A senior official told a House of Commons committee Thursday that Canadian companies can bid on as much as US$9.85 billion in production contracts for U.S.-built stealth fighter.
"This is the estimated slice of the pie, if you like, for Canada," said Simon Kennedy, an associate deputy minister.
He was responding to questions from the public accounts committee amid concern the windfall has been overstated.
The Conservatives have long trumpeted the estimated US$12 billion the country expects to gain in contracts for Canadian aerospace firms. Industry access to the program was often cited as a reason for not considering alternative aircraft.
Almost 75 per cent of the revised figure is expected be gobbled up by the 70 companies that have already signed agreements with manufacturer Lockheed Martin, as long as their contracts are renewed throughout the nearly five decades the fighter is expected to be in production and operation, Kennedy said.
"We think Canadian companies have done very well to date," he said, referring to the US$435 million in production and research agreements already on the books.
Canada's auditor general, who issued a scathing report on the F-35 procurement, has been concerned the database used to establish the government's estimate was run by the prime contractor. Defence Department projections for industrial benefits have been all over the map in the last six years, ranging from US$5.2 billion to US$14.7 billion.
Michael Ferguson's report also noted that prior to signing on to the program, senior decision-makers were warned "that industrial benefits could not be guaranteed under the (joint strike fighter) program."
New Democrat MP David Christopherson underscored that point. "It is not exclusive bidding by us. There is a competition," he said.
The auditor general also said the rationale to cabinet for the numbers was unclear.
"We found briefing materials prepared by departments for decision-makers and ministers did not explain the basis for the projections, or the consequent limitations involved in on those projections for decision-makers," said Ferguson's April 3 report, which set off a political fire storm.
"Moreover, in the majority of cases, only the most optimistic scenario was put forward, rather than a range of potential benefits that reflected inherent uncertainties in the projections."
A small link in the government paper trail justifying the decision to purchase the F-35 was obtained by The Canadian Press late Friday.
A brief paragraph-long letter from National Defence to the department of Public Works outlines the air force's technical requirements in the barest of detail and states the F-35 is the only fighter that meets them.
The document also points out the fact many other countries are also purchasing the F-35, ensuring "long-term essential interoperability."
The auditor-general pointed to the letter as an example of how public works didn't conduct proper due diligence in signing off on the purchases.
NDP defence critic Jack Harris noted that the letter was requested of the Defence department and produced on the same day.
"There's nothing in the document to justify such an enormous purchase," he said late Friday.
What should have been given to public works was the military's full statement of requirements, which outlines in detail the kind of missions the jetfighter would have been expected to perform, among other things.
"The lack of due diligence is shocking. There's no other word for it."
Also on HuffPost