Japan Nuclear Power: Thousands Celebrate As Last Of Reactors Switch Of

CP  |  By Posted: 05/05/2012 9:30 am Updated: 05/05/2012 9:30 am

TOKYO - Thousands of Japanese marched to celebrate the last of this nation's 50 nuclear reactors switching off Saturday, shaking banners shaped as giant fish that have become a potent anti-nuclear symbol.

Japan will be without electricity from nuclear power for the first time in four decades when one of three reactors at Tomari nuclear plant in the northern island of Hokkaido goes offline for routine maintenance checks.

After last year's March 11 quake and tsunami set off meltdowns at Fukushima Dai-ichi plant, no reactor stopped for checkups has restarted amid growing public worries about the safety of nuclear technology.

"Today is a historical day," shouted Masashi Ishikawa to a crowd gathered at a Tokyo park, some holding traditional "Koinobori" carp-shaped banners for Children's Day that have grown into a symbol of the anti-nuclear movement.

"There are so many nuclear plants, but not a single one will be up and running today, and that's because of our efforts," Ishikawa said.

The activists said that it was fitting that the day Japan will stop using nuclear power coincided with the nation's annual Children's Day, because of their concerns about protecting children from radiation, which Fukushima Dai-ichi is still spewing into the air and water.

The government has been eager to restart nuclear reactors, warning about blackouts and rising emissions as Japan is forced to turn to oil and gas for energy.

Japan now requires reactors to pass new tests to withstand quakes and tsunami and needs local residents' approval to restart them.

The response from people living near the nuclear plants has been mixed, with some wanting them back in operation because of jobs, subsidies and other benefits to the local economy.

Major protests, like the one Saturday, have been generally limited to urban areas like Tokyo, which had gotten electricity from faraway nuclear plants, including Fukushima Dai-ichi.

Before the nuclear crisis, Japan relied on nuclear power for a third of its electricity needs.

The crowd at the anti-nuclear rally, estimated at 5,500 by organizers, shrugged off government warnings about a power shortage. If anything, they said, with all the reactors going offline one by one, it was clear the nation didn't really need nuclear power.

Whether Japan will suffer a sharp power crunch is still unclear.

Electricity shortage is expected only at peak periods, such as the middle of the day in hot weather, and critics of nuclear power say the proponents are exaggerating the consequences to win public approval to restart reactors.

Hokkaido Electric Power Co. spokesman Kohei Ofusa said Saturday's shutdown was going ahead as planned. Power generation is gradually being turned down from 5 p.m. (0800 GMT) with all operation ending at 11 p.m. (1400 GMT), he said.

Yoko Kataoka, a retired baker and grandmother, who was dancing to the music at the rally waving a small paper Koinobori, said she was happy the reactors were going off.

"Let's leave an earth where our children and grandchildren can all play without worries," she said, wearing a shirt that had, "No thank you, nukes," handwritten in the back.

Loading Slideshow...
  • People gather at an anti-nuclear demonstration on the Children's Day national holiday, calling for a safer future for younger generations at a park in Tokyo on May 5, 2012. The last working reactor in Japan is to be switched off May 5, 2012, leaving the country without nuclear power just over a year after the world's worst atomic accident in a quarter of a century. AFP PHOTO / KAZUHIRO NOGI

  • People gather at an anti-nuclear demonstration on the Children's Day national holiday, calling for a safer future for younger generations at a park in Tokyo on May 5, 2012. The last working reactor in Japan is to be switched off May 5, 2012, leaving the country without nuclear power just over a year after the world's worst atomic accident in a quarter of a century. AFP PHOTO / KAZUHIRO NOGI

  • People gather at an anti-nuclear demonstration on the Children's Day national holiday, calling for a safer future for younger generations at a park in Tokyo on May 5, 2012. The last working reactor in Japan is to be switched off May 5, 2012, leaving the country without nuclear power just over a year after the world's worst atomic accident in a quarter of a century. AFP PHOTO / KAZUHIRO NOGI

  • People gather at an anti-nuclear demonstration on the Children's Day national holiday, calling for a safer future for younger generations at a park in Tokyo on May 5, 2012. The last working reactor in Japan is to be switched off May 5, 2012, leaving the country without nuclear power just over a year after the world's worst atomic accident in a quarter of a century. AFP PHOTO / KAZUHIRO NOGI

  • Protesters stage an anti-nuclear demonstration on the Children's Day national holiday, calling for a safer future for younger generations at a park in Tokyo on May 5, 2012. The last working reactor in Japan is to be switched off May 5, 2012, leaving the country without nuclear power just over a year after the world's worst atomic accident in a quarter of a century. AFP PHOTO / KAZUHIRO NOGI

FOLLOW CANADA

TOKYO - Thousands of Japanese marched to celebrate the last of this nation's 50 nuclear reactors switching off Saturday, shaking banners shaped as giant fish that have become a potent anti-nuclear sym...
TOKYO - Thousands of Japanese marched to celebrate the last of this nation's 50 nuclear reactors switching off Saturday, shaking banners shaped as giant fish that have become a potent anti-nuclear sym...
Filed by Lauren Strapagiel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:44 AM on 05/06/2012
YES! Now the reactors in California are off line and we all still have our lights on!
WHY? you may ask.... because of this..
http://sanonofresafety.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/excessenergywonukechart.pdf
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:02 PM on 05/05/2012
Japan is the world's biggest importer of coal and natural gas. Expect these imports to rise ever higher, as their fossil-fuel generating plants go full tilt to make up for the loss of nuclear power.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
01:53 PM on 05/05/2012
"Electricity shortage is expected only at peak periods, such as the middle of the day in hot weather, and critics of nuclear power say the proponents are exaggerating the consequences to win public approval to restart reactors."

Just water rooftop solar solves.

They have to rebuild lots of homes anyway, might as well make the solar.

Solar is far cheaper than new nukes of "clean" coal. Panels now cot 65 cents per W to produce.

Wind and waste are half that, and efficiency half that again.

pv solar is doubling every year or so, and can easily replace the lost nuke power in just a few years.

Waste bio char bio fuels can backup solar and wind. Carbon negative, and cheaper than dumping.

Solar can even charge the electric cars while people are parked.

No fossils or nukes needed.

I am so proud of the Japanese, they are making the tough choices now, and will benefit massively for it.

solar wind and waste are cheaper, safe, clean, and forever.
10:21 PM on 05/05/2012
" pv solar is doubling every year or so, and can easily replace the lost nuke power in just a few years. "

Unmitigated nonsense!

Japan had 53 reactors providing 25% of their power at a rate of about 47 giga-watts. Typically, solar panels cost on the order of $1/ (peak) Watt. Over a 24 hour period the actual power produced by a fixed panel will average only about 15% of peak. So to replace the 47 GW generating capacity lost they will have to install over 313 GW of solar panels costing over 313 Billion dollars and covering 2.1 trillion square meters. Then there will have to be some sort of storage for overnight with attendant losses and huge costs.

This isn't going to happen!

Solar and wind are kilowatt to megawatt scale sources and aren't up to solving gigawatt scale problems.

Fossil fuels are a limited resource, burning them faster puts more carbon dioxide into the air and uses them up faster.

Like it or lump it, thorium fueled nuclear is presently our only hope for a long term solution. Or you can buy into the green energy con and leave your grandchildren to freeze in the dark while they starve.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:48 PM on 05/06/2012
Obviously Japan can survive without those reactors.

The is several times the roof and parking lot area needed for solar to provide twice the peak electrical wattage needs. Note I did not say energy.

ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20050301005530&newsLang=en 700GW available ­ area.

Think about it, just 3% of the Sahara would supply all the world's energy, not just peak electrical.

Solar wind and waste energy are increasing their percentage of the energy mix, while nukes and fossils are decreasing theirs.

http://www.iea.org/stats/surveys/mes.pdf nukes, combustibles, all decreasing total installed base, renewable up 23% world wide.

It IS happening.

Why don't you think about the rest of my comment. I never said it would all come from solar, that would require expensive storage.

Offshore wind tends to balance solar. And it's half the cost of solar or new nukes per KWH.

That leaves less than 10% that can easily be made up for with waste bio fuels powering existing fossil plants, but clean and carbon negative.

Green is cheaper than nukes. Supply that energy with nukes would cost far more.

Megawatt scale is your mental limitation. distributed rooftop solar is more than enough to supply peak and charge electric cars, and it's more efficient, since it reduces grid travel and load. Cars store the solar energy for replacing oil. Waste supplies the backup.

It's not that hard to understand, and it's the ONLY system that works, clean, safe, cheap and forever.
11:29 AM on 05/05/2012
Ah yes, when push comes to shove, energy needs will trump environmental concerns. Coal and natural gas both produce carbon dioxide when burned. To hell with global warming and ocean acidification.

Coal and natural gas are limited resources and will someday run out. What then?

Nuclear is the only way forward, but not in the form of the uranium fueled pressurized water reactors currently being deployed, but rather the thorium fueled molten salt reactor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_fluoride_thorium_reactor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molten_salt_reactor
There is enough thorium available to meet the entire world's energy needs for over a thousand years.
There is more potential energy in the trace thorium in the ash from burning coal than was produced by burning the coal.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
01:54 PM on 05/05/2012
Bait and switch, no thorium reactor for 20 years at least. Just PWR.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
02:05 PM on 05/05/2012
Good post.

And if these reactors were used to produce Hydrogen gas, then The Hydrogen Economy could get underway.

This little 1 acre Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electrical Generation plant in S. Korea supplies electricity to 20K homes: http://tinyurl.com/6skgw9h .

General Electric Nuclear Division will not be happy with your post as they make much more money from Nuclear plants and their maintenance contracts than they could off these reactors.

And since the GEO sits on Obama's shoulder, as an adviser, that is but one reason thorium and hydrogen technologies are being stymied.
10:53 AM on 05/05/2012
Actually coal is much cheaper than nucleur when you factor in cap cost
, Germany is going down the same road and there is an abundance of coal in the world
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
01:54 PM on 05/05/2012
"clean" coal is just as expensive as nukes. Even rooftop solar is cheaper.
02:00 PM on 05/05/2012
I think you will find that rooftop solar is approx 10x the cost of coal(when it is working) with the major disadvantage that it does not work at night or on cloudy days
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:45 AM on 05/05/2012
They'll be back.

and maybe next time they wont buy those fast breeder, cheapy American tech nuclear reactors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norma Ward
10:35 AM on 05/05/2012
Here is a look at all of the nuclear reactors in the United States and their relationship to seismically active areas:

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2011/03/americas-nuclear-industry-how.html

With over 100 reactors scattered throughout the United States, many of them in either seismically active or coastal areas, even a one in five hundred year even could be catastrophic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sillyfrog
Pastafarian and UU student
01:10 PM on 05/05/2012
Not to mention the deadly waste.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phatbiker
Dentalfloss tycoon
10:24 AM on 05/05/2012
So does this mean they will be generating their power with dirty coal from now on?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
sillyfrog
Pastafarian and UU student
01:11 PM on 05/05/2012
It is nothing compared to nuclear waste.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phatbiker
Dentalfloss tycoon
12:16 AM on 05/06/2012
If we had spent our money unlocking cold-fussion instead of on the military and the war on drugs, we would have it by now. Clean power for all.
01:47 AM on 05/06/2012
It is not a either or game... If they are smart they will take the path of Germany.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
10:06 AM on 05/05/2012
Wow, I am truly surprised. Japan relied heavily on nuclear reactors for their energy needs...and clearly the meltdown impressed them. Good for them for recognizing a problem and making the tough decision. Japan is no place for nuclear power...too many earthquakes by far.