Bill C-309: Conservatives Back Private Members' Bill Targeting Masked Protesters

CP  |  By Posted: 05/06/2012 11:47 am Updated: 05/09/2012 5:28 pm

OTTAWA - The Harper government is throwing its weight behind a private members' bill that would give police the power to arrest anyone hiding their identity during a riot or unlawful assembly.

Conservative backbencher Blake Richards is proposing penalties of up to five years in prison or a fine of up to $5,000 for protesters who wear a mask or disguise.

The bill, Richards said in an interview, is designed to give police more power to prevent the kinds of riots that have caused so much damage, including the current student riots in Quebec, the Stanley Cup riot of last spring in Vancouver and the G20 protests in Toronto two years ago.

"Certainly I've heard of instances where it is legitimate that there might be reasons that someone needs to protest anonymously and this bill certainly still allows for that," said the second-term MP from Airdre, Alta., representing the riding of Wild Rose.

"I think it strengthens the right for peaceful protest. It's only when individuals engage in criminal activity or become violent where this law would apply."

Justice Minister Rob Nicholson announced Sunday that the Conservative majority formally supports the legislation, meaning it is all but assured of becoming law.

"Destructive and reckless behaviour damages communities and should not be tolerated," Nicholson said in a release.

Richards says the bill will allow police to step in and stop violence and property damage if a protest turns ugly.

"Primarily I see this as a tool that will be a preventative one, one that will deter these situations from developing or from escalating in the first place," he said.

But some civil libertarians are concerned that the legislation will give police the power to break up peaceful protests, which are frequently filled with people in costumes, masks or even face paint that could be construed as concealing identity under the new law.

The provisions of the legislation specify that it only applies during riots or "unlawful assembly," a legal term in which police deem there to be reasonable grounds to expect a disturbance of the peace.

Francoise Boivin, the NDP justice critic, said the official Opposition does not have a problem with the "concept" of the bill, but she says police already have the power to arrest and charge people intent on inciting a riot, and of using a mask to commit a crime.

Boivin argued that the additional law may simply muddy the water and give defence lawyers an opportunity to point out inconsistencies between the various statutes.

"We're still not really convinced of that factor, that for police it will be easier (to prevent property damage)," she said.

"What will be a legitimate excuse to cover your faces?"

The bill would create two classes of offence.

Those who incite a riot wearing a mask "without lawful excuse" face an indictable offence with prison terms of up to five years.

For those "who participate in an unlawful assembly while wearing a mask or disguise to conceal identity," the charge could be an indictable offence or a summary offence. Under the summary offence, penalties range up to six months in jail and fines up to $5,000.

Earlier on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • When Police And Students Clash

    Students protesting against tuition hikes battle with Quebec Provincial Police at the Lionel Groulx college Tuesday, May 15, 2012 in Ste. Therese, Quebec.THE CANADIAN PRESS/Ryan Remiorz

  • When Police And Students Clash

    Police unmask a student after arresting him during a protest against tuition hikes, Tuesday, May 15, 2012 in downtown Montreal.THE CANADIAN PRESS/Ryan Remiorz

  • A riot police officer takes down a student during a protest against tuition hikes at the Tuesday, May 15, 2012 in downtown Montreal.THE CANADIAN PRESS/Graham Hughes

  • When Police And Students Clash

    Two riot police officers tackle a demonstrator Friday, May 4, 2012 in Victoriaville, Quebec. Provincial police say a riot in small-town Quebec last week was the most violent protest they've seen in more than a decade and insist their response was a measured one. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jacques Boissinot

  • When Police And Students Clash

    Police hold back students who want to attend class from entering CEGEP Lionel Groulx in Ste. Therese, Que., Monday, May 14, 2012, as striking students block the entrance. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Graham Hughes

  • When Police And Students Clash

    Demonstrators break though a barrier as Provincial police officers stand by outside the Quebec Liberal Party meeting on Friday, May 4, 2012 Victoriaville, Quebec. A violent standoff erupted on the streets of a small city where Quebec's governing party was holding its weekend convention, as protesters and provincial police rained physical abuse on each other Friday.THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jacques Boissinot

  • Provincial police officers confront protesters during a student demonstration outside the Quebec Liberal Party meeting Friday, May 4, 2012 Victoriaville, Quebec. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jacques Boissinot

  • When Police And Students Clash

    Riot police move in on protesters during an anti-capitalist rally in Montreal, Tuesday, May 1, 2012. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Graham Hughes

  • When Police And Students Clash

    CREDIT: Yves Charlebois, Huffington Post Quebec

  • When Police And Students Clash

    CREDIT: Yves Charlebois, Huffington Post Quebec

  • When Police And Students Clash

    CREDIT: Yves Charlebois, Huffington Post Quebec

  • When Police And Students Clash

    CREDIT: Yves Charlebois, Huffington Post Quebec

  • When Police And Students Clash

    CREDIT: Yves Charlebois, Huffington Post Quebec

  • When Police And Students Clash

    CREDIT: Yves Charlebois, Huffington Post Quebec

  • When Police And Students Clash

    CREDIT: Yves Charlebois, Huffington Post Quebec

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS

Filed by Lauren Strapagiel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 215
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
06:45 PM on 05/07/2012
If you're going to protest, don't wear a mask, that seems like a simple rule to follow. If you believe in something strong enough, you shouldn't be hiding behind a mask, it almost seems cowardly. And honestly this bill seems to target violent protests, so unless you support the individuals who are being destructive protesters, you should be happy this bill is coming.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scratchingmyhead
11:30 AM on 05/09/2012
employers sometimes fire people who have different beliefs than them.
03:00 PM on 05/07/2012
I don't see the problem.... you would agree with the gun registry! Why not a face registry so to speak?? (Insert all your gun registry arguements here)
Speaking of history lessons.... left thinking people, like the bulk of those commenting here, are quite fine with limiting rights of others until the oppresser comes for them then suddenly find themselves alone and there is no one left to help them! Kind of like....NOW!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DirkNeptune
I love raspberry pie, damn it.
09:55 AM on 05/07/2012
Harper should just get it over with and make disagreeing with him against the law.

I think this is reasonable...

An online anti-Harper comment: 2 years in jail
Thinking an anti-Harper thought: 5 years in jail.
Peaceful protest: 8 years in jail

Smoking a joint doing any of the above add 3 years to your sentence.

Problem solved.

Now can we all move on and get back to enjoying our freedoms in the wonderful country of HarperLand.

Government Note: Two Harper points were earned by the subject who posted this suggestion.
12:58 PM on 05/07/2012
This is the best comment I've ever seen on the HuffPost!
HarperLand is getting more radical everyday and we can do less and less about it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gravescanada
09:50 AM on 05/07/2012
This law will NEVER be allowed to stand. Its foolish, its a waste of time, and its a waste of money. The first time a university student is sent to prison for 5 years for wearing a mask, we will all revolt.
08:02 AM on 05/07/2012
What if I wear a berka? Or my Darth Vader helmet (The Force is my religion)?
07:32 AM on 05/07/2012
this is no longer the country I grew up in instead of moving forward we are falling backwards. However the jail time mentioned (how many students have the money for the fine) would keep these american prisons being built stay full so if your a con this is just another if you grow 6 pot plants you are going to jail law
photo
CarlyQ
Without followers, evil cannot spread.
12:44 AM on 05/07/2012
I feel a sudden urge to again watch "V for Vendetta."

It becomes more meaningful every time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phatbiker
Dentalfloss tycoon
12:09 AM on 05/07/2012
I wonder if King Harper will demand manditory minimum sentences for people wearing masks at protests. Soon our laws will be the same as China's regarding demonstrations and protests, all must be Govt' "sanctioned".
12:04 AM on 05/07/2012
I would support this bill if it included penalties of up to five years in prison or a fine of up to $5,000 for any police officer who hides or removes his badge during these protests.
12:56 AM on 05/07/2012
excellent point. The mentioned jail terms are ridiculous.
01:01 PM on 05/07/2012
True!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
temenos
castigat ridendo mores
12:03 AM on 05/07/2012
"In a state where corruption abounds, laws must be very numerous."

Tacitus
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RudyHaugeneder
12:01 AM on 05/07/2012
If this proposed bill is passed, no doubt facial hair will soon after be seen as a mask or disguise by the Harperites who regulate the police and military. No doubt at all.
The new federal NDP leader better shave his beard -- or hide -- especially since House of Commons behavior is often little more than riot.
And then there are noisy Halloween parties and Christmas parties where people dress up, or sports events where people paint their faces and wear strange clothing and scarves that make them hard to identify but not the team they support. Political conventions too. Jeez, there's an endless list of public events where people alter their appearance for fun.
How long will it then be, after the bill, before Harper is forced to declare martial law in order to protect us from ourselves?
Dinsdale Pirahna
"lookin' out the 'ole in the wall"
04:18 AM on 05/07/2012
I think hairpieces should be banned too. That way we wouldn't have to look at Harper's ridiculous bowl cut.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
contest d
10:00 AM on 05/07/2012
There's no need to sanction beards or face painting because advances in facial recognition technology and the proliferation of public video surveillance and tracking systems easily see through them.

The rub of course is there's also been great advances in the facial prosthetic and make-up field. So if you're in cities with a big tv/film industry like TO and Van (which will also be future hot-spots of social unrest, at least as long as the wealth-hoarders continue to set public policy), it'll even be irritatingly affordable.
photo
CarlyQ
Without followers, evil cannot spread.
11:59 PM on 05/06/2012
I think I'm going to watch "V for Vendetta" again.

It becomes more meaningful every time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BUTCHER99
11:56 PM on 05/06/2012
Another Torie bill that will cost us millions only when it is thrown out the first time it goes to court.
paintitblacker
shit happens life goes on
11:54 PM on 05/06/2012
maby every one who goes outside should just wear a mask ,no matter what there doing
paintitblacker
shit happens life goes on
11:43 PM on 05/06/2012
this is just subterfuge meant to deflect attention from the real crimes of voter supression, harper is a parasite.