Baird Says Iran Could Build Nuclear Bomb Within Months

CBC  |  Posted: 05/07/2012 8:25 pm Updated: 05/09/2012 8:32 am


Iran could build a nuclear bomb within months if it decides to weaponize its atomic enrichment program, according to Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird.


In an interview with CBC's Power & Politics host Evan Solomon, Baird said he doesn't believe Iran has made that decision yet — but warned the country could move "very quickly" once it does.


"When they're enriching uranium to 20 per cent, when they've got the volume of materials.… When you're putting all the ingredients in front of you, it obviously wouldn't take long to make the decision to do it," he said.


"They're certainly moving to be able to be in that position, then they could certainly dash to the end which could be done in as few as nine or as many as 18 months."


Baird called the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran "unfathomable," and said it would inevitably lead to nuclear proliferation right across the region, which the minister said is a concern for the entire planet.


"The real concern is what would it do to security in the region," he said. "And frankly, Arab states are just as concerned as Israel is with a nuclear-armed Iran...you also look at the potential for proliferation — other countries wanting to acquire nuclear weapons to protect themselves from the threat of Iran."


Baird's comments come as the United States and Europe urged Iran to use upcoming talks with world powers to defuse concerns it has plans to develop nuclear arms — concerns Tehran insists are based on "fake evidence" created to cause the country economic harm.


While international talks are working to persuade Iran to end its nuclear ambitions, Baird said it remains a huge challenge to "de-escalate" the situation.


"I'm skeptical of Iran's willingness to engage in meaningful discussions on this, but let's take them at their word and let's go through this diplomatic exercise and hope for the best," he said.


"Obviously President [Barack] Obama has said all options are on the table and we're watching the situation very closely and offering our full support to the diplomatic initiative."


"All options" means that nothing is off the table — including a pre-emptive strike against Iran, Baird said. But Canada's position remains to explore and exhaust all diplomatic efforts, he added.


Baird also commented on the dramatic power shifts in Greece and France, where voters rejected candidates pushing austerity measures. In France, Socialist François Holland ousted conservative incumbent Nicolas Sarkozy with a platform of moving from austerity to restoring growth.


“Obviously when the economy is sour, governments tend to get defeated,” he said. “Obviously, the situation in Greece is very, very different. Obviously there’s some tough medicine that’s required and sometimes the patient doesn’t like it.”


Related on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • #9 North Korea: Estimated to have less than 10 nuclear warheads

  • #8 Israel: Estimated to have about 80 nuclear warheads

  • #7 India: Estimated to have 80-100 nuclear warheads

  • #6 Pakistan: Estimated to have 90-110 nuclear warheads

  • #5 United Kingdom: Estimated to have about 225 nuclear warheads

  • #4 China: Estimated to have about 240 nuclear warheads

  • #3 France: Estimated to have about 300 nuclear warheads

  • #2 United States: Estimated to have about 8,500 nuclear warheads

  • #1 Russia: Estimated to have about 11,000 nuclear warheads

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS

Iran could build a nuclear bomb within months if it decides to weaponize its atomic enrichment program, according to Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird. In an interview with ...
Iran could build a nuclear bomb within months if it decides to weaponize its atomic enrichment program, according to Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird. In an interview with ...
Filed by Christian Cotroneo  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 182
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
05:24 PM on 07/02/2012
Hw should come out instead
06:59 PM on 05/10/2012
Baird isn't telling all he knows here
His mentor Dr Strang... I mean Dick C has knowledge that
Macgyver is working with some of those Iranian lookin' fellas to build a nuclear weapon out of
cream cheese, string and those glowing bits from the old Timex watches.
You know the ones that destroyed the Mayans over there.

Hold on now, I've never seen a photo Dick and John together???
This may merit a closer look.
photo
Turdinthepunchbowl
Just say no, to the opiate of the masses.
06:33 PM on 05/08/2012
This John Baird talking point sponsored by Dick Cheney et al. When you absolutely, positively, need fabricated evidence to support an illegal attack on a country that refuses to become part of the Anglo-American Imperium.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SeanMartin
Everything in moderation.
06:17 PM on 05/08/2012
Yup, it's true: man raise flags when they cant get anything else up.
photo
Newfoundlander
I'm a pessimist, an optimist with experience!
04:16 PM on 05/08/2012
arkymorgan
2 minutes ago ( 4:12 PM)
This information brought to you by the same sources who insisted Iraq had WMDs....

Ah, yes, that guy. The Tories would do well to remember that you can't spell "b-u-l-l-s-h-i-t" without "B-U-S-H".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arkymorgan
Nobody knows the trouble I've been...
04:12 PM on 05/08/2012
This information brought to you by the same sources who insisted Iraq had WMDs....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kmilford
03:31 PM on 05/08/2012
This is the typical Neo-Conservative approach as clearly outlined by the likes of Naomi Kline. Don't be fooled. It's a justification for unjustifiable policies, especially Baird's distorted view and support of Israel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SofaProfessor
02:46 PM on 05/08/2012
I don't know about anyone else, but I think we should at least wait for our overpriced jets to show up before we acknowledge Mr. Baird's erection for another war no one wants to see our soldiers sent off to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
01:04 PM on 05/08/2012
how often our leaders speak the truth while acutally attempting to lie..

"Baird called the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran "unfathomable,". to which i agree. Iran has no intention of arming, the supreme religious leader of Iran says nuclear weapons are a sin, and all reputable and even non reputable organization have all agreed iran does not have nuclear weapons nor a program.a

can the cons try and muddle facts and reality anymore than this?
photo
SiameseTrainer
...we are Sia..mese if you don't please..
12:50 PM on 05/08/2012
Mr. Bairds comments deserve all of the deep consideration due to just two letters in the english alphabet; BS.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinnerator
12:50 PM on 05/08/2012
Hey Baird, when did you become a mouthpiece for the U.S. militaryindustrial complex? You couldn't have gotten that info. from out spy agency, We don't have one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doogs62
To see by faith is to shut the eye of reason
01:00 PM on 05/08/2012
When he joined the Reform Party. It's in the small print right below the contempt clause.
photo
freeSpeakr
I stand on the shoulders of giants
12:31 PM on 05/08/2012
What does one expect from a political party whose economic visions extends no further than continuous war, perpetual debt and planned obsolescence?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doogs62
To see by faith is to shut the eye of reason
12:29 PM on 05/08/2012
Baird has a knack for spewing the most ridiculous "facts" ever manufactured by a political party. When are we going to hold Parliamentarians feet to the the fire for spreading untruths and blatant lies. I believe we need to create a Bill that demands only actual facts and truths may be stated by politicians in or outside of the House or they will be charged with perjury as well as contempt.
11:52 AM on 05/08/2012
Another 'parrot' parroting the same old tired lines? Enough already.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gravescanada
10:47 AM on 05/08/2012
It is believed that Israel had possessed an operational nuclear weapons capability by 1967, with the mass production of nuclear warheads occurring immediately after the Six-Day War.[2] Although no official statistics exist, it has been estimated that Israel possesses from 75 to as many as 400 nuclear weapons, which are reported to include thermonuclear weapons in the megaton range.[3][4][5] Israel is also reported to possess a wide range of different systems, including neutron bombs, tactical nuclear weapons, and suitcase nukes.[6] Israel is believed to manufacture its nuclear weapons at the Negev Nuclear Research Center.

Delivery mechanisms include Jericho intercontinental ballistic missiles, with a range of 11,500 km, and which are believed to provide a second-strike option. Israel's nuclear-capable ballistic missiles are believed to be buried so far underground that they would survive a nuclear attack.[7][8] Additionally, Israel is believed to have an offshore nuclear second-strike capability, using submarine launched nuclear-capable cruise missiles, which can be launched from the Israeli Navy's Dolphin-class submarines.[9] Although the Israeli Air Force lacks strategic bombers to deliver nuclear weapons over long range, its F-15I and F-16I Sufa fighter aircraft are capable of delivering nuclear weapons.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doogs62
To see by faith is to shut the eye of reason
12:58 PM on 05/08/2012
Surely Graves you're not suggesting there's another regional power that is the cause of aggres.sive behaviour and viol.ence in order to secure a dominant position. I cannot imagine why any nation would have expansionist plans in such a hos.tile and unhospitable region surely they are happy with what they have already. Thank God they don't posess wea..pons of mass des.truction for surely they would use them to further their political and cultural beliefs.