on 05/04/2012
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/westview/gutting-the-fisheries-act-149967845.html

Gutting the Fisheries Act
Also in the budget, besides amending the Fisheries Act in this way, the
government guts the Environmental Assessment Act, revises the Species at
Risk Act, repeals the Kyoto Implementation Act, and dumps the National
Round Table on Environment and Economy. A film critic would say: too
many plots.

The budget is, in fact, a disguised and brutal assault on Canadian
environmental law. It is the mark of a regime that thinks it can make
the fish swim on time. It is a budget in which nature is subjected to a
finance minister's eye for efficiency. Cut non-vital lakes, trim rivers,
re-direct fish, let the provinces do the rest (or not; whatever).

Next year the government might want to pack all its legislation into the
budget and shutter Parliament for the summer, fall, and winter. To cut
costs, a single minister (of finance) could run the country.

If Ashfield really has learned fish-speak, perhaps he could try having a
word with those pesky F-35s? Otherwise, he should stay in the piranha
pool and leave the fish to their lakes and rivers. The rest of us
appreciate fish habitat, too.

Gus Van Harten is a professor at Osgoode Hall Law School. He studied
Canadian environmental law in the days when it meant something.

-- Troy Media

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 3, 2012 A10
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
12:41 AM on 05/04/2012
The very title of the federal government’s /Building the Canadian
Advantage: A Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy for the Canadian
International Extractive Sector/ suggests that it is corporations that
are intended as the real beneficiaries of CSR initiatives, with
collaborating NGOs following in second place.

We are increasingly concerned that such benefits will be gained at a
financial cost to Canadian taxpayers, while mining-affected communities
will pay through loss of livelihoods, devastated environments,
contaminated and depleted water sources, and removal of the right to
determine what “development” truly means for their regions.

For more on this, hear Catherine Coumans’ October 2011 radio interview
on CKUT Montreal at
http://www.archive.org/details/CatherineCoumansMiningWatchCanada
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
12:36 AM on 05/04/2012
Government initiative draws push back from industry – and NGOs are brought on board

In Canada, concern about the lack of government accountability
mechanisms for ensuring that public financing not support bad mining
practices abroad led to a parliamentary report /Mining in Developing
Countries/ (SCFAIT, 2005), and subsequently in 2006, to the federal
government spearheading a multi-stakeholder process called the National
Roundtables on Corporate Social Responsibility and the Canadian
Extractive Industry in Developing Countries.

An Advisory Group led the Roundtables process and included
members from civil society, academia, labour and the resource
development sector.

The subsequent Advisory Group report on the Roundtables reflected, to a
certain extent, the many highly critical presentations made by over 150
members of public stakeholder groups from within and outside Canada, and
was not well received by a number of companies.

As the report was being presented to the government in March 2007, a series of closed-door
meetings began at the Munk Centre for International Relations at the University of Toronto that brought together major Canadian mining companies, mining associations such as PDAC, and a number of the country’s larger organizations such as World Vision, Care Canada and Plan Canada, organizations that had not participated in the Roundtable
process.

The aim of the meetings – which came to be known as the
Devonshire Initiative (DI), named after the street address of the Munk
Centre – was to establish the potential for long-term
institutionalized collaboration around development projects at Canadian
mining projects overseas.
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
12:29 AM on 05/04/2012
References:

Coumans, Catherine. 2010a. /Alternative Accountability Mechanisms and
Mining: The Problems of Effective Impunity, Human Rights, and Agency/.
Canadian Journal of Development Studies 30, nos. 1–2: 27–48.

Coumans, Catherine. 2010b. /Bill C-300: A High Water Mark for Mining and
Government Accountability/. MiningWatch Canada Newsletter. 29: Autumn.

Devonshire Initiative. 2010. /About the DI/.
http://devonshireinitiative.org/About.html, viewed November 22, 2011.

ICMM 2010. /Good Practice/ Vol. 9 Issue 2. International Council on
Mining and Metals.

Kuyek, Joan and Catherine Coumans. 2003. /No Rock Unturned: Revitalizing
the Economies of Mining Dependent Communities/. MiningWatch Canada.

McKay, John. MP, Bill C-300, /An Act respecting Corporate Accountability
for the Activities of Mining, Oil or Gas in Developing Countries/
http://openparliament.ca/bills/1987/

McPhail, Kathryn. 2008. /Sustainable Development in the Mining and
Minerals Sector: The Case for Partnership at Local, National and Global
Levels/. International Finance Corporation.
http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/essaycompetition.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/Bronze_Mining/$FILE/Bronze_Mining.pdf.

SCFAIT (Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade).
2005. /Mining in developing countries: Corporate social responsibility,
38th Parliament, 1st Session, 14th Report: June/. House of Commons.
http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=1961949&Mode=1&Parl=38&Ses=1&Language=E
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
12:02 AM on 05/04/2012
January 21, 2010 - The Union of BC Indian Chiefs (UBCIC) urgently calls upon the Government of Canada to adopt the findings of today's Supreme Court of Canada decision of MiningWatch Canada v. Canada and apply the findings immediately to all mining, oil and gas proposals in British Columbia that are subject to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. (the Supreme Court of Canada ruled the federal govenrment should have done a full envionmental assessment, but also the high court decision allows the Red Chris project in northern British Columbia to proceed) "Given the virtual collapse of the BC Treaty process, the demise of the Recognition legislative reform initiative and the rising tide of litigation, the Government of Canada must heed the court's warning that procedural shortcuts are unacceptable," said Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, President of the Union of BC Indian Chiefs. "This decision provides hope for Indigenous communities, such as those of the Tahltan Central Council, who call for full and rigorous studies to adequately assess the impacts on both the environment and our people. Proposals like Taseko's Prosperity Mine, Terrane Metals' Mt. Milligan Project and Enbridge's Northern Gateway certainly come to mind.
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
12:01 AM on 05/04/2012
“Stealth Bill C-38 upends CEAA
By: John Cumming

Over the years, mine developers in Canada have heard politicians at the
provincial and federal level make so many empty promises to streamline
the redundancy-laden process for mine approvals, it?s been easy to tune
them out and temper hopes.

But that scenario is changing fast, and in a big way, with the governing
federal Conservative party having introduced Bill C-38 in late April.
Modestly titled "An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget
tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures," Bill C-38 is
not a tweak, but a sweeping omnibus bill that amends 60 acts, adds
three, repeals six and completely rewrites the Canadian Environmental
Assessment Act.
paintitblacker
shit happens life goes on
02:59 PM on 05/04/2012
enviromental terrorism as brought to you by the harper regime , criminals all of them!!
Donna Meness
www.findmaisyandshannon.com
12:00 AM on 05/04/2012
http://www.vancouversun.com/wisdom+messy+democratic+assessments/6550006/story.html

The wisdom of messy, democratic assessments

BY JAY RITCHLIN, SPECIAL TO THE SUN MAY 2, 2012

Making development decisions democratically can be a
ponderous exercise, but it?s the best way.

Northern Gateway, Prosperity Mine, Jumbo Glacier: Balancing
environmental protection against economic and social benefits of big
projects is seldom easy. It?s often ponderous, complex and messy. And
that?s if the assessment is done properly.

The new environmental regime outlined in the federal budget on March 29
will likely expedite and tidy up assessments. But if history is correct,
it will ultimately lead to greater conflict and lower standards of
environmental protection.

Under the new ?streamlined? federal process, only one environmental
assessment would be conducted, by the federal or provincial government.
The new regulations also limit the length of time for reviews and
restrict who can speak at them. Add to this the weakening of fish
habitat protection, by limiting Fisheries Act protection to major bodies
of water used for commercial, recreational or aboriginal fisheries, and
strengthening of the hand of the federal cabinet and environment
minister in decision-making, and you have an unravelled environmental
assessment process.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:42 PM on 05/03/2012
If I said and did, or more likely didn't do, what Peter Kent does, or actually doesn't do, I would be very confused.
07:59 PM on 05/02/2012
One of the best suggestions I have read about investigating the charitable organization status of environmental organizations had to do with expanding it even further.

I wonder exactly how much foreign money goes to Canadian right wing think tanks and other organizations that have charitable status? It would be interesting to compare them and identify the biggest recipients of foreign cash.
01:22 PM on 05/02/2012
He was a horrible news anchor and now I see that he is keeping the streak alive as Minister of Environment!
Does he ever stop and think about what he is saying?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileen Warren
12:46 PM on 05/02/2012
And at the end of the day,Kent like any good politician,will change his mantra to no comment as he cannot comment on inidividual cases or the investigation is ongoing.